Sorry for a possible many asked question, but generally available anywhere the development releases of routeros? My devices affected in a bug in 6.6 (vlan on bridge), and i will be try, but also useful for "advanced" users used with caution. If not accessible generally, please give me download link ...
from 3.22 to 5.2 - it is like upgrading from Windows 3.11 to Windows 7 - with saving all the features. :) I would go for: /system reset-configuration /system routerboard upgrade /system reboot and then would start to configure my board from zero. What power supply are you using, sounds improbable, ...
Hello, I don't know exactly what you want. I see you want bridge some interface and separate traffic in interfaces. The dot1q traffic in name "tagged" no untagged traffic in dot1q (if you see untagged packet that is come from tagged interface because incoming traffic from vlan interface give you unt...
In simple terms: If in-interface is VLAN, then specific VLAN tag will be removed as soon as packet with this tag will enter the interface If out-interface is VLAN, then specific VLAN tag will be added as soon as packet leaves router via this interface So these 2 simple things together with bridging...
Thanks for an explanation, but if possible i have some questions for you: I have long standing problem and seems to similar of your problem, but i need to know. If possible please write me the port speed i think you connect with 1Gbit to internet and 100mbit with 450g. Also please give advice to us...
Thanks for an explanation, but if possible i have some questions for you: I have long standing problem and seems to similar of your problem, but i need to know. If possible please write me the port speed i think you connect with 1Gbit to internet and 100mbit with 450g. Also please give advice to use...
Hello !, Thanks for the reply. What i understood from above is that; To get untagged traffic from a physical interface, need to make a bridge to that interface(ether1) To get tagged traffic from a physical interface, need to bridge a vlan to that interface(ether1) My concern is to which vlan the tr...
Hello! Some clarification Mikrotik routeros mainly linux. Nothing more special in fundamentals. Linux layer2 networking code (bridge) get any packet come from an interface. If you want get "untagged" traffic from any physical interface you need to put the physical interface to the bridge. In this si...
nop :D Ok, anyone can help me downgrade the firmware and not RouterOS? I need help because now the up/down speed is 2/3 lower than normal Thanks, If you provide answers to my questions maybe i can help you to reach higher speed... On question 1, speed means port speed of 450g and not the connection...
I have a big problem. I own a RB450G and yesterday I made a firmware upgrade from 2.28 to 2.29 routerboard: yes model: "450G" serial-number: "2796017D3BA0" current-firmware: "2.29" upgrade-firmware: "2.29" For now the speedtest.net tests decreased dramatically from about 94 MB/s to 32 MB/S with the...
Hello! Sorry i can't help you how to downgrade firmware, but i think if you answer following questions we are close to solve the problem "root" 1, in the measurement of speed you are use 450G 100Mbit and the uplink connection 1Gbit? 2, you are use 450G port in switch mode? 3, speed changed both dire...
Hello! If possible i give you a humble advice: i send this device supout 4.17 and 5.0rc11 and 5.0, if im not wrong you can install exactly same device and config from this supout.rif, if you install this to rb750G and upgrade to 5.1 must see the problem, if problem related to configuration. But in f...
Heh? I collect all 5.0 upgraded device from my network and do netinstall with all? I try reset again. Now same state. After reset no config under switch (collect data via winbox) only 2 dynamic host in host table 1 in a ether interface (winbox desktop mac) and another on UNKNOWN interface (it may be...
WARNING! Please DO NOT install 5.1 if you have Atheros-8316 switch chip in use! Board ssh communication stopped immediately after you type "interface ethernet switch p" (not able to write after to terminal) (issued on p as port or print, and h as host) (winbox works) I cannot reproduce this problem...
We are sorry about the HTTP downloads problem, we will try to restore it shortly. Product available on torrent now. p.s.: after some test ROS terminal may fail on some commands. Please, send problematic console commands to support (support@mikrotik.com), thank you very much. Sergejs! I'm _always_ s...
This bug related to switch chip, maybe another elements not affected (but not tested) cli died after specify a specific command (winbox connection works and i see in profiler the "console process" eats 100% of cpu)
Bug report issued on april 3 to mikrotik support. Not answered yet, but 5.1 is out, and seems to works fine (other problems in 5.1 i do not recommend to install).
WARNING! Please DO NOT install 5.1 if you have Atheros-8316 switch chip in use!
Board ssh communication stopped immediately after you type "interface ethernet switch p" (not able to write after to terminal) (issued on p as port or print, and h as host)
(winbox works)
Normis, Thanks! This topic is very noise and i post problems about switch chip here, I have two not closed ticket related this topic: One of a configuration aid, because documentation is very minimal. (please read my post above, where i make speculation how to work this, and see wiki docs, also plea...
Normis, at 2.7 series the documentation cover near full capabilities of ROS. Now changes may not altered, new features configuration missing. I would happy if you uncover your company future plans for devices (for example 750g because config changed in 5.0rcX and i questioning in support request but...
macgaiver: Hmm? I only want DOCUMENTATION. In this situation i cannot plan. Mikrotik documentation on 2.7 ~700pages, good reference 2.9 same. Now: some wiki pages with buggy information. "Do it yourself." I do my homework and now i use device with 4.17. But now released 5.0 and do it again. I ask qu...
You list it as issue f: "f, in 4.x series you cannot make rules to switch cpu port, and you can't communicate with the switch in some configurations. (more complex to explain this, but if you understand how work vlan-header, vlan-mode and the rule table, you understand this problem also. This will ...
Some other information:
RB750G not have backpressure problem. This is my mistake. Because i use mikrotik only environment for test i do tests with bandwidth-test. And bandwidth-test is buggy (reported to Mikrotik support) and make false data (not cpu problem).
Thanks!
Jeroen1000: Im not dutch, but if you have questions, please do it here. If contains confidential information may contact private line (pm-s not available in forum.mikrotik.com).
Hello Atheros-8316 a 5 port switch but have "virtual" port this is a cpu port this cpu port connect to ROS. (this is explained also in Switch Chip Features page well, but this page very confusing) This problem related you could not set vlan-header and vlan mode on cpu port. This is a known problem. ...
Hello, Some advantages: 1, I will make previous question detailed to Mikrotik, because i have configuration support, but no answer, and documentation isn't complete yet. (two weeks) 2, I spend more time with the device. device capabilities: (or how could be use this device) a, device is a 5 port rou...
Oh, some changes happen with documentation, silently insert an example how to use utilities. Thanks! But... Missing information: ROS version used? Problems: The example is not reference. Reference: what settings what to do. Example only aid for understanding the reference. Some features are well sel...
Hello, Some history. I use mikrotik and routerboard hw from 2004 because and very good choice. Routerboard hw and routeros very stable and handy and well documented. I have some problems in the past, and i see: mikrotik representative very aggressive in communication, and think routeros always perfe...
Problem only appear if you contact 100mbit device trought 1Gbit 750G interface, and you use the switch chip. 750G (A device) 750G (B device) 433AH (C device) 750G connect with 1 Gbit/s use original patch utp 2 meters (on desk) connect 433AH to any 750G Ok choose device B to connect C device (A and B...
Please do not offtopic this thread, this problem _not_ related to duplex problem, and wrong setting may cause problems on your boxes (please don't check off auto negotioation on your boxes only if this is the problem, and in this situation, make proper settings at the other end).
My previous post may not understandable enough. Many test and hour behind the post above. (The short description very clear, please verify) Please make a testbed config same devices, and you see: this is not duplexity problem. If would duplex mismatch the problem affect all port regardless of connec...
Hello! I discovered a serious problem with 750G switch Reproductible scenario: 2 pcs 750G ROS4.16 many 433AH ROS4.16 1 RB600 ROS4.16 Connect 750G to another, and connect 433AH to any port on any device and connect RB600 to any 750G Using wire speed switching via switch chip. Each 433AH connect 100Mb...
----- Hi fren, yes, and good ide. with remote logging you will save your routerboard resources. on this situation try to make remote logging to other divice and follow like this: - dowload mikrotik's Syslog from mikrotik's website. - install it to other divice e.g: with XP. - choice your logging to...
I have a problem. I use various routerboards on wireless networks. Normally works good, (this is the reason why i use this hw/sw). But sometimes can cause big problems, and mikrotik make near imposible to get information about the problem. Mikrotik logging is exclusive. If i leave default configurat...
Yes, TCP bandwidth test. The test done on two RB600 latest O.S. Yes, TCP and UDP bandwidth tests done between the two boards directly!! Should we reach more? How much? You may experience that the TCP test is slower when you do it directly between the boards - we have seen it too. You should use tes...
Correction, this information was sent to companies that bought the RB333 before we corrected it for other devices here in stock. If you have a RB333 that is not fixed, you also have this information. Ahham. We get two rb333 to test, and not receive the notification above, when i write the topic you...
3.0rc4
A signal -58
B signal -64 (yes)
rx,tx ccq (99%-100%)
throughput 4-4,5MB/s (30-40Mbit/s) tcp connection
stable (runs 24 hour with only one problem)
The first usable release in pre3.0 series .
It would be nice to see UDP results also.... Is this a throughput test ? Does bandwidth test runs from one remote location to other through the routers? I dont like udp tests. This is variabled mtu random data and high traffic quasi fixed mtu tcp (ftp) transfers run on independent host directly con...
I dont understand exactly what u want, but nstreme2 interface in bridge make transparent bridging of networks (in my network tested with 2.9.X and 3.0rcX).
Hello, I test 3.0 rcX series wireless, test configuration: 2 rb532r4 with 2xcm9 2x 2m h1000 2x lowloss pigtail 2x 22dB grid distance 500m elevation 35 deg. connection mode: configured each device to ap-bridge ptp connection via wds band: 5GHz turbo 2.9.x (34) A signal -54 B signal -57 rx,tx ccq (97%...
Nice. Mikrotik hides this information from endusers. Normis says "try another cable". MT! Please share some office information 1. Witch cable recommend to r333? 2, Why not work the (correct) cable that works with rb532? 3, Plan to change anything in rb333 to works with most null modem cables? Thanks.
Hello i try 3 different cables 2 different boards (in 2 version of os (rc1, rc2) on 3 different computer, 2 different serial communication software on different os (minicom, hyperterm). All same.
Hello, The 2 test rb333 arrived yesterday, now i try to configure it. with rb532 (115200 8N1 flowcont off) good serial settings the serial communication is very strange. All chars display correctly if come from routerboard, but any key sending with keyboard somtimes altered a -> d i->n etc. I try wi...
In my post: stability==wireless stability. Memory allocation and cpu utilization not problematic. The cpu or memory utilization or high transfer not cause of wireless stability in my test environment. I think rc1 wireless stack may more vulnerable in noisy or reflective environment than 3.0b5 (or 2....
Hi, After months we upgrade two test board (rb532) to 3.0rc1 from 3.0b5. The wireless transfer speed (on same placement, and same frequency) better than 3.0b5 (3MByte/s tcp ftp with 3.0b5 and 4.51MByte/s with 3.0rc1 in 802.11a turbo mode, but performance is terrible. 3.0b5(and 2.9.x) was really stab...
Hello, I need to configure eduroam (http://www.eduroam.org) access with two mikrotik ap. Eduroam authenticate with freeradius server and username/password. Eduroam documentation describe ap can authenticate with 802.1x but i cannot find in mikrotik documentation (but not too cheap soho ap can do thi...
Hello, I have 2 rb532 with 2 sector antennas and one building (campus) to achieve wireless access on campus park. No possible wds link between the routers, but the routers are connected to same VLAN in two switch. Scenario: make seamless roaming to wireless clients walk building one side to the othe...
I installed dude package to rb532 (3b5). But via ssh can't find any new configuration for dude server, from windows machine cannot login to dude server on rb532. Any documentation to try dude on routerboard?
Hi, I have problem. I have ~80 rb532 and some other mt router (x86) and i need to monitor signal strengts etc. in 2.9 signal strenght oid like this oidnumberbase . mac_address . interface_index. This is cannot handle normal (templated) way because interface index can represent some value alone and i...
demo servers are advertised in homepage as active, respond to ping but cannot login via http, telnet, ssh
I want to test v3 betas download and install not an option.
Thanks
I configure a new ap and needs to sniff wlan1 interface tool sniffer works good w trafr but interface wireless sniffer not
How to receive this streamed packets?