MikroTik

jose

There are some ways to get the volt besides SNMP. You could get the voltaje through API and call through a script. require('routeros_api.class.php'); function getVoltaje($request, $response, $args) { $ip = $request->getAttribute('ip'); $username = "XXXX"; $pass = "YYYYYY"; $API =...

jose

jose

Any update with this problem?

Thanks

jose

Cool, What is the max range you can achieve?, is hard to align at 1km?

jose

Boen_robot

It worked as you sugested. Thank you very much

jose

I Just changed that line to according to the poperties of "API_command_notes" located in mikrotik.com website just to show the three attributes like in your example. items.innerHTML += "<tr><td>" + escapeHtml(data.attributes.time) + "</td><td>" + escapeHtml(data.attribu...

jose

Hi I don´t want to hijack this thread but i thought that would be helpfull also. I installed the below quoted code and it runs amazing fine. Now for our support support staff I want to show ping times in real time, so I replaced new RouterOS\Request('/log print detail="" follow', null, 'l'...

jose

Yeah, I would like to know also

jose

When exactly will be on market RB911G-5HPacD aka BaseBox5

Yes, Would like to know too.

Thanks

jose

Engitech

Where did you got the ac cards?
What brand?

Thanks

jose

Hi, sudiptakp or EunaFita

Would yo mind to share your mikrotik rules?

I am having some problem seting up CacheMARA in fully transparent mode (using original client IP address in the requests to the Internet)

Thanks

jose

Hey guys, I did update all of my equipment to 6.2 yesterday. UPS is now working again. Yeah! It's connected via USB to a RB751U-2HnD box. It did work after applying update 6.2 and upgrading the RouterBoard firmware to 3.09. In former releases the APC 1500 Smart UPS wasn't recognized. It wasn't poss...

jose

Bump

Any idea?

jose

Hello A lot of my customers are accessing some random urls where there is the same malicious code. Some partial malicious code is: <html> <head> <title> </title> <script type="text/javascript"> function bredir(a, b, c, d, e, ldr, ifc) { var h, i, j; var f = 0; var g = 0; var k = false; var...

jose

Hi, I had the same issue

I put current time and worked OK

jose

Maybe your product is very good, but I never liked the idea of paying a monthly fee for using it.

For instance a Plan T15400 to serve about 3000 customers would cost monthly about $350. In 5 years you would end paying about the cost of a bluecoat cacheflow but without receiving any hardware.

jose

If you have money to spend, get your self a Bluecoat Cacheflow. If you are tight on budget, but still want to deploy something semi-professional go for Cachemara. But I assure you that you wont see more than %35 bandwidth savings from Cachemara. Dont beleive in anything the marketing says about Cac...

jose

Yes I am using virtio with both network adapters and hard disk

jose

Hello I have a KVM-Proxmox VM running Mikrotik. I am going to put about 500 queues in that machine, now I am testing with just about 10 queues. The resource usage is the following: [admin@Accesssvr] /system resource> pr uptime: 3d3h22m16s version: 5.21 free-memory: 1903844KiB total-memory: 1943140Ki...

jose

Hi

The ARP reply-only feature does not work. I tested with previous beta versions and does not work also.

I need this feature because I am providing internet through radius DHCP and I have enabled "Add ARP For Leases" option.

Thanks

jose

I thought that sending the Mikrotik-Mark-Id radius attribute would create a dynamic firewall mangle rule in the hotspot chain regardless if the user be PPP, DHCP, or hotspot, so I was wrong.

Filter-Id attribute also do not create any dynamic rule with DHCP, only PPP and hotspot.

Any Ideas?

jose

Hello I am setting up a freeradius server to authenticate my users with a Mikrotik DHCP server. I want to redirect some non paying users to a webpage. So I was thinking in using Mikrotik-Mark-Id radius attribute to mangle that users but is seems it is not working. Radius delivers all attributes but ...

jose

Hello

I know this a old topic.

I am implementing a similar setup with a web frontend to manage customers.

How do you manage disconnections to non paying customers?

jose

Hello guys :) Due to malware, virus or trojans sometimes a see a rise of traffic usage and when I made a torch I see a lot of UDP entries in torch, generally from the same source IP address to the same dst port. So when this happens I manually create a firewall rule to block that UDP port. So I woul...

jose

bump
Any ideas to do this?

jose

In v.3.9 In the "Adaptive Noise Immunity" I see the following fields
-AP and client mode
-client mode

What is the difference between them?

jose

Hello, I had to downgrade a couple of RB500s because they were keeping rebooting each some minutes. I think it is a 3.6 problem because I saw the same behavior in both RBs: In log I saw: system rebooted because of kernel failure In routerboard settings I saw the same: routerboard: yes model: "5...

jose

Hello I lost two license keys in the same week. Trying to solve the problem I upgraded with netinstall to 3.3 version also I upgraded with the latest routerboard firmware. The routerboards are 133 and 112. I have the message: You have 23h48m to configure the router....., I dont think the licence is ...

jose

Thanks. it worked

jose

Hello, I am having weird issues with RB3.0RCXXX so i want to downgrade. So I choose the "upgrade" option in the http menu, then I uploaded 2.9.47 firmware then I choose the "downgrade" option but the RB keeps the new firmware. Also I tried to downgrade from RC8 to RC6 with simila...

jose

me too,

I had to delete the ethernet ports from the bridge to be able to modify ethernet settings, this behavior I´ve saw in RC8, in rc7 I do can change

jose

hello I have a RB133 in a mountain, I upgraded from rc6 to rc8 and I lost access to the equipment connected in the Ethernet ports. I have access to the equipment through a wireless interface of the RB133. the equipment connected to the Ethernet ports are a couple of RB500. I had access to the other ...

jose

Hello, it seems MT people is taking seriously p2p detection including the capability to put custom "signatures" to shape other layer7 protocols.

But still I can not block imesh v1.7. Anyone has some "signature" to block that protocol?

jose

Imesh v7 is not working, I updated MT to 2.9.46.

also layer7 filter nor IPP2p does not work, I updated the protocols definitions and nothing.

jose

MT can block almost all p2p protocol, but ares in a limited way.

I use layer7 in a linux box to block all unwanted p2p

jose

hello, I am only passing about 2 MB, but doing bandwidth test I see the link is sometimes only capable to transfer up to 2.5MB, so I am reaching my limit. I am using a RB532 and I think I don´t need more processing power because the CPU usage is about 35%. the 70km 5ghz link ubn_sr5 00156D520167 00:...

jose

hello, :) I have a couple of long links chained. (about 80 kms each one), they perform somewhat poor so I would like to tune up them. Nstreme is enabled, the framer policy is set exact size 3200, the data rates are fixed up to 36mbps because the card was changing frequently between 18mbps up to 48mb...

jose

The best solution is MT accept that there is a problem, it is pathetic seing to a lot of users trying to solve a vendor problem

jose

I have better results re-associating the radios by putting DFS Mode to "radar detect" in wireless options, scanning the interface worked also although with less success. of course it is an atheros problem because all my cards are CM9. I see this issue for a long time in this forum. before ...

jose

Hello, I am doing "improved load balancing over multiple wateways" as mikrotik wiki example. I have two routes, the first has 2MB/512k, the second one has 1MB/1MB, I route two connections for the first route and one conecction for the other. This setups works OK but sometimes the upload of...

jose

Hello, I hope somebody can give me a solution A lightning problem made the POE interface unusable in a RB532, so now I am able only to access from ether2. I formated NAND to install the upgrade mikrotik version but I can not use netinstall because the RB try to boot from ether0 that is not working. ...

jose

Hello, Should I have any problem if a block traffic to broadcast ip 192.168.1.255 in my backbone?

Does anybody else have the same issue in the above post?

jose

Hello Guys :) I have a bridged network with WDS enabled. I have a very weird issue when I try blocking netbios traffic in my backbone. When I start to block everything is OK but after some hours I lose IP connection. Even the radios are associated but I can not ping them, also in the winbox I can´t ...

jose

Ok, I tried three setups without no success First: Just putting in the beginning of /ip firewall filter add chain=forward p2p=all-p2p action=drop Second as you suggested / ip firewall mangle add action=mark-connection chain=prerouting new-connection-mark=p2p_connection p2p=all-p2p passthrough=yes / ...

jose

It is not necessary to decript the entire conversation, it is to detect just the beginning of the p2p conversation and "mark" the rest of the connection. this part is not working in the code you submited because I see the same number of packtes when I try to mark the rest.

jose

Any solution from mikrotik people about blocking new p2p protocols?

Please not advise to priorize traffic, I am doing already, but I would like to have a method to just droping p2p traffic.

jose

Yes but in this case is not just canging routes because the src-nat

jose

hello I am doing load balancing according to the example provided in the MT wiki http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Load_Balancing with very high success. Now I would like to do failover also but it seems somewhat tricky because it is not just like to changing routes in /ip route because for each marked ...

jose

* The number of packets marked with the p2p connection mark is the same as the number of packets market with p2p packet mark. I wonder why all packets belonging to the p2p2 connection is not marked, no matter if the p2p traffic is encripted, the first packets must be unencripted so I should be able...

jose

Hello guys :) I am droping p2p traffic as macgaiver posted http://forum.mikrotik.com//viewtopic.php?p=55425#55425 / ip firewall mangle add action=mark-connection chain=prerouting new-connection-mark=p2p_connection p2p=all-p2p passthrough=yes / ip firewall mangle add action=mark-packet chain=prerouti...

jose

Sam Why do you close your mind? With the tools you have in MT is enough to provide a shaping/priorization of the bandwidth either satellite or fiber. I tell you this because I have used both satellite and fiber wateways where bandwidth is expensive in my country and I can see a BIG difference when t...

jose

You can limit the number of connections for each ip within a subnet. it depends of the profile of each one of your customers, for instance I let every residential customer can have up to 20 simultaneous connections, but every corporate customer can have up to 80 simulteneous connections. this you ca...

jose

pppoeperu and ether1 are WAN connections, av is the private connection. This is just an example, you should not have to cut and paste in your MT box because every one have a particular setup. In my case I have a couple of wateways doing load balancing with persistent connections as described in the ...

jose

jose if user can't browse when download big files, his download manager can be set to speed under his speed limit (in this case problem is on hes/shes PC/MAC) if the speed is not enought, it is time to pay for more. Are you administrators or only lamers, configuration is not a 1 button and you shou...

jose

From mikrotik documentation "Let us consider that we have a setup, where max-limit=256000, burst-time=8, burst-threshold=192000 and burst-limit=512000. When a user is starting to download a file via HTTP, we can observe such a situation:" Here is the graphic: http://www.mikrotik.com/docs/r...

jose

Hey guys You don´t catch the main idea. I know burst works as it should, but sometimes we need more tools to do the the job. for instance a user is downloading a very large file, so the "heavy user" is capped to their max allowed bandwidth without disturbing other "light users" T...

jose

Sam I've done in linux with the wondershaper script http://lartc.org/wondershaper/, this script priorize intercative traffic over massive downloads. In MT i've tried to replicate the idea with low success, I just mangled packets belonging to very large connections and i made a queue tree to give the...

jose

Hello, I have a mikrotik box doing NAT, I put DNSs that my provider gave me, so I don´t have a dns server and The cache size is 10 MB Today a customer call up because some web pages did not opened, then I asked to try by just putting the ip address of a web page instead of the domain name, then he w...

jose

What would happen if I just put

/ip firewall filter add chain=forward p2p=all-p2p action=drop ?

Search found 59 matches