MikroTik

staslabs

6.42rc49 - DISK Lite AC (arm)

NTP client not work

staslabs

A solution found?

staslabs

Mikrotik 6.21 on CCR1036-12G-4S - so terrible!!!!! Restarts after some minutes of work. Again and again.

staslabs

6.15 + CCR1036-12G-4S

Radius not work well

downgrade for 6.7 -> is OK

staslabs

DUDE database size exceeded 2Gb,then the program stopped working.

How to clean and compress the database of unnecessary data?

staslabs

In 6.12 ver. is not stable work NSTREME from new wireless+capsman package.

After downgrade to 6.9 links work fine again.

staslabs

6.11 on CCR-1036 is not stable - lock and freeze twice, after working for an hour after the upgrade. Went back to version 6.7 - its works stable

staslabs

Revert to 6.7, and again I can remove created by me interfaces like EoIP tonnel, Bridge..

in 6.9/6.10 a can't do it, and have Winbox frozen after attemps to remove its

staslabs

ROS 6.9 What about effective distribution of the load between the processor cores? just 80 Mbit/s L2TP, NAT and Queu tree with 20 rules server on CCR1036-12G-4S Queue Tree is NOT Multi-thread/Multi-Core optimized yet so performance will be limited to a single core(tile) on the CCR routers. This is ...

staslabs

ROS 6.9 What about effective distribution of the load between the processor cores? just 80 Mbit/s L2TP, NAT and Queu tree with 20 rules server on CCR1036-12G-4S Queue Tree is NOT Multi-thread/Multi-Core optimized yet so performance will be limited to a single core(tile) on the CCR routers. This is ...

staslabs

And what can i use to increase queu perfomance? Simple queu?

staslabs

NAME CPU USAGE ppp all 0.3% l2tp all 0.1% ppp all 0% spi all 0.1% ntp all 0% console all 0% flash all 0% ssh all 0.7% dns all 0.6% traffic-flow all 0.1% firewall all 1.9% networking all 0.4% gre all 0% winbox all 0% logging all 0% management all 0.2% telnet all 0% idle all 94% dhcp all 0% profiling ...

staslabs

ROS 6.9 What about effective distribution of the load between the processor cores? just 80 Mbit/s L2TP, NAT and Queu tree with 20 rules server on CCR1036-12G-4S [admin@border] /system resource cpu> pri # CPU LOAD IRQ 0 cpu0 0% 0% 1 cpu1 2% 0% 2 cpu2 0% 0% 3 cpu3 0% 0% 4 cpu4 92% 90% 5 cpu5 0% 0% 6 c...

staslabs

Realy, where is manual?

staslabs

Where full PDF doc?

staslabs

UDP tests are not relevant...

Yes. Try it on small packets, like 100 bytes.

staslabs

Its work with nstreme=on?

staslabs

Весчь!!!

staslabs

Without Nstreme, AP WDS connect to other AP WDS.

But Nstreme AP WDS not connect to other Nstreme AP WDS

How in this case organize MESH network with many nodes?

Scheme without Nstreme not so interesting on the score of small speed, capacity and problems with hide nodes.

staslabs

After upgrade from 4.3 to 4.4, I obligged downgrade to 4.3 cause "n" nstreme link on 4.4 was terrible. Now on 4.3 10km link with 55cm dishes work well and stable. RB433AH + R52N

staslabs

It may be interference between antennas not between cards...
No,there's no interferences between the antennas, because previously the rb133 was working there and everything was ok!!!

We have same experience - rb433ah interference between mpci cards.
But no in RB600 with 2 XR5 cards.

staslabs

"n" + Nsterme + WDS

is it work now, or I obliged to use EoIP?

staslabs

4.3 was more stable then new 4.4.

4.4 - is terrible.

staslabs

Is MESH work with Nstreme?

staslabs

Yes improve 802.11n + Nstreme for small packet traffic (CCQ drops drasticly)

+1

staslabs

In ROS 4.3 Nstreme(BESTFIT frame 4000) works well for traffic comprising of packages 500-1500bytes.
But real traffic heave many 48-200bytes packet effect :CCQ crash from 90-95% to 30% , data rate drops lower & and again and again.

+1

staslabs

On 1500 byte packets looks so good (but not on small)
10 km link
60 cm dish on each side
dual polarity emmitor
R52N cards
Nstreme

staslabs

But when we change mode to A or G without N on the same R52N cards - all looks ideal: CCQ=100% on small packages like 100-300, and troughput is maximum and ideal for A and G modes.

staslabs

Change Local and Remote Tx Size to 150-300, and you will see dramaticaly CCQ and speed degradation. (I was test it on 10 km link on 60 cm dish, -65 db Rx/Tx signal strenght).

staslabs

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/802.11n_Setup_Guide

It's too shot:

Non-Winbox viewable configuration options
ht-amsdu-limit (0..8192)
ht-amsdu-threshold (0..8192)
These last two only appear in terminal at this time. (ROS4.0beta4 made these configurable in winbox too.)

staslabs

Got a good result with newest software version using 2 duel pol dishes a link of 20 miles aprox over sea is running at 80 mbps half duplex and actually does do 40/40 full duplex which we thought pretty good. It has a signal in the 50s and is using nstream which does bomb out ocasionally but works q...

staslabs

Thank you staslabs for your input. How are you using theses cards? I'm going to use them for short-range wireless links, so I don't think that I need professional radio cards. This is also a non-commercial project carried out entirely by volunteers and zero budget. Someone is going to pay for it, a...

staslabs

I stumbled upon this wireless card when I purchased two RB1000 from a company in California. They cost only around $20, so I'm little suspicious about the quality. Has anyone used this card, and what do you think about it? http://www.engeniustech.com/datacom/products/details.aspx?id=223 Very good c...

staslabs

Ping from NAT router (RB600 mt4.2) is normally. --------------------- internet ---------------------- | | ----------------------- RB600 MT 4.2 - normal ping ----- NAT -------- ---------------------- | | --------------------------------------- RB433AH MT3.30 or PC Windows - not answer after 3-5 hops ...

staslabs

*) fixed route next-hops falling under multiple connected routes; . Its fixed? No! Why I can't go far 3-4 hops after src-NAT? (RB600 MT 4.2) This fixed problem have nothing to do with your problem. You have to look for problem on a router which is 3-4 hops away. But why this problem not exist on ol...

staslabs

*) fixed route next-hops falling under multiple connected routes;
.

Its fixed? No! Why I can't go far 3-4 hops after src-NAT? (RB600 MT 4.2)

staslabs

Mikrotik 802.11n + Bullet2M - is it work?

staslabs

Обновили 2.0b9 на 2.0b10

Замечены возникшие проблемы обновления изображения элементов - при изменении цвета линков, меняется не весь.

Search found 38 matches

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Re: Possible "Stall" Bug

Re: v6.20 released!

Re: v6.15 released

Size of DUDE database

Re: v6.12 released

Re: v6.11 released

Re: CLOUD CORE ROUTER

Re: CLOUD CORE ROUTER

Re: CLOUD CORE ROUTER

Re: CLOUD CORE ROUTER

Re: CLOUD CORE ROUTER

Re: CLOUD CORE ROUTER

Re: RB250GS Manual

Re: SwOS features - anybody care to guess?

Re: 802.11n

Re: wds repeater wih RB 433

Re: Hot new Mikrotik Radio Card - R52Hn

Re: Dual-frequency MESH applications

Re: mikrotik v4.4 wireless is worse than ever

Re: rb433ah interference between mpci cards

Re: 802.11n

Re: 802.11n

Re: Dual-frequency MESH applications

Re: 802.11n

Re: 802.11n

Re: 802.11n

Re: 802.11n

Re: 802.11n

Re: 80211n begginer question

Re: 802.11n

Re: EnGenius EPI-3601S 600mW (28dBm) 802.11g PCI Card

Re: EnGenius EPI-3601S 600mW (28dBm) 802.11g PCI Card

Re: v4.2 released

Re: v4.2 released

Re: v4.2 released

Re: 802.11n