Community discussions

Search found 73 matches

  • 1
  • 2
by bevhost
Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:48 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

Or, try this... use the other brand access point that you know works. Then, with your 751, make a bridge between two of the ethernet ports (bridge, not switch). This would force all the data to go through the mikrotik's system, but would bypass the mikrotik wireless radios. So to be clear, this is ...
by bevhost
Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:32 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

Did you try upgrading os+fw?
Yes, Currently running 5.15 os and 2.38 fw
by bevhost
Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:11 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

More testing has revealed that it actually has nothing to do with authentication. Actually changing the auth mode makes it appear like its working because, it actually works when the phone is newly connected to the wireless. Changing the auth mode disconnects and reconnects the wireless association,...
by bevhost
Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:51 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

Actually sometime the problem still occurs with WPA.
Switching authentication to none works.
by bevhost
Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:57 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

Have just changed the Authentication from WPA2 to WPA and it appears we might have a solution.
More testing to be done.
by bevhost
Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:37 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

Just tried the same Handset at another site.
This site has a Billion BiPAC 7404VGO Wireless ADSL Modem Router with active VoIP Ports.

The phone works just fine here, without a Mikrotik.
by bevhost
Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:10 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

/interface wireless security-profiles set default authentication-types=wpa2-psk group-ciphers=aes-ccm group-key-update=5m interim-update=0s management-protection=disabled \ management-protection-key="" mode=dynamic-keys name=default radius-eap-accounting=no radius-mac-accounting=no radius-mac-authen...
by bevhost
Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:56 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

Is the Mikrotik the wireless access point for the wireless phones, or do you have a separate wireless access point? If it is the Mikrotik that has wireless radio, look at the wireless hardware settings (HW Retries, quality, tx/rx power, etc) I have looked at this and tried to change anything I thou...
by bevhost
Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:46 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

Even if the voice cuts out, there is no reason the pings should stop working. How do you "fix" it? Do the pings start working at call termination? Do you have to reboot Mikrotik, phone, or unplug the network? What a great question, I just tried it and something amazing happened. 64 bytes from 192.1...
by bevhost
Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:36 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

[admin@BEVHOME] /ip firewall filter> export # apr/24/2012 06:31:47 by RouterOS 5.7 # /ip firewall filter add action=log chain=forward disabled=yes log-prefix="BIt Torrent" p2p=all-p2p add action=drop chain=input comment="drop ssh brute forcers" disabled=no dst-port=22 protocol=tcp src-address-list=s...
by bevhost
Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:30 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

but right now no rules at all.
In the bridge anyway, I'll get the IP firewall rules and export them.
by bevhost
Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:28 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

You say that the pings stop working with the voice stops.

Do you have any filter rules in your firewall or bridge? If so, export them here.
I've tried rules that log things, but right now no rules at all.
Pass through IP Firewall also turned off.
by bevhost
Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:26 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

I have also disabled the Bandwidth Test Server in case port 2000 conflicts with SCCP Skinny Protocol.
by bevhost
Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:18 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

Turn off the SIP Helper in Mikrotik.

IP -> FIREWALL -> SERVICE PORTS
DISABLE SIP

Please let us know the results after you do that.
No change. :(
by bevhost
Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:49 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

Since my home setup is a little less complicated than work I tried to configure a different SSID just for the phone, so I could get rid of the Bridge between the wireless interface and my LAN. I setup a separate IP subnet on the new wireless interface with a DHCP server and NAT rules to let it route...
by bevhost
Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:23 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

Have you done any bypass troubleshootig yet to make sure the wireless phones work properly without the Mikrotik? Should be testing that tomorrow on a Cisco Wireless AP. I'll let you know. Have now tried it on a few networks. Our phone system provider tried it in their office on a Cisco and it works...
by bevhost
Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:44 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Re: Cisco 7921G IP Phones

Have you done any bypass troubleshootig yet to make sure the wireless phones work properly without the Mikrotik?
Should be testing that tomorrow on a Cisco Wireless AP. I'll let you know.
by bevhost
Sat Apr 21, 2012 4:31 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Cisco 7921G IP Phones
Replies: 30
Views: 7312

Cisco 7921G IP Phones

We have deployed a new phone system using wired Cisco 7941 phones and Wireless 7921G phones. We have the wired phones running on a VLAN on top of our normal LAN. We have HP switches which give priority to the VLAN traffic. The wireless network has two SSID's one for the PC's and one for phones. The ...
by bevhost
Fri Oct 07, 2011 11:27 am
Forum: General
Topic: Radius CoA and PoD with PPPOE
Replies: 18
Views: 14443

Re: Radius CoA and PoD with PPPOE

Does anyone know if this is still unsupported, or have things changed in newer releases?
by bevhost
Fri Feb 04, 2011 12:18 am
Forum: General
Topic: IPv6
Replies: 17
Views: 1925

Re: IPv6

Last time we had this discussion, january and february 2011 were mentioned.

But you've seen our ToDo list, so don't worry.
I hope that DHCPv6 is high up on the to do list.
by bevhost
Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:24 am
Forum: General
Topic: IPv6
Replies: 17
Views: 1925

Re: IPv6

Two /8s allocated to APNIC from IANA https://www.apnic.net/publications/news/2011/delegation Published on: Tuesday, 1 February 2011 Dear Colleagues The information in this announcement is to enable the Internet community to update network configurations, such as routing filters, where required. APN...
by bevhost
Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:46 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: Feature Request: IPv6 Hotspot support
Replies: 95
Views: 21350

Re: Feature Request: IPv6 Hotspot support

E-mail support, Keep asking. Make sure they know that you want v6 worked on. RIPE (Europe RIR) chews through a /8 every 3-5 months so it looks like RIPE is out sometime between June 2011 and Jan 2012 Its every 2-3 months for APNIC who have China and India churning through them. APNIC will run out w...
by bevhost
Tue Nov 30, 2010 2:33 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: Feature Request: IPv6 Hotspot support
Replies: 95
Views: 21350

Re: Feature Request: IPv6 Hotspot support

Vint Cerf, vice-president of Google who is known to many as one of the ‘fathers of the Internet’, declared at a 6UK launch event held in London recently that the UK will run out of IPv4 addresses well before the end of 2011. He said “There’s no question we’re going to be out of address space by spri...
by bevhost
Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:09 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

There is a liveCD floating around Ok, so I found the CD, downloaded it, had a play. Read the specs., It's really only designed to allow IP6 only clients to access IPv4 legacy servers. It's not meant for Ipv4 to Ipv6 connections and not designed to do P2P applications. It might allow for Hole Punchi...
by bevhost
Fri Oct 29, 2010 5:39 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

Web browsing worked fine, never ran into an issue. Skype worked for voice but I didnt try video (Never had a need) Existing NAT-busting methods used in alot of software works fine but will run into issues in a NAT444 setup. SIP and FTP had issues due to IP info carried inside the application level ...
by bevhost
Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:15 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

I can see some benefit of NAT64 for some of the Mobile phone providers in countries like India and China that are turning on new mobile devices at a staggering rate. Some newer mobile devices do support IPv6 quite well and they need access to legacy web servers on IPv4 and that is a good reason to u...
by bevhost
Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:08 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

Do you really think manual port forwarding at the ISP level is ever going to work?? I doubt we'll see NAT64 in ROS but the big players are deploying it, It will likely end up another transition step after large scale ISP's find that NAT444 is just not worth the hassle. Have you actually used NAT64 ...
by bevhost
Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:27 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

I would think that NAT444 + Dual Stack would work much better than NAT64/DNS64. If you would need a gun to your head to do NAT444 then you'll need an even bigger gun to do NAT64. If you think NAT64 will solve any of your problems think again. Heaps of stuff doesn't work with NAT64. About the only th...
by bevhost
Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:46 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

HI, Just returned from the IPv6 Forum Conference in Melbourne, Australia and the current advice is.

Dual Stack where you can.
Tunnel where you can't
Use NAT if you have a gun to your head.
by bevhost
Thu Oct 21, 2010 2:07 am
Forum: General
Topic: MUM in Australia. Would you come?
Replies: 115
Views: 21638

Re: MUM in Australia. Would you come?

Count me in. I live in Brisbane so that's fantastic.
by bevhost
Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:07 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

Has anyone had a look at this? http://www.isc.org/software/aftr AFTR (Address Family Transition Router) is the latest product in ISC's family of open source Internet infrastructure products. Developed in concert with Comcast, AFTR 1.0 is intended to ease the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 by allowing ...
by bevhost
Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:52 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: Roadmap for IPv6?
Replies: 98
Views: 21976

Re: Roadmap for IPv6?

If you can't do DHCPv6 client/server yet can you at least do DHCPv6 relay? If hotspot with IPv6 can't be made to work then we need to fall back to PPPoE Server working with IPv6 and we need DHCPv6 relay. This won't be too good for Hotels and the like, but for sites with longer term users they can us...
by bevhost
Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:39 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Serve hotspot web page on ipV6 address?
Replies: 5
Views: 897

Re: Serve hotspot web page on ipV6 address?

not this discussion again ... please search before you post Which part do you think I have wrong. Please tell me it's the part that Mikrotik has decided not to implement hotspot and that you are in fact going to do it soon. And please don't tell me that IPv6 doesn't do NAT so hotspot won't work bec...
by bevhost
Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:50 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

And how well does skype work?
Or MSN ?
by bevhost
Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:47 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

Can anyone who has a NAT64/DNS64 setup try a couple of tests for me.

http://66.102.11.104/

And how well does skype work?
by bevhost
Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:30 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

allowing pure v6 CPE users to access the v4 world, But perhaps this is a tech that should be kept in the big boys league of Cisco/Juniper as those that will actually run into the NAT44 issues will have the money to buy them Finally we actually agree on something. Although I was not aware that Junip...
by bevhost
Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:28 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

You dont need hole punching unless the application your attempting to use sends the IP contact info within the packet i.e SIP/RTP/FTP etc
I think you're confusing Hole Punching with ALG (Application Layer Gateway) kernel modules.
by bevhost
Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:06 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

I suggest you gain access to NAT64 devices a v6 client accessing v4 space will use the same port on v4 that the v6 address is attempting to use thus its normal mode is only to address translate and will port translate only when the v4 pool assigned to the NAT64 box is exhausted for the v6 side port...
by bevhost
Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:18 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

double NAT is neither acceptable nor legal here in Italy for ISPs. You can legislate all you like, but once there is no more IPv4 space to go around thats the end of the game. I still don't see how NAT64 solves this problem especially if the ISP is not allowed to use NAT. Because there is no port N...
by bevhost
Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:14 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Serve hotspot web page on ipV6 address?
Replies: 5
Views: 897

Re: Serve hotspot web page on ipV6 address?

Hotspot can be made to work on IPv6, Mikrotik has just chosen not to implement it yet.
by bevhost
Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:32 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

It's a work in progress. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate-stateful-12 I think I like this one better. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xli-behave-ivi-07 Translates both ways not just IPv6 to IPv4. Stateless, so no NAT timeouts. Has been in production for some time at CERTNET ...
by bevhost
Thu Sep 30, 2010 1:37 pm
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

double NAT is neither acceptable nor legal here in Italy for ISPs.
You can legislate all you like, but once there is no more IPv4 space to go around thats the end of the game.

I still don't see how NAT64 solves this problem especially if the ISP is not allowed to use NAT.
by bevhost
Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:55 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

I see DNS64/NAT64 as a way of getting rid of Dual Stack. It means that a client can have a single IPv6 Stack and connect to IPv6 directly and IPv4 through NAT. Incoming connections must be made to IPv6 address. Outbound connections (to IPv4 anyway) must use the provided DNS. If you have dual stack P...
by bevhost
Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:44 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

I don't see how it solves that problem. It's not like there is a NAT46 and DNS46 as well. We are already an ISP doing Double NAT and we want to get an IPv6 Stack to allow customers to support incoming connections more easily. I don't see how NAT64 can help us. Currently customers have to use UPNP to...
by bevhost
Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:32 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: Feature Request: IPv6 Hotspot support
Replies: 95
Views: 21350

Re: Feature Request: IPv6 Hotspot support

Do you separated layer 2 between your "Hotspot" and Normal lan? If not having 2 subnets is a complete waste of time since v6 local link address would be able to be used between then
of course, how silly do you think I am?
by bevhost
Thu Sep 30, 2010 4:17 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: Feature Request: IPv6 Hotspot support
Replies: 95
Views: 21350

Re: Feature Request: IPv6 Hotspot support

True, No need to be wastful from the start tho, Residential's have no need for multiple subnets yet so handing out /64's is fine, /48's for Business clients If you want to be really stingy just allocate a /60, I have a residential internet service and I use more than one LAN. I have two SSID's on w...
by bevhost
Thu Sep 30, 2010 4:08 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

Dual stacking only works when you have v4 space to dual stack with, If you dual stack with private v4 space you run into double nat issues, NAT64 is a way around this for some but not all applications What problems does it solve? I don't see how it's any better, and considering it's not well tested...
by bevhost
Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:05 am
Forum: RouterOS v6 RC and v7 BETA
Topic: NAT64 and DNS64
Replies: 77
Views: 24747

Re: NAT64 and DNS64

However it has to be ready (and tested) by the time the address space is exhausted otherwise we are in deep s.... :)
Why can't you run Dual Stack?
  • 1
  • 2