Hello, Did anybody experience the PCI 32-bit board named: IN/E44 I intend to purchase one to test in Windows VMware environment. BUT a friend of mine did already this test and told me this pci board hangs in Windows environment even without vmware running.Does anybody knows any helping issue regardi...

Hello... regarding my comment below: BUT I have special connections from users: tcp:443 which targets bank sites. The bank sites checks if connections comes from SAME IP ADDRESS. May I have ability to control this scenario using BONDING technique? Based on this document: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/ima...

Thank you Sir!



I will search at wiki too.

I appreciate a lot your participation.




Regards,

Hello GURUS! Here am I again with some doubts.... I understood the concept regarding bonding. I create a virtual interface like "BOND0"... which will play as master interface. And I will configure my ethernet interfaces LINK1 and LINK2 as slaves of BOND0. Seems to work fine... BUT I have s...

Thanks a lot!!! BOTH you 02 gurus!!!



I REALLY appreciate a LOT your oppinion and information.


I will try to use "bonding"... (but I will search and read about it before).



Regards,

Good to read 02 gurus talking about...



How can I initiate in bonding under routerOS ?


Any article... wiki... or personal tip?




Regards,

Hello mrz... ... and if I do this.... /ip firewall nat ==> simple masquerade (just one rule) /ip routes: routing-mark: link1 ==> gw=67.75.80.1 with prefsource=IP1 routing-mark: link2 ==> gw=67.75.80.1 with prefsource=IP2 routing-mark: {none} ==> gw=67.75.80.1 with prefsource=IP1 BUT... is there a wa...

Hello mrz...


Thank you for your kind information.

Is there another way to solve this issue instead of using additional routers inbetween?

My thoughts:

Is there a way to solve this using somethng like:
ip rule and ip route equivament in RouterOS world?




Regards,

Hello gurus, let me introduce my environment: My PC RouterOS v2.9.51 has the following interfaces: ether1 ==> renamed as LINK1 ether2 ==> renamed as LINK2 ether3 ==> renamed as USERS Interface LINK1 is connected to cablemodem1 with the following configuration: IP1 = 67.75.81.184/20 GW1 = 67.75.80.1 ...

Hello janisk.... So... what is wrong with: /ip firewall mangle add chain=prerouting connection-mark=AAA action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=AAA passthrough=yes add chain=prerouting connection-mark=BBB action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=BBB passthrough=yes add chain=prerouting connection-mark=CCC acti...

Hello janisk, Thank you for your fast reply. Lets consider LB with 3 links. Following what you said I would do: (v3.x) /ip firewall mangle add chain=prerouting connection-mark=AAA action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=AAA passthrough=yes add chain=prerouting connection-mark=BBB action=mark-packet new-p...

Hello janisk... Let me post a question regarding Nth in v3.x regarding load balancing issue. I see examples of LB... sharing packets... as one can see at: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NTH_in_RouterOS_3.x I understand that one should share connections in order to accomplish load balancing... instead...

Hello... regarding load balancing... it is desirable to track "connections". Considering you have 4 links... as you told... you should track every **NEW CONNECTION**. Then the rules will be like below: chain=prerouting action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=conn41 passthrough=yes conne...

Hi...

v3.x
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NTH_in_RouterOS_3.x


v2.9.x
http://www.mikrotik.com/testdocs/ros/2.9/ip/mangle.php



Regards,

Hello... considering RouterBoard's users enviroment... with limited RAM... no local disk... and limited CPU power... usage of external proxy is the best run. I also tested a parent-proxy using fedora8/squid... with **unlimited RAM** and unlimited disk sapce** (quite unlimited)... and the performance...

Hello...


regarding RouterOS v3.3 web proxy feature:


how one can set max-object-size for the web proxy?

In v2.9.xx there was a field to define this parameter... BUT in v3.3 this field is not there anymore...


ANY SUGGESTIONS?




Regards,




mson77

Hello all.... sorry guys... I did a little typing mistake. Follows the basic and simplified rules to be used in the linux box: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $eth0 -P TCP --dport 8291 -j --to-destinantion $RouterOS_ip:8291 iptables -A INPUT -i $eth0 --dport 8291 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD --dpo...

Hello... I have a PC based RouterOS (v3.3). This RouterOS is inside an internal LAN and between the RouterOS and the internet there is a linux based firewall. I am trying to access this PC based RouterOS system from remote site... with no success. My question is: Which tcp ports should I redirect fr...

Hello sandov63,

to make your LB be failover... just add check your gateway with ping or arp.


Regards,