When Cube 60 will be released with 1gbit ports?
Search found 33 matches
- Tue Jul 14, 2020 6:08 pm
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: MikroTik newsletter May 2020 (#95)
- Replies: 50
- Views: 27300
Re: MikroTik newsletter May 2020 (#95)
Yeah, thanks for not response....
- Tue Jul 14, 2020 11:42 am
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: MikroTik newsletter May 2020 (#95)
- Replies: 50
- Views: 27300
Re: MikroTik newsletter May 2020 (#95)
When Cube 60 will be released with 1gbit ports?
- Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:39 pm
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: Newsletter 92
- Replies: 39
- Views: 28359
Re: Newsletter 92
It's a low cost CPE for using 8 CPE + 1 AP. If you split one gigabit to 8 CPEs, you don't need more than 100Mbit. We have other models with 1Gbit ports, if you are interested, but not the CUBE We need mid cost, like 20x20cm dishes with narrow beam for CPE to work in around 500m range, GE is must. Y...
- Mon Nov 05, 2018 11:19 am
- Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
- Topic: 60Ghz Perplexed
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1676
Re: 60Ghz Perplexed
When will you release something like DISC 5 size client antenna (for ~700m distances) with gigabit lan?
- Tue Feb 23, 2016 2:58 pm
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: Vlans on routed backbone?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1820
Re: Vlans on routed backbone?
Thanks guys for answers. As I know for now(after lot searching), that vlans not possible on routed L3 network. Looked like easy and convenient way to manage network... So I will consider other known ways to do that, but allways looking for sweet spot 
- Mon Feb 22, 2016 11:49 am
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: Vlans on routed backbone?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1820
Re: Vlans on routed backbone?
I have tested MT eoip to linux, but performance really bad. VPLS would be great, but not sure there is MT to linux vpls implementation...
- Sun Feb 21, 2016 3:26 pm
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: Vlans on routed backbone?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1820
Vlans on routed backbone?
Hello folks, So I'm thinking to move from bridged wireless network to routed. Now I have like 7 sites (2-3sectors/site), all linked daisychain/star topology... See attached example. In A there is linux server, now serving as NAT gateway / traffic shaper, with own created user management. User get IP...
- Tue Feb 17, 2015 1:18 pm
- Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
- Topic: RB750P-PB
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4311
Re: RB750P-PB
OK, good news. What size of buffer for switching is provided?
- Tue Feb 17, 2015 12:41 pm
- Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
- Topic: RB750P-PB
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4311
Re: RB750P-PB
I was talking about RB260GSP
So normis, please reveal when mikrotik going to release Gbit poe RB ?
So normis, please reveal when mikrotik going to release Gbit poe RB ?
- Tue Feb 17, 2015 11:34 am
- Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
- Topic: RB750P-PB
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4311
Re: RB750P-PB
This is not RouterOS device...
- Mon Feb 16, 2015 11:23 pm
- Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
- Topic: RB750P-PB
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4311
RB750P-PB
Oh c'mon guys, why do even bothering to release this crap, while we had 750UP ? We now need to power Gbit equipment, not the FE anymore. Or at least 1 GBE port for backhouls. This year is to move to Gbit backhouls. When mikrotik is planning to release such product? Just dont do that mistakes that ub...
- Sat May 03, 2014 5:57 pm
- Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
- Topic: QRT-5
- Replies: 23
- Views: 9524
Re: QRT-5
ste, can you run p2p link test? I'm considering to use theese for ptp but affraid that it wont work properly with nv2 (like current p2p link, two sextants, nv2 and nstreme not working with both chains, only with one chain working not bad...)
- Sun Apr 13, 2014 10:37 pm
- Forum: Wireless Networking
- Topic: Nstreme or Nv2. Is Nstreme Obsolete?
- Replies: 23
- Views: 14954
Re: Nstreme or Nv2. Is Nstreme Obsolete?
I noticed that both works bad with chain 1 and 2 enabled. CCQ bad, rates 216-180mb/s... When enabled only chain 1, everything is ok, rates 150/150 CCQ 99-100. Maybe something is wrong with the link, I dont know, 700m CLOS, enough fresnel, interference low...
- Sat Apr 12, 2014 5:59 pm
- Forum: Wireless Networking
- Topic: Nstreme or Nv2. Is Nstreme Obsolete?
- Replies: 23
- Views: 14954
Re: Nstreme or Nv2. Is Nstreme Obsolete?
Agree, nstreme is total crap on v6. Do you guys know last stable ROS version that nstreme runs stable and with good bandwidth? I need to run this wireless link for a month before I can change it to UBNT gear...
- Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:58 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Change default startup time
- Replies: 1
- Views: 413
Change default startup time
Hello,
is it possible to change default startup time from 01011970 00 00 to any else?
is it possible to change default startup time from 01011970 00 00 to any else?
- Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:46 pm
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: Multiple VLANs over WDS wlan bridge
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9129
Re: Multiple VLANs over WDS wlan bridge
Thanks for replies. Done it with abdu808's scenario. Ran some test, and saw that vlan is the same as vpls in CPU resources. So I stay with vpls config, it is less complicated, I can add vpls interface directly to wlan, and then bridge vpls with eth. Simple.
Thanks again, for help.
Thanks again, for help.
- Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:51 pm
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: Multiple VLANs over WDS wlan bridge
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9129
Re: Multiple VLANs over WDS wlan bridge
Routing for 20+5 PCs ? I doubt it
So, how to make this setup work?
So, how to make this setup work?
- Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:00 pm
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: Multiple VLANs over WDS wlan bridge
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9129
Re: Multiple VLANs over WDS wlan bridge
Thanks for your reply, I edited first post, I think now it's much easier
- Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:15 pm
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: Multiple VLANs over WDS wlan bridge
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9129
Multiple VLANs over WDS wlan bridge
Hello everyone Situation: http://shares.vdx.lt/mt%20vlan.png I want OFFICE A LAN and OFFICE B LAN would be completly separated by vlan. Why vlan? I think it's less resource hungry then vpls, or especially eoip. I need as much bandwidth as possible. On both LANs there are no any managed(vlan capable)...
- Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:51 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: New Ethernet port flap issue enquiery, PLS JOIN!
- Replies: 247
- Views: 91597
Re: New Ethernet port flap issue enquiery, PLS JOIN!
1. With port 7 I don't get any packet loss.
2. RB is powered by dedicated power port, not POE.
3. cable is prebuild 0,5m.
2. RB is powered by dedicated power port, not POE.
3. cable is prebuild 0,5m.
- Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:40 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: New Ethernet port flap issue enquiery, PLS JOIN!
- Replies: 247
- Views: 91597
Re: New Ethernet port flap issue enquiery, PLS JOIN!
I will write about port flapping too. Til now, I haven't real problem, 2-3 flaps a day, so be it. But now log looks like this: 14:03:31 interface,info eth1-W1 link up (speed 100M, full duplex) 14:03:41 interface,info eth1-W1 link down 14:03:43 interface,info eth1-W1 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)...
- Wed Feb 09, 2011 2:06 pm
- Forum: Wireless Networking
- Topic: WDS problem?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1561
Re: WDS problem?
Oh, ok, that's a news to me, thanks any way.
- Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:01 pm
- Forum: Wireless Networking
- Topic: WDS problem?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1561
Re: WDS problem?
No problem? 
Except that wlan pings are >1000ms, and all bandwidth is used.
As you can't see actual throughput is 1898kbps to that site.
Except that wlan pings are >1000ms, and all bandwidth is used.
As you can't see actual throughput is 1898kbps to that site.
- Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:59 pm
- Forum: Wireless Networking
- Topic: WDS problem?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1561
WDS problem?
Hello,
Can anyone tell my what kind of crap is going on here?:
Only few users using internet, but this shows that all using almost the same amount bandwidth... CPEs are ubnt NS5.
Can anyone tell my what kind of crap is going on here?:
Only few users using internet, but this shows that all using almost the same amount bandwidth... CPEs are ubnt NS5.
- Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:14 pm
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: bonding+vpls mtu problem
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4632
bonding+vpls mtu problem
hello, I have bonded two eth ports at each end (RB750G) and set vpls tunnel through bonding1, but web pages fails to open. I think there is mtu problem, because small packets (until 1450 or so) goes normally. MPLS MTU set to 1526, didn't help. How can I fix that? Correction: this is not mtu problem....
- Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:12 pm
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: 2 vpls tunns sum bandwidth
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1027
Re: 2 vpls tunns sum bandwidth
No one?
Where's mikrotik's staff???
----------------------------------------------------
All right...
Conclusion - MT m*st d*e
Where's mikrotik's staff???
----------------------------------------------------
All right...
Conclusion - MT m*st d*e
- Thu Nov 11, 2010 11:33 am
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: 2 vpls tunns sum bandwidth
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1027
2 vpls tunns sum bandwidth
hello, Here is my setup: . . . . . . RB433AH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RB433AH LAN1_1 --- eth1 -- vpls1 ----\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /---- vpls1 -- eth1 --- LAN1_2 LAN2_1 --- eth2 -- vpls2 --...
- Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:58 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: RouterOS v5 RC1
- Replies: 82
- Views: 20518
Re: RouterOS v5 RC1
with nv2 enable rate is 270/270 while with nstreme 300/300
tried diferent channels, tx power.. everything. couldn't make 300/300.
ping nv2 vs nstreme = 4ms vs 0.7ms
else is ok, bandwidth about the same.
tried diferent channels, tx power.. everything. couldn't make 300/300.
ping nv2 vs nstreme = 4ms vs 0.7ms
else is ok, bandwidth about the same.
- Sun May 30, 2010 2:48 pm
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: Routing betwen two /25 networks
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1115
Re: Routing betwen two /25 networks
add ip 62.168.78.1/25 to lan-bridge
add ip 62.168.78.129/25 to lan-bridge
for PCs in subnet 62.168.78.0/25 set gw 62.168.78.1
for PCs in subnet 62.168.78.128/25 set gw 62.168.78.129
do NAT for 62.168.78.0/25
do NAT for 62.168.78.128/25
add ip 62.168.78.129/25 to lan-bridge
for PCs in subnet 62.168.78.0/25 set gw 62.168.78.1
for PCs in subnet 62.168.78.128/25 set gw 62.168.78.129
do NAT for 62.168.78.0/25
do NAT for 62.168.78.128/25
- Tue May 25, 2010 2:01 pm
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: 3 vpls tunnels through 1 wlan
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2375
Re: 3 vpls tunnels through 1 wlan
OK, I've done it. By adding another vpls just with diferent VPLS ID.
would performance be better with 3 vlans over 1 vpls ???
attached testing just for fun
would performance be better with 3 vlans over 1 vpls ???
attached testing just for fun
- Tue May 25, 2010 11:11 am
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: 3 vpls tunnels through 1 wlan
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2375
Re: 3 vpls tunnels through 1 wlan
Create 3 VPLS instances between the routers, bridge each with Ethernet port Thats what I want, but how to do that? :) I don't need especialy vpls. I had running 3 eoip tunnels, but often it stops passing dhcp packets through until I reboot RB in WDS station mode. I don't know if it is a bug or some...
- Mon May 24, 2010 11:28 am
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: 3 vpls tunnels through 1 wlan
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2375
Re: 3 vpls tunnels through 1 wlan
Now it's just one vpls bridge running, like described in wiki.
I don't know if you need anything else...
I don't know if you need anything else...
- Sun May 23, 2010 6:02 pm
- Forum: Forwarding Protocols
- Topic: 3 vpls tunnels through 1 wlan
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2375
3 vpls tunnels through 1 wlan
Hello, I am trying to build a setup like in attached picture. To make transparent bridge between 3(6) LANS using vpls tunnels. LANS cant see each other. No problem for one vpls tunnel, but how configure other two? Cant make it by following this example http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Transparently_Bri...