Community discussions

Search found 126 matches

by bda
Fri Aug 30, 2019 1:12 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45.5 [stable] is released!
Replies: 54
Views: 15859

Re: v6.45.5 [stable] is released!

There is no bug. It just got fixes some Versions ago. "The accuracy of your information could be sucessfully questioned". You are right that the bug consisting in having the firewall too open for GRE was fixed, but bundled with this fix came another bug - the very first GRE packet of a new tunnel i...
by bda
Thu Aug 29, 2019 2:31 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45.5 [stable] is released!
Replies: 54
Views: 15859

Re: v6.45.5 [stable] is released!

Sorry, but are any news on bug with "GRE marking as invalid pakets" in this release?
by bda
Wed Aug 14, 2019 6:58 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.44.5 [long-term] is released!
Replies: 97
Views: 34780

Re: v6.44.5 [long-term] is released!

has anyone had any wireless problems with cAP (RBcAPGi-5acD2nD) and 6.44.5? After upgrading from the great 6.43.16 (I didn't know about the devices for like a year) to 6.44.5, I started to receive complaints from users. I don't see anything in logs or monitoring, but users say internet drops for a ...
by bda
Sat Aug 03, 2019 3:04 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45.3 [stable] is released!
Replies: 90
Views: 25414

Re: v6.45.3 [stable] is released!

GRE fixed? What exactly do you have in mind? The incorrect flagging of actually new GRE packets as invalid ? If so, then no, this is not fixed in 6.45.3, but it can be worked around by adding protocol=!gre to the action=drop connection-state=invalid rules in the default firewall, or several other e...
by bda
Fri Aug 02, 2019 1:31 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45.2 [stable] is released!
Replies: 206
Views: 35983

Re: v6.45.2 [stable] is released!

Hi,
6.45.3 has no GRE miss-marking fix. Very Bad...
by bda
Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:45 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45.2 [stable] is released!
Replies: 206
Views: 35983

Re: v6.45.2 [stable] is released!

Dear Mikrotik Dev Team,

What about GRE (wrong mark first packet as invalid) problem?
by bda
Fri Jul 19, 2019 4:26 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RB450Gx4 and hAPac spanning tree problem
Replies: 11
Views: 1116

Re: RB450Gx4 and hAPac spanning tree problem

One more test.

CRS112 <-> RB450Gx4.

Only if CRS112 has high priority then stp works. RB450Gx4 has lower prio and it sees root on port to CRS112.
If CRS112 has priority lower than RB450Gx4 - both devices become roots...
by bda
Fri Jul 19, 2019 3:21 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45.2 [stable] is released!
Replies: 206
Views: 35983

Re: v6.45.2 [stable] is released!

Yes, something is not quite right with the SFP+ interface on RB4011, we will look forward to fixing it asap!
thanks a lot, we'll wait.
Sorry for flood... but GRE-problem is important too...
by bda
Fri Jul 19, 2019 2:55 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RB450Gx4 and hAPac spanning tree problem
Replies: 11
Views: 1116

Re: RB450Gx4 and hAPac spanning tree problem

This is not a full config export.
And are you sue about always-strip?
Not sure... I will try an report than.
Test with add-if-missing on interconnected ports on both ends does nothing...
by bda
Fri Jul 19, 2019 2:43 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RB450Gx4 and hAPac spanning tree problem
Replies: 11
Views: 1116

Re: RB450Gx4 and hAPac spanning tree problem

This is not a full config export.
And are you sue about always-strip?
Not sure... I will try an report than.
by bda
Fri Jul 19, 2019 2:40 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45.2 [stable] is released!
Replies: 206
Views: 35983

Re: v6.45.2 [stable] is released!

Hi,
Does GRE invalid packet mark still exist in this release?
by bda
Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:11 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RB450Gx4 and hAPac spanning tree problem
Replies: 11
Views: 1116

Re: RB450Gx4 and hAPac spanning tree problem

Sorry for long answer.. Lab setup one: Router RB951G: /interface bridge add name=bridge1-switch priority=0xA000 /interface bridge port add bridge=bridge1-switch interface=ether2 add bridge=bridge1-switch interface=ether3 add bridge=bridge1-switch interface=ether4 [X@RB951G] > interface bridge monito...
by bda
Wed Jul 17, 2019 5:04 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RB450Gx4 and hAPac spanning tree problem
Replies: 11
Views: 1116

Re: RB450Gx4 and hAPac spanning tree problem

As Anav said, we're fishing in the dark without actually seeing your configs. I could imagine two more scenarios: Is it possible that the PVIDs differ between the devices? Can there be an additional link between them through an access port? -Chris About PVID... dont know how to check without tcpdum...
by bda
Wed Jul 17, 2019 1:10 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RB450Gx4 and hAPac spanning tree problem
Replies: 11
Views: 1116

Re: RB450Gx4 and hAPac spanning tree problem

One more test.
Setup:
RB493G(Atheros 8316) <---> CRS112
RB493 stp prio = a000
CRS112 stp prio = 9000
stp = rstp
All devices uses HW offload
Version: 6.44.3 on both...

In this setup - all devices become root bridges... weird
by bda
Tue Jul 16, 2019 1:49 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RB450Gx4 and hAPac spanning tree problem
Replies: 11
Views: 1116

RB450Gx4 and hAPac spanning tree problem

Greetings, Simply scheme: RB450Gx4 ether2 <---> ether2 hAPac Hardware offloading is on on both devices Trying to setup RSTP protocol. If I set up stp prio to 9000 on hAPac and any lower prio on RB450Gx4, than hAPac becomes root and RB450Gx4 - becomes common bridge with root port on ether2. But... If...
by bda
Tue Jul 16, 2019 11:34 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45.1 [stable] is released!
Replies: 416
Views: 70271

Re: v6.45.1 [stable] is released!

Regarding protocol 47. Tested on CHR 6.45.1 (stable) with no default configuration. Added the folowing 3 filters: /ip firewall filter add action=passthrough chain=input connection-state=invalid protocol=gre add action=passthrough chain=input connection-state=new protocol=gre add action=passthrough ...
by bda
Wed Jul 10, 2019 8:18 pm
Forum: The Dude
Topic: The Dude 6.40.8 - db failure: database disk image is malformed
Replies: 35
Views: 5825

Re: The Dude 6.40.8 - db failure: database disk image is malformed

Yes. The dude was not subject to change for few years and it seems mikrotik is not going to change anything on it in near future.
Thanks, I will try.
One more question. Do I need transfer all dude files or only the .db file?
by bda
Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:19 am
Forum: The Dude
Topic: The Dude 6.40.8 - db failure: database disk image is malformed
Replies: 35
Views: 5825

Re: The Dude 6.40.8 - db failure: database disk image is malformed

Finally the dude works again. Just for one hour so far, but even this is much longer than usual two minutes before... The dump import took around 10 hours. It was running on i7/SSD, not taking more than 2% of single cpu core. Really "effective" :-). Final db file is 0,25GB comparing to 1GB of origi...
by bda
Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:15 am
Forum: The Dude
Topic: Dude db vacuuming
Replies: 5
Views: 782

Re: Dude db vacuuming

Does it applicable for >6.41 dude installations?
by bda
Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:54 pm
Forum: The Dude
Topic: Dude db vacuuming
Replies: 5
Views: 782

Re: Dude db vacuuming

There is only one vacuum command available so you cannot make a mistake. But it might not help at all. You have to try... I did it. But it have to "eat" up to 1GB of system partition. Not Dude disk. And finishes without any status info. Database sill >3.5GB Maybe I need to transfer db-file to x86 p...
by bda
Fri Jul 05, 2019 7:31 pm
Forum: The Dude
Topic: Dude db vacuuming
Replies: 5
Views: 782

Dude db vacuuming

Hi,
ROS 6.44.3 on CHR
How to do vacuuming right?
Does DB will reduce in it size after vacuuming?
by bda
Mon Jul 02, 2018 11:08 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.42.5 [current]
Replies: 124
Views: 23113

Re: v6.42.5 [current]

And at last.... Before 6.42.1-4, any of hEX has more than 4mb... anyway
by bda
Mon Jul 02, 2018 11:07 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.42.5 [current]
Replies: 124
Views: 23113

Re: v6.42.5 [current]

Script do nothing on hEX PoE: Why? Of course not! It is for devices with 128MB flash. They have to store the updates in the same partition as the running firmware. You have a 16MB flash device which puts updates in the RAM disk. And thus the error that is being fixed here cannot occur on those devi...
by bda
Mon Jul 02, 2018 10:39 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.42.5 [current]
Replies: 124
Views: 23113

Re: v6.42.5 [current]

Script do nothing on hEX PoE: Why? Of course not! It is for devices with 128MB flash. They have to store the updates in the same partition as the running firmware. You have a 16MB flash device which puts updates in the RAM disk. And thus the error that is being fixed here cannot occur on those devi...
by bda
Mon Jul 02, 2018 10:25 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.42.5 [current]
Replies: 124
Views: 23113

Re: v6.42.5 [current]

We are sorry for any issues caused by the previous package, we uploaded new packages, that will work fine on any router. Package updated 07/02/2018 To fix storage issue on your router, use package from the link, https://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/fix_space.npk - upload package to your router; ...
by bda
Mon Jul 02, 2018 9:21 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.42.5 [current]
Replies: 124
Views: 23113

Re: v6.42.5 [current]

We are very sorry for any inconvenience caused. Fix package for missing storage space has been temporary removed and will soon be updated to patched version.
Sorry for disturbing.
When we can download fix for missing storage space?
by bda
Fri Jun 29, 2018 2:53 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.42.5 [current]
Replies: 124
Views: 23113

Re: v6.42.5 [current]

Hello,

Are anybody have any info on "low hdd space" problem?
by bda
Thu Jun 28, 2018 8:04 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.42.5 [current]
Replies: 124
Views: 23113

Re: v6.42.5 [current]

SOme way to clean these remotely would have saved me $3k so far in travel expenses and all sorts of lost income while I traveled all over doing Netinstalls in a emergency mode. I reported and warned about this issue months ago. I warned this would cause huge issues for people as it effects every fl...
by bda
Thu Jun 28, 2018 7:31 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.42.5 [current]
Replies: 124
Views: 23113

Re: v6.42.5 [current]

Hello,

CRS112-8P-4S is affected by low disk space problem too. I can't even upgrade from 6.42.4 to 6.42.5.
Netinstall is not possible in my case...

We need some sort of cleaning script or something ...
by bda
Thu Jun 28, 2018 3:09 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.42.5 [current]
Replies: 124
Views: 23113

Re: v6.42.5 [current]

pe1chl, honzam, server, Cha0s - Current version that has a third number in its name is a version that contains only fixes backported from rc version. As long as there is no fix in rc, there will be no fix in current version that is a rebuild (6.42 vs. 6.42.5 means that version has been rebuided 5 t...
by bda
Wed Jun 27, 2018 10:13 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.42.5 [current]
Replies: 124
Views: 23113

Re: v6.42.5 [current]

Regarding this, I can see the problem with 'lost' disk space is pretty much random (at least at first glance). Other devices (even the same model or x86) have increased free space after today's upgrade and others have decreased free space. Does it depend on the version sequence? I am considering re...
by bda
Wed Jun 27, 2018 7:14 am
Forum: General
Topic: Low disk space while disk is almost free
Replies: 23
Views: 6642

Re: Low disk space while disk is almost free

HELP!
Do the repartition (if you use it) to one partition only(this helped me). If this is not your case, bad luck then, netinstall I suppose.
Repartition does not help... Netinstall - great, but I have many device far from me, as I said - across our country...
by bda
Wed Jun 27, 2018 12:39 am
Forum: General
Topic: Low disk space while disk is almost free
Replies: 23
Views: 6642

Re: Low disk space while disk is almost free

Hi, I have all this problems on more than 15 CCR, and more than 50 litle boxes, like hEX. Even RB850Gx2 - affected... Support telling me to netinstall, but I can not do it across our country!!! Weird! Update: 6.42.1 to 6.42.4 - and we have less than 4.9 mbyte on some 16bm platforms, and 10-12 mbytes...
by bda
Mon Jun 25, 2018 5:29 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.42.4 [current]
Replies: 93
Views: 16539

Re: v6.42.4 [current]

Hello,

Sorry for disturbing. But loss of hdd space appears on upgrading to 6.41.2, and gone worse with upgrade to 6.41.4.
In 64 Mb partitions (2x64), only 10-15% free space left after upgrade...

Dear developers. Please help. Ticket number #2018062222003568
by bda
Mon Jun 25, 2018 8:33 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.42.4 [current]
Replies: 93
Views: 16539

Re: v6.42.4 [current]

Does it fix the "lost space after upgrade" issue on CCR? (when upgrading 6.42.1 to 6.42.3 on a CCR split into two 64MB partitions a lot of diskspace remains in-use after the upgrade and not enough space is left for another upgrade) Hi. We have identical problem on all CCR-routers... I opend a ticke...
by bda
Fri Jun 05, 2015 2:10 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Winbox 3 RC
Replies: 639
Views: 124032

Re: Winbox 3 RC

Yesterday rc11. Today rc12 :)

What's new in v3.0rc12:
*) added "clear cache" command to Tools menu;
very good!
by bda
Thu Apr 21, 2011 7:05 pm
Forum: General
Topic: snmp problem on multi core x86 system
Replies: 4
Views: 1547

Re: snmp problem on multi core x86 system

get OID: /system resource cpu print oid on test router i get admin@tst] > sy resource cpu print oid load=.1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.3.1.2.1 load=.1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.3.1.2.2 router has 2 cores $ snmpget -c public -v 1 tst .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.3.1.2.1 iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.3.1.2.1 = INTEGER: 7 $ snmpget -c public -v ...
by bda
Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:10 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.0 -- new OIDs for memory-total/memory-used?
Replies: 14
Views: 8124

Re: ROS 5.0 -- new OIDs for memory-total/memory-used?

Does anybody have any news about this problem?
by bda
Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:11 pm
Forum: General
Topic: snmp problem on multi core x86 system
Replies: 4
Views: 1547

Re: snmp problem on multi core x86 system

Just a quick comment to point out that the official support channel is email to support@mikrotik.com. Mikrotik staff may or may not read this thread.
Thanks, but maybe anybody facing such problem... I think all x86 multi-core devices have it.
by bda
Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:25 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.0 -- new OIDs for memory-total/memory-used?
Replies: 14
Views: 8124

Re: ROS 5.0 -- new OIDs for memory-total/memory-used?

Dear developers, please comment problems we found... It is very difficult to use boxes without snmp memory\disk data...
by bda
Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:21 pm
Forum: General
Topic: snmp problem on multi core x86 system
Replies: 4
Views: 1547

snmp problem on multi core x86 system

Good day!

I think, snmp subsystem counts only one core on multi cpu x86 system. After I bind network adapters per separate cores - it reports very low cpu usage.Cpu usage in winbox stays the same.

Dear developers, please help.

PS Memory and disk OID still not working at all.
by bda
Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:46 pm
Forum: General
Topic: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67
Replies: 32
Views: 5887

Re: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67

Is there MikroTik 5.0 final supporting Intel 82579V LAN and Intel P67 Chipset?
Multicore is working for now... but i have no load tests on this chipset. On board Ethernet is not supported.
by bda
Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm
Forum: General
Topic: SNMP not work, possible bug?
Replies: 2
Views: 875

Re: SNMP not work, possible bug?

more details needed...
by bda
Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:24 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Mikrotik router record !!!
Replies: 22
Views: 9994

Re: Mikrotik router record !!!

tx drops here... in the first screenshot. Why?
by bda
Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:49 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.0 -- new OIDs for memory-total/memory-used?
Replies: 14
Views: 8124

Re: ROS 5.0 -- new OIDs for memory-total/memory-used?

facing the same problem using fresh 5.1: [bda@MikroTik] > system resource print oid uptime: .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 total-hdd-space: .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.5.131073 used-hdd-space: .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.6.131073 total-memory: .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.5.65536 used-memory: .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.6.65536 No cpu ...
by bda
Sat Apr 09, 2011 9:44 am
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS 5.1 is out!
Replies: 93
Views: 13509

Re: RouterOS 5.1 is out!

download is not possible. 404 error in usa site, latvia site - hangs up on download. Pls help.
by bda
Sun Apr 03, 2011 1:47 am
Forum: General
Topic: How to get snmp count of dynamic pppoe\pptp sessions?
Replies: 1
Views: 741

Re: How to get snmp count of dynamic pppoe\pptp sessions?

How to get snmp count of dynamic pppoe\pptp sessions?
can anybody help?
by bda
Sun Apr 03, 2011 1:46 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: separate vrf for pppoe interaces and management
Replies: 4
Views: 1677

Re: separate vrf for pppoe interaces and management

It is not possible to manager router via VRF.
Also ppp servers/clients are not VRF aware.
thanks... bad news...
by bda
Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:48 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: separate vrf for pppoe interaces and management
Replies: 4
Views: 1677

Re: separate vrf for pppoe interaces and management

is it possible to have one vrf for internet table and pppoe interfaces and separate vrf for management (with nat possibility to internet vrf)?

UPD: question corrected.
Sorry for bump. Any clues?
by bda
Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:39 pm
Forum: General
Topic: How to get snmp count of dynamic pppoe\pptp sessions?
Replies: 1
Views: 741

How to get snmp count of dynamic pppoe\pptp sessions?

How to get snmp count of dynamic pppoe\pptp sessions?
by bda
Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:37 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Stop counting quota / data limits for updates of OS or AV
Replies: 2
Views: 426

Re: Stop counting quota / data limits for updates of OS or A

Hi, You are referring to an ability to not account specific source/destination IP ranges - a feature many of us in the ISP space are looking for. Cisco's ISG funcationality can do that - and much more. I've requested this sort of feature capability before but don't expect it any time soon as there ...
by bda
Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:32 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS 5.0 is out!
Replies: 153
Views: 27110

Re: RouterOS 5.0 is out!

I suppose you mean Intel Ethernet controller is not supported on your Sandy Bridge motherboard.
Currently there is no drivers for it.
Thank you for info. But the second box is not so new and it also has unknown pci devices... Can you help?
by bda
Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:41 am
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS 5.0 is out!
Replies: 153
Views: 27110

Re: RouterOS 5.0 is out!

New hardware is still not detected... 0 device="03:00.0" name="unknown device (rev: 3)" vendor="NEC Corporation" category="USB Controller" vendor-id="0x1033" device-id="0x0194" irq=10 memory=0xF7D00000-0xF7DFFFFF 1 device="01:00.1" name="82576 Gigabit Network Connection (rev: 1)" vendor="Intel Corpo...
by bda
Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:25 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: separate vrf for pppoe interaces and management
Replies: 4
Views: 1677

separate vrf for pppoe interaces and management

is it possible to have one vrf for internet table and pppoe interfaces and separate vrf for management (with nat possibility to internet vrf)?

UPD: question corrected.
by bda
Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:36 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Make ROS services VRF-aware
Replies: 8
Views: 2403

Re: Make ROS services VRF-aware

and DHCP-server is VRF aware..
But not btest...
Do anybody know, how to put pppoe\ppptp dynamic interfaces to vrf, and not to main routing table? Is it possible?
by bda
Mon Mar 28, 2011 5:00 pm
Forum: General
Topic: bridge mac-address problem
Replies: 6
Views: 2430

Re: bridge mac-address problem

By default bridge inherits MAC address from its ports. You can set it manually: /interface bridge set bridge5 auto-mac=no admin-mac=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx Thanks. I`ll try. But tell me please: does rc07 and rc11 have any change in bridge creation or processing? As I tell before - my old rc07 box has mac...
by bda
Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:43 pm
Forum: General
Topic: qinq like Cisco or JUNOSe
Replies: 7
Views: 2505

Re: qinq like Cisco or JUNOSe

bda is looking for a way to have SP-vlans dynamically created, or created in blocks such as in the examples.


This is a pretty common requirement, im suprised it's not already a feature.
Yes... I am waiting for this feature long time.... but no hope...
Sorry for bump, but any news?
by bda
Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:43 pm
Forum: General
Topic: bridge mac-address problem
Replies: 6
Views: 2430

Re: bridge mac-address problem

Do you have any VLAN port in bridge without MAC address?
I have no interfaces in bridge, only have bridge interface, like cisco loopback interface...
by bda
Sun Mar 27, 2011 5:12 pm
Forum: General
Topic: bridge mac-address problem
Replies: 6
Views: 2430

Re: bridge mac-address problem

Can anybody help?
Sorry, but does anybody has some problem?
by bda
Fri Mar 25, 2011 11:00 pm
Forum: General
Topic: bridge mac-address problem
Replies: 6
Views: 2430

Re: bridge mac-address problem

Can anybody help?
by bda
Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:36 pm
Forum: General
Topic: bridge mac-address problem
Replies: 6
Views: 2430

bridge mac-address problem

I have two mikrotik x86 boxes... On one ( 5rc07 ) i have mac address on bridge interface: Flags: X - disabled, R - running 0 R ;;; -M- CNxxxx cn-msk80rs br5 interface (Moskva) --- name="bridge5" mtu=1500 l2mtu=65535 arp=enabled mac-address=00:1B:21:4F:69:78 protocol-mode=none priority=0x8000 auto-ma...
by bda
Fri Mar 25, 2011 9:19 am
Forum: General
Topic: qinq like Cisco or JUNOSe
Replies: 7
Views: 2505

Re: qinq like Cisco or JUNOSe

bda is looking for a way to have SP-vlans dynamically created, or created in blocks such as in the examples.


This is a pretty common requirement, im suprised it's not already a feature.
Yes... I am waiting for this feature long time.... but no hope...
by bda
Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:28 pm
Forum: General
Topic: qinq like Cisco or JUNOSe
Replies: 7
Views: 2505

Re: qinq like Cisco or JUNOSe

Wrong...

Example in wiki is not like my examples... As you can see - Cisco config uses one S-VLAN and massive C-VLANs, or we can use any vlan id for C-VLAN and one S-VLAN. Juniper config is more complex - any combination is possible...
by bda
Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:29 am
Forum: General
Topic: qinq like Cisco or JUNOSe
Replies: 7
Views: 2505

qinq like Cisco or JUNOSe

Is it possible to make configuration on Mikrotik like this (Cisco): interface GigabitEthernet0/2.801 description -NA CNxxxx SPVLAN-801 () --- encapsulation dot1Q 801 second-dot1q 801-4000 interface GigabitEthernet0/2.802 description -NA CNxxxx SPVLAN-802 () --- encapsulation dot1Q 802 second-dot1q 8...
by bda
Wed Mar 23, 2011 5:00 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [request] CoA for PPPoE/PPTP
Replies: 34
Views: 12363

Re: [request] CoA for PPPoE/PPTP

Sorry for bumping... But do we have any news on this topic?
by bda
Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:59 pm
Forum: General
Topic: v5rc11 is out!
Replies: 68
Views: 14137

Re: v5rc11 is out!

But no CoA for PPP, and no ipv6 for PPP, and no vrf aware for ppp.... Cry!
by bda
Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:11 am
Forum: General
Topic: Make ROS services VRF-aware
Replies: 8
Views: 2403

Re: Make ROS services VRF-aware

and DHCP-server is VRF aware..
Well thanks for pointing that out :)
Are there any plans of bringing VRF awareness at least the other key services like PPP?
Yes, we also need vrf-aware for pptp/pppoe!
by bda
Mon Mar 21, 2011 12:23 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Make ROS services VRF-aware
Replies: 8
Views: 2403

Re: Make ROS services VRF-aware

Hi all, I recently tried to make ROS work with two VRFs, which by itself worked fine. However, I have a problem with the router accessing services within the VRFs. I have two VRFs, RED and BLUE. Both RED and BLUE are using the 10.0.0.0/24 subnet. RED is on interface ether4, BLUE on interface ether5...
by bda
Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:30 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [request] CoA for PPPoE/PPTP
Replies: 34
Views: 12363

Re: [request] CoA for PPPoE/PPTP

I just checked the changelogs for v4 and 5 and it looks like this was introduced/changed in December last year.

Or am I missing something?
Is it true for PPoE/PPtP? I know it works only for wireless...
by bda
Tue Mar 15, 2011 6:09 am
Forum: General
Topic: Console has crashed
Replies: 2
Views: 864

Re: Console has crashed

Can anybody help? Sorry for bumping
by bda
Mon Mar 14, 2011 6:25 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Console has crashed
Replies: 2
Views: 864

Console has crashed

After I entered "interface ethernet <press tab>", than i`ve got message: "Console has crashed; please log again."
ROS version 5.0rc11.

Please help.
by bda
Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:58 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [request] CoA for PPPoE/PPTP
Replies: 34
Views: 12363

[request] CoA for PPPoE/PPTP

Dear developers, CoA function for PPPoE/PPTP is very great for B-RAS applications. Then we can have it im ROS?
by bda
Sun Mar 13, 2011 5:59 pm
Forum: General
Topic: v5rc11 is out!
Replies: 68
Views: 14137

Re: v5rc11 is out!

Thanks for new version, but new harware still not working: CPU: Intel Core i5-2400S 2.5Ghz Soket 1155 MB: INTEL DH67CF (OEM) LGA1155 <H67> PCI-E+DVI+HDMI+DP+GbLAN SATA RAID Mini-ITX 2DDR-III Additional Network Adapter: Intel <E1G42ET> Gigabit Adapter Dual Port (OEM) PCI-E x4 10/100/1000Mbps And mul...
by bda
Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:41 pm
Forum: General
Topic: v5rc11 is out!
Replies: 68
Views: 14137

Re: v5rc11 is out!

Thanks for new version, but new harware still not working: CPU: Intel Core i5-2400S 2.5Ghz Soket 1155 MB: INTEL DH67CF (OEM) LGA1155 <H67> PCI-E+DVI+HDMI+DP+GbLAN SATA RAID Mini-ITX 2DDR-III Additional Network Adapter: Intel <E1G42ET> Gigabit Adapter Dual Port (OEM) PCI-E x4 10/100/1000Mbps And mult...
by bda
Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:58 am
Forum: General
Topic: v5rc10 released
Replies: 77
Views: 9036

Re: v5rc10 released

NTEL DH67CF and Intel Core i5-2400S 2.5Ghz Soket 1155 still not working normally...
we didn't change any drivers so you shouldn't expect support for new hardware
Can we hope on update?
by bda
Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:32 am
Forum: General
Topic: v5rc10 released
Replies: 77
Views: 9036

Re: v5rc10 released

NTEL DH67CF and Intel Core i5-2400S 2.5Ghz Soket 1155 still not working normally...
we didn't change any drivers so you shouldn't expect support for new hardware
Thanks for reply. Can I hope on drivers update?
by bda
Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:53 am
Forum: General
Topic: v5rc10 released
Replies: 77
Views: 9036

Re: v5rc10 released

NTEL DH67CF and Intel Core i5-2400S 2.5Ghz Soket 1155 still not working normally...
by bda
Thu Feb 10, 2011 11:57 pm
Forum: General
Topic: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67
Replies: 32
Views: 5887

Re: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67

After installing 5.0rc9 - nothing changed... Very bad...
by bda
Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:23 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v5rc8
Replies: 110
Views: 19751

Re: RouterOS v5rc8

@normis: Do NOT even say that there is no proof there are routing problems. We have decided to go with 5.0rc8 for further testing to be able to contribute with information to the further development of Mikrotik solutions (which we are big fans of) but you have to agree that when there are multiple ...
by bda
Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:15 pm
Forum: General
Topic: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67
Replies: 32
Views: 5887

Re: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67

these are 2 features that greatly increases throughput of multi-core hardware.
Oh... Thanks. But as I said before - multicore - is not possible on rc8 and Core i5+H67. Maybe Mikrotik developers help me...
by bda
Wed Feb 09, 2011 2:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67
Replies: 32
Views: 5887

Re: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67

What do you mean? Balancer works? Or what? And RPS?
by bda
Tue Feb 08, 2011 5:31 pm
Forum: General
Topic: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67
Replies: 32
Views: 5887

Re: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67

I fell that this problem related to my http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?p=248880&f=1#p248880 After upgrade from 5.0rc5 to 5.0rc8, I don't see interfaces in winbox, first time I was able to see them via ssh, but now I cannot see them. Some interfaces still works, some doesn't. Thanks for the ...
by bda
Tue Feb 08, 2011 8:24 am
Forum: General
Topic: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67
Replies: 32
Views: 5887

Re: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67

this forum is in english, please switch to english
Sorry, but the initial questions was in english... Our conversation on russian was about new hardware and ROS5.

Could you please help me with my question?
by bda
Tue Feb 08, 2011 6:49 am
Forum: General
Topic: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67
Replies: 32
Views: 5887

Re: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67

Поэтому - не наступайте на мои грабли - Юзайте 4.16 и железо, которое его поддерживает. ага, и при трафике в 1 гигабит 4.16 версия загнется уже на 300 мегабитах.. Может всетаки ковыряние в биосе даст результат. Нужно попробовать разные варианты.. Да как-то не хотелось бы отключать встроенную сетеву...
by bda
Sun Feb 06, 2011 10:42 pm
Forum: General
Topic: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67
Replies: 32
Views: 5887

Re: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67

а чем тебя 7-я и 5-я RC версии не устраивают ?? там все теже драйвера, но работают они месяцами без проблем
Пробовал и 5 и 7 - теже грабли, если использовать указанное железо. При этом, на Core2Duo+chipset X58 - все нормально.
by bda
Sun Feb 06, 2011 12:09 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: [BUG REPORT] BGP GUI: Instance routing-table
Replies: 1
Views: 717

Re: [BUG REPORT] BGP GUI: Instance routing-table

Yes! It will be very good to have mostly all options in GUI!
by bda
Sun Feb 06, 2011 12:07 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature request for 5.0 final.
Replies: 40
Views: 6660

Re: Feature request for 5.0 final.

CoA/PoD for PPTP/PPPOE/L2TP/OVPN/SSTP/HotSpot
Yes! But mostly for PPPoE/PPTP.
by bda
Sun Feb 06, 2011 10:01 am
Forum: General
Topic: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67
Replies: 32
Views: 5887

Re: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67

а так же не стоит юзать последнюю бету, на ней багов уйма.
Спасибо за конструктивный ответ...

А как же быть с новыми драйверами?
by bda
Sat Feb 05, 2011 1:47 pm
Forum: General
Topic: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67
Replies: 32
Views: 5887

Re: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67

Some addition detail: integrated lan chip is Intel 82579V.

Another news: after i turn off "Multi CPU" - the system goes without interface resets, but only pcie card. Integrated card - still not detected.
by bda
Sat Feb 05, 2011 1:10 am
Forum: General
Topic: several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67
Replies: 32
Views: 5887

several interface problems on 5.0rc8 + intel Core i5+H67

Dear Mikrotik Dev Team, My device have: CPU: Intel Core i5-2400S 2.5Ghz Soket 1155 MB: INTEL DH67CF (OEM) LGA1155 <H67> PCI-E+DVI+HDMI+DP+GbLAN SATA RAID Mini-ITX 2DDR-III Additional Network Adapter: Intel <E1G42ET> Gigabit Adapter Dual Port (OEM) PCI-E x4 10/100/1000Mbps I am in real big trouble. M...
by bda
Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:46 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Need help with Radius CoA
Replies: 15
Views: 3295

Re: Need help with Radius CoA

Sorry again for bumping, but can anybody answer? Maybe Mikrotik stuff help me?
by bda
Tue Nov 23, 2010 8:14 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Need help with Radius CoA
Replies: 15
Views: 3295

Re: Need help with Radius CoA

PPPoE does not support CoA. Only DM (disconnect message) are supported for PPP. CoA are supported for HotSpot only. Disconnect Messages disconnects PPPoE client, while different settings should be applied on RADIUS server. PPPoE client redials and gets new settings from RADIUS server. Does MT 5.0rc...
by bda
Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:13 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Need help with Radius CoA
Replies: 15
Views: 3295

Re: Need help with Radius CoA

As of the last stable version of UM and even into version 4 test, no it does not.
yes, i`ve got official support answer: pppoe coa is not supported... very, very bad...
by bda
Mon Oct 04, 2010 1:34 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to search specific route in specific vrf?
Replies: 8
Views: 1956

Re: How to search specific route in specific vrf?

Try to replace = with ~ it should help.
Thanks!
by bda
Mon Oct 04, 2010 12:27 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Need help with Radius CoA
Replies: 15
Views: 3295

Re: Need help with Radius CoA

Sorry for bumping again... Can anybody find out, does CoA work on PPPoE sessions?
by bda
Fri Oct 01, 2010 3:33 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Need help with Radius CoA
Replies: 15
Views: 3295

Re: Need help with Radius CoA

Dear developers! Could you please help me to find out an answer on this topic?
Can anybody help me! Anybody!
by bda
Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:12 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Need help with Radius CoA
Replies: 15
Views: 3295

Re: Need help with Radius CoA

Dear developers! Could you please help me to find out an answer on this topic?
by bda
Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:50 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Need help with Radius CoA
Replies: 15
Views: 3295

Re: Need help with Radius CoA

Doesn't seem that it is supported. Error 406 means unsupported extension, which is sent when disconnect or CoA is unavailable. See RFC3576 section 3.1. The attributes you are sending are listed as supported by the Mikrotik wiki so that shouldn't be the issue. But maybe email support@mikrotik.com to...
by bda
Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:12 am
Forum: General
Topic: Need help with Radius CoA
Replies: 15
Views: 3295

Re: Need help with Radius CoA

Sorry for bumping, but i am seriously need help. Does MT support CoA for PPPoE?
Sorry... but does anybody know? Is it possible?
by bda
Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:31 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Need help with Radius CoA
Replies: 15
Views: 3295

Re: Need help with Radius CoA

Sorry for bumping, but i am seriously need help. Does MT support CoA for PPPoE?
by bda
Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:30 pm
Forum: General
Topic: PPPoE + Radius
Replies: 9
Views: 1341

Re: PPPoE + Radius

Hi all, I configurated a PPPoE server and it's working OK. But I've more than one network with the gateway in the same interface where is running the PPPoE server. I don't know how to configure the Local Address option in the profile of the PPPoE because each client will be in different networks. T...
by bda
Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:46 am
Forum: General
Topic: Need help with Radius CoA
Replies: 15
Views: 3295

Need help with Radius CoA

Dear developers, I've got problem with Radius CoA. Details: Radius server send CoA request for some current session: 09-28/09:38:19 INFO [nas-con-insp-PodNasConnectionInspector-rtr22] connections - [ 000006; test6@virtual; 74450 ] CoA packet on 10.13.28.160:1700 Packet type: CoA-Request Identifier: ...
by bda
Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:30 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to put dynamic interfaces to specific VRF
Replies: 7
Views: 4259

Re: How to put dynamic interfaces to specific VRF

/pppoe server add name=client1 ... /ip route vrf add routing-mark=test inteface=client1 Thanks... understood. It is not so perfect for dynamic interfaces and pppoe aggregation services. But can I use some sort of script? Does ROS have tool set for changing routing table for interface in near online...
by bda
Fri Sep 17, 2010 8:16 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to put dynamic interfaces to specific VRF
Replies: 7
Views: 4259

Re: How to put dynamic interfaces to specific VRF

It is not possible at the moment, you need to add static pppoe entries in server list and then add them manually to vrf
Oh... sounds very catastrophic for me... But could you please explain your statement in more detail. Sorry, but I don`t understand the procedure...
by bda
Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:23 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to search specific route in specific vrf?
Replies: 8
Views: 1956

Re: How to search specific route in specific vrf?

Dear Dev. Team! Pls help me to resolve this problem. Sorry for bumping.
by bda
Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:22 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to put dynamic interfaces to specific VRF
Replies: 7
Views: 4259

How to put dynamic interfaces to specific VRF

Dear friends!

Is it possible to put dynamic PPPoE interfaces to specific VRF. For example, my internet table lies in vrf-internet, but newly created PPPoE interfaces are all in main routing table after creation.
by bda
Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:52 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: internet access from main table, if internet is in vrf
Replies: 4
Views: 1201

Re: internet access from main table, if internet is in vrf

Yes, as far as I know it is not possible to have the main routing table utilize routes from a VRF. I've never seen a way to do this in MikroTik or Cisco. Thank you... it is very pity.... Hmm... And if I transfer inner src nat interface to another vrf from main table? Maybe dear developers say somet...
by bda
Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:48 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: internet access from main table, if internet is in vrf
Replies: 4
Views: 1201

Re: internet access from main table, if internet is in vrf

You really need to set things up the other way around. Internet in main routing table. Other interfaces in VRF.

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:In ... s_from_VRF
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Internet_ ... F_with_NAT
Is it only way possible?
by bda
Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:09 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: internet access from main table, if internet is in vrf
Replies: 4
Views: 1201

internet access from main table, if internet is in vrf

Dear developers and users, i need your help. The situation is: some interfaces are in main routing table, but internet interfaces and internet FullV are in separate vrf. How can i grant nated access from main table to internet? I have read wiki article, but, it describe some other setup: access from...
by bda
Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:07 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to search specific route in specific vrf?
Replies: 8
Views: 1956

Re: How to search specific route in specific vrf?

I`m still have problem with searching routes in specific vrf... Can anybody help me?
by bda
Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:34 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to search specific route in specific vrf?
Replies: 8
Views: 1956

Re: How to search specific route in specific vrf?

Which version you are running? Works fine on v5.
I have 5.0beta6
by bda
Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:13 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to search specific route in specific vrf?
Replies: 8
Views: 1956

Re: How to search specific route in specific vrf?

/ip route print det where dst-address=3.3.3.3/32 routing-mark="lala" Hmm... Not working. /ip route print det where dst-address =1.177.124.0/22 routing-mark ="vrf-internet" Flags: X - disabled, A - active, D - dynamic, C - connect, S - static, r - rip, b - bgp, o - ospf, m - mme, B - blackhole, U - ...
by bda
Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:43 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to search specific route in specific vrf?
Replies: 8
Views: 1956

How to search specific route in specific vrf?

I have internet table in vrf-internet. For example: 287 ADb dst-address=1.177.116.0/22 gateway=213.137.224.33 gateway-status=213.137.224.33 on vrf-internet reachable ether3 distance=200 scope=40 target-scope=30 routing-mark=vrf-internet bgp-as-path="20485,3491,9318,38091,9845,9845,9845,9845,9845,101...
by bda
Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:59 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Please describe "routing-table=" statement
Replies: 7
Views: 2182

Re: Please describe "routing-table=" statement

some new parameters are available only in Terminal. later they are being added to WinBox
Ok, thanks. Understood.
by bda
Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:26 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to inject default route to some vrf and adv. to peers?
Replies: 8
Views: 2176

Re: How to inject default route to some vrf and adv. to peer

This option is not up to date in winbox. Use CLI to set default-originate=always and nothing will be reset unless you open peer config in winbox and make any changes then default-originate will be set to winbox defaults.

Ok, thanks.
by bda
Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:25 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to inject default route to some vrf and adv. to peers?
Replies: 8
Views: 2176

Re: How to inject default route to some vrf and adv. to peer

Dear developers, is it right to reset peer parameter default-originate=always to default-originate=if-installed , after peer restart via winbox? Pls help...
by bda
Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:42 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Please describe "routing-table=" statement
Replies: 7
Views: 2182

Re: Please describe "routing-table=" statement

Yes you can configure it in winbox.
Routing->BGP->VRFs(tab)
But I cant specify routing table parameter for bgp instance via winbox. Is it right?
Dear developers, could you describe situation with routing table parameter and winbox, please... Sorry for bumping this post...
by bda
Sun Sep 05, 2010 1:46 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Please describe "routing-table=" statement
Replies: 7
Views: 2182

Re: Please describe "routing-table=" statement

Yes you can configure it in winbox.
Routing->BGP->VRFs(tab)
But I cant specify routing table parameter for bgp instance via winbox. Is it right?
by bda
Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:46 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to inject default route to some vrf and adv. to peers?
Replies: 8
Views: 2176

Re: How to inject default route to some vrf and adv. to peer

Solved. peer set default-originate=always rtr11 do the trick. ? So, Winbox defaults to if-installed when you check default-originate ? Interesting. When you said you had default-originate turned on I assumed you were using the option always . I prefer the command line due to these types of inconsis...
by bda
Sun Sep 05, 2010 1:10 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to inject default route to some vrf and adv. to peers?
Replies: 8
Views: 2176

Re: How to inject default route to some vrf and adv. to peer

Solved.
peer set default-originate=always rtr11
do the trick. Winbox only have default originate checkbox, and has no menu in which we can select options...

UPDATE. pls, can anybody describe, why after peer restart - the default-originate=always reset to if-installed?
by bda
Sat Sep 04, 2010 11:29 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to inject default route to some vrf and adv. to peers?
Replies: 8
Views: 2176

Re: How to inject default route to some vrf and adv. to peer

Did you try this?
/routing bgp peer refresh-all
Of course!
by bda
Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:16 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How to inject default route to some vrf and adv. to peers?
Replies: 8
Views: 2176

How to inject default route to some vrf and adv. to peers?

Dear developers... How to inject default route to some vrf to advertise it to peers in this vrf? Simply adding "default originate" do nothing... Is it possible at all?
by bda
Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:27 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Please describe "routing-table=" statement
Replies: 7
Views: 2182

Re: Please describe "routing-table=" statement

Thanks for detailed explanation! But than we can do it for bgp instance via winbox?
by bda
Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:51 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Please describe "routing-table=" statement
Replies: 7
Views: 2182

Please describe "routing-table=" statement

Dear developers, describe please "routing-table=" statement, and how it impact on mp-bgp. There is no clear detail description in wiki.

Should the default bgp instance be in some routing table? And what about vrf`s? Every vrf in separate routing table? Why winbox does not have this property for vrf?
by bda
Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:44 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: ijecting local generated routes to some vrf [solved]
Replies: 2
Views: 1191

Re: ijecting local generated routes to some vrf

I've track an error! Thanks. The problem was in absence static redistribution in vrf configuration.
by bda
Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:35 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: ijecting local generated routes to some vrf [solved]
Replies: 2
Views: 1191

ijecting local generated routes to some vrf [solved]

Need help. The situation is: I cannot install local generated routes in some vrf, if this vrf is advertised to bgp-ce peer. Routes form that peer are successfully installed to target vrf, but my routes does not. The CE-router is cisco 2801 router this simply config and no input filter. The Cisco deb...