MikroTik

und3ath

https://www.androidauthority.com/wi-fi-7-802-11be-3069524/ In 2023 or 2024 we can expect wifi 7 draft. Do you think that Mikrotik will fully support wifi 6 in 2030? I am writing this with little sarcasm, but when I look at your competitors (the cheapest tplink now supports 802.11ax), I feel like 10 ...

und3ath

Hi, I have problems with latest beta release on CRS328-4C-20S-4S+ 1. All SFP modules are linked on 10 Gbps (which is wrong) -> I have 3 interface bonding between CCR1036 and this router. There are sfp19, sfp20 and combo4 ports used. Because of wrong link speed, the combo port became inactiv...

und3ath

Yes, of course I have support ticket. They see problem, but cannot replicate.
1100AHx4 freezed every week because of this.
Now it runs on chr Core i9 9900KF and 48GB ram

und3ath

I have tried to add 69120 frequency into scan-list, but it did not stayed there.
According the mentioned table, 70200 Mhz - 1080 Mhz (half of 2160 MHz channel width) is 69120 MHz.
This applies to any other frequencies in the table, which are accepted in the scan-list.

und3ath

https://www.i4wifi.cz/cs/253552-ubnt-unifi-6-long-range Mikrotik, please!!! Can we get some info, whether there will be any usable 802.11ax HW soon? I have network with thousands MK devices and dont want to change the vendor, but even stupid TP Link now supports latest wifi hardware. Fast every news...

und3ath

Same problem at me. I was using many years bonding with active backup mode for 24 GHz and 5 GHz failover without any problem. The same with 60 GHz and 5 GHz. Suddenly after upgrading ROS the active backup mode stops working. There is 50% ping loss and no matter what kind of configuration I have trie...

und3ath

Dude 6.46.5 does not keep winbox connection alive. It floods logs of all ROS devices on network with connect / disconnect message. Cca every minute Dude connect and disconnects to devices, which are marked as RouterOS. I did not see this behavior prior 6.46 version Does this problem have somebody el...

und3ath

Exactly my same opinion. MK is like "let's make hyper sport car.. and wait..... don't put wheels on it"

und3ath

please provide us more detailed info and send a support output file to support@mikrotik.com What wireless protocol you are using? How are you testing the speed/capacity? How often do you see this problem? I am using 802.11 speed/capacity - just looking on winbox and pinging other side. MKs are link...

und3ath

please provide us more detailed info and send a support output file to support@mikrotik.com What wireless protocol you are using? How are you testing the speed/capacity? How often do you see this problem? I am using 802.11 speed/capacity - just looking on winbox and pinging other side. MKs are link...

und3ath

Even with latest 6.44beta14 ROS I see unstability on ptp connections, when at least 1 device with IPQ4019 chipset is used. My setup: couple of PtPs - shortest cca 1 km, longest 12km. HW used: Disc ac, LHG XL ac, Dynadish Ptp Dynadish works fine, ccq 99 - 100% Disc ac <-> Disc ac or LHG XLac <-> LHG ...

und3ath

lhg 60 + 6.44 beta9 - interface wlan60-1 window in winbox, Status tab: only frequency is shown, anything else is empty. SNMP also stopped working for these values.

2nd problem - I see only 4 frequencies - there is no 66000 MHz option

und3ath

Try to change frequency mode from manual-txpower to superchannel.

und3ath

Just looking forward, when MK will implement this

http://www.quantenna.com/2016/10/quante ... -solution/

und3ath

wlan mode should be AP bridge, not station - station is for clients.

Nastav si mod AP bridge. Mod station je pre klientov a ty potrebujes vysielat.

und3ath

Nv2 has it's limits at the moment. I recommend you to use Nstreme instead of Nv2, as for setup I created it worked perfectly. But you tried Nstreme in the lab. Try to make several km outdoor links with 95% CCQ and -55 signal and you will see the problems with nstreme. Nstreme has perfect latency, b...

und3ath

What about Nstreme? When will it be fixed? (not polled for too long disconnections)

und3ath

The problem we have is, that single user with single TCP connection(speedtest.net, ...) can not achieve the speed. Total agregate speed of the link is not problem. Can you repeat the test with Nstreme protocol? Thanks for indicating that. Here's my results on how much tcp-connections used => tx spee...

und3ath

BT was TCP/UDP? If TCP, how many connections? Hello! I just repeated almost identical scenario. CCR9 --- wire > 921UAGS-5SHPacT --- wireless > 921UAGS-5SHPacT --- wire > 260GS --- wire > 922UAGS-5HPacT --- wireless > 921UAGS-5SHPacT --- wire > 911G-5HPacD --- wireless > SXT G-5HPacD --- wire > 911G-...

und3ath

And as usually no single word from Mikrotik

und3ath

This is exactly the same by me. In lsa is everything ok, but it is lost from routes. I had a similar problem with a extremely simple set-up, but never found a solution. This happens on 6.25 and 6.24. Never tested it on earlier versions. 1 OmniTik with 2 clients on the WLAN connecting to 2 different ...

und3ath

Hi all, can anybody explain to me, how is it possible, that network (several hundreds of RBs) works perfectly for months(everything with NBMA). And when I simply restart some router, OSPF begins to behave crazy. After disabling and enabling instance (or disabling and enabling NBMA neighbours) routes...

und3ath

This is very weird, still no single word from Mikrotik. I was now forced to go back to nv2, because of nstreme disconnecting. With nstreme I was able to deliver through 5 hops(20km together) more than 100Mb through one single TCP connection with 1-3ms ping. Now with nv2 I can get max 4Mbit..... Sorr...

und3ath

Same here.

I bought new ccr1036. I replaced the my old ccr1016. I Just copied the config from one router to another and now this is 5th day, I can not properly work with OSPF.... Tried every single firmware from 6.5 to 6.23 and the issue still exists.

und3ath

Guys from Mikrotik, please!!!! We have here 2 big problems, one of them is not solved for years (Nstreme - not polled for too long)! Second problem is nv2 over multiple hops. It is unusable for higher bandwidths over single TCP connection and also because very high latency. Please, try to replicate ...

und3ath

wireless-fp. And there is also cca 10% usage from unclassified.

And have you wireless or wireless-fp or wireless-cm2 package instaled ?

I dont see this problem on 6.22 with wireless package

und3ath

I have upgraded many routers (911G, 433AH, 912UAG, 435G) to ROS 6.22 and I see constantly high cpu usage cca 20-30% even when very small traffic flows(cca 1Mbps). The wireless package makes this high cpu usage. Also when making bandwidth test directly from these routers, throughput jumps from 5Mb to...

und3ath

When do you want to use nbma, you have to set priority for every nbma neighbour and also add static interface with the proper priority. How to: on you AP add static interface with priority=1 and ospf type=nbma. Then add all the nbma neighbours with priority=0 On every of your clients add as the nbma...

und3ath

Same problem by me when using nv2. It is not possible to get high speeds through multiple hops over single tcp connection.
For example I have 5 nv2 ptp links in a row. Between every hop I can get >100Mbps through bw test. But when testing over all hops, the bandwidth is 10Mb.

und3ath

I have the latest ROS verion 6.21rc8 and I have the same issue. trying all recommendation by mikrotik support, but still have the same problems, The link performance is more than the expectation, but it drops or have low data rate frequently. Mikrotik recommend to enable wireless FP package, reset ...

und3ath

you have ROS 6.11
Try to upgrade to 6.12 also with wireless-fp package and repeat test.

und3ath

Exactly the same issue by me. DNS resolving is incredible slow from last friday (14.3.2014)
When I use Mikrotik DNS cache, it is slow, but when I change DNS on my PC to IP of my ISP, it is working ok.

und3ath

check your emails, I sent you some info.

Simon

Still have no email.

und3ath

Ha... I am not authorized to sent private messages... WTF?

my email: peto (at) yellownet.sk

und3ath

I think nobody is replying because we dont fully understand what you are trying to do. Maybe it is SRc nat that you want to use... You should be able to Nat across any address or range of adresses inside the network to another address that is outside the network. I use that a lot to Nat across a cu...

und3ath

still nobody knows? I need this same urgently

und3ath

Excellent job on wireless! Every single AP(RB411, RB600, RB435, RB433, ...) - PtMP and also PtP are now stable.
We had many "reassociatings" on 2.4GHz 802.11b with old 2.4G APs, but now is everything OK.

Perfect!!!!!

und3ath

Show column Distance

und3ath

Insider - do you have plans for converting to 24GHz? Because in Slovakia 10GHz is not license-free.

und3ath

We don't have any products in this range, but you could look at upconverters such as this: http://pojitko.cz/index.php/mikrovlnne-spoje A few customers are using them with success With this new feature in RouterOS (you need a license upgrade for it), you can make custom channel width, as your equip...

und3ath

Something like AirFiber @24GHz would be nice.

und3ath

http://www.netgear.com/R6300#

Real 802.11ac product

und3ath

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11ac

I am looking forward to 802.11ac miniPCI cards

And also topics in this forum: I have PtP which goes only 800Mbit... Where is the problem?

und3ath

use different polarization for your customer and for point to point

My ptp links are H pol and also both pol V&H, clients are V ....

und3ath

i think it's an external converter, not a true 10GHz device

I am only thinking, what to use for ptp links instead of 5GHz. Now I have 5GHz ptp links, but clients are also in 5GHz frequency spectrum. And I wanna to separate it a little. And also gain a better speed / latency.

und3ath

no / no / no

then what about this:
http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... lnne-spoje

http://pojitko.cz/index.php/mikrovlnne-spoje

und3ath

Is it possible to use RouterOS / Routerboard with some 10GHz cards? Do they even exists? Or is Mikrotik planning some 10GHz cards?

und3ath

yes, EoIP with source IP, I want this too

und3ath

do not use bridge when you are using station mode and masquerade....
Or you can you station-pseudobridge WITHOUT nat and then use bridge

und3ath

Nothing new with this issue? I am still having problems with all google services (google.com, gmail.com,...)

und3ath

I have the same problem... I had for 4 years this configuration: Ap1(rb133c) <- Ap2 (rb133c) -> Ap3(rb133c) everything ran ok Ap1 --> Ap3 max 15 Mb the same between Ap1, Ap2, and Ap2, Ap3 Cards were CM9 Last weekend I replaced AP1 and AP3 rb133c with RB411AH and R52s In the middle AP2 there is now R...

und3ath

the same happens, when I generate certificate with openssl...

und3ath

I created server certificate on CAcert.org. Than I successfully imported it to RouterOS. Also I imported private-key.pem When I try to decrypt the private key, following happens: [admin@MikroTik] /certificate> import passphrase: *********** certificates-imported: 1 private-keys-imported: 1 files-imp...

und3ath

actually it's the other way round, the are receiving lower power signals. from a more powerful card. strange?

the signal strengths are different because of different cards used - there is other output power, other sensitivity, maybe also other cables used.... so thats why you get these numbers

und3ath

Note that client B is 130m from AP, client A around 250m, client B doesn't "see" client A, buildings between them etc. I am reading this: client A) signal strength -55, tx signal strength -71 client B) signal strength -51, tx signal strength -64 this is logical because of different distanc...

und3ath

also tried to change cable between antenna and card?

what about lower Tx power?

und3ath

so the only problem with RB600 is that it has 4 miniPCI slots insteads of 3 ?

we can't make a specific device for each customer needs, it's very hard to make everyone happy.

I think he thought, that it is a waste of RB600 power because of 3 LAN connected PCs

und3ath

But I can see big differences with and without.
More bandwidth, more stability... just like a 802.11a link.
RB411AH has 100mbit fdx ethernet..... how possible >180 mbit/s in UDP ????

because he is testing wireless to wireless

und3ath

so here it goes again ... router A (ISP) - "my router 1" ---- wireless link --- "my router2" : create EoIP tunnel between router1 and router2. then create bridge interface on router1 and add ether interface, which is connected to ISP switch and EoIP interface. finally on router2 ...

und3ath

I have same problems though PPtP. But it is possible to make it without PPtP with dynamic IPs on PPPoE. Just use dynamic dns. For example www.no-ip.com It will create host name for you and it will be always binded to the dynamic IP address - most of today routers support the dynamic DNS feature. You...

und3ath

At this moment I don't have access to the routers (because of firewall on the hotel where I am now). But it is similar to this: http://www.mikrotik.com/testdocs/ros/3.0/interface/bonding_content.php#.2 My simplified schema: 4x ADSL2+ Vigor2700 router in bridge mode. PPPoE is dialed from Mikrotik: Vi...

und3ath

My working solution: I have now 4x 12Mb ADSL2+ lines. For real 48Mb line you need to put a router into serverhousing (because of high speed line). So the "outside" router has 1Gbps line with cca 2TB data limit(here I pay cca 130€ monthly for it). Next step: I create 4xEoIP tunnel between e...

Search found 62 matches