It's a low cost CPE for using 8 CPE + 1 AP. If you split one gigabit to 8 CPEs, you don't need more than 100Mbit. We have other models with 1Gbit ports, if you are interested, but not the CUBE We need mid cost, like 20x20cm dishes with narrow beam for CPE to work in around 500m range, GE is must. Y...

When will you release something like DISC 5 size client antenna (for ~700m distances) with gigabit lan?

Thanks guys for answers. As I know for now(after lot searching), that vlans not possible on routed L3 network. Looked like easy and convenient way to manage network... So I will consider other known ways to do that, but allways looking for sweet spot

I have tested MT eoip to linux, but performance really bad. VPLS would be great, but not sure there is MT to linux vpls implementation...

Hello folks, So I'm thinking to move from bridged wireless network to routed. Now I have like 7 sites (2-3sectors/site), all linked daisychain/star topology... See attached example. In A there is linux server, now serving as NAT gateway / traffic shaper, with own created user management. User get IP...

OK, good news. What size of buffer for switching is provided?

I was talking about RB260GSP
So normis, please reveal when mikrotik going to release Gbit poe RB ?

This is not RouterOS device...

Oh c'mon guys, why do even bothering to release this crap, while we had 750UP ? We now need to power Gbit equipment, not the FE anymore. Or at least 1 GBE port for backhouls. This year is to move to Gbit backhouls. When mikrotik is planning to release such product? Just dont do that mistakes that ub...

ste, can you run p2p link test? I'm considering to use theese for ptp but affraid that it wont work properly with nv2 (like current p2p link, two sextants, nv2 and nstreme not working with both chains, only with one chain working not bad...)

I noticed that both works bad with chain 1 and 2 enabled. CCQ bad, rates 216-180mb/s... When enabled only chain 1, everything is ok, rates 150/150 CCQ 99-100. Maybe something is wrong with the link, I dont know, 700m CLOS, enough fresnel, interference low...

Agree, nstreme is total crap on v6. Do you guys know last stable ROS version that nstreme runs stable and with good bandwidth? I need to run this wireless link for a month before I can change it to UBNT gear...

Hello,
is it possible to change default startup time from 01011970 00 00 to any else?

Thanks for replies. Done it with abdu808's scenario. Ran some test, and saw that vlan is the same as vpls in CPU resources. So I stay with vpls config, it is less complicated, I can add vpls interface directly to wlan, and then bridge vpls with eth. Simple.

Thanks again, for help.

Routing for 20+5 PCs ? I doubt it

So, how to make this setup work?

Thanks for your reply, I edited first post, I think now it's much easier

Hello everyone Situation: http://shares.vdx.lt/mt%20vlan.png I want OFFICE A LAN and OFFICE B LAN would be completly separated by vlan. Why vlan? I think it's less resource hungry then vpls, or especially eoip. I need as much bandwidth as possible. On both LANs there are no any managed(vlan capable)...

1. With port 7 I don't get any packet loss.
2. RB is powered by dedicated power port, not POE.
3. cable is prebuild 0,5m.

I will write about port flapping too. Til now, I haven't real problem, 2-3 flaps a day, so be it. But now log looks like this: 14:03:31 interface,info eth1-W1 link up (speed 100M, full duplex) 14:03:41 interface,info eth1-W1 link down 14:03:43 interface,info eth1-W1 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)...

Oh, ok, that's a news to me, thanks any way.

No problem?
Except that wlan pings are >1000ms, and all bandwidth is used.
As you can't see actual throughput is 1898kbps to that site.

Hello,
Can anyone tell my what kind of crap is going on here?:

Only few users using internet, but this shows that all using almost the same amount bandwidth... CPEs are ubnt NS5.

hello, I have bonded two eth ports at each end (RB750G) and set vpls tunnel through bonding1, but web pages fails to open. I think there is mtu problem, because small packets (until 1450 or so) goes normally. MPLS MTU set to 1526, didn't help. How can I fix that? Correction: this is not mtu problem....

No one?
Where's mikrotik's staff???


----------------------------------------------------
All right...
Conclusion - MT m*st d*e

hello, Here is my setup: . . . . . . RB433AH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RB433AH LAN1_1 --- eth1 -- vpls1 ----\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /---- vpls1 -- eth1 --- LAN1_2 LAN2_1 --- eth2 -- vpls2 --...

with nv2 enable rate is 270/270 while with nstreme 300/300
tried diferent channels, tx power.. everything. couldn't make 300/300.

ping nv2 vs nstreme = 4ms vs 0.7ms

else is ok, bandwidth about the same.

add ip 62.168.78.1/25 to lan-bridge
add ip 62.168.78.129/25 to lan-bridge

for PCs in subnet 62.168.78.0/25 set gw 62.168.78.1
for PCs in subnet 62.168.78.128/25 set gw 62.168.78.129

do NAT for 62.168.78.0/25
do NAT for 62.168.78.128/25

OK, I've done it. By adding another vpls just with diferent VPLS ID.

would performance be better with 3 vlans over 1 vpls ???

attached testing just for fun

Create 3 VPLS instances between the routers, bridge each with Ethernet port Thats what I want, but how to do that? :) I don't need especialy vpls. I had running 3 eoip tunnels, but often it stops passing dhcp packets through until I reboot RB in WDS station mode. I don't know if it is a bug or some...

Now it's just one vpls bridge running, like described in wiki.
I don't know if you need anything else...

Hello, I am trying to build a setup like in attached picture. To make transparent bridge between 3(6) LANS using vpls tunnels. LANS cant see each other. No problem for one vpls tunnel, but how configure other two? Cant make it by following this example http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Transparently_Bri...