Community discussions

Search found 46 matches

by mhugo
Sat Jul 13, 2019 12:33 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45.1 [stable] is released!
Replies: 409
Views: 53154

Re: v6.45.1 [stable] is released!

Lots of wierdness in this release on 317s. Working OSPF stops working - neighbour is not seen from 317 but adjacent 1016 sees ospf neighbor. Romon stops working. Downgrade to 6.44.5 works but that breaks some of the SFPs with autoneg that was broken until 6.45 in 317s and early 6.42.x with old auton...
by mhugo
Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:56 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.44 [stable] is released!
Replies: 219
Views: 32275

Re: v6.44 [stable] is released!

Hi,

On CRS317 two SPFs working in previous version is not seen by system anymore.

Yellow bidi is seen for uplink thank god, but blue is not there any more.

/M
by mhugo
Wed Sep 19, 2018 10:50 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Feature request: BGP flowspec (RFC5575)
Replies: 24
Views: 6435

Re: Feature request: BGP flowspec (RFC5575)

We also need this - +1
by mhugo
Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:13 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Forward LACP in bridge?
Replies: 8
Views: 860

Re: Forward LACP in bridge?

Hi,

The reason is that the optical link was too long, so im using a CRS317 to repeat the signal. It should not do anything but forward packets to the other port. I dont know if a port mirror could be used?

/M
by mhugo
Fri Aug 17, 2018 10:20 am
Forum: General
Topic: Forward LACP in bridge?
Replies: 8
Views: 860

Forward LACP in bridge?

Hi,

We are trying to use a CRS317 to repeat a wave that required more than 80 km laser. The customer wants us to forward LACP, but it seems the CRS is not doing it.

Is there any way I can bridge two interfaces so seamlessly that LACP is forwarded?

/M
by mhugo
Mon Jul 09, 2018 3:36 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: Basic BGP improvements in ROS 6
Replies: 5
Views: 1271

Re: Basic BGP improvements in ROS 6

+1 from me too. I could live with slow commands as long as the convergence is at least somewhat faster. We have been hoping for year now, but now we are getting closer and to desperation as the table grows.

/M
by mhugo
Mon May 14, 2018 4:54 pm
Forum: RouterOS v7
Topic: Feature Request /31 Subnet
Replies: 29
Views: 9863

Re: Feature Request /31 Subnet

+1 for just fixing this. /31 and two /32s are different usecases.

We use /32s for end users but we would like /31 for core backbone links and uplinks - gets ugly injecting both /32s from MT and /31s from non MT equipment.
by mhugo
Sat Apr 28, 2018 8:12 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CRS 317 support 802.1ad QinQ
Replies: 15
Views: 3383

Re: CRS 317 support 802.1ad QinQ

As other people wonder - Are we/Have we gotten hardware support for QinQ?
by mhugo
Thu Mar 01, 2018 6:02 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: New router OS
Replies: 46
Views: 11445

Re: New router OS

My wish for V7 is basically better BGP performance since my routers are maxing the core it runs on all the time. Besides that I need to be able to set circuit id in DHCP request would be great with possibility of running a script when assigned/deassigned to configure central interface with the lease...
by mhugo
Sat Feb 17, 2018 10:57 pm
Forum: RouterOS v7
Topic: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?
Replies: 548
Views: 129941

Re: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?

We have been waiting too long for basic SP features like multithread BGP and something as simple as DHCP Option 82 Circuit ID. I think that if Mikrotik showed that anything was actually happening it would be easier to not look at other vendors.
by mhugo
Thu Nov 02, 2017 7:25 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 119863

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Hi,

Is it just me or did the new bridge implementation just vanish in 6.41rc50 - On CRS212-1G-10S-1S+ Im back with masterports and no hardware offload in menu?

/Mikael
by mhugo
Wed Nov 01, 2017 1:26 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 119863

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Seems to be some chip issue when adding vlans in bridge on 212. Verified by Mikrotik trainer who will contact MT tomorrow.
by mhugo
Mon Oct 30, 2017 6:00 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 119863

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Hardware offload for Vlans using the bridge ports on CRS212 does not seem to work? /interface bridge add igmp-snooping=no name=bridge1 add igmp-snooping=no name=bridge2 /interface vlan add interface=sfp10 name=sfp10-vlan100 vlan-id=100 add interface=sfp10 name=sfp10-vlan101 vlan-id=101 /interface br...
by mhugo
Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:30 pm
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: CHR suggestions for new functionality
Replies: 157
Views: 31101

Re: CHR suggestions for new functionality

BGP Route Reflector support not installing the routes would be nice.
by mhugo
Fri Jun 30, 2017 12:35 am
Forum: General
Topic: /32 dhcp experience
Replies: 5
Views: 960

Re: /32 dhcp experience

Hi, You can use 1.1.1.1/32 and 2.2.2.2/32 as example. Router A is 1.1.1.1/32 so as the ip you add 1.1.1.1/32 with broadcast of 2.2.2.2 Router B is 2.2.2.2/32 so there you use 2.2.2.2/32 and broadcast of 1.1.1.1 To route 0.0.0.0/0 to router A from router B you add a route to 0.0.0.0/0 with gateway 1....
by mhugo
Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:18 pm
Forum: General
Topic: /32 dhcp experience
Replies: 5
Views: 960

/32 dhcp experience

Hi, We started assigning IPs to customers using DHCP and giving them a /32 ip and providing a different gw also as a /32. This works fine for the couple of routers we tested on, but now a new customer with limited skills and far away says its not working even if we can see the address is assigned an...
by mhugo
Fri May 05, 2017 12:08 am
Forum: General
Topic: DHCP Option 82 / DHCP-Snooping
Replies: 9
Views: 9742

Re: DHCP Option 82 / DHCP-Snooping

Thank you for the effort but this is only with dhcp relay and not per interface. Coupled with portable /32 requirement backed by radius its just so that routeros is too weak right now. Think solving this before going into full TR0069 solution would have been better path. Basically we would like to h...
by mhugo
Tue May 02, 2017 4:21 am
Forum: General
Topic: DHCP Option 82 / DHCP-Snooping
Replies: 9
Views: 9742

Re: DHCP Option 82 / DHCP-Snooping

Hi!

Any luck with this? Im looking for the same kind of solution.

Im considering one dhcp server per port right now, but that feels very unscalable.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Wed Mar 01, 2017 11:40 am
Forum: General
Topic: Mikrotik hex as option 82 server
Replies: 1
Views: 561

Re: Mikrotik hex as option 82 server

Did you manage to figure anything out? I think it would be great if we could us Option 82 in the HEX Cpe in dhcp relay mode wth circuit id that we can set to the line-id and connect with dhcp/radius.
by mhugo
Tue Feb 07, 2017 5:02 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DCHP, Radius and /24
Replies: 2
Views: 448

Re: DCHP, Radius and /24

I was unclear on what I meant. Assigning a /24 via DHCP does not add the route and with no route OSPF wont announce anything. If /24s are assigned scattered over a routed network static routes would be needed for each /24 and then using ospf. I was asking if anybody had good scripts for the DHCP ser...
by mhugo
Mon Feb 06, 2017 5:13 pm
Forum: RouterOS v7
Topic: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?
Replies: 548
Views: 129941

Re: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?

New routing engine is a big expectation together with multicore bgp. That would be great :)

/Mikael
by mhugo
Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:23 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DCHP, Radius and /24
Replies: 2
Views: 448

DCHP, Radius and /24

Hi, Im planning to implement a network assigning /24s to customer using radius enabled dhcp from same subnet all over the network so it is not part of a bigger subnet in each router. Has anyone succeed in a good way to add the routes into the central routers table when an IP is assigned? I think the...
by mhugo
Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: 450Mhz LTE card for Mikrotik
Replies: 4
Views: 1293

450Mhz LTE card for Mikrotik

Hi,

Does anyone know of an LTE (preferably pci-e) that works in Mikrotik?

SXTLTE would be great but does not support 450 band.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Mon Sep 26, 2016 5:26 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Mikrotik GPON FTTH Architetcure
Replies: 7
Views: 2232

Re: Mikrotik GPON FTTH Architetcure

Hi, We are actively investigating a GEPON architecture and despite being a heavy Mikrotik user for many years this is making us look at alternatives on central nodes. I agree that BIDI is cheap and efficient, but it fills a lot in volume on central nodes and requires singlefiber per customer (espcia...
by mhugo
Thu Aug 18, 2016 6:49 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: SwOS version 1.17 released
Replies: 14
Views: 6617

Re: SwOS version 1.17 released

Im still hoping for dhcp client to make it easier to deploy in the field as customer CPE. We want the dhcp client for the management network.
by mhugo
Wed Jul 13, 2016 4:25 am
Forum: RouterOS v7
Topic: Feature Request /31 Subnet
Replies: 29
Views: 9863

Re: Feature Request /31 Subnet

We really need this since we are low on IPV4 and use a lot of /32
by mhugo
Tue Jun 16, 2015 12:01 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR1072 Availability
Replies: 29
Views: 15764

Re: CCR1072 Availability

Hi,

I would also say it would be ok for us if the 1072 was released with ROS 6 and have performance limitations. We are delaying builds where we would like to place 1072s to make it futureproof.
by mhugo
Thu May 21, 2015 7:53 pm
Forum: RouterOS v7
Topic: Feature Request /31 Subnet
Replies: 29
Views: 9863

Re: Feature Request /31 Subnet

Needed +1
by mhugo
Sat May 24, 2014 8:49 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with ipv6 smaller than /64
Replies: 3
Views: 750

Re: Issues with ipv6 smaller than /64

Reboot solved it. IPV6 does not seem 100% stable.
by mhugo
Sat May 17, 2014 8:51 am
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with ipv6 smaller than /64
Replies: 3
Views: 750

Issues with ipv6 smaller than /64

Hi, Were finally putting in ipv6, but we have issues with our upstreams since they provide smaller networks for the links than /64. In mikrotik it says unreachable and we cant ping them. If we use the link local fe80 then it works and also the links carry ipv4 without any problem. Its a CCR1036-12G-...
by mhugo
Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:01 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: Feature Request TR-069 CPE
Replies: 72
Views: 23071

Re: Feature Request TR-069 CPE

+1 (Its not replacable with auto.rsc)
by mhugo
Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:24 pm
Forum: General
Topic: MUM Croatia NEW PRODUCT ANNOUNCEMENT
Replies: 42
Views: 17031

Re: MUM Croatia NEW PRODUCT ANNOUNCEMENT

Hi,

Great with th SFP+ cloudcore - Any chance of getting a version with SFPs instead of coppergigs.

Would need 10 immediately :)

/Mikael
by mhugo
Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:41 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: About OSPF
Replies: 12
Views: 2505

Re: About OSPF

We have made some investigation into the issue now, and it seems it has to do with when the links change.

Like switching port and moving the ip along, the system crashing and booting, etc.

So im guessing there is a small issue somewhere in the internal code making the LSAs wrong in these conditions.
by mhugo
Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:32 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Database description packet has different master status flag
Replies: 65
Views: 34130

Re: Database description packet has different master status

Hi, We are having the issue sometimes - Our observation is that this only happens on routers with one ospf uplink but on all kinds of routers. Right now we have managed to reproduce this error on a router not carrying any traffic and the ospf has been cycling for 2 days. The routers are connected on...
by mhugo
Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:16 am
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: ROS6 RC9 on Xenserver crashes on boot
Replies: 10
Views: 9785

ROS6 RC9 on Xenserver crashes on boot

Hi,

We get kernel errors booting ROS6 on Xenserver - Version 5 is working.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:05 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: About OSPF
Replies: 12
Views: 2505

Re: About OSPF

Sudden master flags wrong and the ospf recalculates many times before stabilizing and sometime triggering a crash on one of the OSPF routers.

100% Mikrotik OSPF network with some IPv4 BGP.

There are some threads on this which MT has been very absent on.
by mhugo
Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:54 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: About OSPF
Replies: 12
Views: 2505

Re: About OSPF

+1

We want to roll out like 80 cloudcore routers in our DC but with the current state of OSPF we will be getting too many issues we feel.
by mhugo
Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:27 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Database description packet has different master status flag
Replies: 65
Views: 34130

Re: Database description packet has different master status

We dont have any duplicate router ids since that will cause a mess :)
by mhugo
Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:40 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: Kernel 3.4 please - Hyper-V support OOTB
Replies: 8
Views: 2978

Re: Kernel 3.4 please - Hyper-V support OOTB

We would like it too - we use it a lot in our hyper-v enviroment.
by mhugo
Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:37 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1
Replies: 96
Views: 29661

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

DHCP client is working like 25% of the time even on factory reset unit with only dhcp client enabled on ether1 on 750G
by mhugo
Mon Jul 09, 2012 10:26 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Database description packet has different master status flag
Replies: 65
Views: 34130

Re: Database description packet has different master status

Sorry for crossposting -

I have the issue too and it seems to be originating in one router as two neighbours gets the master flag changed issue.

The router has been switched two times 732->RB1100->RB1100X2

Routerid has been checked, no visible network issues on the ethernet , etc.

Any clue?

/M
by mhugo
Mon Jul 09, 2012 10:22 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Ospf 3.10 BUG: Database Description packet has different mas
Replies: 21
Views: 9880

Re: Ospf 3.10 BUG: Database Description packet has different

Hi, I have this problem in 5.18 - One box looses two ospf neighbours at the same time and the other neighbours sees that there is a different master flag. Since this happens at the same time with two directly connected neighbours its little wierd. Routers are using a unique (checked too) ip on a loo...
by mhugo
Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:04 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Bonding - 1 server 2 mikrotiks
Replies: 1
Views: 475

Bonding - 1 server 2 mikrotiks

Hi,

Is there any way to run an ethernet bond from one server to two mikrotiks so that it wont fail if a RB1200 goes down for an upgrade or power is lost?

The server is running XEN with a lot of VLANS terminated into the RB1200.

/MH
by mhugo
Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:10 pm
Forum: General
Topic: 3.18 and BGP w/ full routing tables
Replies: 10
Views: 1423

Re: 3.18 and BGP w/ full routing tables

Im very interested in knowing if it works too.

Anyone knows if the RAM can be upped from 512mb?
by mhugo
Sat Oct 25, 2008 11:00 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Cannot reach machines via multinat and external IP
Replies: 0
Views: 771

Cannot reach machines via multinat and external IP

Hi! I have a couple of services running on dedicated public IPs with static NAT. Everything works fine from the Internet, but internal machines cannot reach the services on the external IPs. It seems Im not getting any traffic back. Here is a dump frommy firewall MT running 3.15 - All hosts are conn...
by mhugo
Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:29 am
Forum: General
Topic: upnp and vista
Replies: 0
Views: 634

upnp and vista

Running 2.9.38 - Upnp is enabled but is not detected by either vista or any other app as a upnp device.

upnp is enabled and not firewall filters are in place - just plain nat enabled.

Interfaces are tagged internal for all but the external.

Any idea what is broken?