+1For sure all of us want to schedule upgrading routerOS at a low usage time... And upgrade routerboot also...
still need to upgrade dude client manually. Client crashes after each upgrade via client uiVersion 6.43rc32 has been released.
*) dude - fixed client auto upgrade (broken since 6.43rc17);
seems, not. rc23 even worse for LHG. alot disconnects (~50/hour). after roll back to 6.42.3 - rockstable.Does rc23 fix the w60g issues seen in rc19 and rc21?
Why offtopic? it should be "must-have" feature ASAP.Small off-topic: isn't it time to protect port 53 DDOS for WAN interface in the default rule set ?
unfortunately i can't check this feature, because after upgrade i am not able to connect to 260GS via web interface, the browser just gets the "download" fileSwOS version 1.15 released
http://www.mikrotik.com/downloadWhat's new in 1.15:
*) name can be assigned to each port;
Draw your network layout and put here.Hello, how to block roque DHCP-servers
http://www.wirelessinfo.be/index.php/mi ... hcp-alerte
I know how detect them but i want to block them.
Anybody can help me?
you should read manuals, test and if something will go wrong ask here in forum.WOWO 51 visit and no one know what i am ask
If queue type is "default" Try to change default queue type to another eg from pfifo to RED. and write here if it helps.Queue Tree queues does not work in 6.27 (all counters stays on 0) (at least for GRE tunnel interfaces)
Very poor performance for single TCP flow over GRE tunnel.
what option did you use? ptp-bridge ? if yes,Quick set does not change anything, still "0bps" on "Tx Rate" port ether1 in Torch tool.
drop torrents at all??is there any known way to get desired effect?
Can you edit this topic on the wiki?It's on the Wiki. Why is that strange?Well, then remove this list.
Because on mikrotik site things which are not maintained by mikrotik, at least looks strange.
Well, then remove this list.This list is not maintained by Mikrotik, we do not test all available motherboards for compatibility.
This ruleWhat NAT rule?
So the problem can beNo, my users connect to the access points (on the bridged network) using pppoe but on the gateway I'm not using it...
Normis what do you mean "conditions"?zyzelis what are the conditions of the link?
CyberTod did you already install the 8km link ?
sorry for delay, i've used 1.13 of course.What version did you try to netinstall? Same version you're currently on, or latest (1.13)?
did you connected to ether1 (1st port)?Nobody has any idea? BTW ethernet ports blinks for few seconds after resetting the board after that no activity and pc lan show only send bytes no received byte. anybody haven't faced that kindda problem?
I hope it will help you... signal is goodIs it possible no one can help me for my problem i Tried everything but its same ccq is not good but signal is good
see this pic
Hello,Thank you for your reply can I ask you what is the highest throughput with nv2 that You have obtained and with which configuration?
I did upgrade to 6.9.
Is the upgrade to 3.12 will kill my omni? Yes/no ?
core router for 200 customers with traffic shaping, dhcp server, vlan internetworking, firewalling. works so far so good...What functions it performs?ok,thanks:) give me to know. because currently CCR 1036-12-4 works with old stable 6.3:)
Hi,I have loaded my CCR and all looks well. I suspect the release of 6.9 is good judging by the lack of complaints on this thread
Hello,http://routerboard.com/RB912UAG-2HPnD - Max consumption 14W
or better is RB411UAHL - Power consumption 1,4W board only + R52n-M 1.95W = 3,35W
Seems hw fault, because other devices works as expected.In V6.8 works fine. I tried BW test (10/10) 1minute. No crashaffected CPE SXT (6. still crashing under load (10/10Mbit udp btest) after 10s
And it seems with nv2 ping isnt jumping like before, now stable 3ms under 40/40mbit btest.mietus, some possible nv2 lockups/crash are fixed and also speed for the 802.11n might be more stable.
Janisk,have you looked here?
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Up ... to-upgrade