Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 16 matches

by ALDISBEHMANIS
Wed Feb 28, 2018 7:41 pm
Forum: General
Topic: MT Wireless AP with athentication against RADIUS
Replies: 4
Views: 570

Re: MT Wireless AP with athentication against RADIUS

Solved. You can do it. And it works. Both wireless and Capsman configs work. /radius add accounting-backup=no accounting-port=1813 address=RADIUS_SRV_IP \ authentication-port=1812 called-id="" disabled=no domain="" realm="" \ secret=RADIUS_SHARED_SECRET service=wireless src-address=YOUR_ROUTER_REQUE...
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:00 pm
Forum: General
Topic: MT Wireless AP with athentication against RADIUS
Replies: 4
Views: 570

Re: MT Wireless AP with athentication against RADIUS

Really nobody knows?????
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:00 pm
Forum: General
Topic: MT Wireless AP with athentication against RADIUS
Replies: 4
Views: 570

MT Wireless AP with athentication against RADIUS

Hello, Is it possble to configure MT to authenticate against external RADIUS server using USERNAME (no MAC address as username) and password? I see examples where clients MAC address is sent as username, but is it possible that MT passes through Radius auth requests using username AND password? Thanks
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Tue Mar 15, 2016 2:21 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: mAP Lite Ethernet susceptible to interference!
Replies: 44
Views: 9718

Re: mAP Lite Ethernet susceptible to interference!

Same problem here.
Even tried changing unit.
Design flaw!
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Tue Mar 15, 2016 2:18 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.34.3 [current] is released!
Replies: 58
Views: 19055

Re: v6.34.3 [current] is released!

WOW!
If you use built in magnet to attach mAP Lite to something metallic (as expected by design) then expect anything but not working and stable system.
Avoid using magnet to attach your mAP Lite.
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Tue Mar 15, 2016 12:43 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.34.3 [current] is released!
Replies: 58
Views: 19055

Re: v6.34.3 [current] is released!

I meant not to load any config. Then set the dhcp clients on maybe each port and to move the cable from one to other. Also try other devices to test the port auto negotioation. Last option is to netinstall the ros. If it does not help, you should return it to the dealer. For 99% it seems that there...
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:22 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.34.3 [current] is released!
Replies: 58
Views: 19055

Re:

Hard to help you more remotely. Try to reset without any config and set the dhcp directly to the ether port. Then try to make a bridge and move the dhcp client to it. I already did that too .... i even don't see this router on neighbours list ... all filter rules are disabled. Default config loaded...
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Mon Mar 14, 2016 5:29 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.34.3 [current] is released!
Replies: 58
Views: 19055

Re:

Isn't there any mac conflict in the network? Does mac ping work in both ways? Any firewall rule Coul be blocking that? After countless tests and resets its seems to be faulty hardware. It was not accepting any IP and after i took tried wobbling LAN connector it just accepted IP .... It seems that S...
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Mon Mar 14, 2016 3:52 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.34.3 [current] is released!
Replies: 58
Views: 19055

Re: v6.34.3 [current] is released!

If you have dhcp client active on the bridge and it actually asks the dhcp server with different mac, it means the mac had changed. The mac on bridge can be changing when no administrative mac is set to it. Once you set the administrative mac, it becomes "fixed" for the bridge and all its ports. Re...
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Mon Mar 14, 2016 12:43 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.34.3 [current] is released!
Replies: 58
Views: 19055

Re: v6.34.3 [current] is released!

Update problem. Given: mAP lite 6.34.2, latest FW 3.29 Config very basic, just bridge ether1 and wlan1 and dhcp client on bridge1. PROBLEM: After standard update procedure ( packages update via winbox 3.1) from 6.34.2 to 6.34.3 mAP lite does not accept DHCP server offered address. (i general any ad...
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Fri Mar 11, 2016 6:51 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.34.3 [current] is released!
Replies: 58
Views: 19055

Re: v6.34.3 [current] is released!

Update problem. Given: mAP lite 6.34.2, latest FW 3.29 Config very basic, just bridge ether1 and wlan1 and dhcp client on bridge1. PROBLEM: After standard update procedure ( packages update via winbox 3.1) from 6.34.2 to 6.34.3 mAP lite does not accept DHCP server offered address. (i general any add...
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Thu Dec 17, 2015 2:38 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RB532 + routeros mipsle 6.33 = fail
Replies: 19
Views: 4791

Re: RB532 + routeros mipsle 6.33 = fail

I confirm! Same problem here. Updated 6.33 ->6.33.3 = CRASH! Does not come back from reboot. Had to power down and power UP. Did clean reinstall from 5.21->6.32.x->6.33.3 Making export compact file=xxx complains about upnp config backup. Probably problem is with this stuff somewhere. upnp is one of ...
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Thu Nov 19, 2015 7:33 pm
Forum: General
Topic: IPSec Phase 1 fails on restart, multiple IPs
Replies: 20
Views: 3868

Re: IPSec Phase 1 fails on restart, multiple IPs

ok. i got the solution! 1) Probably all your ip's on WAN have equal mask .... that is wrong. All except one has to have /32 (assuming all of them have same gateway ip) 2.0) Firewall - NAT add rule on top (before your masquerade) src-nat dest-addr <your remote peer ip> protocol 50 action=accept 2.1) ...
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Thu Nov 19, 2015 4:34 pm
Forum: General
Topic: IPSec Phase 1 fails on restart, multiple IPs
Replies: 20
Views: 3868

Re: IPSec Phase 1 fails on restart, multiple IPs

It actually is replay IP but this MF NATs your source ip to his default ip for reaching GW :/
I have no idea how to change this situation :(
Using "smallest" ip for ipsecs is simply stupid idea .....even it will work .....
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:37 pm
Forum: General
Topic: IPSec Phase 1 fails on restart, multiple IPs
Replies: 20
Views: 3868

Re: IPSec Phase 1 fails on restart, multiple IPs

I have more or less the same problem that cannot be solved at the moment ... at least by me :( Problem is in fact that MT tries to reach gateway from lowest IP number. For ex. if you have .3, .2, .1 on WAN and ipsec is made from .2 then MT is trying to push all traffic through .1 address to gateway....
by ALDISBEHMANIS
Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:44 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Windows 2008 connection to MT L2TP or IPSEC
Replies: 1
Views: 1012

Windows 2008 connection to MT L2TP or IPSEC

Hello, Has anyone tried and succeeded connecting MS windows 2008 using RAS L2TP/IPSEC to MT box? Maybe there is another IPSEC client i could use under Windows server? I need this because KERIO Control does not have IPSEC VPN :( they advise to use MS RAS interface. I have succeeded using PPTP but thi...