Cisco still have to use existing technology. They do not have Magic Pixies inside their equipment.The Cisco routers we have support it now
Oooops. I have that Feature. I don't know why i stole it.I checked, and it's a known missing feature actually.
There are many ways to do this :-What's the best way to separate Access Points from Wi-Fi users?
Cheers Normis. I get fed up explaining about my Ancestors in the Ruski Sputnik dog-breeding programme.what dog? i have seen him, it's his picture
Never do dodgy electrical wiring in the Nude.Even blindfolded, naked and with no tools, I can do better than that
Maybe i have always inhabited parts of the Unreal world. Maybe a Virtual world.most parts of the real world hand out public v4
The CPU and general architecture will be the same, so all that is missing is the driver for the Atheros 9xxx chip.I'm surprised 3.30 actually works on it at all.
So do I in most cases on the WLAN side, but the temptation to just stick a Downstream HotSpot on it and add a binding on the Upstream HotSpot is tooo easy to *not* do.What about those of us using the hotspot as an Ethernet authentication method
You started off asking a question, and unfortunately nobody knew, read your post, or wanted to answer.in case anyone wants it..
You mean like what most users have already ?get used to the idea that their Internet connection isnt going to have a static v4 globally routed address to use
I stopped buying those aluminum cases ages ago !Similar device.
Only a true bloodthirsty (but polite) 1000 year old warrior would ask that question !do you need mangling at all?
How many punters do you get billed for $250 ?We currently pay $250/mo
No f**king way.can u please review tht product and let me know
Ah. The slippery slope towards illegal EIRP.you should turn up the power a little bit
Why do you do that ?turn off automatically using electric timer for half an hour a day
You can't get the 3Mb/s delivered to any 1 customer, but if you use the PCC setup, the users will not congest the Total link capacity so much.3 mbps
?!?!?! Like what ?the way you tried to pry information off of me either
Damn right.If he has a solution and dont wont to share it or help out he has no buisness even being on this forum
OK. Maybe.or shut up!
Sorry.Adrian pretty well ruined my desire to paste it in this thread.
I dunno.is a 433 really going to be able to handle more than 50 concurrent associated clients?
I know it's terrible50% of anything for a "program" is NOT a bargain