hi there i try the 87.121.0.45 with TCP and it starts running and disconects in the same moment, when i try UDP it starts running but with no data at all... the same with the 207.32.194.24 it just says: cant connect both udp and TCP... i tried with the newest stable and with the newest long term

the NetMetal AC2 works over 100 km? or has it the same problem like the older AC that we get only about 80 MB throughput ?

is the server running on stable or long term ?
, lately you can test only if you have the same version of the packages

Anybody?

i couldnt find anybody else having this problem : we have a RB 750 G3 (hex) running on 6.42.9 (bugfix) on that we have arround 30000 hotspot users on file , we cant have less, because those give service to 50 rural hotspots and we have to leave for each one arround 600 user tickets (like 100 of 1h ,...

Thanks for the link!
It was handy to test our 10Gbps connection,
Screenshot 2018-01-08 13.25.48.png

shame, when mikrotik itself has to use another server to test their speed ,, you should offer this service from your side..... at least for europe
saludos from mexico

did you ever find a solution ?

merry cristmas
and i love this server
on each mikrotik i can proof the speed for my client localy, without going there and show it on his windows..
does anybody know another server you can use, for the same mather (even slower, i dont mind)

here an example of the Nstream drops

i know its 2 years old this post.. but i have exactly (STILL) the same problems on a 126km long link and i have to put one more part to the equation, why we cant use NV2... if i run this link on NV2 it gets rock solid no drops for days but apart of the 40 to 60 ms delay (which you cant use for Voip)...

i love this Tool
but today i also get only 700 to Max 900 Kbps on tcp receive,, down here in Mexico..
upload is working fine

6.35 has repeater mode now

if i want to change the clock , in time zone name i can see all the options, but when i click one, i get a empty field and after that when i klick ok , an error in time zone
using a note4 android 5.01

cards are Dbii f52n (Atheros 11N type) pigtail abouth 1 feet ( 30cm ) plus rf 400 ca. 1foot (40cm) so pretty short 1 conectors thats about 3 dB loss. And yes we did realign thats when i figured something is wrong, because otherwise: i dont change a running horse i also checked all the frequencies......

i use 34 dbi RocketDish-5G34 on both sites so one chanel couldnt be missalined, or the antenna is bad made ?

hello from Mexico...
we have a 80 miles link working abouth a year now , but we want to get more throughput, so i need to know if the TX/RX signal strength value of ch0 -69/-64 means that i have a problem on the antenna side or is that difference acceptable

anyway what other ddns server can you use since dyndns is not free anymore are there scripts made for other servers

just to inform : we finished most of the instalation and we had first a 30dbi mimo dish on one side and a 34dbi mimo dish on the other, but the CCQ was bouncing from 60% to 90% and data trouhgput is from 90Mb to 12Mb changing , so we did replace the smaller dish for another 34dbi antenna, here are s...

You mean the cel radius ? Yes I put the distance and no change

ok as i see nobdy has an answer to my questions (or doesnt want to answer) i will put some info here : i am writing this using the link which is a total of 180 km long: 125km one link and 55km the other, the repeater is on a hill here some fotos https://plus.google.com/photos/110037793424454011121/a...

hi all we will have a 125km or 80 miles link using the rb435 board and the dbii f52n pro (atheros 9220 chip) cards, before we start with all the ACK timing problems and packet sizes tests, can somebody provide us with a configuration file that works over 110km (from my reading at that distance we wi...