Community discussions

MUM Europe 2020

Search found 8 matches

by loop11
Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:05 am
Forum: General
Topic: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???
Replies: 188
Views: 39207

Re: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???

Janisk, I would kindly ask you, that you stop responding to this thread at all, please dont read it, dont think about it, just continue to do something else. Your agenda is wrong, you are thinking like this, if anyone could get the example my consultant days were over. That's wrong and I'm sick of s...
by loop11
Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:15 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???
Replies: 188
Views: 39207

Re: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???

easy - use "connection-bytes" option in mangle - to prioritize first 4Mb or so of ever TCP port 80 connection. Long version 1) HTTP browsing connection usually is not more that 0,5MB (or 4Mb) 2) Mangle facility can mark only part of connection - you must use mark-packet directly without mark-connec...
by loop11
Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:52 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???
Replies: 188
Views: 39207

Re: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???

I have a Mikrotik QoS working as a charm. Packets with lower priority are being dropped correctly and if my bandwitdth is full and a higher priority request is processed, it makes room and bandwitdth for it... No theory or documentation. I have it deployed on my network and i have 600 users in a 34...
by loop11
Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:09 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???
Replies: 188
Views: 39207

Re: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???

there is no difference in port between browsing , latge file download and a small file download , they all are using port 80 ( of course i'm talking about http download )!!!!! and this is what i was talking about .. if we have 10Mbps total download speed , and its all filled with downloading large ...
by loop11
Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:56 am
Forum: General
Topic: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???
Replies: 188
Views: 39207

Re: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???

ping (icmp) is a simple test. You could be seeing 1000ms ping times or timeouts and it doesn't always mean the path is slow. For a router to generate packets it is way more overhead that simply routing them. cfosspeed is doing the perfect shaping on the windows, they found the solution. With that s...
by loop11
Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:11 am
Forum: General
Topic: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???
Replies: 188
Views: 39207

Re: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???

Even Windows have the tool which could fight with this issue, its cfosspeed, and it will do just what I explained, it monitors the ping with their main site, and based on ping, reply's it will lower the speed on the inbound lower ports, to give higher priority ports better response and transfer rate...
by loop11
Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:36 am
Forum: General
Topic: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???
Replies: 188
Views: 39207

Re: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???

Ok now we getting something, that in fact inbound qos doesn't exist on mikrotik and that talking about it is just the marketing trick. Listen just this second I'm thinking about 10 ways, lets just spoke about few. For example we have 10mbit incoming link, we want to prioritized the incoming traffic,...
by loop11
Sun Nov 09, 2008 1:56 am
Forum: General
Topic: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???
Replies: 188
Views: 39207

Re: Is (( PRIORITY )) Really working ???

I made a thread asking the same thing, and I didn't get any answer, seems and this is for sure that there is no priority on the Mikrotik for incoming packets and ports if you want to use the whole incoming bandwidth. People should warn other people that if you need the qos you should avoid Mikrotik....