I disagree, it's a bug. Proof: where is this in any changelog? (because I looked before posting, twice)You can't change username anymore, if you need different username create new, and delete old one.
This is feature, not a bug.
so virtualized hardware will not be supported.
will you add that to VLAN driver? ppp interfaces?..
ip routing bgp peer set [/ip bgp peer find name="ISP1"] out-filter="" ip routing bgp peer set [/ip bgp peer find name="ISP2"] out-filter="OUT_OFF"
yes, that will work.So for example;
If I enable PPPoE server on Wlan1,
than in the profile I give the local address 10.1.1.1 (eth1 address)
than in the remote ip pool I give real IPs of 212.1xx.x.x
Will it work ? Real IPs will be routed through local addresses ?
I think this would be the best way, and would give some nice flexability for people who frequently have to run different commands or scriptsmaybe default installed aliases.
/system aliases add alias=/updateip cmd=/system script run ChangeIP /updateip
that option only updates the display in winbox (basically what you see in the registration table), and has no affect on the connection.Did you try setting update-stats-interval?
I'm assuming that 25dB is only for 24 Mbps and lower data rates like most other cards, what is the power output @36Mbps, @48Mbps and @54Mbps?Output Power Up to 25dB (320mW)
please send the support output files from your routers where you have installed the wireless-test package to email@example.com so we could check how well it is working.
option only exists on the AP side... disable it at the AP and it affects all clients connectedJust tried to disable default forward on a pseudobridge CPE and its greyed out.. we're running 3.11
add action=drop chain=forward comment=\ "Drop incoming connections from IPs in Blacklist" disabled=no \ dst-address=220.127.116.11 in-interface=ether1 out-interface=\ ether2 src-address-list=Blacklist
This graph is from an HP DL140 that's serves our streaming.
It went live the 1st of the year.
email sent.I would like to see your ospf configuration. Please contact off forum.
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=21332Are you guys just going to release major versions one after each other untill you reach 3.9 and then going to start with minor versions? 3.9.x?
It certainly seems so.
Thanks*) graphing - ip address formatting bugfix;
*) user manager - fixed ampersand bug;
*) updated drivers;
according to Robert from UBNT, sometime this month.I tested all in the lab. I can't find anything that doesn't work with the XR3. Its all a go. Once UBNT does the FCC for Part 15 and Part 90. When is this going to happen? I want part 15 first so I can use the public channels.
you either need a custom frequency license, or you need to change your country to austria, where 5.65-5.7ghz is selectableI can't select the 3.5 frequency range. Do we have to buy a Custom License from Mikrtotik to use a public frequency? Anyways I did not get XR3 working.
full QOS and reduced latency will provide better bandwidth where needed through more efficient use of the airtime.This will be excellent features. Is it possible that mikrotik make new dual nstreme from source, to achieve more bandwidth ?
OSPF locked up on a RB333 2 hours after installing, requireing a reboot to before routes came back online, however I forgot to make a supout......I guess it's still possible for v3.0 not be stable until v3.0.1 )
I hope you didn't mean me... I was saying I wanted config from the dude...as somebody pointed out - multiple device config in dude is already possible.
allowing more then one device access to snmp, without allowing everything access (since we STILL can't allow more then one address or subnet access to a particular community string)what would be the reason for this? Either your snmp tool has access to the MT OIDs or it doesn't right?