MikroTik

vmnx

That is intresting.
So you are sugesting that snow is the reason for this?
I also having some issues with random ip connection problems (some client ip reachable, some not), but not sure is it related to RB version. I will try 6.44.6 on AP ant clients will upgrade to latest.

vmnx

Yeah, already did. Thanks.

vmnx

As usualy I'm lucky to get broken hardware...
Check this vid: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kMckHb ... sp=sharing
In short, there is something loose inside.

Should I RMA it? or open and fix by myself? does opening voids waranty?

Thanks for advice.

vmnx

5ghz backup is useless because: When the first 60G devices were introduced there were a lot of folks asking for a combined devices with 5G backup. Now that the first such device is introduced there are other guys saying the opposite... I think it is worthwile to have a 60 GHz device with 5 GHz back...

vmnx

Cube 60G ac, well, ok. We asked for Cube 60 with gigabit port, thanks, but we won't asked for 5Ghz backup and double the price point. 5ghz backup is useless because: * Cube 60G ac is licence leve 3, so we cant use it as access point * RBwAPG-60ad-A and RBwAPG-60ad-SA doesn't have 5ghz radio * we use...

vmnx

Thanks for the tips.

vmnx

Hello folks I have simple PtP link AP: DISC Lite5 ac CPE: QRT 5 ac Wireless protocol NV2 kinda works but slow, 802.11 gives better throughput, but does this: Reply from 172.17.31.202: bytes=1450 time=3ms TTL=64 Reply from 172.17.31.202: bytes=1450 time=4ms TTL=64 Reply from 172.17.31.202: bytes=1450...

vmnx

hAP ac³ is not bad, but home AP market is really competitive and at $100 you can get more chains, working MU-MIMO or 2.5/5GbE ports. But nice to see more than 16MB of flash! Also bit disappointed by lack of 60GHz gear with SFP. I was hoping to see some new 60GHz gear announced. I see you are adding...

vmnx

Yeah, thanks for not response....

When Cube 60 will be released with 1gbit ports?

vmnx

When Cube 60 will be released with 1gbit ports?

vmnx

It's a low cost CPE for using 8 CPE + 1 AP. If you split one gigabit to 8 CPEs, you don't need more than 100Mbit. We have other models with 1Gbit ports, if you are interested, but not the CUBE We need mid cost, like 20x20cm dishes with narrow beam for CPE to work in around 500m range, GE is must. Y...

vmnx

When will you release something like DISC 5 size client antenna (for ~700m distances) with gigabit lan?

vmnx

Thanks guys for answers. As I know for now(after lot searching), that vlans not possible on routed L3 network. Looked like easy and convenient way to manage network... So I will consider other known ways to do that, but allways looking for sweet spot

vmnx

I have tested MT eoip to linux, but performance really bad. VPLS would be great, but not sure there is MT to linux vpls implementation...

vmnx

Hello folks, So I'm thinking to move from bridged wireless network to routed. Now I have like 7 sites (2-3sectors/site), all linked daisychain/star topology... See attached example. In A there is linux server, now serving as NAT gateway / traffic shaper, with own created user management. User get IP...

vmnx

OK, good news. What size of buffer for switching is provided?

vmnx

I was talking about RB260GSP

So normis, please reveal when mikrotik going to release Gbit poe RB ?

vmnx

This is not RouterOS device...

vmnx

Oh c'mon guys, why do even bothering to release this crap, while we had 750UP ? We now need to power Gbit equipment, not the FE anymore. Or at least 1 GBE port for backhouls. This year is to move to Gbit backhouls. When mikrotik is planning to release such product? Just dont do that mistakes that ub...

vmnx

ste, can you run p2p link test? I'm considering to use theese for ptp but affraid that it wont work properly with nv2 (like current p2p link, two sextants, nv2 and nstreme not working with both chains, only with one chain working not bad...)

vmnx

I noticed that both works bad with chain 1 and 2 enabled. CCQ bad, rates 216-180mb/s... When enabled only chain 1, everything is ok, rates 150/150 CCQ 99-100. Maybe something is wrong with the link, I dont know, 700m CLOS, enough fresnel, interference low...

vmnx

Agree, nstreme is total crap on v6. Do you guys know last stable ROS version that nstreme runs stable and with good bandwidth? I need to run this wireless link for a month before I can change it to UBNT gear...

vmnx

Hello,
is it possible to change default startup time from 01011970 00 00 to any else?

vmnx

Thanks for replies. Done it with abdu808's scenario. Ran some test, and saw that vlan is the same as vpls in CPU resources. So I stay with vpls config, it is less complicated, I can add vpls interface directly to wlan, and then bridge vpls with eth. Simple.

Thanks again, for help.

vmnx

Routing for 20+5 PCs ? I doubt it

So, how to make this setup work?

vmnx

Thanks for your reply, I edited first post, I think now it's much easier

vmnx

Hello everyone Situation: http://shares.vdx.lt/mt%20vlan.png I want OFFICE A LAN and OFFICE B LAN would be completly separated by vlan. Why vlan? I think it's less resource hungry then vpls, or especially eoip. I need as much bandwidth as possible. On both LANs there are no any managed(vlan capable)...

vmnx

1. With port 7 I don't get any packet loss.
2. RB is powered by dedicated power port, not POE.
3. cable is prebuild 0,5m.

vmnx

I will write about port flapping too. Til now, I haven't real problem, 2-3 flaps a day, so be it. But now log looks like this: 14:03:31 interface,info eth1-W1 link up (speed 100M, full duplex) 14:03:41 interface,info eth1-W1 link down 14:03:43 interface,info eth1-W1 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)...

vmnx

Oh, ok, that's a news to me, thanks any way.

vmnx

No problem?

Except that wlan pings are >1000ms, and all bandwidth is used.
As you can't see actual throughput is 1898kbps to that site.

vmnx

Hello,
Can anyone tell my what kind of crap is going on here?:

Only few users using internet, but this shows that all using almost the same amount bandwidth... CPEs are ubnt NS5.

vmnx

hello, I have bonded two eth ports at each end (RB750G) and set vpls tunnel through bonding1, but web pages fails to open. I think there is mtu problem, because small packets (until 1450 or so) goes normally. MPLS MTU set to 1526, didn't help. How can I fix that? Correction: this is not mtu problem....

vmnx

No one?
Where's mikrotik's staff???

----------------------------------------------------
All right...
Conclusion - MT m*st d*e

vmnx

hello, Here is my setup: . . . . . . RB433AH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RB433AH LAN1_1 --- eth1 -- vpls1 ----\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /---- vpls1 -- eth1 --- LAN1_2 LAN2_1 --- eth2 -- vpls2 --...

vmnx

with nv2 enable rate is 270/270 while with nstreme 300/300
tried diferent channels, tx power.. everything. couldn't make 300/300.

ping nv2 vs nstreme = 4ms vs 0.7ms

else is ok, bandwidth about the same.

vmnx

add ip 62.168.78.1/25 to lan-bridge
add ip 62.168.78.129/25 to lan-bridge

for PCs in subnet 62.168.78.0/25 set gw 62.168.78.1
for PCs in subnet 62.168.78.128/25 set gw 62.168.78.129

do NAT for 62.168.78.0/25
do NAT for 62.168.78.128/25

vmnx

OK, I've done it. By adding another vpls just with diferent VPLS ID.

would performance be better with 3 vlans over 1 vpls ???

attached testing just for fun

vmnx

Create 3 VPLS instances between the routers, bridge each with Ethernet port Thats what I want, but how to do that? :) I don't need especialy vpls. I had running 3 eoip tunnels, but often it stops passing dhcp packets through until I reboot RB in WDS station mode. I don't know if it is a bug or some...

vmnx

Now it's just one vpls bridge running, like described in wiki.
I don't know if you need anything else...

vmnx

Hello, I am trying to build a setup like in attached picture. To make transparent bridge between 3(6) LANS using vpls tunnels. LANS cant see each other. No problem for one vpls tunnel, but how configure other two? Cant make it by following this example http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Transparently_Bri...

Search found 41 matches