MikroTik

whoknew

I am looking for 2x of the following;

https://mikrotik.com/product/mt48_480095_11dg

However, I need the DGU version. I can't seem to find it anywhere. I have had a couple of these bricks die and had to steal them from other CCR stock. Does anyone know where I can grab the DGU version?

whoknew

so I think then, since I can keep it in a good clean environment, this is a good option and connect it with 12/2 Romex to the top of the tower.

https://mikrotik.com/product/mtp250_53v ... ifications

whoknew

These indicate outdoor. I have a fully generated power source with backup in a building below the tower. Is this indicated installing a standard plug on one side and connect it to 18/2 on the other end? If so that works all the same for me.

whoknew

I will be powering multiple 60GHz Mikrotik products on a tower, I see the netPower 16P comes with the proper DC blocks for 18/2 powering, but what external switching power supplies work with it?

whoknew

I don't see any current product in the lineup with an SPF+ connection, any idea on when/if that is in the pipeline?

whoknew

Nice, so I have it working. I used ether6 and ether7, put them in a bridge and made sure to use IP Firewall and Use IP firewall for VLAN and it took off. I am going to need a bigger router for some of my 1Gbps+ connections to do this, but it looks like its working. Anyone else doing larger feeds and...

whoknew

Depends which CCR1009 in particular ... CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+ has a switch chip managing ether1-ether5 ... to have traffic through those ports to hit bridge code one has to disable HW offload.

It is a CCR1009-8G-1S-PC, maybe I'll try the upper ports, looks like it may have group 1 as ether1-4

whoknew

I am needing to offload some bandwidth queing to a seperate CCR, I thought I could do this potentially with a transparent traffic shaper, but I am running into some issues. I have created a bridge and added two of the ports ether2 & ether 3 into the bridge, I see traffic passing on ether2 and et...

whoknew

If I buy a RBwAPG-60ad-SA, do I have to buy wAP_60G's with the license level 4 to attach them or can I use RBwAPG-60adkit with a license level 3?

whoknew

Anyone using the wAP 60Gx3 AP? Can I buy 3 wAP 60G's and attach them to the 60Gx3 without license upgrade?

Has anything changed on the normal wAP 60G's that allow PtMP without license upgrade?

whoknew

SOLVED We get after a lot of work and trouble solving the problem of CCR1072 no longer restart or freeze. Solved the problem was relatively easy, after more than 3 months waiting for the mikrotik team to position on the problem, solved. We traded the CCR1072 for an MX-80 Juniper. So....you went fro...

whoknew

SOLVED We get after a lot of work and trouble solving the problem of CCR1072 no longer restart or freeze. Solved the problem was relatively easy, after more than 3 months waiting for the mikrotik team to position on the problem, solved. We traded the CCR1072 for an MX-80 Juniper. So....you went fro...

whoknew

Can we get a Mikrotik response please. The 1072 is ideal with the redundant PSU's but I cannot be rebooting it once or more a week.

At the very least like Doush said, give us a v6.38.xx that is patched. specifically for the CCR1072.

whoknew

Our CCR1072 has around 2Gbps going through it currently (about to go up to 4Gbps). Constant watchdog reboots, if I disable watchdog, I can only recover the CCR1072 by pulling power from both power supplies. Our setup is as follows: 6.42.6 is the firmware we are on. We have 38 static routes (nothing ...

whoknew

There is a clear problem with the CCR 1072. Mikrotik we need refunds for these units or for the problem to be addressed. Please issue a statement here on the forum.

whoknew

We are on 6.43.4 and the problem still exists. If you disable the watchdog timer, the router will hard lockup, all lights on and you will have to pull both power supplies.

whoknew

We are having the same issue with the watchdog timer reboot. disabling the watchdog causes the router to lock up until power is taken away. Full reboot with pulling power cables from both Power supplies. We are looking for a solution to this. Our CCR1036 that this replaced did not have this issue. W...

whoknew

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=136455

Thanks!

whoknew

I've been running down through the thread, where is the disable beam forming at? I will try to align without it, I am guessing we have been impatient with the alignment process, or beamforming is causing us to have a poorly aligned link and correcting it for us. its the set tx-sector=0 ?

whoknew

I'm just want to share my experience with PtP W60G link. We've deployed this link about 45 days ago. Since then we have experience HEAVY rain (2 days non-stop) and light snowing. Link hasn't disconnected once and lowest MCM was 6. I've read that people have problems with allignment but we all have ...

whoknew

For all of you that don't seem to be dropping, how are you aligning your LHG's and even WAP60G's if using those. My disconnects have to be coming from an alignment issue.

Are you using Signal, RSSI, sector info?

whoknew

Anton,

On all of our links we are running 6.42.9 or greater, this link is specifically is on 6.43.4 along with firmware 6.43.4

whoknew

I have a pair of these and many more of the WAP60G's in the field and all of them have disconnect/reconnect issues, even without rain/snow etc. This is my latest paired numbers below, if I try and align them any differently then where they are now it gets worse. I am actually on the latest firmware....

whoknew

Don't trust RSSI readings too much. You should be able to get same distances with ease - upgrade to latest versions, there a lot of changes that affect receive sensitivity So what exactly do we trust? What are we aiming for, centre? If so, I have seen centre on different tx-sector. 36, 26/27, etc I...

whoknew

Here is a common example of our links. The amount of link downs is numerous, we are @ 81.89m in distance and -62dB. I can;t tell if we are way out of alignment and we are @ center. We have tried fine tuning these but cannot seem to get better than -61/-62 or so. This particular link is line of site ...

whoknew

Going to bump this up. We have aligned several to "center" and best RSSI as possible. We are still getting link downs on the wireless radios. We have several on 6.42.7 and 6.43 and see the same issues. Some of these are less than 50M, we are also seeing this on a LHGG-60ad pair that is on ...

whoknew

Hi Guys, I have several of the Wireless Wires and a few of the LHGG-60ad's. I am having a lot of link downs on the wireless interfaces, I believe this may be due to alignment, however we typically aligned for best Signal and not RSSI or center. I have noticed the link degradations mostly during a ra...

whoknew

Hi all, I am wanting to get a more precise mount for pitch as I will be using a pair to connect two buildings at much different heights. What is everyone using? A standard J mount will not work in my situation, I need something a little more custom. I was thinking about grabbing one of the quickmoun...

whoknew

excellent, I look forward to it.

I may try to do 4-to-1 multi-point. I have the application to test it, just need to get my hands on 1 more unit.

whoknew

I have 4 total units and ready to put them through the paces. I sent off my request this morning, how long is the turn around on this?

whoknew

Bumping, also interested if I can use this as a core switch to carry 150+ Vlans including QinQ

whoknew

Hi All, I wanted to get some ideas on large apartment complex networking setups. I run a few larger ones and have been wanting to redesign a few of them now that I have larger blocks of Public IP's to assign to the residents. Current models for me have been a VLAN assigned to each apartment and then...

whoknew

still a no-go, not sure why this is not working, has anyone else had this working on v6 of routerOS?

whoknew

I do have the use firewall in the bridge settings checked, I also tried disabling it and then enabling it again to see if there was something going on there. I had connection tracking set to auto, I changed it to yes and it still is not catching anything. I have also tried another RouterBoard (750G ...

whoknew

bumping, wondering if I did something wrong, I followed the instructions via the Wiki, I tested it on my office connection and it worked, but not in quite the same setup as the production network I tried applying it to.

Thanks all!

whoknew

Hey all, I am wanting to do a transparent traffic shaper before my router that is doing PCC load balancing. The problem I am having is that nothing is being marked on the firewall. I have a bridge setup and ether 2 and ether 3 added to the bridge and the bridge has enabled "Use IP Firewall"...

whoknew

bump, could use some help. I have 2 100Mbps fiber connections that I load balance via PCC. I need to set a max download and upload on both the WAN interfaces. If they go much over 100Mbps the latency will jump to 500+ms. I also need to be able to watch the queues for each Vlan, is there a way to set...

whoknew

I need to set a max limit on interface WANA and interface WANB to keep latency from going up. I also want to be able to see each "cluster" on my network, each "cluster" or "pod" has up to 5 Vlans per. Below is what I have in place for the "pods". Whenever I tr...

whoknew

I can no longer setup an NTP client as unicast, did this feature get removed or moved to another area I am not seeing?

whoknew

So v6.13 seems stable? Anyone using a hotspot with usermanager? Anyone using PCC and needing to use allow remote dns use?

whoknew

keep us posted paulsa.

whoknew

I have had problems with the built in sip helper in RouterOS on a couple of occasions.

try disable the sip helper under the ip firewall service-port

whoknew

bump please.

I am looking for some help with queue prioritizing and delivering a better experience to my end users.

Thanks,!

whoknew

Agreed.

honestly I know it was over kill but for all my PCC setups that I was seeing 20,000 pps or more per interface I just went with the CCR 1016. I have like 8% max cpu usage.

whoknew

how much traffic is going through this?

whoknew

Pull out a couple of the DSL connections from the PCC loadbalancing and manually route the customers with gaming consoles. Also UPnP for me was broken in 6.10 I have not tried it in awhile.

Do you have the internal network Vlan'd out?

whoknew

Are the inputs to mark the new-connection set to passthrough?
Are the outputs to add the new-routing-marks set to passthrough?
Are the prerouting accepts set to passthrough?
Are the prerouting to add the new-routing-marks set to passthrough?

Are they supposed to be?

whoknew

hey all, I was checking out the wiki page : http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service In it is listed the simple queue setup for a single user IP. I am running a dual WAN PCC setup and want to limit the maximum each WAN can go. They will both be 50Mbps download and 10Mbps upload...

whoknew

its cool, I am confused by the dns issue though, as it was not present in my v5 devices.

whoknew

maybe SRPF impact. try disable RP filtering if used(usual/reasonal for bras/cpe only), temporally.

I have RP Filter set to no currently. PCC setups are not designed to work if RP Filter is enabled

whoknew

hmm,

is there another way not to use Internal DNS when using a hotspot? I have not been able to get that to work also running PCC.

whoknew

I have a CCR1036-12G-4S with the following running on it; hotspot PCC load balancing 2 Nat rules I am seeing slow load times on webpages and I suspect a possible issue with DNS Caching. I am on v6.1 with firmware version 3.09. All packages installed are running v6.1 including user-manager. Should I ...

whoknew

What exactly did they change in RouterOS to make this a switch over say an RB-2011 etc?

whoknew

Troy, I figured it was his internal lan subnets, wasn't for sure, I usually do not use address list. I am thinking of giving this a go as well, I will use a simple queue to limit the total bandwidth download and upload, then begin using the queue tree for QoS. Why does DNS take such a high priority?...

whoknew

derr12,

can you elaborate what you have in the address-list=public.

I too only use pcq for individual bandwidth queues but I'm look to give ea better browsing experience to my users.

Thanks.

whoknew

I have had this problem on another CCR, I can only connect via IP address, it will not connect via MAC. [admin@MikroTik] > /tool mac-server mac-winbox print Flags: X - disabled, * - default # INTERFACE 0 * all [admin@MikroTik] > /tool mac-server print Flags: X - disabled, * - default # INTERFACE 0 *...

whoknew

I have gone through the config multiple times, cannot find an error.

Anyone else run into this?

whoknew

same performance on v6.3 and v6.4

whoknew

Hi, I have a CCR1036-12G-4S on v6.2 (has also been on 6.0 RC 12 as well as v6.1). I am using the PCC method of load balancing with src address being the Per Connection Classifier. It can currently only do near 135-140Mbps simultaneously on both connections at once (so 67-70Mbps on each connection). ...

whoknew

I have a ccr1036 running a dual wan. I need to make 2 simple queue rules that does the following; limits WANA to a Maximum of 50Mbps download and 10Mbps upload limits clients to 8Mbps download and 2Mbps upload limits WANB to a Maximum of 35Mbps download and 10Mbps upload limits clients to 8Mbps down...

whoknew

had the same issue on v6.0rc14

I ended up using the lcd to assign an ip address. after that I immediately updated to v6.1 and updated the firmware to 3.09.

whoknew

disable sip helper.

ip->firewall->Service Ports

whoknew

:bump:

whoknew

I have 3x CCR1036-12G-4S's and one of them has been rebooting non stop. 1 of them is on firmware 3.05 with RouterOS being v6.1, another is on v6.0 RC14 and on firmware version 3.05. The one that was rebooting was on v6.1 with firmware version 3.08. I updated it to version 3.09 and the reboots seem t...

whoknew

I am experiencing this exact same issue, however mine will work fine with Internet Explorer 9 and 10, but it receives this error in Google chrome and Mozilla Firefox. Is this a bug or are we doing something wrong? My package version of the userman is v6.1 on a ccr1036-12G-4S I have rebuilt the datab...

whoknew

Is there a way to attach a profile to multiple users all at once?

whoknew

I have a routed connection on a router that is using PCC (PCC works fine). I need to not have the routed connection NAT, it does have a static public IP.

Is there a way to tell NAT not to NAT a connection?

whoknew

in-interface= is still needed. Also do you have either the rule: /ip firewall nat chain=pre-hotspot action=accept dst-address-type=!local hotspot=auth if not using this you will need to add the following to each line in PCC mangles: /ip firewall mangle chain=prerouting action=mark-connection new-con...

whoknew

I am running a Dual Wan load balancing setup with PCC.

I need to put a max limit on each WAN so that I can keep latency down. I need to cap both interfaces @ 29Mbps and not let them go over that. I can then queue each user @ 5Mbps x 5Mbps.

whoknew

Hi folks, quick question, here are my mangle rules currently (still have them in notepad, haven't put them into the router yet; add chain=input in-interface=ether1-WANA action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=ether1-WANA_conn add chain=input in-interface=ether2-WANB action=mark-connection new-con...

whoknew

I have been looking at the possibilities via the wiki; http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Load_Balancing#PCC_.28Per_Connection_Classifier.29 I think the PCC method will be my best option, over the ECMP method. I would like for it to have failover, if one modem locks up then all traffic could go out the o...

whoknew

is connecting to a CCR via mac address not allowed anymore? I can connect fine via IP to ether1 but cannot connect via MAC. check if "mac server" is enabled for that interface. [admin@MikroTik] /tool mac-server> print indeed it is enabled. just like the rest of my RB's. It does nothing wh...

whoknew

is connecting to a CCR via mac address not allowed anymore? I can connect fine via IP to ether1 but cannot connect via MAC.

whoknew

my high cpu was being caused by routerOS installed as a virtual machine in ESXi 4.1 with the adapter type as flexible. I fixed the high cpu load by changing it to e1000. The high TX drops I was never 100% convinced were a huge problem, but I do queue my users as a total using the queue tree, capping...

whoknew

I did not, I had previously posted this while the install of routerOS(x86) was inside of ESXi. I then just did an install without ESXi and had the same results. I do have a layer 3 Cisco switch in between my sites and router running QinQ but I cannot remove that as it is my fiber providers. If you h...

whoknew

I had posted this same exact scenario about 3 months ago, as well as 5 months ago.

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=66255

whoknew

Routes; 0 A S dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=2.2.2.1 gateway-status=2.2.2.1 reachable ether2 outbound distance=1 scope=30 target-scope=10 routing-mark=isp_2 1 A S dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=1.1.1.1 gateway-status=1.1.1.1 reachable ether2 outbound distance=1 scope=30 target-scope=10 Mangle (I went ...

whoknew

I have several finger networks that come in via fiber and hook in to their respective x86 RouterOS machines, from each of the RouterOS machines they hit the switch, go into the Core Router (Virtual machine in ESXi). This is beside the point however, I am now using 2 ISP's (went from 500Mbpsx500Mbps ...

whoknew

several locations coming in via fiber directly attached to my noc, each location on its own router for various reasons.

whoknew

can you post diagrams of your network setup.

whoknew

Has anyone cleanly and successfully done this migration without just starting from scratch? If so any advice, howto's etc?

whoknew

I have attached a quick paint image of this particular network. I don't need to failover the 2 ISP's if one goes down, I really want to route a set of subnets out 1 ISP and obviously the rest out the other ISP. I'm more concerned with getting my Mangle rules and route marking/table setup properly. I...

whoknew

:bump:

Sorry for bringing this up, I am stuck and really didn't want to rebuild the userman on v5. If anyone has successfully gone from a v4 to a v5 please let me know the process used!

Thank you!

whoknew

whoknew

I have a 4.17 x86 install that I want to do an update on, it is running the userman database that is quite large, I have read horror stories that the update process is not worth going through. Has anyone successfully gotten through this without to many problems and a bunch of extra work?

whoknew

This is not resolved. The issue is that they can be in a group with each other if some third party creates the group, neither one of them can be the host of that group. parties in general can sometimes be an issue. Either way a loopback issue with xbox live? the way i understand it the party is crea...

whoknew

I'm not sure. Try to setup hairpin NAT and see if that helps. If you think of each xbox as a server connecting to each other over Xbox live (public IPs) could make it an invalid connection on the same LAN. I tried this, no dice. I could try NAT'ing them to different public IP addresses. edit: of no...

whoknew

I have customers that are unable to connect to groups of friends etc on XBOX live when it is internal to the network. They are on different Vlans internally but they both get NAT'd to the same Public IP. Is there a way to allow them to connect to one another with a UPNP? I tried setting this up earl...

whoknew

:bump:

whoknew

I have something very broken with your script. I edited only what I needed to. # ------------- start editing here ------------- # Edit the variables below to suit your needs # Please fill the WAN interface names :local InterfaceISP1 ether1 :local InterfaceISP2 ether2 # Please fill the gateway IPs (o...

whoknew

If you run 1:1 then do it like this: add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat dst-address-list=WAN_IPs_host1 to-addresses=10.0.y.x1 add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat dst-address-list=WAN_IPs_host2 to-addresses=10.0.y.x2 Then for your address list do it like add address=87.197.y.x1 list=WAN_IPs_host1 add addre...

whoknew

Alright I'm a bit confused now, I thought I had the failover working, but it appears I don't.

I can unplug ether1 = ISP1 and it fails over to ether2 = ISP2. When I plug ether1 = ISP1 back in, it does not fail back to ISP1.

whoknew

I run 1:1 pretty much everywhere, I have not done NAT based on "WAN IP" before with address lists. Could you give me and example to work from.

Thank you so much tomaskir for your expertise on this. The video was awesome in your comment.

whoknew

ok it would appear I have this working, however I have a hang up that I completely forgot about.

I cannot only srcnat->masq

I have a ton or src/dst rules for different servers behind this.

whoknew

Let's see if I have this right, apologies first time doing failover, not first time doing dual WAN (route marking) :IP routes dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=68.68.x.x gateway-status=68.68.x.x reachable via ether1-sv distance=1 scope=30 target-scope=10 routing-mark=sv dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=50....

whoknew

The setup works. Notice how the scope is used to recursively lookup routes. I personally dont like this, because it makes a mess of your routing table. You can look at my failover script on the wiki http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Failover_Scripting It monitors an IP, if that goes down, it increases ...

whoknew

:bump:

whoknew

Has anyone got the following working? http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Advanced_Routing_Failover_without_Scripting I am not following this wiki write up at all with the Host explanations. The second step is to have the host as a gateway..... Also is this really the best way to do failover? What are oth...

whoknew

Not trying to download/upload, more so go out WAN1 and come back in WAN2 to access a web gui of something that is on WAN2.

whoknew

been trying at this all afternoon, still no progress.. Anyone done this, where you allow clients to be nat'd out one wan link and be able to come back into the other Wan link?

whoknew

hi,

I have a dual wan setup, I am needing to have my data users go out one WAN and come back in the other WAN. How do I accomplish this?

whoknew

:bump:

went to 5.20, still same problem. Have not tried going back to v4 yet.

whoknew

:bump:

Still looking for the problem, may create a new machine in VMware and turn it into 4.11-4.6 machine.

whoknew

Why don't you upgrade? Maybe it will solve your problems. I have several other Routers, same setup in general, the difference is ROS versions. Examples of my x86 machine versions: 4.11 - Has the same number of Vlans as the v5.1 in question, no problems. 4.30 - Not as many Vlans but using hotpots. 4...

whoknew

:bump:

whoknew

Hello, I am attaching a screenshot once again of an ongoing problem that I am having. I have several other routers setup in the same fashion as this one, but this one in particular is giving me fits. If you look in my screen shot I have a ton of TX drops on Vlan interfaces. The only thing I can thin...

whoknew

I have 1:1 them out different Public IP addresses and they still cannot connect to each other.

whoknew

Hey guys, I have a couple of customers that are about to make me pull my hair out over their damn XBOX's. First they are on different Vlan's on one router, they both have xbox's and cannot join one another's party. They both currently get srcnat'd to the same Public IP, I do have the availability to...

whoknew

What cards do you have in the machine? I had a i2600 doing the same thing on 5.1, however I stopped the router and change the network adapters in ESXi 4.1.0 from flexible to e1000 (cards I'm using) and the resources went from up near 80-90% down to 20-30%.

whoknew

Ok so after making the change to the network adapters on the vm, it appears all my TX drops are gone! Also I went from an average of around 50% cpu usage down to 12-20%. The ethernet was consuming about 30-50% cpu usage on the machine with the flexible adapter chosen.

whoknew

Bumping this.

I think part of my problem is the interfaces in ESXi are set to flexible, I believe we are going to try and set them to the e1000e setting from the command line.

Anyone else experience this? I had seen one post on it a long time ago, but didn't see a resolution.

Thanks!

whoknew

I have the exact same thing with an x86 on ESXi 4.1 with an i7 2600k it was randomly crashing and showing 100% cpu usage in vmware.

whoknew

I am seeing huge amounts of Tx drops on one of our x86 machines. This box in particular is housing 572 Vlans. I am going to attach a screen shot and show you. I went back and found another post that was made on something similar, however many versions ago. I wanted some input or help as to a fix, or...

whoknew

:bump:

whoknew

On 4.17 I cannot get the uPnP to work correctly to stop the strict NAT setting on XBOX's.

I cannot find a work aroud except that supposedly its fixed in newer versions. I do not use simple queues so if that is the only issue then I may give it a go.

whoknew

I think I may be messing up my Queue Trees and maybe misunderstanding the way it works, I have used the QOS documents from MUM but maybe seeing someone type it out will help. here are print outs of my setup: Queue Tree 0 name="main-global-down" parent=global-out limit-at=0 priority=8 max-l...

whoknew

What is the best method to update this? Any gotcha's I should be looking out for? I will snapshot it before updating it, just looking for someone with past experience, this will be the first of many updates for me on mikrotik PC/x86. This machine that I will be updating is running a core 2 duo 2.8Gh...

whoknew

Yup then I have the same exact internal setup as you.

whoknew

Do the math again and read 2 posts up.

I see it, 130.3Mbps from your bandwidth test is UDP, the rest is real traffic. I can't do tx and rx 50Mbps, mine is one way tops.

So again is there anything tweaked in the bridge at all? everytime I add the bridge it adds a L2 MTU of 65535. yours is 1520.

whoknew

Oh also in your screenshot it shows that 130.3Mbps is UDP from the bandwidth test you have running, that would mean 50Mbps or so TCP. That lines up with my maximum transmissions as well for TCP. Are you for sure you can go higher than 50Mbps on that bonding?

whoknew

Ok, are you doing anything special on the other side of things? are these connected to switches? I am bonding ether2 and ether3 and bridging bond and ether4. ether4 is connected to a trunk port on a switch that is carrying 2 vlans. The only difference I see is my L2 MTU on my bridge is setting itsel...

whoknew

care to share your configuration? especially the bridge setup. my bond it identical, and I bridge the bond and an ether port that is connected to switches. Mine do carry vlans, but I'm seeing terrible performance with TCP, UDP is fine. TCP obviously is doing some re transmissions and the re ordering...

whoknew

The clients are doing the reordering of the packets, I do see a bunch of re transmissions, but I didn't think the overhead would be so large.

whoknew

Anyone have anything on this? I have tested both on RB450G's and RB750's. both pairs of them are seeing 200Mbps UDP easily, but only 50Mbps tops on TCP 22.5Mbps on each interface in the bond. I have tested with a simple copy of a file on the network, as well as the bandwidth tool test on the RB's an...

whoknew

I have tried everything, simple file transfer between two windows machines, bandwidth test from RB's without capping its resources. btest from client to opposite end RB450g. I have also tried something suggested by another user, send 3 200MB files across and see if the throughput increases, it did n...

whoknew

I have read some of the other posts as well on this, I'm seeing 50Mbps (22.5/22.5 on each link) instead of closer to 200Mbps. Is there a working cure for this or is that what I'm stuck with? UDP performs perfectly fine, its TCP traffic that has the performance issue. This is between two RB450G's run...

whoknew

No I do not. I need 3 ports on the RB450g to be trunk ports. Ether2 and Ether3 are part of a bonding with Rocket M5's in WDS mode. I need to carry 2 vlans from one site to the other. I need the ports to be trunked.

whoknew

I need to trunk 3 ports on an RB450g (ether2 and ether3 belong to a bond with WDS RocketM5's in the middle) and ether1 is trunk port to a cisco switch. On my switch I have the following: int fa0/24 switchport mode trunk switchport trunk vlan 60,70 I have read the wiki set but the example given is fo...

whoknew

just tried the rule as well as adding the vlan to the switch. does not appear to work. It does work as soon as I bridge bonding1 and ether1 on both sides. I cannot ping from anything to the inside's of the rb's though (ether1, vlan 60 ip address). I suspect this is something to do with the vlan tags...

whoknew

I found this (http://lansklad.ru/articles/nastroyka_oborudovaniya/238/bonding_mikrotik_ubiquiti_rocket_m5_200_mbps_1204.html), I did have to translate it, I think they are doing exactly what I'm wanting to do as well. The problem is I can't see the rest of the configuration used. I can try and add t...

whoknew

Ok, So I have been trying to set this up, and still no luck. I have removed the native vlan so that vlan 60 and 70 are both tagged before making it to either mikrotik. ether1 on both RB450gs connect to the cisco switches on both sides. On both RB450g's I have ether 2 and ether 3 setup as the bonding...

whoknew

Ok, I cannot get this to work. I am getting 200Mbps on the wireless bridges with the RB450's have 2 bonded ether ports. That works great. I cannot grasp however how I will be able to manage the wireless bridges inside of that bond. I need to be able to get to their GUI's from the internal LAN. Also ...

whoknew

I have it setup currently in a test situation, the 2 routerboards are connected directly, I took the wireless bridges out for right now and wanted to test 2 Gbps ports in a bonded situation. I am only seeing 500Mbps or so going across in a bandwidth test between the 2 boards. Should it not be 2Gbps?...

whoknew

The Rockets are in StationWDS and AccessPointWDS respectively. The ports that the RB450's connect to the cisco switches are in question at this point for me. I have them trunked to allow vlan 60,70 with vlan 60 being native. I am now wondering how I setup ether 1 on the RB450's, do I add VLAN 60 and...

whoknew

Yes, http://wiki.ubnt.com/Mikrotik_bonding I'm doing this exactly right now, I am still trying to figure out how to make the routerboard and bridges transparent to carry the VLAN 60 and 70. Essentially ether3 and ether 4 right now are the two slaves in the bonding. The bridges are configured properl...

whoknew

I do want to bond the wireless ubnt rockets, I dont need to bond to the switches. I was under the impression that bonding from the rb450g would be the exact same setup that I have now? Maybe I'm reading that wrong. I essentially need to carry up to 200Mbps on the wireless bridges and the two vlans m...

whoknew

I attached a pretty poor drawing of the network in question. I need to get two vlans across the wireless bridges with Load Balancing if possible. I figured someone else has run into this at some point, the bridges are currently working properly but in etherchannel, I cannot monitor them obviously no...

whoknew

so add another ip route 0.0.0.0/0 towards the gateway I want to use?

whoknew

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Load_Bala ... e_Gateways

I was using this, it works well for what I have setup. Only problem I have, I can't access the RB450G via winbox offsite. Any thoughts?

whoknew

1 WAN for data and another for a SIP trunk. Whats the best way to route both? I have read the wiki on the ECMP load balancing (I don't want to load balance, just route all voip traffic to SIP trunk and route data through the cable modem), also read the Load Balancing over Multiple Gateways wiki. Any...

whoknew

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Load_Balancing_Persistent I have followed this, however I was wondering how it is choosing which WAN circuit to use. I've noticed completely random numbers on both interfaces that the WAN connections are connected to. Also I have noticed the connection appearing as thou...

whoknew

Hey all, I'm getting weird ping results from a switch, it will reply back with 3 responses. I checked to see if i have a duplicate IP problem, but my ARP table and an ARP ping to that address only shows the switch. I am thinking it may be a switch problem, has anyone run into this? I'm also seeing a...

whoknew

Anyone else having problems with the Nook Color not bypassing the hotspot even after having a reservation in DHCP and a binding based off of both IP and MAC? I have a nook color customer that it will not bypass the hotspot.

whoknew

I don't need to capture it all, maybe free up some bandwidth and prioritize http traffic while keeping my pcq rules.

whoknew

Hello All, I currently have over 50 Routers running RouterOS in various forms. One of the big things that I'm wanting to do now is to prioritize http traffic ahead of say p2p etc to maybe take off some fo the bandwidth issues I am seeing at certain sites. I use pcq rules now and limit users to a set...

whoknew

I have been running torch and it looks like the packets are making it to the PBX just fine. So I see a src address from the static IP of my IP phones offsite, and the dst address as the public IP of my PBX that is in the dstnat rule. When I go to torch packets from my (src address) Public IP of the ...

whoknew

Still no luck on this

whoknew

it is a Toshiba Strata

whoknew

The reply address in SIP packets are in the payload, not in the IP headers. If you are using SIP, check pcap of the conversation and make sure its not replying to the private IP from the sources network. also if this is the case, what is the fix. on the external site as well they have static IP's w...

whoknew

1 chain=dstnat action=dst-nat to-addresses=172.16.10.21
dst-address=1.1.1.21

this is the dstnat rule right after the src-nat, also if I torch the src. and dst addresses I can see a connection made for about 2 seconds then it disappears.

whoknew

why would it respond to a private IP if my srcnat and dst nat rules are 1:1? Im not using masquerade. Im using 1 private to public. anything incoming should be forwarded to the private IP and anything outgoing should be forwarded to the public IP.

whoknew

Hi, I have a srcnat rule setup as follows (public IP changed of course) 0 chain=srcnat action=src-nat to-addresses=1.1.1.21 src-address=172.16.10.21 out-interface=ether1 internet The PBX looks like its dst nat is working. It also has incoming connections to it, but srcnat is showing no traffic at al...

whoknew

# Set needed variables :local username "USERNAME FOR DYNDNS HERE" :local password "PASSWORD FOR DYNDNS HERE" :local hostname "dydns.org ADDRESS HERE" :global dyndnsForce :global previousIP # print some debug info :log info ("dyndns-update: username = $username"...

Search found 153 matches