MikroTik

claiudio

After some tests, I could say that if PPPoE is used, set-priority does not work.

claiudio

Is it possible to set vlan-priority for a specific pppoe connection?

claiudio

I was searching for a CF for a low-cost router. I found a CF 128 MB (I think was used before-RB112 era). And I had a (little) jump in the past. witness_past_2018-10-17.png And now, let's upgrade. PS I think I'll not ask Mikrotik to resolve the bug of the 1950 year, with NTP client enabled. I have so...

claiudio

This request is for setup with many simple queue as (eg. AP sector) and many leaf, as PPPoE interface. Now I should do this / queue simple add name=AP_1 target=<pppoe-user1>,<pppoe-user2>,<pppoe-user3> max-limit=60M/20M add name=pppoe1 parent=AP_1 target=<pppoe-user1> max-limit=10M/10M priority=8 ad...

claiudio

I had to link two HDMI extenders with a CAT5e, because they didn't work through a wireless link (I don't know why). Most likely the HDMI extenders didn't work over the WiFi link because it's not Ethernet. Just because it's a RJ-45 connector, does not mean it's Ethernet. For the purpose, there is no...

claiudio

First of all, thanks for all to gave time to write an opinion. When I wrote, I gave partial informations: a good part of the link was CAT6 (maybe 40 %), but with lightning protection on both side. But what I wanted was direct experience, not hint. We didn't have time to put fiber optic, we cannot pu...

claiudio

I had to link two HDMI extenders with a CAT5e, because they didn't work through a wireless link (I don't know why). I'm not sure how long the cable is, but using a badly off cable tester, a SC8108, it showed me ~ 190 meters over all 4 pairs. After some trials (and many tribulations), the HDMI extend...

claiudio

TLDR; collaborate with your ISP and help them fix their broken IPv6 implementation. Once you get past the initial layers of tech support and into the ones actually doing the design and configuration they'll welcome the feedback if it's presented constructively. Allocating /56 is actually RIPE prefe...

claiudio

TLDR; collaborate with your ISP and help them fix their broken IPv6 implementation. Once you get past the initial layers of tech support and into the ones actually doing the design and configuration they'll welcome the feedback if it's presented constructively. Allocating /56 is actually RIPE prefe...

claiudio

Yes, you are right it isn't optimal, but it is a viable solution for RIPE: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-690/#4-1-4---64-prefix-out-of-the-ipv6-prefix-assigned-to-the-end-user I found the same publication yesterday and was about to reply. However the topic of this issue is not to dete...

claiudio

Your traceroute shows exactly that the ISP router has no routes to you for your LAN addresses. Per ISP docs X:X:X:100::/56 is essentially statically assigned to us. that brings us to : X:X:X:0100::0002 - first usable X:X:X:01ff:ffff:ffff:ffff:fffe - last usable. This makes zero sense. Here's what i...

claiudio

No, you are doing wrong. You have to traceroute to the IP on the LAN side of the mikrotik (not the WAN address) What exactly am i doing wrong? If i can reach to the ISP gw, it means the routing is setup on ISP site. The issue of me not reaching to the LAN site and back is what i am trying to solve....

claiudio

Your ISP has any route to your IPv6 prefix?
It does, i can traceroute fully to mikrotik's wan "X:X:X:8" from digital ocean droplet.

No, you are doing wrong.
You have to traceroute to the IP on the LAN side of the mikrotik (not the WAN address)

claiudio

Probably the most beaten up question here, however anything i've tried is unsuccessful. My setup : RB1100 with latest OS. ISP -> ether6->RB1100->ether1 -> Clients. ISP gw = X:X:X::100:1 mikrotik ether6 = X:X:X::100:8 mikrotik ether1 = X:X:X::102::/64 The clients are getting ipv6 through RA, and are...

claiudio

Queue tree parent need be a interfaces. In mangle try mark connection, then mark packets, you don't need mark upload/download stream, if queue parent=interface. Yours respectfully! Hi Kujo Sorry for the delay. Well, I tried your hint, but it doesn't work. At the end, I put a third CCR (but a new pr...

claiudio

We have three CCR, connected to a CRS via copper, as PPPoE server. Two of them are CCR 1009, the troubled one is the CCR1036.
Randomly, happens no traffic is passed over the LAN interface, even for 20 seconds.
Anybody has seen something like that?
In the next days I'll try with a SFP copper interface.

claiudio

After another day of right searching, I can add these link ... https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=75028 https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?p=378611#p378611 ... and say that I'm not the first who faced the problem, talked about it and took the decision to exhume an old x86 server. Now, ...

claiudio

Last week we saw an abnormal pppoe session drops on one of our PPPoE server, a CCR1036. Session count is ~1300 with 500 Mbps traffic. After a short search, CPU load was at 100 % daily.gif and process affected is queuing 435806502_69408.jpg @Normis So, doubtlessly, it's not a case of "IDLE proce...

claiudio

Why? IMHO there are no need for that... at least in all VLAN configuration that I can imagine I'm sorry to exhume this thread. A reason is giving IPv4/IPv6 address via DHCP from a central server and every CPE does VLAN tagging with different VID. As different CPE has different VLAN, it is a setup l...

claiudio

ahmedbona3, any news?

claiudio

I'm activating a new PPPoE server, a CCR1009, and for the first time i saw this message, when pppoe clients where connecting: 18:51:16 pppoe,info PPPoE connection established from EC:08:6B:XX:XX:XX 18:51:16 pppoe,info PPPoE connection established from EC:08:6B:XX:XX:XX 18:51:16 pppoe,ppp,info,accoun...

claiudio

Hi Chiara
Did you find what was?
A workaround for the packet loss was to change link from ether6 to ether4 (from FastEthernet to GEthernet) on a RB2011, but you already use the "right" port.

claiudio

Well, it's hard to believe this thing, but it's real. We gave to a customer a RB2011 (RB2011UiAS-2HnD-IN) as a router. Internet connection is through via a WiFi link (a SM PMP450) or, as backup, ADSL. On the ADSL there is a bare DLINK modem/router with pppoe-passthrough enabled. Ethernet port for WA...

claiudio

Hello We are using a CCR (CCR1009-8G) as PPPoE server. To shape traffic for most of the customers we use queue tree. 4 days ago we upgraded RouterOS from 6.19 to 6.27 to solve a problem about delay over ethernet interface (pings to this CCR were high, 5-30 ms, when traffic was above 200 Mbps) Delay ...

claiudio

I'm playing with vlan priority, but I can see in logs the priority is changed only with IP datagram, not PPPoE frames. Is it right or if I use ethereal, I can see VLAN priority field is modified as expected? This is what I see in log 13:57:14 firewall,info forward: in:ether7 out:vlan2, src-mac d4:ca...

claiudio

Reached 300mbps on a PPPoE connection going through it. That cap was caused by the PPPoE client router(RB2011) hitting 100 percent CPU not cloud router acting as switch. The cloud router was at about 50 percent but I think part of that was me being logged in it on winbox. Will need to find a differ...

claiudio

The QoS I wasn't aware is Nv2 QoS policy.
Changed priority for packets going over VPLS interfaces and delay desappeared.

claiudio

Yes, you're right. But on wireless link under heavy load, I see routed ping are faster than VPLS tunnelled; also less ping are lost.
So I suspect there's some kind of QoS that I'm not aware.

claiudio

Hi I'm trying to understand why this VPLS tunnel has a bigger delay than MPLS forwarding and plain routing. VPLS tunnel 172.16.249.57 56 64 10ms sent=100 received=99 packet-loss=1% min-rtt=8ms avg-rtt=18ms max-rtt=68ms > /tool traceroute 172.16.249.57 # ADDRESS RT1 RT2 RT3 STATUS 1 172.16.249.57 16m...

claiudio

Sure. AP side /interface wireless set wlan1 default-forwarding=no disabled=no frequency=5280 mode=ap-bridge rate-set=configured \ tx-power=13 tx-power-mode=card-rates wds-default-bridge=bridge_wds wds-mode=dynamic /interface bridge add name=bridge_wds /interface bridge port add bridge=bridge_wds int...

claiudio

Today we upgraded a link between a RB411AH and Groove A-5Hn, changing the RB411AH with a RB Metal. Link is LOS, but a tree is inside the first Fresnel zone. Old link was wds+nstreme+11n with ROS version 5.22 on both side. Max throughput was about 35 Mbps. New link was with nstreme+11n, ROS 5.25/5.22...

claiudio

is there any difference if you open them for editing? is there difference if you print it? No, if I open and save it, there's no difference: it doesn't work. About printing the environment, this is my script { :global var 123 } { :environment print :put ("Var contains ".$var) } And this i...

claiudio

Hello

Is it right that the same script doesn't work if imported from a .rsc file, but works if copy-pasted?

{
  :global var 123
}
{
  :put ("Var contains ".$var)
}

claiudio

Burst not working for me too, user manager+ppp

What are your settings?

claiudio

You can use RB711, but you have to use 2 chains. You can achive someting similiar to this:

Thanks.
Yes, dual chain is a must.
I see you're using 6.5. Did you ever tried 5.x on that link?

claiudio

We have a ptp with rb411ah+rb800, single chain at 40 MHz, nstreme and WDS (but not for bridging). Max throughput is ~ 70 Mbps, with a cpu load on the 411ah about 60 %. For 1 day, we used a rb911, ROS 5.25, single chain, nstreme and WDS. At 60 Mbps, packet loss was about 7 %. Routing table isn't so b...

claiudio

We think to have found the problem: to restart pppoe connections, my colleague uses the tool inside the UM to close the active session (list sessions, find the username, select, edit, close). Instead, in the last two weeks, we used my "old way": login to the local pppoe server and do a &qu...

claiudio

can you explain your answer please? And look again in picture above and pay attention on red rings on pictures... Queue simple and queue tree are different from wireless access list/registration table. The latter doesn't use queue to manage tx limit. They work on different layers. And if I'm not en...

claiudio

Maybe because there's NO burst in wireless settings?

claiudio

We are using UM 4, on a ROS 5.25 x86, as radius server to authenticate PPPoE sessions. Normally, there are about 900+ sessions open (peak is at 1100). For customers who "forget" payments, instead to block them, we change their profile which simply tells to add its IP address into an addres...

claiudio

I thought it is funny to share this with others 172.16.7.225 56 63 651ms 172.16.7.225 56 63 715ms 172.16.7.225 56 63 7w1.. 172.16.7.225 56 63 169ms 172.16.7.225 56 63 1ms 172.16.7.225 56 63 11ms 172.16.7.225 56 63 86ms 172.16.7.225 56 63 158ms sent=780 received=509 packet-loss=34% min-rtt=1ms avg-rt...

claiudio

It partially worked, but non definitively.
My new workaround is set the ip address on another tunnel, like EoIP, wait about 3-4 minutes and the /undo. But EoIP isn't feasible, due to its overhead.

claiudio

I was trying to use IPIP tunnels between repeaters and two different border routers, all with mikrotik. The setup is this: every repeaters has two IPIP tunnels and using src-address with mangle rules, traffic is routed to tunnel or another. As it is in testing, only a repeater works with this setup....

claiudio

other routes 172.16.2.xx/xx are external and are accepted by routing filter on router1 so they will be wisible on gateway router. I think I understand. routing filter does its job only on external routes matching chain "ospf-out", is it right ? So, is adding server 2 & 3 to the ospf a...

claiudio

routing filters can filter only external routes, otherwie it will break OSPF database.

Ok.
But, why are /30 and 172.16.2.232/29 summarized ? Aren't they internal routes ? Even 172.16.2.224/29 isn't propagated, if Router 2 has this net enabled in /routing ospf network

claiudio

I'm trying to summarize routes from a nssa area to the backbone, through an ABR. Area1 (nssa) has only network 172.16.2.0/24 and subnets are assigned from different routers My problem is that I don't know why the ABR (Router 1) isn't announcing just 172.16.2.0/24, but also some two routes, as 172.16...

claiudio

Done. But it doesn't work. $ telnet 172.16.30.11 81 Trying 172.16.30.11... Connected to 172.16.30.11. Escape character is '^]'. (Ok, is listening) Tried to connect via chromium, the output is "Error 102 (net::ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED)" $ telnet 172.16.30.11 81 Trying 172.16.30.11... telnet: ...

claiudio

I'm using an RB411U to make an hotspot. To add a username, the customer must send a SMS, which is read by a script looking in /tool sms inbox. Sometimes (ok, very often) usb port is marked as "invalid" or it is regulary recognized, but can't receive nor send SMS. Usually a reboot solve thi...

claiudio

After doing two
> /system reset-configuration skip-backup=yes no-defaults=yes keep-users=no
on a RB411U with routeros 4.17, ssh stops working.

$ ssh admin@192.168.1.37
Protocol major versions differ: 2 vs. 1

Can somebody confirm this bug ?
This RB was downgraded from routeros 5.12

Search found 49 matches