The main reason was a few extra byte of MTU, I guess.... I cannot understand why Cisco had to invent the new nonstandard VTI protocol for something that was already covered (and implemented by them!) before as IPIP over IPsec transport mode (or GRE over IPsec transport mode).
You can specify L2TP interface itself as a gateway in a static route (including default one).how is the router supposed to know that certain traffic is to be routed to that L2TP connection unless it already is established
If you watched the video introduction, there they said RB5009 will NOT be compatible with v6.Assuming they don't improve it further, would that mean it's a false economy to get the RB5009 if the RB4011 is just as fast if you use v6?
Did you realize this is a user forum and not a support platform? I am not sure anyone from support saw this topic at all.Good work on the support Mikrotik, not.
Yes, there is. Please do.Is there any point sending a supout to Mikrotik....?
Anyone "double-clicking that shortcut" should have read access to a copy of the private key and that automatically grant him/her full access to the router.this method doesn't require that you leak your login credentials to anyone with a copy of the shortcut
When the first 60G devices were introduced there were a lot of folks asking for a combined devices with 5G backup. Now that the first such device is introduced there are other guys saying the opposite...5ghz backup is useless because:
I think they just forgot to update the wiki page. Partitioning works just fine on ARM devices with enough storage.Would help of course, if ARM was officially supported.
You should use bridge mode instead. For more details please check this page out.The AP mode is not allowed on my device.
Guess, 3G/LTE dongles, serial communication, etc. Mikrotik produces routers, not NAS devices, after all, so SMB/FTP/etc functions are purely supplementary (firmware update, backup download/upload, hotspot customization, etc.).What nonsense.
why do they put USB in it at all.
Wrong certificate, erlinden was asking about the certificate from download.mikrotik.com, i.e. the one from the page giving the error.Certificate is OK
Perhaps because you missed N in dowNload?mikrotik.com/dowload
NetFlow is an obvious choice for that kind of data.What do I use then to get traffic data from each client that I do use in Splunk for MikroTik?
Then what was your reference to 802.11 and MIMO about?Nowhere did I state that Spatial Multiplexing is Beamforming .... grrrr
Sounds plausible. I run Winbox (64-bit) natively on Win10. And (simply out of curiosity) I have just tested 32-bit version, which also works fine for me.I am running winbox (32-bit) under wine on a Debian system.
Maybe it behaves differently on a native Windows system?
I like these a lot! Please keep posting!Au contraire. MK has a superior QC department. They created the "obsessive compulsive TRAP".
Looks like it found a victim already.
This is a community forum, for support please look here: https://mikrotik.com/support.I struggled to find a Support section or separate Support forum
That is normal, as expected, and is not the cause of your problem.I found something on the second devide. On that bridge and ether1 got the same MAC-Adress.
That is not an indication of memory leak on its own. Does the memory usage keep growing? How does it look over time? Do you have a graph to show?just 7 days uptime, free memory down from 80Mb to 65Mb
Please, please, please, go buy one and stop complaining here! It is cheaper and works better for you, so what's the point in doing what you are doing?Almost any Chinese device cost less then Mikrotik and performs better.
Yes, that's correct. Your device is 5GHz only.Since the model of my Metal is missing the 2 (5SHPn and not a 52SHP-n) can I safely assume it is not capable of 2.4Ghz?
Can you elaborate on this "same Wi-Fi" thing please? Do you mean associated with the same CAP in your CAPsMAN?Players on the same Wi-Fi can always see each other.
You wrote in another thread, that you don't have neighbors nearby and that the spectrum is free from other networks at your place. So, of course if does!This seems work in some conditions only, at least for me the 20/40 Ce gives better speed than 20 only.
Absolutely. Upgraded RouterOS on all 8 units from CAPsMAN, and once they all came back online rebooted once again to upgrade RouterBOOT (they all have /system routerboard settings set auto-upgrade=yes). All went smoothly.Lastly, are you able to upgrade firmware on your wAP ac normally.
Sounds like a DFS (radar detection) in action. What's the interface status?It reappeared later on after a reboot and then disappeared again.
How comes 6.45.9 contains a fix for something introduced in 6.46? In case the bug was "backported" from 6.46 it would be good to know what 6.45.x versions are affected.*) chr - fixed graceful shutdown execution on Hyper-V (introduced in v6.46);
What software? WinBox itself? WinBox is just a configuration tool for RouterOS powered devices. You cannot use it for anything else.2. The only Winbox facility on the MikroTik webpage I downloaded was software
It's wireless. I.e. it uses shared medium and is pretty susceptible to interference. So, you never know when it is really free...but link is free, and I'm the only user.
SCA (Single Channel Architecture). Basically the whole network "pretends" to be a single AP, so there's no roaming from the wireless client point of view at all.so how do seamless roaming work
You cannot bridge wireless interface in station mode. You can configure that, obviously, but it won't work. Try using station-pseudobridge (or station-pseudobridge-clone), but beware of the limitations.it's station mode
all interfaces are in bridge.
What's the problem with that?but the catch was CPU would hit 40% and sometime higher on my RB4011.
This is user forum. Support replies in some topics occasionally, but there's not guarantee they reply to your particular message. If you are looking for an official reply you should contact support@ and/or you supplier/distributor directly.Hey Mikrotik guys, where are you?
Why would one need to do that? What's the point?Ofcorse you can add a wireless interface in Station mode inside your Bridge in case lets say you want to assign the address to the Bridge and not to just your wireless interface...
It seems to be marked for outdoor use only here. Please change installation parameter to outdoor or any and see if those frequencies reappear.In my country, in Ukraine, the U-NII-3 range is allowed, but there is no U-NII-3 range in the frequency list