Community discussions

MUM Europe 2020

Search found 66 matches

by iprob
Tue Aug 11, 2015 4:40 pm
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: Hyper-V integration components
Replies: 127
Views: 63405

Re: Hyper-V integration components

This is great news! Finally we can retire the specialized VM hosts just for routeros and integrate it into our existing Hyper-V environment!!
by iprob
Sun Jun 01, 2014 4:22 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously
Replies: 42
Views: 12502

Re: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously

I've upgraded several routers to 6.13 and haven't had an issue and the failures related to route cache have stopped. We only have one open bug. That is in a scenario with dual ISP setups and marking PPTP packets. L2TP/IPSec was fixed in 6.13 and PPTP is expected to be fixed in 6.14. I agree with jar...
by iprob
Tue May 20, 2014 7:13 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously
Replies: 42
Views: 12502

Re: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously

We opened up a support ticket about this issue and they indicated it is fixed in 6.13. We're only now beginning to roll it out so I don't have any definitive results yet.
by iprob
Wed May 14, 2014 3:26 pm
Forum: General
Topic: L2TP tunnels and multiple WANs
Replies: 6
Views: 1798

Re: L2TP tunnels and multiple WANs

Thanks for the heads up. We'll test it once 6.13 comes out. Appreciate the post!
by iprob
Tue May 13, 2014 10:12 pm
Forum: General
Topic: L2TP tunnels and multiple WANs
Replies: 6
Views: 1798

Re: L2TP tunnels and multiple WANs

Do you know if this was addressed in version 6? I'm running 6.12 and cannot get the L2TP packets of a L2TP/IPSec tunnel to route over a specific interface. Everything else works fine. I'm using PCC and have tried two specific rules (one for PPTP and one for L2TP). /ip firewall mangle add action=mark...
by iprob
Mon Apr 28, 2014 5:02 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously
Replies: 42
Views: 12502

Re: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously

Good point, I only saw the issue when using L2TP. I never did see the issue with site-to-site IPSec tunnels, I'm not running any ppp on any "core" BGP routers and I don't use SSTP.
by iprob
Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:36 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously
Replies: 42
Views: 12502

Re: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously

If you are seeing the same "No buffer space available" then I would recommend contacting support. They reported this bug as fixed in 6.12 and I haven't seen it so far on any of the 26 routers we upgraded to 6.12. Unfortunately, you'll need to be on the router to verify that the problem is the buffer...
by iprob
Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:52 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously
Replies: 42
Views: 12502

Re: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously

Have you tried version 6.12? I haven't seen the issue yet with 6.12 although I still leave the automatic reboot scripts in place.
by iprob
Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:53 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Stuck Routes on Route Cache
Replies: 103
Views: 42266

Re: Stuck Routes on Route Cache

Looks like this issue is much worse in 6.11. We downgraded several routers back to 5.24.
by iprob
Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:36 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: ip route cache BUG
Replies: 36
Views: 12082

Re: ip route cache BUG

This problem appears to be much worse in 6.11. See the thread here: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 43#p419643.

All indications are that it is a bug in the PPP code from MikroTik. My problem routers are the ones with L2TP set up.
by iprob
Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:08 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously
Replies: 42
Views: 12502

Re: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously

Up time was only 5 hours last go around. What version is the suggested downgrade? I'd prefer not to have to go all the way back to 5.24 since the queues are redone for version 6 and all the ipsec configuration scripts had to be updated with "aes-256-cbc" instead of aes-256. I don't know why MikroTik...
by iprob
Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:44 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously
Replies: 42
Views: 12502

Re: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously

I know it isn't nearly as useful as Nathan's detail information...but here is an odd scenario that happened. - The MikroTik running routeros x86 crashed after about 16 hours after the upgrade - Rebooted and one L2TP connection was made - Crashed again within 45 minutes - Two L2TP connections made (s...
by iprob
Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:52 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously
Replies: 42
Views: 12502

Re: RB2011UAS-2HnD stops responding spontaneously

We are seeing this issue with router x86 machines that have a lot of inbound VPN connections. These are a combination of on-demand L2TP and site-to-site IPSec tunnels. Failure occurs in less than 24 hours. We've implemented the check for the route cache to automatically reboot. This issue has been a...
by iprob
Tue Apr 01, 2014 3:45 pm
Forum: General
Topic: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem
Replies: 15
Views: 2781

Re: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem

We are phasing out VRRP. The challenge of getting it to work right with outbound NAT, L2TP, STS IPSec tunnels, and various issues we've run into has made it more a problem that a resolution. We're going to create redundancy via the KVM layer instead and in the meantime, rely on backups which we can ...
by iprob
Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:07 pm
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: Hyper-V integration components
Replies: 127
Views: 63405

Re: Hyper-V integration components

OK, thanks for clarifying. I'm not sure I agree with that strategy but that is clearly Mikrotik's choice. Personally, I think it is too bad. There is a role for virtual routers and firewalls. Routeros is perfect because of the small footprint and powerful platform. The idea of training staff and sup...
by iprob
Tue Mar 04, 2014 5:18 pm
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: Hyper-V integration components
Replies: 127
Views: 63405

Re: Hyper-V integration components

I'm sorry, but I'm not sure I fully understand your post. The part I'm confused about is "Mikrotik can't guarantee routeros will work from release to release". Are you saying something about the upgrade paths of the core routeros that you license to customers? Or are your saying that you don't guara...
by iprob
Tue Mar 04, 2014 3:11 pm
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: Hyper-V integration components
Replies: 127
Views: 63405

Re: Hyper-V integration components

With Ubuntu/KVM, we use the e1000 NIC in our routeros VM's which works well with the gigabit switches we use with the underlying host. We do all the VLAN setup and management on the host OS, not routeros. That's our choice and we have to live with it. As I mentioned, I'm not looking for a supported ...
by iprob
Sat Mar 01, 2014 4:53 pm
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: Hyper-V integration components
Replies: 127
Views: 63405

Re: Hyper-V integration components

I think the Hyper-V graph there is interesting. I guess my question would be why is the only major virtualization platform that isn't supported Hyper-V? Linux distributions have fully embraced Hyper-V by building in the integration components. Apache Cloudstack and other cloud management systems are...
by iprob
Mon Feb 03, 2014 4:07 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: ip route cache BUG
Replies: 36
Views: 12082

Re: ip route cache BUG

I read in this thread (http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=51127) that some were running dynamic protocols, and some were not. I noticed on the router that I am experiencing the issue is not running any dynamic firewalls but there are frequent PPTP connections. The PPTP server does create ...
by iprob
Mon Feb 03, 2014 3:02 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Stuck Routes on Route Cache
Replies: 103
Views: 42266

Re: Stuck Routes on Route Cache

Isn't this the same issue as discussed here? http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 90#p407090

I had this issue happen with 6.7 (route cache is full, networking stops). Is anyone from this thread still experiencing the issue with version 6.5 or later?
by iprob
Mon Feb 03, 2014 3:00 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: ip route cache BUG
Replies: 36
Views: 12082

Re: ip route cache BUG

I am experiencing this in 6.7 on one particular router running as an x86 VM. I was able to see the route cache completely full and networking shut down. Since it was a VM, I was able to reboot it and resolve the issue. It does happen regularly with this router. Other than a scheduled reboot, are the...
by iprob
Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:39 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Upgrade to v6 makes connection mark for DNS forwarding fail
Replies: 2
Views: 721

Re: Upgrade to v6 makes connection mark for DNS forwarding f

Are there no suggestions or ideas on why this is happening with v6? v5.24 and v5.26 work without issue.
by iprob
Wed Nov 06, 2013 6:08 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Upgrade to v6 makes connection mark for DNS forwarding fail
Replies: 2
Views: 721

Re: Upgrade to v6 makes connection mark for DNS forwarding f

Anyone? No one seems concerned that the connection marks are not getting properly processed in 6.5? Based on the packet flow diagram for v6, these particular rules should work the same under 5.24 and 6.5. They aren't.
by iprob
Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:05 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Upgrade to v6 makes connection mark for DNS forwarding fail
Replies: 2
Views: 721

Upgrade to v6 makes connection mark for DNS forwarding fail

I have a relatively simple setup where two public IP's are assigned to my ether1 interface. I have an internal interface on ether2. The specifics of this setup is to create two different Dyn DNS internet guide policies. To accomplish this, there is an address list of computers that get the "non-stan...
by iprob
Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Redirect HTTPS to HTTP
Replies: 3
Views: 6302

Re: Redirect HTTPS to HTTP

I don't believe there is any way to do this on the MikroTik. We have the same situation and use IIS URL Rewrite to redirect to https on Exchange web servers. It is very easy to redirect from http to https on both IIS and Apache. You should approach it on the web server since nothing on the MikroTik ...
by iprob
Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:58 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Install on server using LSI1064e
Replies: 2
Views: 881

Re: Install on server using LSI1064e

I mis-typed. On options 1 and 2, the CD was the INSTALL CD, not netinstall. That means it was the ISO downloaded from the MikroTik web site.
by iprob
Mon Sep 23, 2013 7:15 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Install on server using LSI1064e
Replies: 2
Views: 881

Re: Install on server using LSI1064e

Here is some testing that I've done: 1. Tried installing from Netinstall CD with RAID enabled on LSI1064e. CD does not see any drives. 2. Tried installing from Netinstall CD without RAID (drives appear as standard SATA drives). CD does not see any drives. 3. Ran Netinstall on a Windows 7 PC and inst...
by iprob
Sun Sep 22, 2013 4:53 am
Forum: General
Topic: Install on server using LSI1064e
Replies: 2
Views: 881

Install on server using LSI1064e

I've read a few posts about people successfully installing RouterOS on an x86 with the LSI1064e controller. I haven't been able to get the install to work. My objective is to install RouterOS on the machine and use it to run many virtualized routers. We do it today with KVM but that is a one-off and...
by iprob
Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:06 pm
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: Hyper-V integration components
Replies: 127
Views: 63405

Re: Hyper-V integration components

Using Proxmox VE isn't really an option. The point is that we shouldn't have to modify our entire VM infrastructure to accommodate a particular vendor. We're standardizing on Hyper-V and System Center so we can use the new Azure recovery manager to simplify data center failover (http://www.windowsaz...
by iprob
Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:16 am
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS 6rc3 using "old" kernel 3.3.5 instead 3.4
Replies: 6
Views: 2620

Re: RouterOS 6rc3 using "old" kernel 3.3.5 instead 3.4

I would agree, no support, just don't disable if that is possible with the later kernel version. Frankly, I'd be fine with enabling the "Legacy NIC" like in 4.17. I'm even considering running 4.17 if I can. These VM's are just doing basic NAT, firewall, routing features. I think the emulated NIC emu...
by iprob
Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:54 am
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: Hyper-V integration components
Replies: 127
Views: 63405

Re: Hyper-V integration components

I had originally thought running a few KVM machines just for MikroTik would be ok. Now we're running about 300 VM's and the only ones that aren't on Hyper-V are the MikroTik VM's. It is making us rethink that we may need to move to something else. We're running about 50-60 MikroTik devices (RB's and...
by iprob
Wed May 29, 2013 10:31 pm
Forum: General
Topic: method to check if application server responding
Replies: 0
Views: 347

method to check if application server responding

I'm wondering if there is a way to check if a service is active on a machine that has a dst-nat rule. Here is what I'm trying to do: 1. Have multiple SMTP servers behind MikroTik (port 25). 2. Want to use PCC to load balance them. 3. If one does down, I want to remove it from the PCC. Netwatch is no...
by iprob
Wed May 29, 2013 7:33 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Problem with two MikroTiks, VRRP and Microsoft NLB
Replies: 1
Views: 805

Re: Problem with two MikroTiks, VRRP and Microsoft NLB

I created a new MikroTik VM on the same Ubuntu machine with the problem VM (unable to ping NLB address). This MikroTik x86 didn't have VRRP and had the same interfaces set up. This VM also was unable to ping the NLB (192.168.0.5). I set up another MikroTik VM on the Ubuntu machine that didn't have a...
by iprob
Wed May 29, 2013 5:26 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Problem with two MikroTiks, VRRP and Microsoft NLB
Replies: 1
Views: 805

Problem with two MikroTiks, VRRP and Microsoft NLB

I have an odd problem with two of my MikroTik routers. They are running as x86 VMs under Ubuntu KVM. Setup: - Ubuntu 12.04 LTS running KVM. Each firewall is on a separate Ubuntu machine. - Two MikroTik routers running 5.24 - Ether1: Public interface with public IP (dedicated and VRRP). All inbound t...
by iprob
Sat Apr 27, 2013 4:18 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Problem with simple queue stats
Replies: 2
Views: 925

Re: Problem with simple queue stats

Worked perfectly, thanks!
by iprob
Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:47 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Problem with simple queue stats
Replies: 2
Views: 925

Problem with simple queue stats

I've set up a simple queue to monitor traffic to/from an IP using this command /queue simple add name="temporary monitor" target-address="192.168.015" queue="default/default" The queue shows up and traffic is monitored but the "Total Bytes" is always 0. Total Rx Bytes and Total Tx Bytes increment bu...
by iprob
Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:49 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: Simple queue applied to switched traffic too
Replies: 0
Views: 875

Simple queue applied to switched traffic too

I have a scenario where we are using a MikroTik device at a remote site connected by a layer2 link to our main site. The default gateway for the MikroTik is at the main site. The device at the remote site is set up to do rate limiting with simple queues to prioritize traffic. The setup works great w...
by iprob
Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:12 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Best queue for performance
Replies: 1
Views: 1009

Re: Best queue for performance

Anyone?
by iprob
Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:23 am
Forum: General
Topic: Best queue for performance
Replies: 1
Views: 1009

Best queue for performance

I'm doing traffic shaping for VOIP. I've found the best configuration is to use a simple queue setup similar to the export below. I'm running MikroTik OS 5.21 in a KVM hosted on Ubuntu 12.04. The problem I have is that I end up getting less than my full uplink speed when queues are enabled. I suspec...
by iprob
Fri Nov 09, 2012 5:39 pm
Forum: General
Topic: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem
Replies: 15
Views: 2781

Re: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem

Any ideas on why it isn't using the NAT rule? The public IP returned by the L2TP packets is definitely not the VRRP address defined in the NAT rule which is creating the problem.

I'm also open to any possible work around for this issue. Right now, it appears L2TP is broken with VRRP.
by iprob
Thu Nov 08, 2012 7:56 pm
Forum: General
Topic: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem
Replies: 15
Views: 2781

Re: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem

I cleared all connections and rebooted the routers. Now I'm getting replies using the scenario with VRRP. The problem is that the replies are sending the public IP of the ether1 interface, NOT the VRRP IP. This directly violates the NAT rule that I have on the router which says that all traffic goin...
by iprob
Thu Nov 08, 2012 6:46 pm
Forum: General
Topic: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem
Replies: 15
Views: 2781

Re: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem

Here is some more information from packet sniffing: - Scenario to non-VRRP public IP (VRRP is running, router is the master): IPSec is established and L2TP packets are exchanged using the public IP of the interface, NOT the VRRP address. I can see the packets with destination ports of 1701 establish...
by iprob
Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:39 pm
Forum: General
Topic: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem
Replies: 15
Views: 2781

Re: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem

The connections using the VRRP address are not working, so what do you suggest? The rules provided previously in the post do not resolve the problem. So saying to use the VRRP address, which doesn't work, doesn't resolve the problem.
by iprob
Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:08 pm
Forum: General
Topic: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem
Replies: 15
Views: 2781

Re: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem

Further testing shows that the DNS round robin doesn't work either. The problem is that if you connect via L2TP to the router that is not the VRRP master, then the traffic doesn't flow to the internal network. I suspect this is due to a mangle that forces the outbound NAT to be the IP address of the...
by iprob
Tue Nov 06, 2012 8:17 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Problems with large file copies
Replies: 6
Views: 1198

Re: Problems with large file copies

As would be expected, the issue is not with the MikroTik router. Doing some additional testing and verification, I found that this particular file had a corruption issue which was causing the problem. I found this out when attempting to move it to a USB drive. So, no issues with my MikroTik setup af...
by iprob
Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:19 am
Forum: General
Topic: Problems with large file copies
Replies: 6
Views: 1198

Re: Problems with large file copies

I pulled some more statistics. The copy always fails at 58.6% of the copy. The file size is reported at 114.5GB. A 61GB copy of a file in the same directory had no issue. This means the file copy is consistently failing at around 68GB. That number doesn't make any sense to me. But it definitely appe...
by iprob
Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:10 am
Forum: General
Topic: Problems with large file copies
Replies: 6
Views: 1198

Re: Problems with large file copies

Redundant routers... does the error occur on both? (If you disconnect 1 at a time to force the other to be active). Run memtest86 to test the memory? I've tested with making each router active (different attempts obviously). It doesn't matter which is active, the problem still occurs. I have not tr...
by iprob
Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:03 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Problems with large file copies
Replies: 6
Views: 1198

Problems with large file copies

I have two MikroTik x86 routers running as KVM's on Ubuntu connecting two separate VLAN's. VLAN10 is 10.0.0.0/24 and VLAN100 is 10.0.55.0/24. The routers are using VRRP on the two VLAN interfaces and a public VLAN. I'm doing NAT on the public VLAN only. These redundant routers are the default gatewa...
by iprob
Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:59 pm
Forum: General
Topic: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem
Replies: 15
Views: 2781

Re: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem

We could only get this to work on the non-vrrp addresses. We had to set up DNS round-robin to work around the issue. Doesn't seem to work with VIP addresses.
by iprob
Thu Oct 25, 2012 12:46 am
Forum: General
Topic: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem
Replies: 15
Views: 2781

Re: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem

This didn't work. I even tried bypassing the mangle and routing all traffic to the remote location to the <vrrp-gateway> which I'm assuming is the IP address of the VRRP public interface? I cannot find a way to get both IPSec and L2TP to use the VRRP IP.
by iprob
Wed Oct 24, 2012 5:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem
Replies: 15
Views: 2781

Re: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem

I think I'm getting there. I was getting repeated "first L2TP UDP packet received" messages in the log and the IPSec SA was only in one direction. Now I see the IPSec SA on both side but no traffic on the outbound SA. I should note that I have VRRP running on the "LAN" side of the device too but thi...
by iprob
Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:42 pm
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: Hyper-V integration components
Replies: 127
Views: 63405

Re: Hyper-V integration components

We went ahead and setup Ubuntu with KVM to run MT. Works well. We configured an Ubuntu desktop VM running virt-manager to get a simple GUI to the console.

Wish it would work with Hyper-V...but this is a nice option and runs very reliably and fast.
by iprob
Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:36 pm
Forum: General
Topic: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem
Replies: 15
Views: 2781

Re: vrrp vs l2tp reservation problem

Sorry, I'm a newbie trying to do this too. I have the same problem and I'm not sure how to construct the mangle rule. Can you put an example?
by iprob
Wed Oct 24, 2012 2:46 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Wildcard certificates with SSTP
Replies: 2
Views: 1836

Re: Wildcard certificates with SSTP

I verified that the CA is in the trusted root CA's for the Windows machine. The certificate is used on web sites and that is accepted without any warning. I've opened the certificate on the Windows machine and can see the full chain is trusted. So I don't think this is a CA issue. EDIT: I've decided...
by iprob
Wed Oct 24, 2012 5:42 am
Forum: General
Topic: Wildcard certificates with SSTP
Replies: 2
Views: 1836

Wildcard certificates with SSTP

I attempted to set up SSTP using a certificate from GoDaddy. The certificate was a wildcard cert that we use for web sites and other purposes. I thought it would be nice to use the same cert on our MikroTik firewalls for VPN. Installed the certs and private keys getting the RK status next to the cer...
by iprob
Sat Oct 13, 2012 6:54 pm
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: Hyper-V integration components
Replies: 127
Views: 63405

Re: Hyper-V integration components

I was wondering if there was any news on this? I'm perfectly happy with the legacy NIC. We have a large Hyper-V installation and are looking to create a light-weight firewall/router dedicated to customers. We use a lot of other MikroTik hardware so we'd like to keep the same platforms so our support...
by iprob
Wed Oct 10, 2012 11:05 pm
Forum: General
Topic: L2TP using separate DHCP server
Replies: 4
Views: 5734

Re: L2TP using separate DHCP server

The answer to this question is that the PPP connection can't get an IP address like it would from RRAS in Windows (which is what we're replacing). So instead, here is what I did. 1. Create a pool on the MikroTik router since this is the only way to get IP's assigned to the inbound connections 2. The...
by iprob
Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:07 pm
Forum: General
Topic: L2TP using separate DHCP server
Replies: 4
Views: 5734

Re: L2TP using separate DHCP server

That would be if I were using the MikroTik for DHCP, but I'm not. Does the DHCP have to come from the router? Can't it just forward the request to my existing DHCP server and get an IP from it?
by iprob
Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:16 am
Forum: General
Topic: L2TP using separate DHCP server
Replies: 4
Views: 5734

L2TP using separate DHCP server

I'm trying to get L2TP to use IP addresses from a DHCP server behind the MikroTik. The L2TP connections come in and successfully authenticate against the Radius server, then are disconnected with "no network protocols running". I'm sure this is because an IP isn't getting assigned since I don't have...
by iprob
Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:47 am
Forum: The Dude
Topic: Service monitor of cpu is always down, firmware upgrades
Replies: 0
Views: 898

Service monitor of cpu is always down, firmware upgrades

I had two questions. One was why the CPU monitor in TheDude is always down. I know SNMP is enabled because I'm using a different software package to monitor SNMP without issue. But when I add in the service monitor for cpu it is listed as down. Also, when I discover the services on the router (RB110...
by iprob
Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:15 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Change DSCP values - counters not incrementing
Replies: 1
Views: 711

Re: Change DSCP values - counters not incrementing

I figured it out...I forgot to check the passthrough option so it would go to the next rule.
by iprob
Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:51 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Change DSCP values - counters not incrementing
Replies: 1
Views: 711

Change DSCP values - counters not incrementing

I've been having the same problem as listed here: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=49639 I have 4 mangle rules (IP's masked). The goal is to make sure all VOIP traffic is marked with DSCP 46 and to mark the packets for queue processing later. /ip firewall mangle add chain=forward src-ad...
by iprob
Tue Mar 13, 2012 6:42 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Newbie VRRP question using bridge
Replies: 1
Views: 932

Re: Newbie VRRP question using bridge

I resolved this by assigning the vrrp interfaces to a separate ether port. The production implementation has a switch downstream of these ports anyway so the configuration works fine as long as the vrrp is assigned to a physical port instead of the bridge. It seems like the vrrp IP addresses should ...
by iprob
Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:17 am
Forum: General
Topic: Newbie VRRP question using bridge
Replies: 1
Views: 932

Newbie VRRP question using bridge

I'm attempting to set up a basic public router and am a newbie...so my questions are probably pretty dumb. We are replacing a Cisco setup that was using HSRP for redundancy. I'm attempting to set up something similar to the load sharing configuration found here http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/VRRP-exa...
by iprob
Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:53 am
Forum: General
Topic: Multiple VLANS in the same subnet Cisco can can you?
Replies: 7
Views: 3703

Re: Multiple VLANS in the same subnet Cisco can can you?

Thanks for the info!

--Rob
by iprob
Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:49 am
Forum: General
Topic: Multiple VLANS in the same subnet Cisco can can you?
Replies: 7
Views: 3703

Re: Multiple VLANS in the same subnet Cisco can can you?

Eric, Sorry to pick up an old post. I'm a total newbie to MT. I wanted to make sure I understood your post. The solution you are proposing will work for the second option listed in the referenced link, right (Multiple VLAN inside the same subnet)? Cisco won't support that setup but Brocade does. We ...