ok thx.

then i will replace the rb2011 with a device with sfp ports and do the patch over fiber.

Could you give me more information about "known problem with the SRJ01 module linking on 100MBit"? What is a solution for that? Changing the module doesn´t help. On one side we have a RB2011 (only copper ports) and on the other side a CRS212-1G-10S with such a module. Sporadically it goes down to 10...

The mentioned OIDs are still missing.
So we need to monitor the psu state with snmp in case of one is failing.

Please fix this.

What is the difference between a physical disconnect and a logical disconnect?

Sorry to be unclear.

physical was meant if there is a problem on layer 1 (link drops)
logical was meant if the there is a problem on layer 2/3 (eg dhcp client renew won´t work)

Hi, if you have dynamic wan-addresses I assume that you use dhcp-client on that interfaces? If so, then just set different distances "Default Route Distance" within the dhcp-client. So when your main wan (with lower distance) drops, the other route will be active. This works for physical disconnects...

Hi,

I think this is a really good presentation about that topic and you may have a look at it.

http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/US13/kirnak.pdf

Hy, on Ubnt-Device: Mode: Access Point + WDS and Station + WDS in the network tab of the link you have to set it to "advanced". Now you can create the vlans in the following way: "VLAN Network" Interface LAN0 -> VLAN ID 30 -> Comment Interface LAN0 -> VLAN ID 40 -> Comment Interface LAN0 -> VLAN ID ...

Hey,

please write me a pm and I think I can help you, because this doesn´t belong to Mikrotik.

+1

nice feature

Could you try to disable "use-ip-firewall" in bridge-settings of the mpls routers? I saw a strange behaviour in the past after upgrading to version 6.

+1 for that

Mikrotik, are you investigating this? If not then please provide me assistance with MPLS/VPLS configuration. We continue to sink thousands of dollars into your gear and it's the least you could do. Thanks, Scott I can give you assistance for MPLS/VPLS if you still need it. Please send me an email t...

Look at this.

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 29#p407324

The funny part is that if you plug something into ether1 all LEDs are blinking.

It´s a bug with 6.9

Maybe it´s not an answer at all.

But do you tought about using MPLS/VPLS instead of EoIP? It´s more efficient and the overhead is smaller.

I have the same problem only with CCR´s. The other Routerboards connecting fine via MAC-Address. What kind of OS you are using? I´m using Windows 7 and I can´t get the CCR MAC-Connection working. It only works via IP-Address. On other PC´s (XP, Vista, also with Win7) there´s no problem. Usually ther...

an update about [Ticket#2013090666000521] vrrp backup problem - 6.x all the ccr eth interfaces, in rare cases, get flapping all togheter. this happen on the router where we have vrrp interface in backup mode. thanks Ros So this is a current bug? Same here. CCR with OSPF,MPLS,VPLS and TE. RouterOS v...

You can also make your link transparent using MPLS/VPLS. It´s useful for Layer-2 connectivity (for DHCP...) Just use OSPF for routing with different cost, than create MPLS-Interfaces and in the last step create a VPLS-Tunnel between the endpoints. These tunnels you have to bridge with ethernet/vlan ...

is connecting to a CCR via mac address not allowed anymore? I can connect fine via IP to ether1 but cannot connect via MAC. check if "mac server" is enabled for that interface. [admin@MikroTik] /tool mac-server> print indeed it is enabled. just like the rest of my RB's. It does nothing when trying ...

Hy,

maybe you should try to set an admin-mac on the bridge?

*) fix MPLS MTU configuration usage;

What does it mean?

saw this post and thought I would throw my two pesos in as I do a lot of MPLS work in Cisco and Mikrotik. Not sure if any of you guys have tried this, but if you want to do EoMPLS/VPLS and pass a 1500 byte IP packet between the two connected hosts on the CE routers, then the MPLS MTU (and hence the...

Mikrotik any suggestions on this issue?

Do you need more information?

Next update. Replaced all Routers on this line to the customers including the one in the data center. (now 3x RB1100AHx2 with RouterOS 5.19) All routers are configured manually from the scratch. Same problem. The VPLS-Tunnel to place 1 works with 1500 Bytes and the VPLS-Tunnel to place 2 only with 1...

It´s a NEC iPasolink 400 and on the other side a NEC iPasolink 200

Update: changed Routerboard at customer-site ->nothing changed changed the middle Routerboard -> nothing changed tested the MTU-Size more accurate: 1478 Bytes is what i get on all vpls-tunnels at the customer-site. In the middle between data center and customer-site i get 1500 Bytes on all vpls-tunn...

sorry for double post. the first vpls tunnel with 1446 is because of a vpn through which i checked with a server. so this is ok. for the one with 1478 bytes it looks like this: server -> vpls-bridge (rb1100AHx2) -> mpls router (rb 1100AHx2) -> vpls-bridge (rb1100AH) -> wireless ap -> wireless cpe fo...

There are several leased lines from data center to locations over the carrier ethernet. It´s SDH and they say they give us a MTU-Size of 9600. On friday as we noticed it, we made a ticket and they measured the line with no success. All of our other leased lines work with VPLS 1500. after the affecte...

Friday the same thing here. Suddenly the VPLS-Interface stops working with 1500 Bytes. Checked it with a Customer. The Maximum was 1442 Bytes (+ PPPoE-Overhead) which goes through the tunnel. Hardware between Customer and Core: 3xRouterboard 1100AHx2 and 1xRouterboard 1100AH (all with Version 5.14) ...

Hello, we have a Routerboard 1100AH with RouterOS 5.8. Now we want to NAT some Public IP´s to private ones and also a general NAT-Rule for the other private IP´s. example: localnet= 10.0.0.0/8 wan-ip=1.1.1.0/24 What I´ve done: define IP-Adresses add address=10.1.1.1/8 disabled=no interface=ether2-la...