But the regulatory allows it?+1+1 for channel sizes
100mhz or 200mhz steps will be better, at least 500mhz steps. not all need 1gb in ptp and in PTMP ( 8 online ) for sure
Hi Mikrotik, is it possible? channel sizes 500 MHz
why you think lower channels are better?
We have problems with link droping on rain...tested even on beta28, used even align command, but no luck...not stabile at all...signals great (-52/-55 on 1150m link distance).
My company has 6000 mikrotik cpe installed, +1000 new orders every year and when NV2 finally works quite well with AC we have no more hardware compatible with it. It's a nightmare to swith to another vendor...Five years working with @Mikrotik ... Today is the last day. It´s a pitty...
+100Any chance we will see support for narrower channels? Not everyone needs a full gigabit of throughput, often can't be fully used due to the max 8 stations per AP limit.
it's not a standard channel, special permissions usually are required to operate at this frequency.66000 GHz is non standard freq for this band? Will You implement 66960 GHz and 69120 GHz?
*) wireless - improved Nv2 reliability on ARM devices;
The first point-to-point tests with nv2 on arm are not satisfactory. We will perform more tests
thank you for the infoIt works on both planesNormis the antenna beamforming is only in the horizontal plane or also in the vertical plane?