Correction:You enabled it on 2 places ?
Hotspot server radius
And User Manager incoming
Out of the top of my head...
Rather overkill solution ...Sorry, i forgot to say i need to silver this with CAP AC;)
Same here.My map lite does not get any near hot. So I would say that melting the adhesive tape is unusual ROFL
Shouldn't be possible to create a second peer with the same public key. An error should be presented.Have the peers the same public (peer) key?
Never say never.of course not that it will be hacked but just sayin..........
Was already removed for 7.1rc5.No container package? Didn't mentioned in the changelog.
I know. But why am I able to get into that section and get out some details if it's not applicable ?- MMIPS is not the same as MIPS
- the total size of flash is not the same as the minimal size of a partition (the systems with 16MB flash have some special handling for that)
Copy download link and edit url.Where can I download the previous version of development channel build? I can't find it on the download archive page. It only have long-term and stable releases.
Damn, that was a VERY interesting document !Thats funny, never seen load balancing for dual wan setups or more, without mangling.
Here is one such example..............
Eth5 -> interface vlan35 -> GUESTThey are connecting to GUEST and NX MGMT (which as you see is not a VLAN but on a dedicated physical port)
A default Customer with login admin and empty password is created when the User Manager package is installed for the first time.
Unless you SHOW your config, how are we supposed to know ?I know its the configuration thus my reason for posting.
Any idea where the issue is.
Basics first...Since when does RB5009 have any of wireless hardware?
That or waiting for documentation to get updated.*) leds - adjust "system-led" color based on cellular connection technology on Chateau devices;Do I need to write support, to get additional context to these changes?*) wireless - adjusted antenna gain on Chateau devices;
iot = Internet Of ThingsI noticed there's a package called "iot". What is this mused for?
Format c: gave usually an "oops" moment...I am sick of "netinstall resolves it". It is like "format c:/" on old windows 98/xp systems.
Final export with all latest settings please.Okok, how should I proceed now? Is there any solution to the problem at all
Used to drive Audi. Now a Jag (never again. Other story ...).I prefer........... holvoshoulddriveavolvo
Why not ? It's a name like any other.
Or would you prefer "becauseanavsaidso" ?
Why not ? It's a name like any other.I didnt mean literally the file should be called anynameyouwish, I meant that you could use any name you desired for the file LOL
Which was the second part of my answerIf that is not possible (Firewall,double nat, etc..) , you can always use a reverse VPN.
Insteed of your hAP ac lite being a VPN-Server,
Your device is a VPN-Client of a another device.
Yes. Change that to WAN. Don't forget to remove the NOT-tick.Maybe it's line 75 that's blocking the connection?Code: Select all
add action=drop chain=input comment="defconf: drop all not coming from LAN" in-interface-list=!LAN
Right, in that case it does make sense indeed.I was thinking of this from a Wisp point of view, ie, POE out for the antenna CPE, thanks anyway.
This error message does not have any impact on the VPN connection establishment, it simply warns you that the client sent duplicate message which some client software (for example Windows) do.
Best regards, Emils Z."
Right ! Missed that one ... still keeping the accounts separate, thoughYou can still use the 2-Step-Verification if you create a specific gmail app password. https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/185833?hl=en
Indeed, very well spotted !That is amazing information Sindy, good pickup on the users 3G limitations.
(/caps-man datapath) datapath.bridge (list; Default: ) Bridge to which particular interface should be automatically added as port. Required only when local-forwarding is not used.
It is.From my first post on this thread:
'Back in the days, when I managed old router (before mt) I just had to port forward, to my server with wireguard and all was fine. I suspect now is probably the same case.'