Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 137 matches

by mhugo
Sun Jun 13, 2021 12:36 am
Forum: RouterOS v7 BETA
Topic: v7.1beta6 [development] is released!
Replies: 320
Views: 41595

Re: v7.1beta6 [development] is released!

Hi, Does anyone know if the following protocol status page will be updated with information of beta 5 and beta 6 ? https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/v7+Routing+Protocol+Status I found this page really useful to check everything before a migration from older OS I find it very useful too - s...
by mhugo
Mon May 17, 2021 8:56 pm
Forum: RouterOS v7 BETA
Topic: OLT/ONT Solution
Replies: 3
Views: 1136

Re: OLT/ONT Solution

They dont have any OLT but I would 10G OLTs and ONTs if they had in bulk. I know they have 1G ONT support.
by mhugo
Mon May 17, 2021 8:53 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Exact same scenario here, single unit, very low throughput use case. Lasts anywhere from 4 to 20 days on average before a reboot. Nothing dumped to the console. I'm definitely getting tired of this router and I've lost confidence with Mikrotik as a result of using it. We actually dont have that iss...
by mhugo
Fri Apr 30, 2021 12:03 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Running 14 on 6.48.2 they modified the timing so we have had two issues with them getting bad routes after large network changes but not reboots.

Waiting for a stable 7 for some working bgp....
by mhugo
Thu Apr 29, 2021 1:23 am
Forum: RouterOS v7 BETA
Topic: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!
Replies: 293
Views: 47053

Re: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!

waiting for a beta with functional route filtering. I can then test it extensively.
Same here :) Hopefully soon!
by mhugo
Sun Apr 11, 2021 11:53 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 108
Views: 14501

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

Hows the uptime look so far?
No reboots yet on beta22.

/M
by mhugo
Wed Mar 24, 2021 12:48 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 108
Views: 14501

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

Anyone has good news? :-)
Most has been fixed in last RC but still some left. MT says they are improving it still but the fix itself is well tested.

/M
by mhugo
Wed Mar 24, 2021 12:47 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Tested the latest RC Friday just past and the 2004 lasted all of 8 hours before rebooting...
For me they have been stable - we have 7 running RC and it solved most of packetloss.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Thu Mar 18, 2021 10:34 am
Forum: RouterOS v7 BETA
Topic: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!
Replies: 293
Views: 47053

Re: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!

So that this is an unstable beta release is not importante and if it has this function, you will use it in production??? Try running 2004s. They have issues not existing in ROS7 like reboots and package loss that neither are fully fixed even in latest testing, so I can see that it's tempting. /M
by mhugo
Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:19 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 108
Views: 14501

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

There is a new related item in the latest beta: *) switch - improved resource allocation on 98PX1012 switch chip for CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS device; Just got confirmation The latest RouterOS v6.49beta22 has improved resource allocation which has been extensively tested before the release and addresses C...
by mhugo
Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:00 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 108
Views: 14501

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

A week ago I was told by MT support they were hoping to have a fix out in the next beta. Seems one was launched today but nothing in release notes, but could be non-documented. Anybody have any more information? /Mikael What about: *) switch - improved packet transmit between CPU and 98PX1012 for C...
by mhugo
Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:22 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 108
Views: 14501

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

A week ago I was told by MT support they were hoping to have a fix out in the next beta. Seems one was launched today but nothing in release notes, but could be non-documented. Anybody have any more information?

/Mikael
by mhugo
Thu Mar 04, 2021 2:20 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Very simple configuration- Only two static routes, some mangle rules and a few firewall rules. For your sake I hope the issues I have experienced are caused due to running x2 Full BGP tables. If I was you I would be planning for it to experience lockups/reboots. It's not I think. We have had issues...
by mhugo
Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:20 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 108
Views: 14501

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

For us the 1Gs report 10G. Same for you? Hard down, will not establish link. Light is received, but port does not negotiate or come up when set to 1G. Is anybody getting any feedback on support tickets from Mikrotik? I was told that they are working on it but not idea if any fix seems imminent or i...
by mhugo
Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:17 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

I now have one CCR2004 in prod. Uptime only 10 days, but no issues so far. Running 6.48.1. Very simple configuration- Only two static routes, some mangle rules and a few firewall rules. I dont think (or at least hope) you will have any issues. I have had no reboots on the 2004s with simple configs....
by mhugo
Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:02 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Are you using 1Gs - optics or rj45? Yes, some of my cross-connects are 1000BASE-LX 1Gbps. I am pretty sure the Router <-> Router 10Gbps iBGP was going up and down on the 6.49beta11. 1G in 6.49beta11 did not seem to fully work as they negotiated in 10G even when setting to low speed. Just swapped so...
by mhugo
Wed Feb 24, 2021 2:59 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

I tried 6.49beta11 and BGP was flapping like mad on it, certainly don't run that version in production.
Are you using 1Gs - optics or rj45?
by mhugo
Wed Feb 24, 2021 2:35 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

I dont have lockups in ospf/bgp. We have seen interface down/ups and resets. Hmm, maybe that is what I have been experiencing too. I haven't noticed any syslogs for the interface going up/down though. The syslogs that I have noticed are "OSFPv2 neighbor x.x.x.x; state change from Full to Down....
by mhugo
Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:15 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

I have just re-designed my network to be Static Routes/BGP instead of OSPF/BGP. I hope removing OSPF from our design has resolved these issues. If not I think my only option is to replace these CCR2004's. Does anyone have any thoughts on Full BGP tables being too much for the CCR2004's to handle (C...
by mhugo
Fri Feb 19, 2021 11:31 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Got a reboot on one now on 6.49beta11.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Thu Feb 18, 2021 4:51 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 108
Views: 14501

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

…and now same here with the 6.49beta11 "SFP at 1G is not stable" bug.
For us the 1Gs report 10G. Same for you?

I think Mikrotik should make a seperate 2004 release based on long-term and fix this without mixing it with all other fixes.

/M
by mhugo
Wed Feb 17, 2021 10:41 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Full feeds from one or two transits (over both IPv4 and IPv6, so 2-4 sessions) + some peering. So one CPU core is more or less pegged doing BGP. Out of interest, what is your route count? and do you see any packet loss? We see slight packet loss on routers even with 150k routes. I don't think it's ...
by mhugo
Mon Feb 15, 2021 7:07 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 108
Views: 14501

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

Could be interesting 6.49 released. switch - improved packet transmit between CPU and 98PX1012 for CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS device; https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=172259&sid=b361e20f0db7dfba4cf5f4ddcaa12707 It's a beta, so test it out first. 6.49beta11 did not fix packetloss but ...
by mhugo
Mon Feb 15, 2021 7:03 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Very interesting, It potentially could of been a lockup. I really am hoping it wasn't because that would mean I have to buy new Routers :( This could be related to port extender issues. See 6.49 beta. We are running 3 of these in production but beware there is a bug if any of the interfaces at 1G a...
by mhugo
Sun Feb 14, 2021 9:35 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

I have two that are running 6.47.8 with 75 days and 66 days of uptime, as well as a bunch that I just upgraded from 6.47.4 to 6.48.1 that were between 80 and 120 days of uptime before the upgrade. Just BGP, static routes and raw firewall rules. Out of curiosity - how much bgp do you run on them? Fu...
by mhugo
Sun Feb 14, 2021 4:51 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

What version of RouterOS are you running? I might swap to that.
This bug claims to be fixed in 6.47.8 and then some more in 6.48. Ive had reboots on 6.48 but not on 6.47.8 so running 6.47.9 now.

These is also a version 6.49rc11 that fixes some more, but it broke sfp support.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Sat Feb 13, 2021 12:11 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.49beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 169
Views: 41613

Re: v6.49beta [testing] is released!

After upgrading a 2004 to test for the packetloss issue we got issues with one of the links going up and down rapidly. The SFP with issue was original mikrotik bidi 1G but we had no issues with any of the 6 other ports all using FS.com optics 10 and 1G or a 10G DAC. The only thing I noted was that t...
by mhugo
Thu Feb 11, 2021 11:40 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Could be interesting 6.49 released. switch - improved packet transmit between CPU and 98PX1012 for CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS device; https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=172259&sid=b361e20f0db7dfba4cf5f4ddcaa12707 It's a beta, so test it out first. We tried it and rolled back. It lost o...
by mhugo
Mon Feb 08, 2021 5:21 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 108
Views: 14501

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

Could be interesting 6.49 released. switch - improved packet transmit between CPU and 98PX1012 for CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS device; https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=172259&sid=b361e20f0db7dfba4cf5f4ddcaa12707 It's a beta, so test it out first. Hi, Anybody dared trying it? /Mikael
by mhugo
Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:43 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

I have two ccr2004 in our network with traffic of about 1.5gb many problems of packet loss without solution until the moment! Hi, Are you using 1gbit sfps and especially any rj45s plugs? There is a separate thread for that topic, but when we had them in lab we had issues with rj45 plugs. /Mikael
by mhugo
Mon Feb 01, 2021 5:10 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

We've reported it to Mikrotik on multiple occasions an they've been able to replicate it. Unfortunately now we have all the CCR2004's out of production so we cannot provide any further production testing - The risk was too high leaving it in the network. Hi, Did you try with 6.48 that has fixes for...
by mhugo
Sat Jan 30, 2021 12:10 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 108
Views: 14501

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

If no one says anything then nothing will get done. We don't deserve to be left in the dark. Regardless of what's going on. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. I'm not going to stop squeaking until I get some grease. You might be squeaking on your own - I unsubscribed because of the noise. 6.48.1 is...
by mhugo
Fri Jan 29, 2021 8:24 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

It would be great to get a comment from Mikrotik on this matter - It would also be nice to get a refund on the hardware we cannot use due to it being "Faulty" Mikrotik cannot reproduce the issues so they need our help. "RouterOS 6.48 has improvements for arm64 stability, which for so...
by mhugo
Wed Jan 20, 2021 9:11 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Hi,

We had one crash today - first in some time. Uptime 34 days. The 2004 next to it has been up 45 days and pushes even more traffic so no clear difference.

Made new ticket as we are not getting response on the old ones - SUP-39418

/Mikael
by mhugo
Tue Jan 19, 2021 12:43 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

We have 7 of these routers in production. My experience with them is: 1 we use as a route reflector. 115 days uptime. (never rebooted). roughly 2 mill routes in RT 4 we use for passing traffic for clients. 3-13 days uptime. (only local routes and default) 2 we have sitting waiting to be put into pr...
by mhugo
Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:25 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Just opened and supout sent, i believe it is something to do with ospf and or mpls. I have other 2004 routers but they don't reboot that often, some have uptime as much as 20 days. these instead restart every 7-8 hours (OSPF + MPLS, no firewall, mix of 10G 1G interfaces) Hi - we actually removed MP...
by mhugo
Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:04 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Same here, 6..48 and a lot of reboots.
We had 2 reboots on 6.47.8 14 days ago in same day for 2 routers. After that nothing. We don't run 6.48.

Are you making tickets? We need to keep the pressure on mikrotik so they realize it's an ongoing issue.

/M
by mhugo
Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:10 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Which types of ports would you like to see for a high speed router
Replies: 176
Views: 42017

Re: Which types of ports would you like to see for a high speed router

Hi,

One thing I notice is that MT like with the new CCR2xxx has 2 faster ports, but I would say 4 would be required.

2 ports only makes it possible to build rings, but with 4 or more meshing is possible. For me 4 would be enough normally.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Mon Jan 04, 2021 9:32 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Hi,

Got confirmation that the fixes are in 6.47.8 so no additional fixes in 6.48.

Mikrotik is under the impression this is fixed so please keep reporting if it crashes for you.

We had 2 reboots with 6.47.8, but it's much better and some routers has been up for 38 days now.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:35 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: Infos regarding CCR1036-8G-2S+EM to migrate from Vyos.
Replies: 10
Views: 1306

Re: Infos regarding CCR1036-8G-2S+EM to migrate from Vyos.

Hello, First i was thinking to buy this CCR1036-8G-2S+EM and use it for 1 year and after to upgrade to CCR1072-1G-8S+ but :) like i see here they die with full tables there is no worth to buy them, i dont whant to use only the metro tables (1.6k routes) it works even with an ubiquity 300$ 1GB Ram :...
by mhugo
Thu Dec 31, 2020 1:28 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Yes, they suggested custom firmware and wanted serial out information. Though the response was unfortunately after I pulled the unit from service. This unit was located about two hours from my office. A little too far to gamble. I had two in a redundant setup that were ten minutes from my office, w...
by mhugo
Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:52 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

I havent tried 6.48, but the thread from 6.48 doesnt look stable at all. I pulled mine last 2004 from service for now until they are stable. I think I have about 6 of the dang things. They suggested custom firmware for them, but I cant let it keep running like that. I will have to setup a separate ...
by mhugo
Wed Dec 30, 2020 1:34 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Local preference not applied in BGP [SOLVED]
Replies: 2
Views: 921

Re: Local preference not applied in BGP [SOLVED]

Filtrs pareizs, tikai jāpievieno BGP peeram! ;)
Yes this was for sure an operator bug :) For other users with the same issue - make sure the filter is applied to the bgp peer.
by mhugo
Wed Dec 30, 2020 12:09 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Sent another one in.

SUP-37419 (new)
SUP-35544 (yours)
SUP-30924 (my previous)
Yeah and sent in some more too - one asking if 6.48 does in fact solve anything more but got a wierd response so I've asked for clarification.

No responses on the main issue in the reboot.

/M
by mhugo
Sun Dec 27, 2020 8:36 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Mine was going strong until you said that, it died 2.5 hours ago lol, time to pull it I suppose. Has anyone had better success 6.46 long term versions?
Please send ticket to Mikrotik too so they dont think its just me :)

6.46.x is worse im afraid.

/M
by mhugo
Sun Dec 27, 2020 6:29 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi,

We had 2 reboots on 6.47.8 in the last 24 hours. Seems they last longer but still reboots.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Wed Dec 23, 2020 10:09 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Mine is running an apartment complex providing internet to tenants. Nothing fancy. Just a few VLANs, NAT and firewall rules. Peak traffic is about 500mbps. What types of sfp's is yours using ? I am using the mikrotik gigabit RJ45 SFPs (S-RJ01) Do you notice any of your interfaces dropping (going up...
by mhugo
Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:48 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

All fs.com optics in ours.
by mhugo
Tue Dec 22, 2020 5:05 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: New High Performance Routers ! ?
Replies: 82
Views: 17254

Re: New High Performance Routers ! ?

What we miss are more than 2 highspeed interfaces on the CCR2004s and upcoming 2016.

Two interfaces makes it hard to mesh a core network as only rings can be made.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Tue Dec 22, 2020 5:02 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi,

Ours have not yet rebooted - all have full BGP - 25 days since last.

We run "simple" ospf/bgp routing. Nothing else. Not too many interfaces (all optical) in either and only 500 mbit of traffic.

The ones with reboots - what differs from ours?

/M
by mhugo
Sat Dec 19, 2020 5:50 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR2004 packet loss
Replies: 108
Views: 14501

Re: CCR2004 packet loss

Hi,

We had issues with interfaces dropping using rj01 on 2004s. After replacing with fiber sfps the issues are gone. Could perhaps be power consumption.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Fri Dec 18, 2020 7:49 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Local preference not applied in BGP [SOLVED]
Replies: 2
Views: 921

Local preference not applied in BGP [SOLVED]

Im trying to apply local preference to incoming bgp from external peer. Its the only filter router I have for the peers inbound bgp. Neither of these work and its announced to the internal BGP routers in same AS. add action=accept append-bgp-communities="" chain=bgp-transit4-in set-bgp-com...
by mhugo
Wed Dec 16, 2020 8:04 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi,

Are any of you experiencing reboots still? We actually havent had any on 6.47.8 yet and the interfaces going down could have been from an RJ45 sfp plug which does makes me wonder about power in the sfp cages on the 2004, but it wasent even connected to anything so was easy to remove.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Sat Dec 12, 2020 9:01 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

We have been advised against using bfd in Mikrotiks by Mikrotik helpdesk. Its been broken for a long time and will not be fixed in 6.x was the answer when I asked again some months ago. BFD typically works fine on CHR, and most ARM based Mikrotik's. I use it with no issue on CHR & RB4011. I hav...
by mhugo
Thu Dec 10, 2020 10:33 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

When mine dropped bfd/ospf connectons, it was using fiber sfp's. Even the two routers connected together with a short fiber jumper. (The other was a longer run to a separate building, though underground and a dark fiber link) I have previously found out that the RJ-01's dont seem to like to hold st...
by mhugo
Thu Dec 10, 2020 9:09 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi again, Today we again experienced a drop of interfaces on a 2004. The drop this time was not all the interfaces, but still all ospf was lost. The other 2004s we are running in test has less traffic and no problems, but one thing I realized is that we are using an SFP28 (DAC Cable) port and that t...
by mhugo
Wed Dec 09, 2020 5:53 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

We tried to RMA our units as not fit for use and it was rejected so we now have 4 of them just sitting collecting dust. What was the reason for rejecting? Nothing wrong with the hardware.... Thats probably true and they will claim software is without warranty I guess which is the real issue. While ...
by mhugo
Tue Dec 08, 2020 3:54 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

You are atacking the wrong problem: this looks like software related, not hardware. I agree that it should be more stable, but (barring some defective units) this kind of complain is usually solved down the line, with a new RoS version. I fully agree this is software, but actually MT was a little u...
by mhugo
Tue Dec 08, 2020 12:39 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

We tried to RMA our units as not fit for use and it was rejected so we now have 4 of them just sitting collecting dust.
What was the reason for rejecting?

/Mikael
by mhugo
Tue Dec 08, 2020 12:38 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Have y'all had these issues with the v7 betas? I know it's a hard question since v7's own bugs can mask this. But as the 2004 was designed for ROS7, I wonder if some of these problems are specific to ROS6. Unfortunately I don't have any spares to try v7 on... Dont try beta3 - It gives massive pingl...
by mhugo
Tue Dec 08, 2020 12:46 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

I may have seen something similar. When an even happens on one ospf port, it sometimes seems to happen simultaneously on one or several other ports. And the site I've had this happen at has 24/7 camera monitoring, so I know nobody touched ours either. If you feel like it then please mail Mikrotik s...
by mhugo
Mon Dec 07, 2020 10:24 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Did you just upgrade the RouterOS or did you upgrade the firmware as well?
Both

/Mikael
by mhugo
Mon Dec 07, 2020 9:32 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi, We havent seen any reboots in 6.47.8 but one 2004 dropped and reconnected all intefaces same second. Was asked by Mikrotik if it was a cable issue - which I dont think since nobody was in the rack or the other sites it connects to. Also disconnecting and reconnecting 8 cables same second would b...
by mhugo
Sat Dec 05, 2020 2:20 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.48beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 185
Views: 71398

Re: v6.48beta [testing] is released!

High packetloss on 2004s. Even with empty config using arpping or single ip.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Sat Dec 05, 2020 2:17 am
Forum: RouterOS v7 BETA
Topic: v7.1beta3 [development] is released!
Replies: 262
Views: 50248

Re: v7.1beta3 [development] is released!

Hi,

This build is not working on 2004s. High packetloss. Same reported on last 6.48beta.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:15 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

We just had a 2004 have all interfaces go down and up again. Also seems OSPF dident fully recover, so in the end we rebooted it.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:34 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

I have two 2004s (and a few spares on the shelf), which are neighbors to each other in a small (mid 20s) mpls network, not a lot of throughput, not a lot of firewall rules(typical usage ~1%). Started with 6.47, tried 6.47.7 (which was better) but every so often they would just reboot. And typically...
by mhugo
Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:32 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.47.8 [stable] is released!
Replies: 56
Views: 15779

Re: v6.47.8 [stable] is released!

We find CCR2004 BGP to suddenly be very slow after this upgrade.

Does anyone else experience the same issue?

/Mikael
by mhugo
Wed Dec 02, 2020 1:29 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

4 months since the issue started - so im hoping the "amazing" starts now :)

So far its been stable for us since upgrade.

/M
by mhugo
Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:12 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

We have rolled out on a couple too. I did see this in the release that someone seems to have experienced a reboot even with the new software. I got the feeling also that BGP convergece with full tables was much slower, but dident time it. Ill try to get some time in the lab to reproduce if possible....
by mhugo
Thu Nov 26, 2020 12:22 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.48beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 185
Views: 71398

Re: v6.48beta [testing] is released!

*) arm - improved system stability; Can you elaborate please? Does this fix the 4011 & 1100AHx4 management lockouts? I think is regarding the arm64 ie 2004s as we were told the issue we have with that was solved by this release. When we tested it however it seems the router gets unresponsive wh...
by mhugo
Thu Nov 26, 2020 12:19 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

We were told the new beta solved the issue, but we did some fast testing and the whole router behaves strange and becomes unreachable even with mac telnet and romon when OSPF is running.

So test very carefully....
by mhugo
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:38 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi!

Did anyone here get any more updates from MT on this? We are seeing processor hangs in the beta and reboots in stable still. We have a lot of 2004s waiting to go to production, so its frustrating :)

/M
by mhugo
Wed Nov 04, 2020 9:11 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: FS.com BiDi SFPs?
Replies: 17
Views: 4314

Re: FS.com BiDi SFPs?

Hi,

We have several houndred fs.com bidis in the network and it works fine with the generic coding for us.

/M
by mhugo
Mon Nov 02, 2020 7:58 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi, Right now we have one 2004 not reachable by winbox, but routing works. It runt 6.48beta48. The same box dropped ospf last time it had issues. Previously is rebooted when it had issues and I think that was actually better. We swapped this with another 2004 so its either a general hardware issue o...
by mhugo
Tue Oct 27, 2020 9:55 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi,

We are running 6.48beta48 on some of the 2004s that was rebooting, It seems to have solved the reboots, but it seems that we now face an issue where the routing protocols stops working instead.

Are any of you experiencing the same?

/Mikael
by mhugo
Sat Sep 05, 2020 1:13 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Mikrotik is running some special debug packages on one of our routers. Its either a software bug or something deep in the hardware since they mentioned involving the CPU vendor. Without the debug packages nothing came on console at crash time, so hoping for a new crash soon so this can be resolved. ...
by mhugo
Fri Aug 21, 2020 4:30 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Bootloader fix was included in 6.47.2
by mhugo
Tue Aug 18, 2020 1:07 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Not from the log but supposedly there should come some crash information on the console disregarding logging settings.
by mhugo
Sun Aug 16, 2020 5:59 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

I have been told by Mikrotik the bootloader memory test has been fixed and fix will be included at next release.

As for the logging we have connected to another mikrotik at the same site and logging to locai file - hoping for a crash to happen.


/M
by mhugo
Thu Aug 06, 2020 11:09 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

Re: 2004 hardware issues?

Hi, I asked the question here because it's a forum. I'm fully aware that it's not a support channel. Mikrotik has no answer for the reboots. Seems they were able to reproduce the memory tester issue so it's confirmed that the memory tester is broken. They don't think it's related to the reboot. The ...
by mhugo
Thu Aug 06, 2020 1:16 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)
Replies: 189
Views: 24355

The big CCR2004 reboot thread (was 2004 hardware issues?)

Hi, We started deploying 2004s into our network and have issues with one we are trying to add into our bgp core. It rebooted every 10-14 days so we took it out and replaced in with another one. We can ran memory test and got memory errors on the first one. This was 12 days ago.... Today the new rebo...
by mhugo
Thu Jul 23, 2020 10:34 pm
Forum: General
Topic: BMP Support
Replies: 2
Views: 685

Re: BMP Support

ROS 7 is coming now so lets hope for some BMP support. Would be great to have!

/M
by mhugo
Thu Jun 11, 2020 8:20 pm
Forum: RouterOS v7 BETA
Topic: hardware offload on other Marvell DX switches?
Replies: 8
Views: 2717

Re: hardware offload on other Marvell DX switches?

Any clue if ipv6 can be supported later? I would like to run 317s as customer edges rather than 2004s, but ipv6 needs to work offloaded at least at some point.
by mhugo
Mon May 25, 2020 11:22 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Feature request: BGP flowspec (RFC5575)
Replies: 26
Views: 9851

Re: Feature request: BGP flowspec (RFC5575)

Now that ROS7 is here although without BGP lets keep our fingers crossed for flowspec support.
by mhugo
Mon May 11, 2020 7:09 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: 10 GIG version of HEX
Replies: 7
Views: 2090

10 GIG version of HEX

Hi! We have 100s of HEXs at customer sites in our network and we basically use them as managed ethernet converters so customer traffic is just bridged to reach larger routers at central sites. On top of that we can monitor them and see that the customers are up. Please make something similar with a ...
by mhugo
Sat Sep 21, 2019 12:09 pm
Forum: General
Topic: 317s storage and temperature acting strange [SOLVED]
Replies: 1
Views: 861

317s storage and temperature acting strange [SOLVED]

Hi, I have a couple of 317s behaving in the same strange way for 2 things I have seen. They are in different locations and run 6.45.6. Important is that I have at least 4 units with the same symptoms as below so I think they might be related and caused by software or some issue in hw batch. 1) Free ...
by mhugo
Thu Jul 25, 2019 1:44 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.46beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 150
Views: 83146

Re: v6.46beta [testing] is released!

317s quite broken with no multicast (romon or ospf). Testing 46rc16 and then downgrade to 44.5 required hands on reboot probably to flash down firmware. Links came up but no ARP.
by mhugo
Sat Jul 20, 2019 9:32 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45.2 [stable] is released!
Replies: 206
Views: 59990

Re: v6.45.2 [stable] is released!

Upgraded from 6.44.5 to 6.45.2 and now I cannot login to the CRS317 using ROMON since it suddenly sees no neighbours and OSPF doesent find a neighbour. Downgrade to 6.44.5 solves this, but not the autonegotiation issue we have on 317s with 1 gig SFPs that was introduced in 6.43 when Mikrotik impleme...
by mhugo
Sat Jul 13, 2019 12:33 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45.1 [stable] is released!
Replies: 416
Views: 143013

Re: v6.45.1 [stable] is released!

Lots of wierdness in this release on 317s. Working OSPF stops working - neighbour is not seen from 317 but adjacent 1016 sees ospf neighbor. Romon stops working. Downgrade to 6.44.5 works but that breaks some of the SFPs with autoneg that was broken until 6.45 in 317s and early 6.42.x with old auton...
by mhugo
Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:56 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.44 [stable] is released!
Replies: 219
Views: 62525

Re: v6.44 [stable] is released!

Hi,

On CRS317 two SPFs working in previous version is not seen by system anymore.

Yellow bidi is seen for uplink thank god, but blue is not there any more.

/M
by mhugo
Wed Sep 19, 2018 10:50 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Feature request: BGP flowspec (RFC5575)
Replies: 26
Views: 9851

Re: Feature request: BGP flowspec (RFC5575)

We also need this - +1
by mhugo
Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:13 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Forward LACP in bridge?
Replies: 9
Views: 2833

Re: Forward LACP in bridge?

Hi,

The reason is that the optical link was too long, so im using a CRS317 to repeat the signal. It should not do anything but forward packets to the other port. I dont know if a port mirror could be used?

/M
by mhugo
Fri Aug 17, 2018 10:20 am
Forum: General
Topic: Forward LACP in bridge?
Replies: 9
Views: 2833

Forward LACP in bridge?

Hi,

We are trying to use a CRS317 to repeat a wave that required more than 80 km laser. The customer wants us to forward LACP, but it seems the CRS is not doing it.

Is there any way I can bridge two interfaces so seamlessly that LACP is forwarded?

/M
by mhugo
Mon Jul 09, 2018 3:36 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Basic BGP improvements in ROS 6
Replies: 5
Views: 2413

Re: Basic BGP improvements in ROS 6

+1 from me too. I could live with slow commands as long as the convergence is at least somewhat faster. We have been hoping for year now, but now we are getting closer and to desperation as the table grows.

/M
by mhugo
Mon May 14, 2018 4:54 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request /31 Subnet
Replies: 30
Views: 14751

Re: Feature Request /31 Subnet

+1 for just fixing this. /31 and two /32s are different usecases.

We use /32s for end users but we would like /31 for core backbone links and uplinks - gets ugly injecting both /32s from MT and /31s from non MT equipment.
by mhugo
Sat Apr 28, 2018 8:12 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CRS 317 support 802.1ad QinQ
Replies: 15
Views: 5951

Re: CRS 317 support 802.1ad QinQ

As other people wonder - Are we/Have we gotten hardware support for QinQ?
by mhugo
Thu Mar 01, 2018 6:02 pm
Forum: General
Topic: New router OS
Replies: 49
Views: 18391

Re: New router OS

My wish for V7 is basically better BGP performance since my routers are maxing the core it runs on all the time. Besides that I need to be able to set circuit id in DHCP request would be great with possibility of running a script when assigned/deassigned to configure central interface with the lease...
by mhugo
Sat Feb 17, 2018 10:57 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?
Replies: 613
Views: 208533

Re: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?

We have been waiting too long for basic SP features like multithread BGP and something as simple as DHCP Option 82 Circuit ID. I think that if Mikrotik showed that anything was actually happening it would be easier to not look at other vendors.
by mhugo
Thu Nov 02, 2017 7:25 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 162587

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Hi,

Is it just me or did the new bridge implementation just vanish in 6.41rc50 - On CRS212-1G-10S-1S+ Im back with masterports and no hardware offload in menu?

/Mikael
by mhugo
Wed Nov 01, 2017 1:26 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 162587

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Seems to be some chip issue when adding vlans in bridge on 212. Verified by Mikrotik trainer who will contact MT tomorrow.
by mhugo
Mon Oct 30, 2017 6:00 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 162587

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Hardware offload for Vlans using the bridge ports on CRS212 does not seem to work? /interface bridge add igmp-snooping=no name=bridge1 add igmp-snooping=no name=bridge2 /interface vlan add interface=sfp10 name=sfp10-vlan100 vlan-id=100 add interface=sfp10 name=sfp10-vlan101 vlan-id=101 /interface br...
by mhugo
Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:30 pm
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: CHR suggestions for new functionality
Replies: 157
Views: 43677

Re: CHR suggestions for new functionality

BGP Route Reflector support not installing the routes would be nice.
by mhugo
Fri Jun 30, 2017 12:35 am
Forum: General
Topic: /32 dhcp experience
Replies: 5
Views: 1941

Re: /32 dhcp experience

Hi, You can use 1.1.1.1/32 and 2.2.2.2/32 as example. Router A is 1.1.1.1/32 so as the ip you add 1.1.1.1/32 with broadcast of 2.2.2.2 Router B is 2.2.2.2/32 so there you use 2.2.2.2/32 and broadcast of 1.1.1.1 To route 0.0.0.0/0 to router A from router B you add a route to 0.0.0.0/0 with gateway 1....
by mhugo
Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:18 pm
Forum: General
Topic: /32 dhcp experience
Replies: 5
Views: 1941

/32 dhcp experience

Hi, We started assigning IPs to customers using DHCP and giving them a /32 ip and providing a different gw also as a /32. This works fine for the couple of routers we tested on, but now a new customer with limited skills and far away says its not working even if we can see the address is assigned an...
by mhugo
Fri May 05, 2017 12:08 am
Forum: General
Topic: DHCP Option 82 / DHCP-Snooping
Replies: 11
Views: 17975

Re: DHCP Option 82 / DHCP-Snooping

Thank you for the effort but this is only with dhcp relay and not per interface. Coupled with portable /32 requirement backed by radius its just so that routeros is too weak right now. Think solving this before going into full TR0069 solution would have been better path. Basically we would like to h...
by mhugo
Tue May 02, 2017 4:21 am
Forum: General
Topic: DHCP Option 82 / DHCP-Snooping
Replies: 11
Views: 17975

Re: DHCP Option 82 / DHCP-Snooping

Hi!

Any luck with this? Im looking for the same kind of solution.

Im considering one dhcp server per port right now, but that feels very unscalable.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Wed Mar 01, 2017 11:40 am
Forum: General
Topic: Mikrotik hex as option 82 server
Replies: 1
Views: 892

Re: Mikrotik hex as option 82 server

Did you manage to figure anything out? I think it would be great if we could us Option 82 in the HEX Cpe in dhcp relay mode wth circuit id that we can set to the line-id and connect with dhcp/radius.
by mhugo
Tue Feb 07, 2017 5:02 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DCHP, Radius and /24
Replies: 2
Views: 923

Re: DCHP, Radius and /24

I was unclear on what I meant. Assigning a /24 via DHCP does not add the route and with no route OSPF wont announce anything. If /24s are assigned scattered over a routed network static routes would be needed for each /24 and then using ospf. I was asking if anybody had good scripts for the DHCP ser...
by mhugo
Mon Feb 06, 2017 5:13 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?
Replies: 613
Views: 208533

Re: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?

New routing engine is a big expectation together with multicore bgp. That would be great :)

/Mikael
by mhugo
Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:23 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DCHP, Radius and /24
Replies: 2
Views: 923

DCHP, Radius and /24

Hi, Im planning to implement a network assigning /24s to customer using radius enabled dhcp from same subnet all over the network so it is not part of a bigger subnet in each router. Has anyone succeed in a good way to add the routes into the central routers table when an IP is assigned? I think the...
by mhugo
Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: 450Mhz LTE card for Mikrotik
Replies: 4
Views: 2176

450Mhz LTE card for Mikrotik

Hi,

Does anyone know of an LTE (preferably pci-e) that works in Mikrotik?

SXTLTE would be great but does not support 450 band.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Mon Sep 26, 2016 5:26 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Mikrotik GPON FTTH Architetcure
Replies: 7
Views: 3481

Re: Mikrotik GPON FTTH Architetcure

Hi, We are actively investigating a GEPON architecture and despite being a heavy Mikrotik user for many years this is making us look at alternatives on central nodes. I agree that BIDI is cheap and efficient, but it fills a lot in volume on central nodes and requires singlefiber per customer (espcia...
by mhugo
Thu Aug 18, 2016 6:49 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: SwOS version 1.17 released
Replies: 14
Views: 11594

Re: SwOS version 1.17 released

Im still hoping for dhcp client to make it easier to deploy in the field as customer CPE. We want the dhcp client for the management network.
by mhugo
Wed Jul 13, 2016 4:25 am
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request /31 Subnet
Replies: 30
Views: 14751

Re: Feature Request /31 Subnet

We really need this since we are low on IPV4 and use a lot of /32
by mhugo
Tue Jun 16, 2015 12:01 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR1072 Availability
Replies: 29
Views: 18105

Re: CCR1072 Availability

Hi,

I would also say it would be ok for us if the 1072 was released with ROS 6 and have performance limitations. We are delaying builds where we would like to place 1072s to make it futureproof.
by mhugo
Thu May 21, 2015 7:53 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request /31 Subnet
Replies: 30
Views: 14751

Re: Feature Request /31 Subnet

Needed +1
by mhugo
Sat May 24, 2014 8:49 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with ipv6 smaller than /64
Replies: 3
Views: 1210

Re: Issues with ipv6 smaller than /64

Reboot solved it. IPV6 does not seem 100% stable.
by mhugo
Sat May 17, 2014 8:51 am
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with ipv6 smaller than /64
Replies: 3
Views: 1210

Issues with ipv6 smaller than /64

Hi, Were finally putting in ipv6, but we have issues with our upstreams since they provide smaller networks for the links than /64. In mikrotik it says unreachable and we cant ping them. If we use the link local fe80 then it works and also the links carry ipv4 without any problem. Its a CCR1036-12G-...
by mhugo
Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:01 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request TR-069 CPE
Replies: 83
Views: 35729

Re: Feature Request TR-069 CPE

+1 (Its not replacable with auto.rsc)
by mhugo
Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:24 pm
Forum: General
Topic: MUM Croatia NEW PRODUCT ANNOUNCEMENT
Replies: 42
Views: 19479

Re: MUM Croatia NEW PRODUCT ANNOUNCEMENT

Hi,

Great with th SFP+ cloudcore - Any chance of getting a version with SFPs instead of coppergigs.

Would need 10 immediately :)

/Mikael
by mhugo
Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:41 am
Forum: General
Topic: About OSPF
Replies: 12
Views: 3500

Re: About OSPF

We have made some investigation into the issue now, and it seems it has to do with when the links change.

Like switching port and moving the ip along, the system crashing and booting, etc.

So im guessing there is a small issue somewhere in the internal code making the LSAs wrong in these conditions.
by mhugo
Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:32 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Database description packet has different master status flag
Replies: 67
Views: 40945

Re: Database description packet has different master status

Hi, We are having the issue sometimes - Our observation is that this only happens on routers with one ospf uplink but on all kinds of routers. Right now we have managed to reproduce this error on a router not carrying any traffic and the ospf has been cycling for 2 days. The routers are connected on...
by mhugo
Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:16 am
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: ROS6 RC9 on Xenserver crashes on boot
Replies: 10
Views: 11863

ROS6 RC9 on Xenserver crashes on boot

Hi,

We get kernel errors booting ROS6 on Xenserver - Version 5 is working.

/Mikael
by mhugo
Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:05 am
Forum: General
Topic: About OSPF
Replies: 12
Views: 3500

Re: About OSPF

Sudden master flags wrong and the ospf recalculates many times before stabilizing and sometime triggering a crash on one of the OSPF routers.

100% Mikrotik OSPF network with some IPv4 BGP.

There are some threads on this which MT has been very absent on.
by mhugo
Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:54 pm
Forum: General
Topic: About OSPF
Replies: 12
Views: 3500

Re: About OSPF

+1

We want to roll out like 80 cloudcore routers in our DC but with the current state of OSPF we will be getting too many issues we feel.
by mhugo
Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:27 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Database description packet has different master status flag
Replies: 67
Views: 40945

Re: Database description packet has different master status

We dont have any duplicate router ids since that will cause a mess :)
by mhugo
Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:40 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Kernel 3.4 please - Hyper-V support OOTB
Replies: 8
Views: 3912

Re: Kernel 3.4 please - Hyper-V support OOTB

We would like it too - we use it a lot in our hyper-v enviroment.
by mhugo
Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:37 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1
Replies: 96
Views: 34699

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

DHCP client is working like 25% of the time even on factory reset unit with only dhcp client enabled on ether1 on 750G
by mhugo
Mon Jul 09, 2012 10:26 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Database description packet has different master status flag
Replies: 67
Views: 40945

Re: Database description packet has different master status

Sorry for crossposting - I have the issue too and it seems to be originating in one router as two neighbours gets the master flag changed issue. The router has been switched two times 732->RB1100->RB1100X2 Routerid has been checked, no visible network issues on the ethernet , etc. Any clue? /M
by mhugo
Mon Jul 09, 2012 10:22 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Ospf 3.10 BUG: Database Description packet has different mas
Replies: 21
Views: 11487

Re: Ospf 3.10 BUG: Database Description packet has different

Hi, I have this problem in 5.18 - One box looses two ospf neighbours at the same time and the other neighbours sees that there is a different master flag. Since this happens at the same time with two directly connected neighbours its little wierd. Routers are using a unique (checked too) ip on a loo...
by mhugo
Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:04 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Bonding - 1 server 2 mikrotiks
Replies: 1
Views: 803

Bonding - 1 server 2 mikrotiks

Hi,

Is there any way to run an ethernet bond from one server to two mikrotiks so that it wont fail if a RB1200 goes down for an upgrade or power is lost?

The server is running XEN with a lot of VLANS terminated into the RB1200.

/MH
by mhugo
Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:10 pm
Forum: General
Topic: 3.18 and BGP w/ full routing tables
Replies: 10
Views: 2151

Re: 3.18 and BGP w/ full routing tables

Im very interested in knowing if it works too.

Anyone knows if the RAM can be upped from 512mb?
by mhugo
Sat Oct 25, 2008 11:00 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Cannot reach machines via multinat and external IP
Replies: 0
Views: 1009

Cannot reach machines via multinat and external IP

Hi! I have a couple of services running on dedicated public IPs with static NAT. Everything works fine from the Internet, but internal machines cannot reach the services on the external IPs. It seems Im not getting any traffic back. Here is a dump frommy firewall MT running 3.15 - All hosts are conn...
by mhugo
Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:29 am
Forum: General
Topic: upnp and vista
Replies: 0
Views: 902

upnp and vista

Running 2.9.38 - Upnp is enabled but is not detected by either vista or any other app as a upnp device.

upnp is enabled and not firewall filters are in place - just plain nat enabled.

Interfaces are tagged internal for all but the external.

Any idea what is broken?