I have the same problem.Does someone have a problem with mac telnet login via neighbours?
Won't login with any user and pass or without pass, nor admin..
You will always get a better speed with phone, because Mikrotik is using a very old LTE chipset. Some providers throttle non-phone LTE chip vendors.As per tests I made at the same spot, where SXT LTE is positioned, with phone and got better download speed.
Ok, so it isn't the bootloader that bricks the devices?No, a reboot or upgrade will not brick the router. If your router works with 6.43.1, there is no need to upgrade to 6.43.2.
Great, I did an upgrade to 6.43.1 on hEX and auto-upgrade of firmware was active. I did not reboot yet, so what to do now? I cannot upgrade to 6.43.2 bootloader before reboot! Will it be bricked afterwards?It should be fixed in 6.43.2, you will need to netinstall v6.43.2.
Renaming is not possible anymore due to security changes, please see viewtopic.php?f=2&t=139091#p685742still cant change any user names.
introduced in 6.43.0
You are correct, I think he (the user from Brazil) just used the wrong english word.That is beyond the point. Saying "inferior" compared to previous model is simply incorrect.
Yes, but today nearly every cheap smartphone supports LTE-A at 1000Mbps/150Mbps down/up and you are still using old 150/50 modems. What about LTE bridge mode, is it supported now with SXT LTE kit?What do you guys mean? It is much better than SXT LTE first generation:
Yes, nearly all vendors handle it that way. For example in the SSD market there is AFAIK only Sandisk that offers pre-paid return stickers.Is it standard policy to have the customer pay return shipping on a defective product?
It's a winbox bug, please see viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&start=450#p650627Hello jspool! tried to connect from another Windows 7 PC using a switch, but still not detecting at all...
What about matching non-secure traffic with wildcards directly in firewall? Still not possible?* Match websites in firewall
Close netinstall, open it again and press install a second time. This time it will work.The device is seen in netinstall, when press the install button it last 12 seconds and then go back ready with no actual install.
I think he means such a kernel thing:How is this different? What would you like to do instead?
a two seconds search in RavenWing71 posts would have told you that: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 64#p577464Oh, you've already found a way how to identify MSDO traffic. Do you mind sharing how it's done?Notes: I mark the MSDO packets with ToS-Bulk...
Is there a way to bypass fasttrack for this, so still beeing able to use it on all other connections?REMEMBER to disable the defconf:fasttrack in the firewall, else the queue will not work
Oh, so is there an easy way to do this for all IPs in a address-list without using mangle/filter/etc before?Source address can be an individual ip or a network range.
add action=drop chain=forward connection-state=invalid
Ok, I hope you don't release 6.32 before this is fixed, because RouterOS without working firewall filters is nearly uselessdadaniel - Issue is not fixed yet. It is reported to developers.
This could be very hard, because you have to be lucky to catch the moment when it is uploading to some other client. I cannot find any information about protocols and ports used anywhere.You will have to sniff the traffic to see what protocol is used.
No, it will kill my bandwidth. Default setting in non-VL editions of Windows 10 is to upload to other users on the internet.but why? it will save your bandwidth
Is this fasttrack rule replacing the default "accept connection-state=established,related"-rule or do I still need it?best is to fasttrack connection-state=established,related
It does only make sense to use FastTrack on specific (known) connections before they enter filter/other routing chains. Using it afterwards makes no sense at all...Why not to mark packet at mangle postrouting?
Is there any SXT shield kit available?Got my first batch of SXT AC and SXT AC SA.
802.11af works fine. The non SA Version does not have a shield painting inside.
So for ptp on a loaded tower some additional shielding might be neccesary.
Try this: http://aacable.wordpress.com/tag/mikrot ... detection/is it possible???
This field is empty, only local address is visible.(I suppose default Gateway: "remote-address"):
I will try this, thank you.as this is tunnel interface you can use interface name as default gateway. And you can assign static name for PPTP-out tunnel.
Will this VLAN processing run at hardware level and is capable of wire-speed?That VLAN rule table does not apply to CRS125, the features which will allow similar functionality are currently being developed.
Your e-mail-support is very good, but getting an answer takes way to long. I do not have the time to wait 1 week for each reply of the same case number. Sorry...In support emails, 90% of bugs are not bugs, but mistakes.
sorry, I forgot to add "wirespeed VLAN capable (via switch chipset)"Every single one, because RouterOS implements 802.1q
Hello,has anybody written to support@?Doesn't appear to be even acknowledged by MT as yet, even though there is more than one report of the issue mentioned on this topic.