MikroTik

leosmendes

-hello good morning, I want to unify my power system to -48v. I have two PCS one running mikrotik, in these I have M4-ATX sources being fed at 24v, I also have two CRS309 being fed by the same source at 24v. It so happens that I also have an olt huawey ma5800 still operating on AC but I have a -48v ...

leosmendes

does beta 8 fix the ppp+queue related issue in this thread?

leosmendes

previously I had installed routeros 6.47.7 on my crs309 and had only one bridge. now the need arose to create another bridge, and in this second bridge the ports do not go up with hardware offload, already reviewed the rconfigurations and are identical to bridge 1, already upgraded to 48.3 and nothi...

leosmendes

crs3x will be able to switch l3 ipv6 via hardware in future?

leosmendes

I tried to perform an installation via netinstall on a more modern system with an Intel network card and I couldn't, I had the error: NBP IS TOO BIG TO FIT IN FREE BASE MEMORY searching the internet I found information that if UEFI was activated it would increase the memory to pxe, but even changing...

leosmendes

hello good morning everyone, I am facing a problem with "queues" my mikrotik server. today i have a x86 pc Ryzen 7 2700 8/16 running native mikrotik v6.47.1. I happen to be having a hard time keeping bandwidth stable for 100mb plans. in fact I put it up a little bigger to see if it could m...

leosmendes

Hello, good morning everyone. I have with a local operator a gpon connection with a fixed ip via pppoe but I have a problem that occurs almost every day. After many technicians go to the installation site, we identified that when going through the "periodic update" that is done once a day,...

leosmendes

don't put development effort in tools that do not belong on a router ! Nah, let's make it useful and comfortable. You've already lost the fight for pure router anyway. Existing BTest, CAPsMAN, Dude, GPS, Graphing, KVM or MetaROUTER, NTP server, User manager, Web proxy, ... and if you're real purist...

leosmendes

Im renamed it to ether 20, and this card die. Im try to insert other card in the her local but im assume the mikrotik nename to less number like ether2 ou 3....

leosmendes

Oh ok then...
Can you export the netwatch rule ?

in netwatch
host 192.168.5.2
down tab:
/system reboot

leosmendes

If you cant connect a host with the same IP then you should netinstall your router... I didn't understand your reasoning, and I don't think you understood my scenario. Good luck then... I apologize but only you talk about netinstall I realize that you did not understand my case ... I use x86

leosmendes

If you cant connect a host with the same IP then you should netinstall your router...

I didn't understand your reasoning, and I don't think you understood my scenario.

leosmendes

in netwatch host 192.168.5.2 down tab: /system reboot the network card that was on the ether2 interface burned, I can't say why another network card did not see ether2. in this case there is no way to put an interface with ip 192.168.5.x for the netwatch ping. as soon as mikortik starts it will rest...

leosmendes

i created a wrong rule in mikoritk that is causing an eternal reboot, to something i can do to be able to disable this rule, my mikrotik is in x86 and i would like to get a backup of the current configuration. no time to do anything or "terminal access"

leosmendes

can someone help?

leosmendes

Hello everyone. Asked in the mikrotik forum the topic v7 "RouterOS v7.0beta1 (ARM)" about the possibility of mikrotik in version 7 to bring the sfp guide to sfp interfaces on mikrotik x86, user @nz_monkey said that mikrotik can already get sfp port information on the intel boards. I have a...

leosmendes

Any chanfs of the sfp tab on interfaces appear on x86 with this new version? Important information is not reported to sfp card users. What tasks are ready for multiprocessing today in v6? and what happened to be in v7? what is the implementation order for them? Mikrotik can definitely get the SFP i...

leosmendes

Any chanfs of the sfp tab on interfaces appear on x86 with this new version? Important information is not reported to sfp card users. What tasks are ready for multiprocessing today in v6? and what happened to be in v7? what is the implementation order for them?

leosmendes

Hi, good afternoon, I have an internet connection using gpon technology. this gpon connection arrives in a "ONU" that is in bridge and mikrotik connecting by pppoe. I would like to delete the un using a dumb sfp onu directly on the mikrotik. I know that in the olt this ONU is tied by the s...

leosmendes

good afternoon everyone. I'm having a problem, which may be a possible bug, when trying to create two pppoe server services on miktoik x86 version 6.43.16. a service is in a vlan and this vlan was created in ether 2, the other service is over ether2 directly. it turns out that the requests that are ...

leosmendes

Hi, good afternoon, with new versions of the router, does the problem persist?

leosmendes

Hi everyone, I would like to know if there is any sfp network card, which is recognized by mikrotik for x86 as port sfp, and can you give me reports of signal strength, manufacturer, etc, as well as sfp ports of routeboards?

leosmendes

even after disabling igmp makes no difference, offload hardware continues disabled

leosmendes

a simple bridge with no filter

leosmendes

Hello, good morning everyone. I would like to know if the chips of the rb's 922 and hEX support hardware offload, I see mention of hEX, but even enabling the option in the interface inside the bridge does not appear the H in the list of bridge interfaces. I'm using version 6.42.1 for firmware too

leosmendes

i350 is working. What is problem?

i350 work on mikrotik?

leosmendes

"Coming soon" ... What a bad joke.

leosmendes

So I can see and test iperf, in addition to passing more traffic information, should consume less resources of the processor, and can thus show the actual throughput that the hardware is able to deliver

leosmendes

leosmendes

Every time I do a mikrotik version update, rules that use time come back damaged without the time and dates marked.

leosmendes

im have a pc x86 with router os 6.37.5 (previous 6.38.5) and winbox 3.11, e very times winbox crach disconecting from routeros while open window firewall with tab filter or many times nat is selected. others windows with many itens open wokrs fine. disconects from routeros seconds after...

leosmendes

I bought rb260gsp thinking it would support rstp, and I see that I was wrong, I'm already thinking of selling it.

leosmendes

Hello good afternoon to everyone Is it just me who hated the iron clips that are on the new products? The new clamp has a screw that has a kind of ring on its head. What is holding the teeth of the tape, making it difficult to tighten. The first iron clips were perfect, but the last ones are pessimi...

leosmendes

http://forum.mikrotik.com/download/file ... w&id=25818

leosmendes

I'm taking a look here at the RouterBoard site and noticed that rb911g shares the same pcb and most rb922 components including wireless chip, this in turn caught my attention because the 911 has a heat sink and 922 not ... Does not influence anything?

leosmendes

without the possibility of a support upnp client in the future?

leosmendes

thanks for your reply but I will show you a more familiar scenario to this, it would save work to leave things a little better and more optimized. I have a PC connected to internet mk_x86 doing nat, and pppoe server on my client interface. my clients are connected to a network bridge, this network i...

leosmendes

for the purpose of testing I have a network that has: a PC with torrent client, getting ip from dhcp a mk_x86, a PC with mk_x86 with dhcp server, nat and getting ip from dhcp of rb2011, UPnP is enabled and dhcp server interface set as internal, and dhcp client interface set as external. one rb2011 g...

leosmendes

I think you shouldn't put addresses on physical ethernet ports that are members of a bridge. IP addresses should be added to the bridge itself, not the interfaces.

really, thanks for the help. problem solved.

leosmendes

Hello! Good night everybody. I am experiencing a very strange problem with a Hap Lite router. The router is with RouterOS 6.34.4 and most current firmware according to the installed version. Below I will describe the scenario so that they can understand. Scenario 1, where the problem occurs. Cable m...

leosmendes

hello good night, also made a topic about UPnP and read your interesting thought. really would otimo the possibility of creating a reserve of doors not to be used by UPnP and the possibility of intelligent use of another port if one is already in use by another rule.

leosmendes

I have a small isp and use "nat". UPnP for pppoe believe it would greatly help to solve problems of microsoft live and psn network, besides offering use of p2p programs easier for my clients. I'm doing some tests before put into production, the result that most interests me and support for...

leosmendes

I have a mikrotik in home for studies, and I'm auditioning for the UPnP pppoe interfaces. happens that this mikrotik this between the PC and the broadband routerconforme diagram below adsl router (dhcp server) <-> (dhcp client Ether1) mikrotik (pppoe server with UPnP ether2) <-> pc with pppoe client...

leosmendes

thanks for the help. this actually happens. to whether the rules were created certar or tested on a schedule of trabaho with rule pointing to the same schedule after certificate that worked just modified the schedule. ps but in version 5x did not happen to turn red. thank you now will migrate to ver...

leosmendes

I think this might have to do with the Mikrotik client setting the two DHCP options: - Option 12 (host name) OR - Option 61 (client identifier) I'd like to disable those, but I can't figure out how. It seems like they're permanently set, and I can't remove them. Has anyone been able to remove/disab...

leosmendes

update

leosmendes

First, upgrade to ros 6.7 and then remove service name from pppoe-server settings. I managed to create a pppoe server without filling the field service name successfully in version 5.23. but not tested the operation, then it is really necessary to switch to Version 6.7? Another question is whether ...

leosmendes

I have a couple of rules designed to block access to some customers (address list) that will run from 11:00 PM until 06:00 AM the next day. for it created a rule that blocks access from 23:00 until 23:59:59 add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment=NIGHT dst-address=!172.31.255.2 protocol=tcp src-addr...

leosmendes

Today was my first test with this mixture and I'm noticing something strange. I am getting the CPE Ubiquiti sign Horizontal / Vertical: -50 / -48 dBm, but in analyzing the data in "RouterOS 5.0" card where the CPE is connected to this, I am getting "-72 in CH0"and "-43 in ch...

leosmendes

in wireless... copy to access list and copy to conection list not work.

leosmendes

estable?

leosmendes

is possible?

leosmendes

x86
intel dual core
4x pcie gigabit intel

im starting tests on rb433 ok!?!

leosmendes

ignore typos I always use the auto-complete tool for no mistakes. so is not enviroiment but environment. I disconnected the cable routes but in this "reachable" ... 30 seconds later ... "Reachable" 1 minute later ... "Reachable" 5 minutes later ... "Reachable"...

leosmendes

work their way into parts. disconnect the interface cable routes as normal, only after a renew of the interface that the gateway is "unreachable" not "/system enviroiment print" [admin@MikroTik] /system> enviroiment print bad command name enviroiment (line 1 column 1) and on the ...

leosmendes

/ip interface print detail ??? /ip adress print detail Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic 0 address=192.168.0.1/24 network=192.168.0.0 broadcast=192.168.0.255 interface=ether1 actual-interface=ether1 1 D address=200.150.24.169/23 network=200.150.24.0 broadcast=200.150.25.255 interface=eth...

leosmendes

Good morning. I'm trying to develop an effective process for sharing the load between gateways securely when the link drops and I am facing certain difficulties concerning the limitation and / or software problems mikrotik. I will report the current problems and difficulties and if any measure that ...

leosmendes

Hello everyone. I am facing a strange problem on my network. I have a routerbard 433 mikrotik with the installed version 4.10. but this problem has remained even in earlier versions. currently have two MacBooks and both can not access the Internet Across the mikrotik. the problem is in the dns serve...

leosmendes

please add delete confirmation on any delete actions for more security in winbox

thanks

leosmendes

hairfarmer i need you help, how to contact you? im from brazil. thanks

my email ... leosmendes@gmail.com

leosmendes

Load Balance with Two adsl modems (BRIDGE) with same isp (gateway) is possible?

i have two adsl with same ip for gateway.

how do to trace valid routes, with two identical gateways?

any suggestion will be coming well, but that the modem is on direct to mikrotik and that it is in bridge!

thanks.

Search found 61 matches