I have VLAN/MTU/Bridge related problems since 7.13Is this an issue introduced in 7.14? I see heavy discussion in this thread but no mention in 7.13 topic.
I don't know if related, but since 7.13, and also in 7.14beta8 I have to disable/enable the VLAN interface to make PPPoE on that interface work.*) vlan - fixed non-running VLAN interface after failed MTU change;
It is probably not that difficult... Here is a good example:no one can help me ?
Why release a new version when there are no bugfixes in it?Wow... that is really not what I was expecting from a new SwOS release.
Is it so hard to finally push out a bugfix release for existing devices?
Ok, I got a change window and upgraded my IPTV router (RB750Gr3) to 7.1rc6.Does anyone use IGMP proxy on ROS 7?
I really want to test, but my wife doesn't want to give me a change window
Oops.. sorry, I didn't see that. Sorry.But this is 6.49 thread, so enough of this off-topic ROS 7 mumbling...
Maybe:I see a some issues with scripts that are launched by scheduler. Log is showing "not enough permissions".
*) console - require "write+ftp" permissions for exporting configuration to file;
Did you read the changelog?After the upgrade I also needed to add write to the policies.
Any idea?
I totally agree!But complaining that something put into the "development" branch is broken? That's a little too much.
Found it.. Nice(also a reference to a lovely addition to the crs3 series is in the image, but i don't want to spoil all the fun)
Can you tell me more about this?*) ipsec - improved hardware accelerated IPSec performance on 750Gr3;
According to the spec. sheet it probably will not work.Would the new S+RJ10 establish 10Gbps connection over 50 meters cat5e cable? My cables are in walls of my home and can not be upgraded.
IPSec VTI +2 here alsoVTI +2 (me and a friend of mine)
Can you tell more about this?Version 6.39rc51 has been released.
!) tile - fixed IPsec hardware acceleration out-of-order packet problem, significantly improved performance;
I experienced no problems when upgrading my RB750Gr3 from version 6.37.3 to version 6.38Really would appreciate you or others to confirm if there is a serious problem with this upgrade on RB750Gr3.
Thanks in advance.
According to the specs it isSo, is Wap AC 802.3af compliant ??
I don't think the CPU load is the problem here. You should be able to hit near 100% CPU load on any core without any dropped packets.If CPU load is less than 10-15% all is ok, if any goes over that there is droped data.
Sounds nice!*) wlan - improve single connection TCP performance for ac chipset with cm2 package;
That would be great. It's more than most routers do with hardware encryption enabled.5. ~150-200Mbps
Of-course... When there is no line-of-sight it is always a bit of a gamble.This depends very much on the buildings and on the used/allowed TX-Power.I recently build a connection like this through 3 buildings. It works very well. Speed and reliability are fine. I used normal SXT.
(mini)PCI-E is the industry standard these days. (mini)-PCI es getting extinct. Current wifi chips do NOT support PCI, only PCI-E.Question, why the heck are you guys making the R11E-AC card a Mini-PCIe, instead of all the standard PCI cards? Does it support faster speeds on PCI or something?
Will GCM be hardware-encrypted in future software?GCM is not hardware encrypted, so in this case you can get max 80Mbps gre/ipsec traffic on CCR1009.
Look more closely.. it is not the sameIs that correct would the link local be the same on 2 different bridges?
What about inter-vlan routing on the 10g port?+1 thank you for this excellent overview. Much appreciated. So then, it does not route over 1 gigabit over a single upstream port? What is the 10 gigabit SFP+ port for then?
It says nothing about PoE as backup.It's in the brochure: