this also creates problems for us in correctly monitoring the status of established BGP sessions Currently there is no mechanism to count exact session prefixes, That is why this parameter is not even set. But it will have to be written for the prefix limit handling anyway, isn't it? When that is do...

+1 Currently there is no mechanism to count exact session prefixes, That is why this parameter is not even set. If you want to know exact prefixes installed in the routing table received from a specific peer, then use /roruting route print command with appropriate filtering options, like "belon...

thanks for the information, in the future it is plausible to restore the "prefix count" value visible on the string of the established session? Currently there is no mechanism to count exact session prefixes, That is why this parameter is not even set. If you want to know exact prefixes in...

ok thank you I missed this post, instead for the problem of the "prefix count" field which always remains zero on BGP sessions, is there a possible resolution of the problem? Thanks. Posting it in every topic won't make it happen faster. As it was already mentioned in one of the topics we ...

I mean the possibility from winbox to add and manage routing filters through list options as currently present in version V6, currently on V7 there is only the possibility to compile and insert filters by hand using syntax v6.png v7.png - "Old style" routing filters add (like v6), not only...