The Gist, Cannot Ping the Gateway from the VLAN Bridge on Router #2, Router #1 Has two DHCP servers one on master port ether#2 and the other DHCP server is on VLAN 447 Router #2 can ping the gateway 100.64.10.1 from ether#24 but cannot ping the gateway from Bridge1. Bridge1 can pass traffic to where...

The runs are about 140' or less.

On private towers, not sharing space with anyone else.

Now seeing other ports without anything plugged into them going to 10Mb connection rate and then shutting off. 

I'm running into an issue with more than one rb where ports are flapping or it will auto negotiate to 100Mbs & 1Gpbs within seconds.

See attached image. Running OS 6.35.2 will be upgrading firmware to 6.35.4 to see if it helps. 

This Mikrotik Noip update script works on 6.27 and it survived an upgrade to 6.34.1 You still need to setup the system scheduler just change the on-event=to match the name of the script /system scheduler add comment="Update No-IP DDNS" disabled=no interval=5m \ name=no-ip_ddns_update on-ev...

Honestly I think this is something that's never going to get answered on here until they make a public statement to everybody in some sort of announcement. Cost vs benefit? I've literally stopped installing anything mikrotik in a wireless format and I've gone to other brands because of this.

Bump'n

Kinda looks that way. With the difficultly our FCC is giving everyone I wonder if Mikrotik is even going to try to get DFS certified. I'm hoping for the minimum of at least having the 5.1-5.2GHz and 5.7-5.8GHz bands, but I'm not too confident we will. Mikrotik has not replied to any questions so fa...

require units sold in the US to be locked to US rules, basically needing a separate SKU.

Hence why UBNT has a US version and most of their devices can be used on U-NII-1 & 2

No, you are NOT allowed to use MikroTik radios (approved only under 15.249) in the US on the lower U-NII bands. Period. If you set the country to US, it will only offer channels in the ISM-band 5745-5825 range (if 20 MHz wide). If you have "no country set", then sure, it'll go down to 518...

I have not seen any U-NII (15.407) approvals for MikroTik devices . They do seem to have DFS with radar detection, but they haven't gotten the FCC approval. Thus it is only legal to use them on the ISM frequencies 5725-5850 under 15.249. See my note from yesterday as to why U-NII approval will be s...

MikroTik RouterBoards do operate in the U-NII-1/2/3 bands, but under the ISM rules. I have used all three bands successfully. Keep in mind that US regulatory rules limit power in the different bands. Band 1 is limited to 50 mW, Band 2 is limited to 200 or 250 mW (can't remember which), and Band 3 i...

Thank you for the reply, but it is Mikrotiks responsibility to get the device approved with the FCC so I can use it in the allowed frequencys? Which is what I'm wondering if they have done that with UNII-2 since I have access to it in my drop down list. BUT not have it listed on the pdf mentioned ea...

Are the following bands "allowed" in the US with Mikrotik devices? NO / YES - UNII-1 5.15-5.25 NO / YES - UNII-2 5.25-5.35 YES - UNII-3 5.725 to 5.825 I'm currently using RB911G-5HPnD with UBNT 5Ghz Sectors and I have stayed out of band 1 & 2 even though their in my drop down list, for...

add distance=1 gateway=1.1.1.254

and screen shot

NOW59=TEST59 I was renaming NOW to TEST

ok so in the process of hiding my public ip I messed up the config I posted. sorry :shock: my actual config is add address=192.168.59.254/24 disabled=yes interface=NOW59 network=192.168.59.0 add address=1.1.1.130/24 interface=ether1 network=1.1.1.0 add address=192.168.2.254/24 interface=NOW59 netwo...

This is the Full Config the only thing missing is the wifi security settings and I changed my first three octets of my public ips to 1.1.1. /interface bridge add name=TEST59 add l2mtu=1598 name=WAN /interface wireless set [ find default-name=wlan1 ] band=2ghz-b/g/n disabled=no l2mtu=2290 mode=\ ap-...

You would think that would also work, but ZERO traffic flows outbound to the world when specifying the src-address as 192.168.2.0/24

Ah YES you would think that would work. I'm receiving the following error when I try specifying the LAN Bridge to the interface.

Ok, So I have the Public IP's showing correctly BUT. I still haven't been able to NAT the 192.168.2.0/24 to Eth1 public ip address and make traffic flow. The currenty Masqr rule is not working. So what is the specific Masqr Rule I should be applying. because this rule add action=masquerade chain=src...

Is it possible to specify the source as a bridge if so how?

I'm not trying get Private IP's to show to the world, im trying to get the WAN Public ip on Router B to show and Router B is connected to router A's Port#2 because of that I think Router A's Masqr its NATing the traffic from Router B, I'm running private ips on a couple of ports not all of them whic...

Traffic is going out to the internet.


Lakis:

chain=dstnat action=dst-nat to-addresses=x.x.x.x
dst-address=x.x.x.x the x.x.x.x should that be my lan or public ips?

last two add interface=ether1 where or = none ?

My guess is your masq rule on a's config. You most likely don't want that.

Ya, I have a feeling it might have something to do with it also, but when I remove the rule all traffic fails.

I'm currently trying out configurations so as to convert my network from Bridged to Routed. :D I have a /24 for discussion purposes I’m calling it 1.1.1.0/24 that is being provided to me. what we have 1 - Core Router 1.1.1.254 2 – Test Router A (Port 1: 1.1.1.130/24) (Port 2: 1.1.1.133/30) (Ports 3-...