on what version? in ROS v5 PCQ was a bit rewitten =)
What is MS? And MK....
AM I correct that you work from MS to MS
Would be nice if MK will increase the power to +/- 400 mW so that the loss could be compensated for. Call it a R52H+n card.
where did you see a PDF link in RouterOS?ROS 5.0beta2 bugs and confuses met
1. Manual --> PDF version not response to download or load refman2.9.pdf
But I was thinking the bridge on his setup may have a part in this. If it is looping back traffic, that could really cause some problems.
connect serial cable and see what is output on the terminal. paste it here.
I would recommend in most cases a minimum of 6 meters or more.
I have installed the p2p link but I can't not getting tx/rx rate more than 65 MBit
Can you help me out with your configuration . Because I'm new on N so if you can give me any advise how should I use HT and HT MCS .
Changelog mentions nothing about NRouterOS 4.1 !!
the question seems to be a bit silly, but we tested n card with one antenna. it works, but not propertly enought... such as 50% of usual card.Can we use One antenna on AP side and ONE antenna on client side and use N standard?
okay. how then to use more than two cards without any bonding here.As far as I know bonding does not provide full duplex link. Dual Nstreme link gives you full duplex.
i'm not sure is that very important or not - to support 802.11n cardsthis has been discussed a lot. 802.11n cards are not supported at all right now. we are working on it.
grows=weakerWhen you say signal grows, do you mean it becomes weaker or stronger? Be a bit more specific on your power source and what wireless cards you are using.
ofcourse, last several comments do say that. days after readings in this forum we replace nstreme2 with bonding in a backhaul... works better.To Promind: looking @ your answer, bonding seems to offer better performance than NStreme2, do you suggest to use it instead of NStreme2 ?
1st MT box is attached @ isp1, 2nd - @ isp2. both routers have attached customers on it.You can use 1 mt box for BGP with 1 ASN and more ISP.
You can use real IP for your client or nat.
shuld guruz say us what to do...None of my scripts from 3.3 works on 3.4... Running the script in a terminal on 3.4 works, running it via the sceduler, it doens't do anything...
I'm about to go back to 3.3
How find any info about what shuld it be - the difference?a -90 noise floor is not a problem for a -60 link - there is 30db difference. If MT had a problem with -90 noise floor then it would be useless...
it's not "FUN!!!!"... it is possible. believe me. futhermore, originally mushmx saidA 2 meter antenna 80 meters up is going to be FUN!!!! - NOT...
... "If you could just lift your Side B to ± 80 meters as " us much more funnest.2 Tower of 60mts high.
Better contact support before replacing anything. All the more that, I have never seen (or heart) about not propertly working Routerboard.This issue is still unresolved. Anyone else have any thoughts here? I think I need to replace the Routerboard...
You can use this freq with superchannel license, with any atheros chipset
yep, it isis that meant that we can repeat that on many routers "at the tunnel" if we replace router2 with a track of routers.
but... you may try EoIP tunnel between router1 and 3, and bridge vlans with EoIP
check "/ ip firewall service-port pr" pptp should be enabled both sites.
adresa ime eshte:
abuse[at]chirpan[dot]comYes - but I would need your e-mail address to send it to you
Either post here or write to info <at> cmit <dot> de
what actually is problem to use 532. i really do not understood what's the CE marking in your country. culd you explain more recently.Unfortunately, I can't use the RB532 in my country, because it haven't the CE marking.
we have 500m link with PII/400MHz secondpards... works fine @30-37Mbps and max. 50% cpu usage.for nstreme you need at least 1 ghz system
hello i need config this scenario. Station and bridge ap-bridge but no works. Have any other option?
Please help Thanks!