Community discussions

MUM Europe 2020

Search found 15 matches

by h3ll1
Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:35 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: 6.5km 1000mbps full duplex design
Replies: 11
Views: 2154

Re: 6.5km 1000mbps full duplex design

Can you show me iperf TCP test? I suspect it will be around 200-250Mbps.
by h3ll1
Sun Oct 30, 2016 9:51 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: 802.11ac P2P Link -> 500+ Mbps
Replies: 2
Views: 835

Re: 802.11ac P2P Link -> 500+ Mbps

What about TCP? Please run TCP tests and post it here.
by h3ll1
Sat Jul 30, 2016 4:06 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: routerboard 133/133c as a single access point
Replies: 3
Views: 881

Re: routerboard 133/133c as a single access point

First off, 133c has very weak CPU. Second - upgrading the license on this old routerboard will cost more than buying new one with better CPU, more RAM and maybe with better wireless card.
by h3ll1
Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:18 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: 802.11ac tests results and opinions
Replies: 22
Views: 7780

Re: 802.11ac tests results and opinions

Look at the ASUS rt-AC88U. Delivering 1Gbit @ wireless with ease. IPERF, no small talk.
by h3ll1
Tue Dec 01, 2015 1:44 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Not bad for 106 KM :)
Replies: 13
Views: 1757

Re: Not bad for 106 KM :)

Synthetic test TCP on mikrotik gives more credible results for passing data over wireless links. This is my opinion based on my personal experience. I have seen speeds over 500Mbps when using UDP, but TCP is near 200Mbps - that is big difference. So i expect on this particular link TCP speed test sh...
by h3ll1
Sun Nov 29, 2015 7:09 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Not bad for 106 KM :)
Replies: 13
Views: 1757

Re: Not bad for 106 KM :)

Test with TCP and post results
Why? what benefit will that give?
TCP test is closer to real life data
by h3ll1
Sat Nov 28, 2015 1:07 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Not bad for 106 KM :)
Replies: 13
Views: 1757

Re: Not bad for 106 KM :)

Test with TCP and post results
by h3ll1
Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:14 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Nstreme + AC = No more than 170Mb Throughput!! 6.19+6.20rc
Replies: 22
Views: 6508

Re: Nstreme + AC = No more than 170Mb Throughput!! 6.19+6.20

results after 10 days: Routerboards AC 13km distance, 1.2m dish on one side, 60cm on other side - rocketdish. Signal jumping around between -44 to -75. Not very stable troughput overall - 100Mbps TCP simplex. I was trying forcing TX power, data rates, NV2 latency, channel size (20 to 80MHz), swappin...
by h3ll1
Sun Jun 15, 2014 4:38 am
Forum: General
Topic: v6.15 released
Replies: 302
Views: 104414

Re: v6.15 released

With CAPSMAN all links with degradated performance about 20%. Disable - all goes normal.
by h3ll1
Sun May 18, 2014 3:25 am
Forum: General
Topic: Linux like interface config
Replies: 1
Views: 558

Linux like interface config

It was like 6 years ago when i asked about linux-type of interface configuration. The problem is every time you change the card, configuration is bound to last one and when you swap or change interface, it is in disabled mode. Mikrotik, do us a favour - keep interface/user config the same even inter...
by h3ll1
Sun Nov 03, 2013 10:53 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Mikrotik, 802.11N and nstream (Working)
Replies: 22
Views: 6591

Re: Mikrotik, 802.11N and nstream (Working)

uldis and normis really dont care about anyone's posts and comments. My remarcs and from people around this board are just FYI. This is not a support, this is just as i said before bug report forum for us. We are lucky that we receive feedback from this people. We are also lucky that OS is Lynux. We...
by h3ll1
Thu Sep 19, 2013 12:43 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: P2P Unstable
Replies: 4
Views: 1979

Re: P2P Unstable

/interface wireless set wlan1 wireless-protocol=nv2 hw-retries=12
by h3ll1
Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:57 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Preconfigure new/replacement wireless card?
Replies: 9
Views: 1823

Re: Preconfigure new/replacement wireless card?

I did back in the days several posts about this issue, but no one from mikrotik ever took it into account. Dont bother even think about it - write your config to a file, and restore one by one.
by h3ll1
Fri Apr 06, 2007 9:18 am
Forum: General
Topic: ht- in beta 7
Replies: 0
Views: 1033

ht- in beta 7

what exactly are those
ht-channel-width --
ht-guard-interval --
ht-rates --
ht-rxchains --
ht-streams --
ht-txchains --

?