MikroTik

marceloru

I have a list of restricted clients ip (ip firewall address list) and I need their pppoe connections to be restarted every 15 minutes, can you help me?

marceloru

I was with version 6.39.3 in a ccr 1036 working as PPPOE server, all correct, I update to version 6.41 and I have problems with access to some ftp sites, among them ftp://200.47.24.13/, I return to the version 6.39.3 again and the problem disappears.- version 6.40.5 also have problems MTU and packet...

marceloru

Dragonmen I'm reading about RADIUS, see it's psoible create queues for each connection to the attributes that are passed, but there is some way to create a firewall rule for attribute too? It is important to give debtors notices to customers. - Also you consult, you tried roureros version 6, is that...

marceloru

testing using rb450G, one in each tower, udp 1500 bytes. but it is not only the performance of the test, I had to change that link because it had no performance with real traffic, generated latency when was smuggling more than 30mbs, now with 45mbs to 50mbs sxt traffic without latency, and I know I ...

marceloru

was turn on aggregation of packets on NSM5? yes, agregation packets on and defaults values i try version 5.2.1, 5.3, 5.3.2, 5.3.3rc2, 5.5b2 all versions, many configurations, auto data rate, fixed data rate, auto ack, fixed ack, with and without airmax, ptp no ack, etc, when link is up airmax quali...

marceloru

I had the same problem with that version, I had to remove the wireless card (as did you) to enter again and reconfigure with winbox

marceloru

My test link: distance: 4kms tower height: 25mts line of sight frequency :5300 mghz (40mhz) upper control channel using nanostation M5 (output power 27dbm antena gain 16dbi) Tower A noise level -93 / signal level -65 Tower B noise level -96 / signal level -67 Airmax Enabled max transfer total transf...

marceloru

routeros version?

marceloru

which model do you recommend? R52Hn or R52nM? connect only chain 0? or 1? now UB5 at 5ghz A 10mhz channel width, delivers up to 8 / 9 Mbits smoothly, with 45 clients connected 9.5/10.5mbits ping times go from 3 ms to 150ms my 80% cpe can use N rates, I want to deliver at least 15-20 megabits per pan...

marceloru

Please, someone tested the Mikrotik N cards using 1 pitail (1 chain) 10MHz only can help me decide which model would be better to replace ub5?

marceloru

I need to update the cards (UB5), I need your recommendation to select best N mikrotik card that can be used in simple polarity (single chain) and the best way to connect that chain to use and which left unconnected. antenas are 5ghz panes 90°, routerboard 433 now use 10mhz channels A rates, using N...

marceloru

you are very close to the solution! still trying
I recommend posting in the section corresponding "RouterOS Community Support [Scripting]"
programmers are more in this section and will likely receive more aid

waiting....
for disable command...

marceloru

I upgraded it to 3.30 and want to upgrade it to 5.4. But it shows license is out of date.
I tryed to put there 4.17 but after reboot nothing has change.
Thanks.

to downgrade need select:

---- system --->package--->downgrade

only reboot is for upgrade.

marceloru

In a RouterBOARD RB333 with 2 XR2, upgrade to version 5.4, is the system was stable, I wanted to activate the advanced mode in the configuration of data rates and the RB restart and could not enter again, I had to remove both XR2 and I could access, I went back to version 4.17 and restore a previous...

marceloru

Thanks, I sent the mail to get it and try it

marceloru

Normis, ethernet problem is serious enough, please see the attached image in the first post in less than 5 minutes switched on and off the port, that port bridge still has a delay of 8 seconds to normalize (lost more 6-pings) and is enough to cause such disconnection of winbox, fail if you browse a ...

marceloru

normis,

please check the ethernet issue.... on rb433 and 450 running V4.17 or v5.2 no errors, upgrading to v5.3 constanstly eth up and down

on rb532, 333 and 493ah run fine.

marceloru

RB433 v4.17 no ehernet erros

upgrade to 5.3

all RB 433 ether link up and down erratic

on RB450 v5.2 no ethernet issue
upgrading to 5.3 constantly eth1 - eth2 - eth3 down and up at same time

marceloru

disabling "Adaptive noise Immunity" and "wmm support" the system works stable, no more reboots

possible incompatibility with "r52n"??

marceloru

i have 20 routerboard rb433 with diferent configuration and ros 4, 4.1 and 4.2

only 3 have r52n and reboot with kernel failure 5 to 10 times at day.

problems with r52n card?

marceloru

i upgrade from beta 4 to RC1, and have 6 to 10 reboot at day, with kernel failure.

RB 433, 1 UB5, 1 r52, 1r52n

i added the supout

Normis any news?

marceloru

i upgrade from beta 4 to RC1, and have 6 to 10 reboot at day, with kernel failure. RB 433, 1 UB5, 1 r52, 1r52n i added the supout what wifi card do you use? I haw saw kernel failures on 4.x when we tested some obscure card (included in some older Proxim radios). The card seemed to work with 3.x (no...

marceloru

i upgrade from beta 4 to RC1, and have 6 to 10 reboot at day, with kernel failure.

RB 433, 1 UB5, 1 r52, 1r52n

i added the supout

marceloru

802.11n have the same media acces like a/b/g (csma/ca)?

have the same limitation at 30-35 clients per AP?

is most efective new N-stream or 802.11n on PTMP with >30 clients?

I appreciate if someone did test experience

Thanks

marceloru

say that a customer downloading 2 Mbits generates latency, which is the total traffic at the AP in that time? 2.4 GHz in B-mode gives you a maximum of 3.5 Mbits in AP with 24 stations aprox, 2.4 ghz G can traffic 5 - 15 Mbit to 24 clients (usually)

marceloru

ROS 4? not suport any 802.11n card?

marceloru

RB433AH i update to version 3.18... for pcq problem... back to 3.13... when read 3.20 solve this problem install 3.20 and update firmware.. and fail ssh at times the service responds, but I can not determine what makes it work or stop working cpu using is at 50% (not saturation) disable, enable, cha...

marceloru

when try to ping with php API, don't recognize count value, and fail.

marceloru

Same Problem

ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host

rb 433ah Routeros 3.20...

marceloru

with 3.19 my queue tree show less traffic than real, and QOS fail

marceloru

to use 5mhz or 10mhz bandwith channel, need Atheros chipset on AP (like mikrotik R52 cars or ubiquitis XRs, etc) and on client.. no realtek, ralink etc, use CPE mikrotik or Nanostation or laptop with atheros chipset on it.

and select 5mhz or 10mhz on the wireless menu

marceloru

in this situation 192.168.1.5/24 client a ----------> Wireless AP 192.168.1.1/24 -----> internet client b ----------> 192.168.1.6/24 with simple queues control cient a ---- internet or client b ------internet but client a ---- client b have full bandwith how to control this traffic interclient? and ...

marceloru

normis...
thank you, excuse me for opening another thread about the problem, not what it had found when searching. correcting it with your solution!

marceloru

on rb 532 runing new firmware 2.17 ether2 and ether3 disappears

on rb600 ether3 have problem

installing firmware 2.16 fix issue.

marceloru

with nstream and polling i think 70 clients work fine per radio ap, limiting upload on client radio.

marceloru

Mikrotik has better alternatives that nanostation, the RIC, but much more versatile and expensive ... I think that with the high penetration that has nanostation, take a very basic version of routeros only client(router mode, with nat router and bridge) and using nstream polling , with a license at ...

marceloru

i read exist rapiraOS with polling protocol and can install on nanostation (default cpe for many wisp)... and other hardware (ap and client) I think, makke compatible nanostation client with nstream and polling very beneficial for both companies (Mikrotik and UBiQUiTi) claiming rights over his polli...

marceloru

thanks HRober

answered all my questions! thank you very much, I'm in the process of migration

Marcelo

marceloru

sorry i use translator, not package.. is packet.

marceloru

thanks sergejs!

I read in some post that use WEP could reduce up to 30% of bandwith, this can be a size extra in each package? and if so, WPA or WPA2 generate less by size package?

marceloru

Hi,

I understand that not using wireless encryption gives the slightest use cpu.
Now, if we use WEP or WPA or WPA2 .. with TKIP or AES .. which consumes more resources and which less cpu, which allows greater bandwidth??

thk

marceloru

like squid tcp_outgoing_address... a rule to match an internal ip/subnet to an external IP. use on firewall 10.0.10.0/24 src-nat to 200.43.8.2 10.0.20.0/24 src-nat to 200.43.8.3 10.0.30.0/24 src-nat to 200.43.8.4 and in webproxy source 10.0.10.0/24 outgoing address 200.43.8.2 source 10.0.20.0/24 out...

marceloru

i use src-nat... and work well different internal subnet have different external ip , but when redirect to proxy on mtik, all http traffic have the same ip.. in my testing, now using parent proxy (squid) and using on it tcp_outgoing address + src_as rule, can modifi external for different internal s...

marceloru

any opinion?

marceloru

is posible? imposible?

rules for diferent output address in webproxy?

marceloru

i use 3.12 and upnp not function... is fixed in 3.12?

marceloru

nobody uses a similar setup and found this problem?

marceloru

Hello now i use squid, and use diferent external ip for diferent internal network. ej 192.168.10.0/ 24 nat -} 200.30.45.10 192.168.11.0/ 24 nat -} 200.30.45.11 192.168.12.0/ 24 nat -} 200.30.45.12 and rules in squid to do same external ip for corresponding internal. i want to use mikrotik with webpr...

Search found 48 matches