MikroTik

void

Hello, I'm having an issue when I put 2 gigabit ports in a switch. After a few minutes (or sometimes seconds) with high traffic I see that there is still communication between those ports but I am no longer able to communicate with these ports from other interfaces that are bridged (the master switc...

void

I've never seen a company ignoring customers like this. People are requesting this feature for years now.

void

Mikrotik guys ?

void

Nobody ?

void

Can somebody explain how the "Auto Upgrade Mirror" is working ? What is required on server side ? Which protocol is being used ?

void

Yes !!! We need this for voip !

void

I had exactly the same issue. I found out one of the capacitor's was blown up on the RB750 (known issue). Replaced it with another one and re-installed with netinstall. It's working fine now

void

How do we get this lte interface ???

void

Normis,

How do we get the lte interface with the Huawei E353 ? Is it included in the next ROS version (5.17 ?)

void

Check also topic http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=62044

I have the same issue. It seems there should be a new interface ?

void

What did you change ? I have a RB751-2HnD with a E353 connected on 5.16 but I still see the E353 as USB port, not as lte interface.

void

This would be a GREAT feature !

void

IPSec is broken since 5.14, flushing doesn't even work anymore. I need to reboot the router multiple times a day. I'm downgrading to 5.13.

void

Nobody using the K3806

void

Hello,

I see the Huawei K3806 is supported and it works on my RB751 but only once until I pull it from the RB and put it back. Has anyone a correct working configuration for this USB stick ?

Also, is there support planned for the Huawei E353 ?

void

+1

Mikrotik, please listen to your customers and don't implement new VPN protocols nobody is waiting for (SSTP).

void

Hmm should be interesting to see in the lab, I wonder whats *actually* changed in this version

I agree, 2 versions in almost one week...

void

Normis,

Does this mean that Mikrotik will commit to implement the most x requested features or do we just filll in that page for fun ?

void

Same problem over here. Will this be fixed in the next version ?

void

Why is Mikrotik ignoring all those request for UDP based OpenVPN and proposing and TCP VPN solution as an alternative ?

void

Hmmm, it seems Mikrotik wants to sell us quickly new licenses

void

This don't work, becaume my adsl routers will be connected with my routeros and this conection will work, but not my pppoe in router.

So how do you decide your ADSL connection has problems ? You want to ping something or ... ?

void

Just mark your connections using PCC and then put a routing mark on them. Then add default backup routes for all the different routing marks with a higher distance over the other DSL lines. If there are troubles with your DSL just disable your PPPOE client (or interface) and PCC will work over the o...

void

was there a bug report and a confirmation that it was fixed? maybe it even wasn't a bug

Normis, this doesn't matter. If there is a change you should put it in the release notes.

void

Normis,

For example:
Where was the DHCP change in the 4.7 release notes ? Check, http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=41086. This has been changed (thanks !) in 4.8 but nothing in the release notes.

void

[don't forget to give karma

Normis, I already did

void

You are right macgaiver, thanks a lot ! I learned a lot through this thread.

void

It seems it's fixed in 4.8 ! Thanks MT ! (however I don't see anything about it in the release notes)

void

I just notice that original topic was a little bit different ). Sorry, void!!! No problem. As far as i can see it - it is not possible. There are no way of knowing for sure that available throughput has changed. And rearrangement of packets in Real-time environment - when packets are coming and lea...

void

did you not see that we took off the v4.7 download as soon as we discovered a minor known bug? we don't have any other known bugs, except those that are reported after version build. Normis, that's exactly what I'm trying to explain. If you are going to take every release off-line due to a minor bu...

void

MT should be more open concerning changes/fixes they do in every version and put a list of known issues on their website. It's not a shame to have bugs in your software, everyone has them. But it's frustrating that everyone needs to hit a bug and waste a lot of time troubleshooting while it's most o...

void

4.7 is removed from the site it seems ?

void

MT Guys, come on, still this bug in 4.7 ??? Unbelievable...

void

All, I'm trying to figure out the following but even after reading the manual I can't figure out how: What I want is a script that removes all connections from the ip-firewall with the connection type of 'sip'.Problem is I don't get a match on 'sip' because there is a strange char behind it when I l...

void

Hello, MT guys ?

void

Yes, certainly. Not only usefull for small communities but also hotels etc. that only have 2-wire cabling.

void

Networkpro,

So you would want something like Long Reach Ethernet ? In that case it would be better that the RB could act as both a VDSL DSLAM & client.

void

All, I want to add a tool to The Dude that allows me to wakeup a host using my routerboard's WOL function. I was thinking about something like: ros_command("/tool wol mac=[Device.FirstMacAddress] interface=""LAN - Local Network""") Now how can I specify on which RB The ...

void

Normis, yes, I think you are correct. So you would consider making a RB with VDSL ?

void

I think integrated is a very bad idea unless it's implemented modular like on a minipci or something. The reason for this is that different providers are using different technologies and I don't want to change routers every time I switch providers or the provider to change it's network technology. F...

void

Is anyone using the Dude for this ? If yes, how ?

I was thinking about writing a custom function that uses ping but I'm unable to find proper documentation on how to do this. Is there a doc on how to write functions ?

void

You don't determine the priority when something is full, you determine it on beforehand. The only thing you need to decide when something is full is what you're going to drop. I have a 100Kb stream that I decided that needs to have strict priority and I don't care about the 99,9... Mbit of the 100Mb...

void

Chupaka, That's the reason why I would like to have the ability to have a strict priority queue no matter what the available bandwith is. With the current system priority only works if the max-limits are reached. That means that in case you have a 100Mbit non-guaranteed link and this links drops to ...

void

So finally my QOS on my RB's are working as desired. Using limit-at and max-limit I can give priority to the different types of traffic during congestion periods. Now this only works if we have guaranteed bandwidth from our provider (which is very rare unless you pay a fortune). Now what in the case...

void

Normis,

I saw this page but I can't find the video were the new products are announced. I'm interested to see pricing info, target market info etc. The slides don't tell everyhting. Like for example it seems there will be 2 versions of the 250GS ? Regular or Smart ?

void

Normis,

Could be but it would be usefull if Mikrotik released some information for people that weren't on the MUM...

void

Exactly, how many times do you need a managed 5 port switch ? Most of the times unmanaged does the job and those switches are cheap. If I want more functionality I'll prefer to buy a 750G which has all the features I need and even more. I would directly buy a 24/48 POE port Mikrotik switch if they c...

void

Any details ? Why would you buy a RB250GS instead of a 750G ? Price ? Features ?
instead of? no. 250gs is a switch, not a router. it doesn't route at all =)

True, but the 750G can also switch, right ?

void

Any details ? Why would you buy a RB250GS instead of a 750G ? Price ? Features ?

void

made some QoS for the stream, see if it's better now people starting to gather, as you see - there is still plenty of beer left

No, it's still choppy. Prove to us that Qos works, I'm curious...

void

Sorry, but why are you upgrading a 'live tower' with a firmware that has just been released ? That's asking for problems...

void

This is a feature I'm also missing. I would like to have a priority working on packets without the need to specify the max bandwidth.

void

void

I have the same issue on a RB493AH. Static routes that were deleted are coming back on 4.4 after a reboot.

void

I have the following issue: I'm tagging in the mangle rule voice traffic in the postrouting chain on an outgoing interface and DSCP value. When I set my inner queue to global-out this works fine. But when I change my inner queue to global-total it doesn't work anymore. I don't see any traffic in my ...

void

Nobody using a similar setup who can help me out ?

void

Hello all, I'm trying to setup an IPSEC connection on a routerboard that's behind a NAT gateway. I know this is not the ideal setup but I have no choice. The internet provider is only providing me with a 1/1 nat mapping of an external ip to an internal one. The routerboard should initiate the IPSEC ...

void

Hello All, I'm having trouble here using routeros as a PPPOE client. When I setup the RB as a PPPOE client to my internet provider I get a 6 Mbit download speed. When I use a Windows PPPOE or Mac OS PPPOE client I get a 12MBit download speed. I'm using a Sagem VDSL2+ modem in all cases. What could b...

void

So nobody has problems with ipsec stability ?

void

Hello, I'm having issues under 3.15 with IPSec connections towards a Cisco. Tunnels come up fine but after a period they just start 'hanging'. When I look in the logs I'm seeing the message 'give up to get ipsec-sa due to time up to wait' and it keeps going on forever. Flushing the connections doesn...

Search found 61 matches