a page under your control that uses the MT API to create equivalent usernames/passwords locally on the MT, then redirect to the hotspot and login with those credentials means that the network admin has the username and password of the user that can be use to get through their facebook account.. ? :...

Hello Feklar,

Could you tell us more in detail about hardcode freeradius to accept all authentication request ?
Which part in the configuration file of freeradius need to be added or removed due to this purpose ?

Regards

Rieky

Hi,

I just found too, that the zero config is not working on UNIX based machine (mac, ubuntu).
I tried this on 5.2 and 4.14, anyone has solution for this ?

Thanks

Hi,

Just find out, that the zero config / universal NAT feature won't work when there's no ip gateway defined on client's computer
(there is ip address and netmask on client's but no ip gateway, and no dns ip defined).

Is there any solution for this ?

Thank you

I think the webfig beta has not working on this 5.0.beta2.

Can someone help me to describe how balance xor mode on bonding works ? I've read the wiki and searching from linux bonding, i just found this explanation : "XOR policy: Transmit based on [(source MAC address XOR'd with destination MAC address) modulo slave count]. This selects the same slave f...

Does anybody can inform me, where can i get dont-fragment option for ipsec on Mikrotik latest version ?

Thank You

Here is my conclusion (not the absolute one :p), previous version of 3.13 will work with hotspot frame-pool and frame-ip-address (i tried on 3.13,3.10, 2.9.51) and will fail (MT box will hang) if I use version after 3.13 ( i tried on 3.15, 3.16, 3.22, until the newest one 3.23). maybe the informatio...

Thank You SurferTim,
anyway i tried to downgrade to 3.13, and it is working !!
thank you for your previous post that mention you are using 3.13,
i'm gonna try another version of MT 3.x,
making it sure.

Yes, of course, radtest to freeradius returning the attribute that i want to for frame-pool and frame-ip-pool, the freeradius frame-pool and frame-ip-address working fine on 2.9.51. When i didnt use frame-pool or frame-ip-address reply to MT 3.22, 3.23, all working fine (no lock up). any suggestion ...

Yes, the same like mine, i'm using freeradius too, i tried freeradius and usermanager as radius server on MT 2.9.51, worked. i tried freeradius and usermanager as radius server on MT 3.22, 3.21, the MT hang. you could get the usermanager on you MT by installing usermanager package for your version, ...

yups,
typo :p i meant frame-pool,
btw SurferTim,
would you test your MT box by using radius from built in usermanager ?
is it working fine too ?

thk u

I already read this post, and i know that when the framed-ip-pool assign it will be on one-to-one nat. on my 2.9.51 it works, but not with 3.x, trying on other hardware, trying on usermanager as radius, nothing work when you assign frame-ip-pool or frame-ip-address, it will lock the mikrotik. anyone...

And what service did you used ?
ppp or hotspot ?

i'm currently have the problem on hotspot service,
the router will lock when a user that has ip assign or pool assign from radius trying to login.

Hi, what kind attribute did you use for 3.22 or 3.23, since i even tried it with userman, but the result is the same, the mikrotik lock up. i have make sure that the pool name already exist on mikrotik (when i used framed-ip-pool), and do make sure that the ip static that i want to assign are availa...

Hello,

any other ever experienced that the mikrotik will be locked / hang when it received framed-ip-address or framed-ip-pool reply from radius.

i tried on mikrotik 3.23, 3.22, i guess all of 3.x have that bug,
because it is not happened on mikrotik 2.9.51.

any confirmation please,

thank you