Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 203 matches

by mhugo
Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:27 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Multiple blackholes for BGP announcements
Replies: 0
Views: 1851

Multiple blackholes for BGP announcements

Hi, Im adding add as example 15.157.31.0/24 to all my EBPG speakers. 6 in total. blackhole comment=bgp-networks disabled=no distance=255 dst-address=\ 15.157.31.0/24 gateway="" pref-src="" routing-table=main scope=30 \ suppress-hw-offload=no target-scope=10 What happens then in r...
by mhugo
Wed Mar 08, 2023 11:11 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7 and BFD, any ETA?
Replies: 148
Views: 26299

Re: v7 and BFD, any ETA?

Those who think BFD is unimportant probably don't understand the importance of an in-place upgrade path for a large installation base. Agree. I run a quite large MT network with 500+ routers in it - 2216, 2004s, 317s. All fiber, OSPF, BGP and hopefully a lot of BFD soon. Without BFD its a long 40se...
by mhugo
Fri Mar 03, 2023 9:33 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: BGP multiple peer setup - load balancing
Replies: 7
Views: 4087

Re: BGP multiple peer setup - load balancing

We are seeing that when multiple local prefs exist then ROS7 has 1 core running constantly 100%. I guess its evaluating the routes all the time, so needs to be optimized from MT side. We dont do load balancing due to that right now. We have 4 transits and 7 IXs with routeservers that we peer on.
by mhugo
Tue Feb 28, 2023 9:31 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.8 [stable] is released!
Replies: 425
Views: 137469

Re: v7.8 [stable] is released!

Please update https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... l+Overview so we know if there are changes.

Im hoping BFD, /31 and working L3HW working with BGP peering will soon be green fields.
by mhugo
Fri Dec 30, 2022 8:25 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Ratelimit gig levels on 1072
Replies: 1
Views: 271

Ratelimit gig levels on 1072

Hi,

I need to ratelimit a port and tried with simple shape on 1072 but it maxed out on all cores when I tried.

Anyone knows a good way to share a 10G port to 5?

Since it has no switch Im unsure if there is any way?
by mhugo
Wed Dec 28, 2022 4:04 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

Im told 7.7 will fix it but haven't tried yet.
by mhugo
Mon Nov 14, 2022 7:43 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.7beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 322
Views: 122499

Re: v7.7beta [testing] is released!

On yours, which device is complaining about the FCS errors?
The 1016 connected to a 2004 was the one complaining.
by mhugo
Fri Nov 11, 2022 3:46 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature Request NAT-PMP
Replies: 18
Views: 11741

Re: Feature Request NAT-PMP

+1 from me
by mhugo
Tue Nov 08, 2022 1:05 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.7beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 322
Views: 122499

Re: v7.7beta [testing] is released!

On beta 4 I get FCS from a 2004 connected to a 1016 with an SFP+ DAC after some days of uptime.

Ill upgrade tonight to latest beta and see if it goes away.
by mhugo
Sat Oct 01, 2022 2:38 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR1036 temperature "issue" cause reboot.
Replies: 12
Views: 7691

Re: CCR1036 temperature "issue" cause reboot.

Which ones did you get of good quality. Have a couple of 1036s with this issue that can be put to use.
by mhugo
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:12 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

It's ha hardware problem due to cache missing on the switch chip, it can not be solved
The packetloss? Then the 2004 wont be usable is the conclusion?
by mhugo
Mon Jun 13, 2022 2:00 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: General packetloss in ROS7 and multiple full BGP
Replies: 12
Views: 3608

Re: General packetloss in ROS7 and multiple full BGP

It occurs to common destinations like 8.8.8.8. Based on the fact that this becomes less when we prioritize down some bgp peers or remove some I have a feeling this has to do with destinations with multiple paths having same weight. As stated in my ticket this is probably hard to simulate in lab but ...
by mhugo
Mon Jun 13, 2022 1:44 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: General packetloss in ROS7 and multiple full BGP
Replies: 12
Views: 3608

Re: General packetloss in ROS7 and multiple full BGP

[/quote] How did you configure affinity on your BGP sessions? I haven't really figured out how exectly behaves this. Tried to use same numbers for sessions that should be operated in the same process. Some sessions are running in the same process but some are running in extra process. Seems it is ki...
by mhugo
Fri Jun 10, 2022 8:21 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: General packetloss in ROS7 and multiple full BGP
Replies: 12
Views: 3608

Re: General packetloss in ROS7 and multiple full BGP

Are you using hardware offload on the CCR2216?
No I loose connectivity with L3HW for Loopback0 so waiting for Mikrotik to fix.

The 2216 is in peering AS where we only take in peers and have rest in a 0.0.0.0/0 route from our other AS acting as upstream.

/ip/route/print count-only
676192
by mhugo
Fri Jun 10, 2022 12:37 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: General packetloss in ROS7 and multiple full BGP
Replies: 12
Views: 3608

Re: General packetloss in ROS7 and multiple full BGP

I have gotten the packetloss to go away by removing some of the BGP feeds and the routing table is now 1.3million.

MT has ticket and cannot reproduce but I have offered access to non-production routers and BGP feeds.

Clearly BGP in ROS7 needs some fine tuning in how it handles bigger bgp tables.
by mhugo
Thu Jun 02, 2022 10:00 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: General packetloss in ROS7 and multiple full BGP
Replies: 12
Views: 3608

General packetloss in ROS7 and multiple full BGP

Hi, We are expericing some low amount of packeloss per node in our network running pure OSPF/BGP on darkfiber. I believe this has to do with BGP updates affecting the routed traffic. The boxes 2216s, 1072s and 2004s are only running a couple of gigabit. We have 2m routes in the tables from various s...
by mhugo
Tue May 31, 2022 9:43 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.3rc [testing] is released!
Replies: 452
Views: 101228

Re: v7.3rc [testing] is released!

Joke <<==
You ==>

:)
You need this Normis - https://www.redbubble.com/i/t-shirt/BGP ... 1893.UGYPM
by mhugo
Wed May 25, 2022 10:48 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.3rc [testing] is released!
Replies: 452
Views: 101228

Re: v7.3beta [testing] is released!

In 99% of the cases /32 can be used instead of /31. Even in setups where remote end has /31, but MT side has configured ptp /32. Doesent work in l3hw logic in 317s and it makes my ospf table messy with 100+ more entries. Packet source also doesent work with /32. Seems like a hygeiene factor to just...
by mhugo
Fri Apr 08, 2022 3:26 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: eoip in RouterOS 7.2rc7 broken?
Replies: 2
Views: 2278

Re: eoip in RouterOS 7.2rc7 broken?

I have made a test between RB3011/RouterOS 6.49.5 and a CHR/RouterOS 7.2rc7 When I create eoip (ipv4) interfaces on both sides and assign private IPv4-Adresses to both ends, I can ping them as expected. When I assign IPv6 (fd::1/126 - fd::2/126) to both ends, I can not ping the other side. Doing th...
by mhugo
Thu Apr 07, 2022 7:30 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: CRS318 and L3HW routing
Replies: 26
Views: 9457

Re: CRS318 and L3HW routing

Please create a support ticket, and we will try to reproduce your issue.
Just tested on 7.2 with same result so posted ticket SUP-79177.
by mhugo
Sun Apr 03, 2022 12:04 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: CRS318 and L3HW routing
Replies: 26
Views: 9457

Re: CRS318 and L3HW routing

We have found a few semi-severe issues on 98DX2xxx/98DX3xxx switch chips (CRS305, CRS318, CRS328, etc.) when L3HW is used together with dynamic routing protocols (OSPF, BGP). Most of the issues have already been fixed in v7.2rc5. The remaining ones will be fixed in the next version. Unfortunately, ...
by mhugo
Wed Mar 23, 2022 7:13 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: ROSv7 equivalent of /routing/bgp/advertisements print
Replies: 49
Views: 24843

Re: ROSv7 equivalent of /routing/bgp/advertisements print

Big effort is put in order to implement this feature, as we hear and notice that is vital for your setups. Either advertisement will be available at 7.2 or perhaps we will take addditional time to polish the feature and postpone it to the next "big" version (7.3?). Please release early an...
by mhugo
Sun Feb 27, 2022 11:49 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: Newsletter 104
Replies: 54
Views: 25692

Re: Newsletter 104

Buy two?

It's still a 10th of Cisco/Juniper 100G stuff.
You obviously dident get the problem which is that 2 interfaces only allows chaining.
by mhugo
Fri Feb 25, 2022 9:55 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: Newsletter 104
Replies: 54
Views: 25692

Re: Newsletter 104

Too bad it doesent have 4x 100G. Same with 2004s 25G - should be 4.
With 2 it can just become a passtrough and not mesh on the edges.

I did order several anyway for testing, but would be great with 4 as minimum "big" ports.
by mhugo
Thu Feb 24, 2022 1:03 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: Newsletter 104
Replies: 54
Views: 25692

Re: Newsletter 104

CCR2216 - Cant wait to get the first couple!
by mhugo
Wed Feb 23, 2022 8:46 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1.3 is released!
Replies: 251
Views: 55667

Re: v7.1.3 is released!

OSPF dident work on new unit with 7.1.3 - Downgraded to 7.1.2 and same worked.
by mhugo
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:55 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1.2 is released!
Replies: 127
Views: 38625

Re: v7.1.2 is released!

I also have routers 1036 and 1072 that use OSPF and BGP. after corrections applied, how has the performance and stability been for these models? @godoy Up since upgrade with no issues in network purely ospf/bgp. 2004s are stable too but we see some packetloss on some of them and also on some (oddly...
by mhugo
Tue Feb 15, 2022 4:51 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1.2 is released!
Replies: 127
Views: 38625

Re: v7.1.2 is released!

Which units did you upgrade using full BGP and was it seemless upgrade - (im still getting used to the new terminology before I upgrade)?
1036, 1072 and 2004s. Its was not seamless - We had to rewrite some of the bgp filters and make some smaller adjustments.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Tue Feb 15, 2022 4:49 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: v7.1.1 OspfNeighbor received wrong LS Ack
Replies: 40
Views: 27754

Re: v7.1.1 OspfNeighbor received wrong LS Ack

We even got this between a 7.1.1 and 7.1 today. Only visible in the 7.1 router.
by mhugo
Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:16 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Packet loss on LACP, 2004, ROS7
Replies: 3
Views: 1376

Re: Packet loss on LACP, 2004, ROS7

Im seeing some packagedrops like this too on my 2004s. The ones with full BGP so feels like something in route updates is not fully optimized in ROS7 yet.

Your run any routing?
by mhugo
Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:04 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1.2 is released!
Replies: 127
Views: 38625

Re: v7.1.2 is released!

If u r not able to release something thats works flawlesly from 6 to 7 and without any problems , just do not bother to do that. Keep in mind that there r people that they use the machines in work environment and they do not want to be beta rc or other kind of testers. I have 20+ boxes running 7.1....
by mhugo
Thu Feb 10, 2022 2:14 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: ROSv7 equivalent of /routing/bgp/advertisements print
Replies: 49
Views: 24843

Re: ROSv7 equivalent of /routing/bgp/advertisements print

Changelog does not say that this feature is added, so 7.1.2 does not have bgp/advertisements equivalent yet. @mrz - Thanks for clarifying. We have 20 full mikrotik bgp routers with loads of filters and 200+ peers. I understand there are many things to cover in 7.x but its really hard not to have bg...
by mhugo
Tue Feb 01, 2022 11:00 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: ROSv7 equivalent of /routing/bgp/advertisements print
Replies: 49
Views: 24843

Re: ROSv7 equivalent of /routing/bgp/advertisements print

We really need this to see what we are advertising.
by mhugo
Tue Jan 11, 2022 8:00 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

/queue type set ethernet-default pfifo-limit=300 /queue interface set [find where queue!=no-queue] queue=ethernet-default https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?p=895484#p895484 We were instructed to use 500 and doing so on 7.x too. /M Just a clarification if someone reads this thread and sees my...
by mhugo
Sat Jan 01, 2022 6:12 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.2rc1 is released!
Replies: 240
Views: 159340

Re: v7.2rc1 is released!

Dont forget to keep the routing status page updated so we know what to expect. Its for 7.1 and there is both 7.1.1 and 7.2rc1 now.
by mhugo
Fri Dec 31, 2021 1:44 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Are you using this router as ppp server ?
I am 200+ ppp clients.
.
For test, I only one ppp client on this ccr, no reboot for 30 days, then i gave full load of 200+ users, and it's started to reboot again. 7 days to 15 days gap.
I have no PPP users and no reboots.

/M
by mhugo
Thu Dec 30, 2021 9:06 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)



No, still weekly reboots on ccr2004 with stable v7.1.1
Thank you I hope to have more positive reports

Im very curious to understand what things are causing this.

We run pure ospf and bgp with multiple full feeds. We don't have any reboots but had loads before.

/M
by mhugo
Wed Dec 29, 2021 12:03 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Coming back to the main point - now that ROSv7 is starting to work towards stability with new feature sets, it's hard to ignore the ROI of something like a CCR2004 vs. ASR/MX or Arista gear We couldent operate our network with Juniper MX204s and still make money. We have 18 main sites just for the ...
by mhugo
Tue Dec 28, 2021 3:15 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

*I have been running 7.1.1 on a device that used to reboot every few days and it has been far more stable.... (no reboots since upgrade) I have 19 2004s running 7.1.x - no reboots. Only thing we see is sometimes during upgrade we need to reboot the unit 3-4 times. Something in l2 get wierd and even...
by mhugo
Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:44 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1 is released!
Replies: 785
Views: 223040

Re: v7.1 is released!


/ipv6/settings/set disable-ipv6=no
Why is not in GUI in Windows (Winbox), or in WebFig?
Try looking under IPv6 settings - first option.
by mhugo
Fri Dec 10, 2021 2:16 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1 is released!
Replies: 785
Views: 223040

Re: v7.1 is released!

To add to the noise in this thread - Can I suggest new threads for anything not releated to the actual released software - Like upgrade schemes, general insulting of MT, etc. I run 7.1 in full production on more than 35 routers now (out of 500). 18 of these having multiple full BGP feeds. There are ...
by mhugo
Mon Dec 06, 2021 3:01 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1 is released!
Replies: 785
Views: 223040

Re: v7.1 is released!

system package update check-for-updates channel: stable installed-version: 6.49.1 latest-version: 6.49.2 status: New version is available Yea, thats not a stable release on CRS326 I think the questions regarding 6.49.2 is because the upgrade to 7 is to be done not via stable on 6.49.1 but via upgra...
by mhugo
Mon Dec 06, 2021 2:58 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

/queue type set ethernet-default pfifo-limit=300
/queue interface set [find where queue!=no-queue] queue=ethernet-default

viewtopic.php?p=895484#p895484
We were instructed to use 500 and doing so on 7.x too.

/M
by mhugo
Mon Dec 06, 2021 2:57 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

I see 7.1 stable has been released.... so might look at trying it, but how to upgrade remotely will be they key, since BGP route filters are not updated in to 7.1 Beware a little - we had issues with something like L2 in the routers after upgrade. We managed to get into it using 30 attempts of mac-...
by mhugo
Mon Dec 06, 2021 1:32 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

Running 6.49.1 with the queue fix I am picking up packet loss only when BGP is syncing routes (100k). If I disable the BGP session then the router shows no signs of packet loss. Packet loss is also experienced between the router and the internal network. Anyone know of a way to stop BGP impacting t...
by mhugo
Mon Dec 06, 2021 11:14 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1 is released!
Replies: 785
Views: 223040

Re: v7.1 [testing] is released!

BFD is working for BGP in v6 not sure why you say its not working.
[/quote]
Due to load in the routing it failed for us all the time and MT support encouraged us to disable it.

We are hoping for its return in 7.x very soon as it has obvious benefits.
by mhugo
Mon Dec 06, 2021 12:24 am
Forum: General
Topic: Truely fanless 10Gb switch with routerOS + hardware accceleration [Fixed]
Replies: 32
Views: 9054

Re: Truely fanless 10Gb switch with routerOS + hardware accceleration [Fixed]

In our datacenters we run dac cables to save energy instead of rj45 plugs that consumes a lot of power. Passive dacs use less than 0.15 watts. Singlemode short range uses around 1 watt and rj45 10gbe uses up 5 watts.
by mhugo
Sun Dec 05, 2021 6:43 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1 is released!
Replies: 785
Views: 223040

Re: v7.1 is released!

So please comment if 7.x in "testing" branch is more stable that it was in "development", or we can consider testing to be new "not to expect to be stable soon"? 7.1rc7 was latest in testing. 7.1 has fixes confirmed in OSPF from the 7.1rc7 so its not a rename. My routi...
by mhugo
Sat Dec 04, 2021 7:53 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1 is released!
Replies: 785
Views: 223040

Re: v7.1 is released!

We are seeing 2004s becoming sluggish after upgrade of 6.x and earlier 7.x. This to some of our 2004s on all earlier 7.x upgrades. We need to reboot 3-4 times and then it suddenly works. Happens to approximately 3-4 2004s of the 16 we have. Random which one. Arpping is showing 70-90% packet loss so ...
by mhugo
Sat Dec 04, 2021 6:27 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

I suspect they probably won't come up with a fix for this on v6 and will ask people to upgrade to v7 to get rid of the issue. If the fix is some change that was introduced to the kernel in the past decade, it may be easier to just upgrade the kernel to fix it instead of trying to track down what ch...
by mhugo
Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:59 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.49.1 [stable] is released!
Replies: 138
Views: 80146

Re: v6.49.1 [stable] is released!

Anyone have experience of jumping large release versions? I've never come across this before - usually a router can be upgraded from any version to the latest without incident. Can someone clarify the supported upgrade path for me? Got similar issue upgrading a 317 to 6.49.1. from 6.42.something As...
by mhugo
Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:53 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

In case any of you are experiencing issue with random reboots on 2004 and 6.49.1/7.1rc7 Please, contact us (support@mikrotik.com) with the information and attached support output files. Does this mean that some fix for this has been applied in 6.49.1 and 7.1rc7 and that fix is not in 6.48.5? As a i...
by mhugo
Fri Dec 03, 2021 11:55 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1 is released!
Replies: 785
Views: 223040

Re: v7.1 [testing] is released!

which version is actually stable, from all RouterOS versions?
7.1 has been stable since yesterday for me on several boxes :)

6.49.x works great on all but 2004s for me and so has many previous versions.

Stable should probably be called latest or something like that.
by mhugo
Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:26 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1 is released!
Replies: 785
Views: 223040

Re: v7.1 [testing] is released!

Since it is not possible to guess what problem you are referring to, all I can say is that even rc7 compared to rc6 had OSPF fixes, and 7.1 compared to rc7 includes even more OSPF fixes. Thanks mrz for clarifying even more OSPF fixes is there. I think our main problem was with large LS updates sinc...
by mhugo
Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:12 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1 is released!
Replies: 785
Views: 223040

Re: v7.1 [testing] is released!

In other words, the 7.1 is a exact copy (as there is changelog between) of 7.1rc7, as the same well reported bugs are still here... no, like Sergejs clearly wrote, it contains several routing fixes, compared to rc7 He did not mention rc7 actually so I dident find it very clear. This changelog is fi...
by mhugo
Tue Nov 30, 2021 1:40 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc7 [development] is released!
Replies: 174
Views: 54545

Re: v7.1rc7 [development] is released!

We complain (me too) a lot here, so for let me break my own habit! Good work on the OSPF in this release - We had some oddities and got 7.2b17 and now 7.1rc7 - guessing this was part of the big LS update bug and possibly speed. Routers became unstable when neighbour next to them came online. All gon...
by mhugo
Mon Nov 29, 2021 2:22 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: SFP 1 Gbps devices in SFP+ cage (CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS) not working in 7.1x
Replies: 4
Views: 2640

Re: SFP 1 Gbps devices in SFP+ cage (CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS) not working in 7.1x

We have seen this issue with some sfp vendors but never with the ones we use mostly from fs.com.

The workaround for the others as reported is to disable autoneg.
by mhugo
Sun Nov 28, 2021 11:54 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Unable to route on my local breakout 7.1beta2
Replies: 11
Views: 8458

Re: Unable to route on my local breakout 7.1beta2

Just had this happen to me on 7.1rc7 so its still there. Disabled and enabled interface and its back. Was adding a new interface to a running router.
by mhugo
Mon Nov 22, 2021 5:14 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

I have exactly the same situation. Did you ever managed to make it work?
Seems to still be the same in ROS7 too. Just did testing with a couple.
by mhugo
Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:03 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc6 [development] is released!
Replies: 145
Views: 56061

Re: v7.1rc6 [development] is released!

I have received a lot of this warning message on my RB5009 over my neighbor which is using ROS v6.49. Is this a bug from the beta3 version?
I see these too on multiple RC6 systems but not quite so often. Just a couple per day and not from all neighbours.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Sun Nov 07, 2021 1:45 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: 7.1rc5 RECV RouteRefresh with invalid subtype: 0
Replies: 3
Views: 4066

7.1rc5 RECV RouteRefresh with invalid subtype: 0

Hi!

Has anyone gotten this error too occuring in the log from bgp process?

RECV RouteRefresh with invalid subtype: 0

/Mikael
by mhugo
Tue Oct 26, 2021 10:39 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

We are not seeing any reboots on 2004s running 7.1rc at all. We do however see some oddness when upgrading - we need to reboot them several time to get what I think is the layer2 working. Units are almost not reachable even with mac telnet. But after a couple of reboots they suddenly work with no ch...
by mhugo
Tue Oct 26, 2021 9:55 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc5 [development] is released!
Replies: 167
Views: 48149

Re: v7.1rc5 [development] is released!

Upgrading 2004s has given me lots of wierd issues over several beta and RCs. Just now 2 with rc5. Seems like something is going on the L2 level - Romon is almost unreachable and everything is flapping. After a few reboots they suddenly behave great. Has anyone experienced something similar? /Mikael
by mhugo
Tue Sep 28, 2021 4:34 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc4 [development] is released!
Replies: 276
Views: 81556

Re: v7.1rc4 [development] is released!

Its still missing and needed for us to really test the correct things.
by mhugo
Mon Aug 23, 2021 11:45 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!
Replies: 344
Views: 75890

Re: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!

Please update - https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... col+Status

And if some of these are postponed to after 7.1 please not that too so we know what to test and what to expect.
by mhugo
Sun Jun 13, 2021 12:36 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta6 [development] is released!
Replies: 377
Views: 241180

Re: v7.1beta6 [development] is released!

Hi, Does anyone know if the following protocol status page will be updated with information of beta 5 and beta 6 ? https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/v7+Routing+Protocol+Status I found this page really useful to check everything before a migration from older OS I find it very useful too - s...
by mhugo
Mon May 17, 2021 8:56 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: OLT/ONT Solution
Replies: 3
Views: 1923

Re: OLT/ONT Solution

They dont have any OLT but I would 10G OLTs and ONTs if they had in bulk. I know they have 1G ONT support.
by mhugo
Mon May 17, 2021 8:53 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Exact same scenario here, single unit, very low throughput use case. Lasts anywhere from 4 to 20 days on average before a reboot. Nothing dumped to the console. I'm definitely getting tired of this router and I've lost confidence with Mikrotik as a result of using it. We actually dont have that iss...
by mhugo
Fri Apr 30, 2021 12:03 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Running 14 on 6.48.2 they modified the timing so we have had two issues with them getting bad routes after large network changes but not reboots.

Waiting for a stable 7 for some working bgp....
by mhugo
Thu Apr 29, 2021 1:23 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!
Replies: 292
Views: 84776

Re: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!

waiting for a beta with functional route filtering. I can then test it extensively.
Same here :) Hopefully soon!
by mhugo
Sun Apr 11, 2021 11:53 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

Hows the uptime look so far?
No reboots yet on beta22.

/M
by mhugo
Wed Mar 24, 2021 12:48 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

Anyone has good news? :-)
Most has been fixed in last RC but still some left. MT says they are improving it still but the fix itself is well tested.

/M
by mhugo
Wed Mar 24, 2021 12:47 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Tested the latest RC Friday just past and the 2004 lasted all of 8 hours before rebooting...
For me they have been stable - we have 7 running RC and it solved most of packetloss.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Thu Mar 18, 2021 10:34 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!
Replies: 292
Views: 84776

Re: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!

So that this is an unstable beta release is not importante and if it has this function, you will use it in production??? Try running 2004s. They have issues not existing in ROS7 like reboots and package loss that neither are fully fixed even in latest testing, so I can see that it's tempting. /M
by mhugo
Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:19 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

There is a new related item in the latest beta: *) switch - improved resource allocation on 98PX1012 switch chip for CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS device; Just got confirmation The latest RouterOS v6.49beta22 has improved resource allocation which has been extensively tested before the release and addresses C...
by mhugo
Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:00 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

A week ago I was told by MT support they were hoping to have a fix out in the next beta. Seems one was launched today but nothing in release notes, but could be non-documented. Anybody have any more information? /Mikael What about: *) switch - improved packet transmit between CPU and 98PX1012 for C...
by mhugo
Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:22 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

A week ago I was told by MT support they were hoping to have a fix out in the next beta. Seems one was launched today but nothing in release notes, but could be non-documented. Anybody have any more information?

/Mikael
by mhugo
Thu Mar 04, 2021 2:20 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Very simple configuration- Only two static routes, some mangle rules and a few firewall rules. For your sake I hope the issues I have experienced are caused due to running x2 Full BGP tables. If I was you I would be planning for it to experience lockups/reboots. It's not I think. We have had issues...
by mhugo
Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:20 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

For us the 1Gs report 10G. Same for you? Hard down, will not establish link. Light is received, but port does not negotiate or come up when set to 1G. Is anybody getting any feedback on support tickets from Mikrotik? I was told that they are working on it but not idea if any fix seems imminent or i...
by mhugo
Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:17 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

I now have one CCR2004 in prod. Uptime only 10 days, but no issues so far. Running 6.48.1. Very simple configuration- Only two static routes, some mangle rules and a few firewall rules. I dont think (or at least hope) you will have any issues. I have had no reboots on the 2004s with simple configs....
by mhugo
Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:02 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Are you using 1Gs - optics or rj45? Yes, some of my cross-connects are 1000BASE-LX 1Gbps. I am pretty sure the Router <-> Router 10Gbps iBGP was going up and down on the 6.49beta11. 1G in 6.49beta11 did not seem to fully work as they negotiated in 10G even when setting to low speed. Just swapped so...
by mhugo
Wed Feb 24, 2021 2:59 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

I tried 6.49beta11 and BGP was flapping like mad on it, certainly don't run that version in production.
Are you using 1Gs - optics or rj45?
by mhugo
Wed Feb 24, 2021 2:35 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

I dont have lockups in ospf/bgp. We have seen interface down/ups and resets. Hmm, maybe that is what I have been experiencing too. I haven't noticed any syslogs for the interface going up/down though. The syslogs that I have noticed are "OSFPv2 neighbor x.x.x.x; state change from Full to Down....
by mhugo
Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:15 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

I have just re-designed my network to be Static Routes/BGP instead of OSPF/BGP. I hope removing OSPF from our design has resolved these issues. If not I think my only option is to replace these CCR2004's. Does anyone have any thoughts on Full BGP tables being too much for the CCR2004's to handle (C...
by mhugo
Fri Feb 19, 2021 11:31 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Got a reboot on one now on 6.49beta11.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Thu Feb 18, 2021 4:51 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

…and now same here with the 6.49beta11 "SFP at 1G is not stable" bug.
For us the 1Gs report 10G. Same for you?

I think Mikrotik should make a seperate 2004 release based on long-term and fix this without mixing it with all other fixes.

/M
by mhugo
Wed Feb 17, 2021 10:41 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Full feeds from one or two transits (over both IPv4 and IPv6, so 2-4 sessions) + some peering. So one CPU core is more or less pegged doing BGP. Out of interest, what is your route count? and do you see any packet loss? We see slight packet loss on routers even with 150k routes. I don't think it's ...
by mhugo
Mon Feb 15, 2021 7:07 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

Could be interesting 6.49 released. switch - improved packet transmit between CPU and 98PX1012 for CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS device; https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=172259&sid=b361e20f0db7dfba4cf5f4ddcaa12707 It's a beta, so test it out first. 6.49beta11 did not fix packetloss but ...
by mhugo
Mon Feb 15, 2021 7:03 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Very interesting, It potentially could of been a lockup. I really am hoping it wasn't because that would mean I have to buy new Routers :( This could be related to port extender issues. See 6.49 beta. We are running 3 of these in production but beware there is a bug if any of the interfaces at 1G a...
by mhugo
Sun Feb 14, 2021 9:35 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

I have two that are running 6.47.8 with 75 days and 66 days of uptime, as well as a bunch that I just upgraded from 6.47.4 to 6.48.1 that were between 80 and 120 days of uptime before the upgrade. Just BGP, static routes and raw firewall rules. Out of curiosity - how much bgp do you run on them? Fu...
by mhugo
Sun Feb 14, 2021 4:51 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

What version of RouterOS are you running? I might swap to that.
This bug claims to be fixed in 6.47.8 and then some more in 6.48. Ive had reboots on 6.48 but not on 6.47.8 so running 6.47.9 now.

These is also a version 6.49rc11 that fixes some more, but it broke sfp support.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Sat Feb 13, 2021 12:11 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.49beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 171
Views: 89090

Re: v6.49beta [testing] is released!

After upgrading a 2004 to test for the packetloss issue we got issues with one of the links going up and down rapidly. The SFP with issue was original mikrotik bidi 1G but we had no issues with any of the 6 other ports all using FS.com optics 10 and 1G or a 10G DAC. The only thing I noted was that t...
by mhugo
Thu Feb 11, 2021 11:40 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Could be interesting 6.49 released. switch - improved packet transmit between CPU and 98PX1012 for CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS device; https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=172259&sid=b361e20f0db7dfba4cf5f4ddcaa12707 It's a beta, so test it out first. We tried it and rolled back. It lost o...
by mhugo
Mon Feb 08, 2021 5:21 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

Could be interesting 6.49 released. switch - improved packet transmit between CPU and 98PX1012 for CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS device; https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=172259&sid=b361e20f0db7dfba4cf5f4ddcaa12707 It's a beta, so test it out first. Hi, Anybody dared trying it? /Mikael
by mhugo
Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:43 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

I have two ccr2004 in our network with traffic of about 1.5gb many problems of packet loss without solution until the moment! Hi, Are you using 1gbit sfps and especially any rj45s plugs? There is a separate thread for that topic, but when we had them in lab we had issues with rj45 plugs. /Mikael
by mhugo
Mon Feb 01, 2021 5:10 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

We've reported it to Mikrotik on multiple occasions an they've been able to replicate it. Unfortunately now we have all the CCR2004's out of production so we cannot provide any further production testing - The risk was too high leaving it in the network. Hi, Did you try with 6.48 that has fixes for...
by mhugo
Sat Jan 30, 2021 12:10 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

If no one says anything then nothing will get done. We don't deserve to be left in the dark. Regardless of what's going on. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. I'm not going to stop squeaking until I get some grease. You might be squeaking on your own - I unsubscribed because of the noise. 6.48.1 is...
by mhugo
Fri Jan 29, 2021 8:24 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

It would be great to get a comment from Mikrotik on this matter - It would also be nice to get a refund on the hardware we cannot use due to it being "Faulty" Mikrotik cannot reproduce the issues so they need our help. "RouterOS 6.48 has improvements for arm64 stability, which for so...
by mhugo
Wed Jan 20, 2021 9:11 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Hi,

We had one crash today - first in some time. Uptime 34 days. The 2004 next to it has been up 45 days and pushes even more traffic so no clear difference.

Made new ticket as we are not getting response on the old ones - SUP-39418

/Mikael
by mhugo
Tue Jan 19, 2021 12:43 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

We have 7 of these routers in production. My experience with them is: 1 we use as a route reflector. 115 days uptime. (never rebooted). roughly 2 mill routes in RT 4 we use for passing traffic for clients. 3-13 days uptime. (only local routes and default) 2 we have sitting waiting to be put into pr...
by mhugo
Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:25 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Just opened and supout sent, i believe it is something to do with ospf and or mpls. I have other 2004 routers but they don't reboot that often, some have uptime as much as 20 days. these instead restart every 7-8 hours (OSPF + MPLS, no firewall, mix of 10G 1G interfaces) Hi - we actually removed MP...
by mhugo
Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:04 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Same here, 6..48 and a lot of reboots.
We had 2 reboots on 6.47.8 14 days ago in same day for 2 routers. After that nothing. We don't run 6.48.

Are you making tickets? We need to keep the pressure on mikrotik so they realize it's an ongoing issue.

/M
by mhugo
Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:10 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Which types of ports would you like to see for a high speed router
Replies: 179
Views: 58564

Re: Which types of ports would you like to see for a high speed router

Hi,

One thing I notice is that MT like with the new CCR2xxx has 2 faster ports, but I would say 4 would be required.

2 ports only makes it possible to build rings, but with 4 or more meshing is possible. For me 4 would be enough normally.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Mon Jan 04, 2021 9:32 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Hi,

Got confirmation that the fixes are in 6.47.8 so no additional fixes in 6.48.

Mikrotik is under the impression this is fixed so please keep reporting if it crashes for you.

We had 2 reboots with 6.47.8, but it's much better and some routers has been up for 38 days now.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:35 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: Infos regarding CCR1036-8G-2S+EM to migrate from Vyos.
Replies: 10
Views: 2623

Re: Infos regarding CCR1036-8G-2S+EM to migrate from Vyos.

Hello, First i was thinking to buy this CCR1036-8G-2S+EM and use it for 1 year and after to upgrade to CCR1072-1G-8S+ but :) like i see here they die with full tables there is no worth to buy them, i dont whant to use only the metro tables (1.6k routes) it works even with an ubiquity 300$ 1GB Ram :...
by mhugo
Thu Dec 31, 2020 1:28 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Yes, they suggested custom firmware and wanted serial out information. Though the response was unfortunately after I pulled the unit from service. This unit was located about two hours from my office. A little too far to gamble. I had two in a redundant setup that were ten minutes from my office, w...
by mhugo
Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:52 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

I havent tried 6.48, but the thread from 6.48 doesnt look stable at all. I pulled mine last 2004 from service for now until they are stable. I think I have about 6 of the dang things. They suggested custom firmware for them, but I cant let it keep running like that. I will have to setup a separate ...
by mhugo
Wed Dec 30, 2020 1:34 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Local preference not applied in BGP [SOLVED]
Replies: 2
Views: 2235

Re: Local preference not applied in BGP [SOLVED]

Filtrs pareizs, tikai jāpievieno BGP peeram! ;)
Yes this was for sure an operator bug :) For other users with the same issue - make sure the filter is applied to the bgp peer.
by mhugo
Wed Dec 30, 2020 12:09 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Sent another one in.

SUP-37419 (new)
SUP-35544 (yours)
SUP-30924 (my previous)
Yeah and sent in some more too - one asking if 6.48 does in fact solve anything more but got a wierd response so I've asked for clarification.

No responses on the main issue in the reboot.

/M
by mhugo
Sun Dec 27, 2020 8:36 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Mine was going strong until you said that, it died 2.5 hours ago lol, time to pull it I suppose. Has anyone had better success 6.46 long term versions?
Please send ticket to Mikrotik too so they dont think its just me :)

6.46.x is worse im afraid.

/M
by mhugo
Sun Dec 27, 2020 6:29 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi,

We had 2 reboots on 6.47.8 in the last 24 hours. Seems they last longer but still reboots.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Wed Dec 23, 2020 10:09 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Mine is running an apartment complex providing internet to tenants. Nothing fancy. Just a few VLANs, NAT and firewall rules. Peak traffic is about 500mbps. What types of sfp's is yours using ? I am using the mikrotik gigabit RJ45 SFPs (S-RJ01) Do you notice any of your interfaces dropping (going up...
by mhugo
Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:48 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

All fs.com optics in ours.
by mhugo
Tue Dec 22, 2020 5:05 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: New High Performance Routers ! ?
Replies: 85
Views: 25956

Re: New High Performance Routers ! ?

What we miss are more than 2 highspeed interfaces on the CCR2004s and upcoming 2016.

Two interfaces makes it hard to mesh a core network as only rings can be made.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Tue Dec 22, 2020 5:02 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi,

Ours have not yet rebooted - all have full BGP - 25 days since last.

We run "simple" ospf/bgp routing. Nothing else. Not too many interfaces (all optical) in either and only 500 mbit of traffic.

The ones with reboots - what differs from ours?

/M
by mhugo
Sat Dec 19, 2020 5:50 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 135
Views: 58102

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

Hi,

We had issues with interfaces dropping using rj01 on 2004s. After replacing with fiber sfps the issues are gone. Could perhaps be power consumption.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Fri Dec 18, 2020 7:49 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Local preference not applied in BGP [SOLVED]
Replies: 2
Views: 2235

Local preference not applied in BGP [SOLVED]

Im trying to apply local preference to incoming bgp from external peer. Its the only filter router I have for the peers inbound bgp. Neither of these work and its announced to the internal BGP routers in same AS. add action=accept append-bgp-communities="" chain=bgp-transit4-in set-bgp-com...
by mhugo
Wed Dec 16, 2020 8:04 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi,

Are any of you experiencing reboots still? We actually havent had any on 6.47.8 yet and the interfaces going down could have been from an RJ45 sfp plug which does makes me wonder about power in the sfp cages on the 2004, but it wasent even connected to anything so was easy to remove.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Sat Dec 12, 2020 9:01 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

We have been advised against using bfd in Mikrotiks by Mikrotik helpdesk. Its been broken for a long time and will not be fixed in 6.x was the answer when I asked again some months ago. BFD typically works fine on CHR, and most ARM based Mikrotik's. I use it with no issue on CHR & RB4011. I hav...
by mhugo
Thu Dec 10, 2020 10:33 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

When mine dropped bfd/ospf connectons, it was using fiber sfp's. Even the two routers connected together with a short fiber jumper. (The other was a longer run to a separate building, though underground and a dark fiber link) I have previously found out that the RJ-01's dont seem to like to hold st...
by mhugo
Thu Dec 10, 2020 9:09 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi again, Today we again experienced a drop of interfaces on a 2004. The drop this time was not all the interfaces, but still all ospf was lost. The other 2004s we are running in test has less traffic and no problems, but one thing I realized is that we are using an SFP28 (DAC Cable) port and that t...
by mhugo
Wed Dec 09, 2020 5:53 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

We tried to RMA our units as not fit for use and it was rejected so we now have 4 of them just sitting collecting dust. What was the reason for rejecting? Nothing wrong with the hardware.... Thats probably true and they will claim software is without warranty I guess which is the real issue. While ...
by mhugo
Tue Dec 08, 2020 3:54 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

You are atacking the wrong problem: this looks like software related, not hardware. I agree that it should be more stable, but (barring some defective units) this kind of complain is usually solved down the line, with a new RoS version. I fully agree this is software, but actually MT was a little u...
by mhugo
Tue Dec 08, 2020 12:39 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

We tried to RMA our units as not fit for use and it was rejected so we now have 4 of them just sitting collecting dust.
What was the reason for rejecting?

/Mikael
by mhugo
Tue Dec 08, 2020 12:38 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Have y'all had these issues with the v7 betas? I know it's a hard question since v7's own bugs can mask this. But as the 2004 was designed for ROS7, I wonder if some of these problems are specific to ROS6. Unfortunately I don't have any spares to try v7 on... Dont try beta3 - It gives massive pingl...
by mhugo
Tue Dec 08, 2020 12:46 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

I may have seen something similar. When an even happens on one ospf port, it sometimes seems to happen simultaneously on one or several other ports. And the site I've had this happen at has 24/7 camera monitoring, so I know nobody touched ours either. If you feel like it then please mail Mikrotik s...
by mhugo
Mon Dec 07, 2020 10:24 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Did you just upgrade the RouterOS or did you upgrade the firmware as well?
Both

/Mikael
by mhugo
Mon Dec 07, 2020 9:32 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi, We havent seen any reboots in 6.47.8 but one 2004 dropped and reconnected all intefaces same second. Was asked by Mikrotik if it was a cable issue - which I dont think since nobody was in the rack or the other sites it connects to. Also disconnecting and reconnecting 8 cables same second would b...
by mhugo
Sat Dec 05, 2020 2:20 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.48beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 184
Views: 114217

Re: v6.48beta [testing] is released!

High packetloss on 2004s. Even with empty config using arpping or single ip.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Sat Dec 05, 2020 2:17 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta3 [development] is released!
Replies: 261
Views: 78643

Re: v7.1beta3 [development] is released!

Hi,

This build is not working on 2004s. High packetloss. Same reported on last 6.48beta.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:15 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

We just had a 2004 have all interfaces go down and up again. Also seems OSPF dident fully recover, so in the end we rebooted it.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:34 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

I have two 2004s (and a few spares on the shelf), which are neighbors to each other in a small (mid 20s) mpls network, not a lot of throughput, not a lot of firewall rules(typical usage ~1%). Started with 6.47, tried 6.47.7 (which was better) but every so often they would just reboot. And typically...
by mhugo
Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:32 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.47.8 [stable] is released!
Replies: 54
Views: 31104

Re: v6.47.8 [stable] is released!

We find CCR2004 BGP to suddenly be very slow after this upgrade.

Does anyone else experience the same issue?

/Mikael
by mhugo
Wed Dec 02, 2020 1:29 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

4 months since the issue started - so im hoping the "amazing" starts now :)

So far its been stable for us since upgrade.

/M
by mhugo
Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:12 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

We have rolled out on a couple too. I did see this in the release that someone seems to have experienced a reboot even with the new software. I got the feeling also that BGP convergece with full tables was much slower, but dident time it. Ill try to get some time in the lab to reproduce if possible....
by mhugo
Thu Nov 26, 2020 12:22 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.48beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 184
Views: 114217

Re: v6.48beta [testing] is released!

*) arm - improved system stability; Can you elaborate please? Does this fix the 4011 & 1100AHx4 management lockouts? I think is regarding the arm64 ie 2004s as we were told the issue we have with that was solved by this release. When we tested it however it seems the router gets unresponsive wh...
by mhugo
Thu Nov 26, 2020 12:19 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

We were told the new beta solved the issue, but we did some fast testing and the whole router behaves strange and becomes unreachable even with mac telnet and romon when OSPF is running.

So test very carefully....
by mhugo
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:38 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi!

Did anyone here get any more updates from MT on this? We are seeing processor hangs in the beta and reboots in stable still. We have a lot of 2004s waiting to go to production, so its frustrating :)

/M
by mhugo
Wed Nov 04, 2020 9:11 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: FS.com BiDi SFPs?
Replies: 17
Views: 8722

Re: FS.com BiDi SFPs?

Hi,

We have several houndred fs.com bidis in the network and it works fine with the generic coding for us.

/M
by mhugo
Mon Nov 02, 2020 7:58 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi, Right now we have one 2004 not reachable by winbox, but routing works. It runt 6.48beta48. The same box dropped ospf last time it had issues. Previously is rebooted when it had issues and I think that was actually better. We swapped this with another 2004 so its either a general hardware issue o...
by mhugo
Tue Oct 27, 2020 9:55 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi,

We are running 6.48beta48 on some of the 2004s that was rebooting, It seems to have solved the reboots, but it seems that we now face an issue where the routing protocols stops working instead.

Are any of you experiencing the same?

/Mikael
by mhugo
Sat Sep 05, 2020 1:13 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Mikrotik is running some special debug packages on one of our routers. Its either a software bug or something deep in the hardware since they mentioned involving the CPU vendor. Without the debug packages nothing came on console at crash time, so hoping for a new crash soon so this can be resolved. ...
by mhugo
Fri Aug 21, 2020 4:30 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Bootloader fix was included in 6.47.2
by mhugo
Tue Aug 18, 2020 1:07 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Not from the log but supposedly there should come some crash information on the console disregarding logging settings.
by mhugo
Sun Aug 16, 2020 5:59 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

I have been told by Mikrotik the bootloader memory test has been fixed and fix will be included at next release.

As for the logging we have connected to another mikrotik at the same site and logging to locai file - hoping for a crash to happen.


/M
by mhugo
Thu Aug 06, 2020 11:09 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi, I asked the question here because it's a forum. I'm fully aware that it's not a support channel. Mikrotik has no answer for the reboots. Seems they were able to reproduce the memory tester issue so it's confirmed that the memory tester is broken. They don't think it's related to the reboot. The ...
by mhugo
Thu Aug 06, 2020 1:16 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 458
Views: 146172

The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Hi, We started deploying 2004s into our network and have issues with one we are trying to add into our bgp core. It rebooted every 10-14 days so we took it out and replaced in with another one. We can ran memory test and got memory errors on the first one. This was 12 days ago.... Today the new rebo...
by mhugo
Thu Jul 23, 2020 10:34 pm
Forum: General
Topic: BMP Support
Replies: 4
Views: 1396

Re: BMP Support

ROS 7 is coming now so lets hope for some BMP support. Would be great to have!

/M
by mhugo
Thu Jun 11, 2020 8:20 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: hardware offload on other Marvell DX switches?
Replies: 8
Views: 4329

Re: hardware offload on other Marvell DX switches?

Any clue if ipv6 can be supported later? I would like to run 317s as customer edges rather than 2004s, but ipv6 needs to work offloaded at least at some point.
by mhugo
Mon May 25, 2020 11:22 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Feature request: BGP flowspec (RFC5575)
Replies: 29
Views: 15528

Re: Feature request: BGP flowspec (RFC5575)

Now that ROS7 is here although without BGP lets keep our fingers crossed for flowspec support.
by mhugo
Mon May 11, 2020 7:09 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: 10 GIG version of HEX
Replies: 7
Views: 2957

10 GIG version of HEX

Hi! We have 100s of HEXs at customer sites in our network and we basically use them as managed ethernet converters so customer traffic is just bridged to reach larger routers at central sites. On top of that we can monitor them and see that the customers are up. Please make something similar with a ...
by mhugo
Sat Sep 21, 2019 12:09 pm
Forum: General
Topic: 317s storage and temperature acting strange [SOLVED]
Replies: 1
Views: 1206

317s storage and temperature acting strange [SOLVED]

Hi, I have a couple of 317s behaving in the same strange way for 2 things I have seen. They are in different locations and run 6.45.6. Important is that I have at least 4 units with the same symptoms as below so I think they might be related and caused by software or some issue in hw batch. 1) Free ...
by mhugo
Thu Jul 25, 2019 1:44 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.46beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 150
Views: 105847

Re: v6.46beta [testing] is released!

317s quite broken with no multicast (romon or ospf). Testing 46rc16 and then downgrade to 44.5 required hands on reboot probably to flash down firmware. Links came up but no ARP.
by mhugo
Sat Jul 20, 2019 9:32 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45.2 [stable] is released!
Replies: 205
Views: 86552

Re: v6.45.2 [stable] is released!

Upgraded from 6.44.5 to 6.45.2 and now I cannot login to the CRS317 using ROMON since it suddenly sees no neighbours and OSPF doesent find a neighbour. Downgrade to 6.44.5 solves this, but not the autonegotiation issue we have on 317s with 1 gig SFPs that was introduced in 6.43 when Mikrotik impleme...
by mhugo
Sat Jul 13, 2019 12:33 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45.1 [stable] is released!
Replies: 415
Views: 195540

Re: v6.45.1 [stable] is released!

Lots of wierdness in this release on 317s. Working OSPF stops working - neighbour is not seen from 317 but adjacent 1016 sees ospf neighbor. Romon stops working. Downgrade to 6.44.5 works but that breaks some of the SFPs with autoneg that was broken until 6.45 in 317s and early 6.42.x with old auton...
by mhugo
Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:56 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.44 [stable] is released!
Replies: 218
Views: 96041

Re: v6.44 [stable] is released!

Hi,

On CRS317 two SPFs working in previous version is not seen by system anymore.

Yellow bidi is seen for uplink thank god, but blue is not there any more.

/M
by mhugo
Wed Sep 19, 2018 10:50 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Feature request: BGP flowspec (RFC5575)
Replies: 29
Views: 15528

Re: Feature request: BGP flowspec (RFC5575)

We also need this - +1
by mhugo
Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:13 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Forward LACP in bridge?
Replies: 9
Views: 4370

Re: Forward LACP in bridge?

Hi,

The reason is that the optical link was too long, so im using a CRS317 to repeat the signal. It should not do anything but forward packets to the other port. I dont know if a port mirror could be used?

/M
by mhugo
Fri Aug 17, 2018 10:20 am
Forum: General
Topic: Forward LACP in bridge?
Replies: 9
Views: 4370

Forward LACP in bridge?

Hi,

We are trying to use a CRS317 to repeat a wave that required more than 80 km laser. The customer wants us to forward LACP, but it seems the CRS is not doing it.

Is there any way I can bridge two interfaces so seamlessly that LACP is forwarded?

/M
by mhugo
Mon Jul 09, 2018 3:36 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Basic BGP improvements in ROS 6
Replies: 5
Views: 3052

Re: Basic BGP improvements in ROS 6

+1 from me too. I could live with slow commands as long as the convergence is at least somewhat faster. We have been hoping for year now, but now we are getting closer and to desperation as the table grows.

/M
by mhugo
Mon May 14, 2018 4:54 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request /31 Subnet
Replies: 30
Views: 18555

Re: Feature Request /31 Subnet

+1 for just fixing this. /31 and two /32s are different usecases.

We use /32s for end users but we would like /31 for core backbone links and uplinks - gets ugly injecting both /32s from MT and /31s from non MT equipment.
by mhugo
Sat Apr 28, 2018 8:12 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CRS 317 support 802.1ad QinQ
Replies: 15
Views: 8019

Re: CRS 317 support 802.1ad QinQ

As other people wonder - Are we/Have we gotten hardware support for QinQ?
by mhugo
Thu Mar 01, 2018 6:02 pm
Forum: General
Topic: New router OS
Replies: 49
Views: 57734

Re: New router OS

My wish for V7 is basically better BGP performance since my routers are maxing the core it runs on all the time. Besides that I need to be able to set circuit id in DHCP request would be great with possibility of running a script when assigned/deassigned to configure central interface with the lease...
by mhugo
Sat Feb 17, 2018 10:57 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?
Replies: 613
Views: 255318

Re: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?

We have been waiting too long for basic SP features like multithread BGP and something as simple as DHCP Option 82 Circuit ID. I think that if Mikrotik showed that anything was actually happening it would be easier to not look at other vendors.
by mhugo
Thu Nov 02, 2017 7:25 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 206676

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Hi,

Is it just me or did the new bridge implementation just vanish in 6.41rc50 - On CRS212-1G-10S-1S+ Im back with masterports and no hardware offload in menu?

/Mikael
by mhugo
Wed Nov 01, 2017 1:26 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 206676

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Seems to be some chip issue when adding vlans in bridge on 212. Verified by Mikrotik trainer who will contact MT tomorrow.
by mhugo
Mon Oct 30, 2017 6:00 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 206676

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Hardware offload for Vlans using the bridge ports on CRS212 does not seem to work? /interface bridge add igmp-snooping=no name=bridge1 add igmp-snooping=no name=bridge2 /interface vlan add interface=sfp10 name=sfp10-vlan100 vlan-id=100 add interface=sfp10 name=sfp10-vlan101 vlan-id=101 /interface br...
by mhugo
Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:30 pm
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: CHR suggestions for new functionality
Replies: 157
Views: 57406

Re: CHR suggestions for new functionality

BGP Route Reflector support not installing the routes would be nice.
by mhugo
Fri Jun 30, 2017 12:35 am
Forum: General
Topic: /32 dhcp experience
Replies: 5
Views: 2578

Re: /32 dhcp experience

Hi, You can use 1.1.1.1/32 and 2.2.2.2/32 as example. Router A is 1.1.1.1/32 so as the ip you add 1.1.1.1/32 with broadcast of 2.2.2.2 Router B is 2.2.2.2/32 so there you use 2.2.2.2/32 and broadcast of 1.1.1.1 To route 0.0.0.0/0 to router A from router B you add a route to 0.0.0.0/0 with gateway 1....
by mhugo
Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:18 pm
Forum: General
Topic: /32 dhcp experience
Replies: 5
Views: 2578

/32 dhcp experience

Hi, We started assigning IPs to customers using DHCP and giving them a /32 ip and providing a different gw also as a /32. This works fine for the couple of routers we tested on, but now a new customer with limited skills and far away says its not working even if we can see the address is assigned an...
by mhugo
Fri May 05, 2017 12:08 am
Forum: General
Topic: DHCP Option 82 / DHCP-Snooping
Replies: 11
Views: 23603

Re: DHCP Option 82 / DHCP-Snooping

Thank you for the effort but this is only with dhcp relay and not per interface. Coupled with portable /32 requirement backed by radius its just so that routeros is too weak right now. Think solving this before going into full TR0069 solution would have been better path. Basically we would like to h...
by mhugo
Tue May 02, 2017 4:21 am
Forum: General
Topic: DHCP Option 82 / DHCP-Snooping
Replies: 11
Views: 23603

Re: DHCP Option 82 / DHCP-Snooping

Hi!

Any luck with this? Im looking for the same kind of solution.

Im considering one dhcp server per port right now, but that feels very unscalable.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Wed Mar 01, 2017 11:40 am
Forum: General
Topic: Mikrotik hex as option 82 server
Replies: 1
Views: 1108

Re: Mikrotik hex as option 82 server

Did you manage to figure anything out? I think it would be great if we could us Option 82 in the HEX Cpe in dhcp relay mode wth circuit id that we can set to the line-id and connect with dhcp/radius.
by mhugo
Tue Feb 07, 2017 5:02 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DCHP, Radius and /24
Replies: 2
Views: 1227

Re: DCHP, Radius and /24

I was unclear on what I meant. Assigning a /24 via DHCP does not add the route and with no route OSPF wont announce anything. If /24s are assigned scattered over a routed network static routes would be needed for each /24 and then using ospf. I was asking if anybody had good scripts for the DHCP ser...
by mhugo
Mon Feb 06, 2017 5:13 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?
Replies: 613
Views: 255318

Re: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?

New routing engine is a big expectation together with multicore bgp. That would be great :)

/Mikael
by mhugo
Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:23 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DCHP, Radius and /24
Replies: 2
Views: 1227

DCHP, Radius and /24

Hi, Im planning to implement a network assigning /24s to customer using radius enabled dhcp from same subnet all over the network so it is not part of a bigger subnet in each router. Has anyone succeed in a good way to add the routes into the central routers table when an IP is assigned? I think the...
by mhugo
Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: 450Mhz LTE card for Mikrotik
Replies: 4
Views: 2689

450Mhz LTE card for Mikrotik

Hi,

Does anyone know of an LTE (preferably pci-e) that works in Mikrotik?

SXTLTE would be great but does not support 450 band.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Mon Sep 26, 2016 5:26 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Mikrotik GPON FTTH Architetcure
Replies: 8
Views: 4811

Re: Mikrotik GPON FTTH Architetcure

Hi, We are actively investigating a GEPON architecture and despite being a heavy Mikrotik user for many years this is making us look at alternatives on central nodes. I agree that BIDI is cheap and efficient, but it fills a lot in volume on central nodes and requires singlefiber per customer (espcia...
by mhugo
Thu Aug 18, 2016 6:49 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: SwOS version 1.17 released
Replies: 14
Views: 15994

Re: SwOS version 1.17 released

Im still hoping for dhcp client to make it easier to deploy in the field as customer CPE. We want the dhcp client for the management network.
by mhugo
Wed Jul 13, 2016 4:25 am
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request /31 Subnet
Replies: 30
Views: 18555

Re: Feature Request /31 Subnet

We really need this since we are low on IPV4 and use a lot of /32
by mhugo
Tue Jun 16, 2015 12:01 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR1072 Availability
Replies: 29
Views: 20155

Re: CCR1072 Availability

Hi,

I would also say it would be ok for us if the 1072 was released with ROS 6 and have performance limitations. We are delaying builds where we would like to place 1072s to make it futureproof.
by mhugo
Thu May 21, 2015 7:53 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request /31 Subnet
Replies: 30
Views: 18555

Re: Feature Request /31 Subnet

Needed +1
by mhugo
Sat May 24, 2014 8:49 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with ipv6 smaller than /64
Replies: 3
Views: 1593

Re: Issues with ipv6 smaller than /64

Reboot solved it. IPV6 does not seem 100% stable.
by mhugo
Sat May 17, 2014 8:51 am
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with ipv6 smaller than /64
Replies: 3
Views: 1593

Issues with ipv6 smaller than /64

Hi, Were finally putting in ipv6, but we have issues with our upstreams since they provide smaller networks for the links than /64. In mikrotik it says unreachable and we cant ping them. If we use the link local fe80 then it works and also the links carry ipv4 without any problem. Its a CCR1036-12G-...
by mhugo
Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:01 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request TR-069 CPE
Replies: 87
Views: 51346

Re: Feature Request TR-069 CPE

+1 (Its not replacable with auto.rsc)
by mhugo
Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:24 pm
Forum: General
Topic: MUM Croatia NEW PRODUCT ANNOUNCEMENT
Replies: 42
Views: 21629

Re: MUM Croatia NEW PRODUCT ANNOUNCEMENT

Hi,

Great with th SFP+ cloudcore - Any chance of getting a version with SFPs instead of coppergigs.

Would need 10 immediately :)

/Mikael
by mhugo
Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:41 am
Forum: General
Topic: About OSPF
Replies: 12
Views: 4101

Re: About OSPF

We have made some investigation into the issue now, and it seems it has to do with when the links change.

Like switching port and moving the ip along, the system crashing and booting, etc.

So im guessing there is a small issue somewhere in the internal code making the LSAs wrong in these conditions.
by mhugo
Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:32 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Database description packet has different master status flag
Replies: 67
Views: 48118

Re: Database description packet has different master status

Hi, We are having the issue sometimes - Our observation is that this only happens on routers with one ospf uplink but on all kinds of routers. Right now we have managed to reproduce this error on a router not carrying any traffic and the ospf has been cycling for 2 days. The routers are connected on...
by mhugo
Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:16 am
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: ROS6 RC9 on Xenserver crashes on boot
Replies: 10
Views: 12946

ROS6 RC9 on Xenserver crashes on boot

Hi,

We get kernel errors booting ROS6 on Xenserver - Version 5 is working.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:05 am
Forum: General
Topic: About OSPF
Replies: 12
Views: 4101

Re: About OSPF

Sudden master flags wrong and the ospf recalculates many times before stabilizing and sometime triggering a crash on one of the OSPF routers.

100% Mikrotik OSPF network with some IPv4 BGP.

There are some threads on this which MT has been very absent on.
by mhugo
Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:54 pm
Forum: General
Topic: About OSPF
Replies: 12
Views: 4101

Re: About OSPF

+1

We want to roll out like 80 cloudcore routers in our DC but with the current state of OSPF we will be getting too many issues we feel.
by mhugo
Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:27 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Database description packet has different master status flag
Replies: 67
Views: 48118

Re: Database description packet has different master status

We dont have any duplicate router ids since that will cause a mess :)
by mhugo
Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:40 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Kernel 3.4 please - Hyper-V support OOTB
Replies: 8
Views: 4484

Re: Kernel 3.4 please - Hyper-V support OOTB

We would like it too - we use it a lot in our hyper-v enviroment.
by mhugo
Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:37 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1
Replies: 96
Views: 39317

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

DHCP client is working like 25% of the time even on factory reset unit with only dhcp client enabled on ether1 on 750G
by mhugo
Mon Jul 09, 2012 10:26 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Database description packet has different master status flag
Replies: 67
Views: 48118

Re: Database description packet has different master status

Sorry for crossposting - I have the issue too and it seems to be originating in one router as two neighbours gets the master flag changed issue. The router has been switched two times 732->RB1100->RB1100X2 Routerid has been checked, no visible network issues on the ethernet , etc. Any clue? /M
by mhugo
Mon Jul 09, 2012 10:22 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Ospf 3.10 BUG: Database Description packet has different mas
Replies: 21
Views: 12562

Re: Ospf 3.10 BUG: Database Description packet has different

Hi, I have this problem in 5.18 - One box looses two ospf neighbours at the same time and the other neighbours sees that there is a different master flag. Since this happens at the same time with two directly connected neighbours its little wierd. Routers are using a unique (checked too) ip on a loo...
by mhugo
Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:04 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Bonding - 1 server 2 mikrotiks
Replies: 1
Views: 1029

Bonding - 1 server 2 mikrotiks

Hi,

Is there any way to run an ethernet bond from one server to two mikrotiks so that it wont fail if a RB1200 goes down for an upgrade or power is lost?

The server is running XEN with a lot of VLANS terminated into the RB1200.

/MH
by mhugo
Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:10 pm
Forum: General
Topic: 3.18 and BGP w/ full routing tables
Replies: 10
Views: 2638

Re: 3.18 and BGP w/ full routing tables

Im very interested in knowing if it works too.

Anyone knows if the RAM can be upped from 512mb?
by mhugo
Sat Oct 25, 2008 11:00 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Cannot reach machines via multinat and external IP
Replies: 0
Views: 1186

Cannot reach machines via multinat and external IP

Hi! I have a couple of services running on dedicated public IPs with static NAT. Everything works fine from the Internet, but internal machines cannot reach the services on the external IPs. It seems Im not getting any traffic back. Here is a dump frommy firewall MT running 3.15 - All hosts are conn...
by mhugo
Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:29 am
Forum: General
Topic: upnp and vista
Replies: 0
Views: 1082

upnp and vista

Running 2.9.38 - Upnp is enabled but is not detected by either vista or any other app as a upnp device.

upnp is enabled and not firewall filters are in place - just plain nat enabled.

Interfaces are tagged internal for all but the external.

Any idea what is broken?