MikroTik

antwal

after several tests and research I saw that only version 7.6 works correctly; using higher versions the ppp-client works badly and the Lora interface does not transfer data as reported by other users; for correct operation it is necessary to manually set the connection using the AT commands as per t...

antwal

Hello everyone, I'm trying to test this product for a project but I'm having trouble getting the ppp link to work in conjunction with the GPS; I read the documentation online but it doesn't seem to work properly. The product that just arrived had firmware 7.6 from the factory and the available ports...

antwal

Educated guess: on that last netinstall you forgot to add the wifiwave2 package. It does not come automatically when using netinstall. Download extra packages for arm64, extract, locate wifiwave2 package. Drop on Files in Winbox. System - Reboot Then system - reset configuration when it arrived new...

antwal

Hi everyone, I have this problem on a hAP AX3, after resetting the configuration the wifi interfaces are non-existent and the router does not complete the default configuration at the time of the reset I had firmware 7.11.2 installed I tried everything, upgrade and downgrade, reset even from the but...

antwal

Solved

Schermata 2023-04-24 alle 18.37.50.png

Schermata 2023-04-24 alle 18.37.59.png

antwal

Ubiquiti UF-RJ45-10G SFP+ to 10Gbase-T Module cannot do 2.5gbps But Mikroitk S+RJ10 should be able to do that.. , https://www.servethehome.com/sfp-to-10gbase-t-adapter-module-buyers-guide/ https://www.servethehome.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/STH-SFP-to-10Gbase-T-Module-Overview-696x361.jpg ok, t...

antwal

Hi, Did you check the features of the router before buying it? https://mikrotik.com/product/rb4011igs_rm There is no 2.5Gb port. Ether1 is 10/100/1000 (like the rest of the ports except SFP+). Regards, yes model is rb4011igs_5hacq2hnd_in I also tried the SFP+ port with a generic "10Gb SFP+ RJ4...

antwal

Hello everyone, I have a problem with the RB4011, firmware 7.8 stable, the eth1 does not connect in any way to 2.5Gbps but exclusively to 1Gbps. I also tried setting the speed to only 2.5G, 5G and 10G but I always see "no link". Using instead in a notebook connected directly to the ZTE GPO...

antwal

Your explanations are not helping. 1. Please provide a network diagram detailing the equipment involved and how they are connected and the subnets involved. 2. Provide requirements as use cases. a. identify users/device, groups of users/device b. identify what they should be able to do and not able...

antwal

LTE1
....
LTE2
....
NEXT POST WILL LOOK AT LTE1,2 routing

do not consider them is a device used exclusively for LTE module tests, all the configuration made there above 80% is no longer necessary but is still active

antwal

your latter statement is very doable, just have to be clear in your requirements on what you wish to accomplish a. subnet to subnet b. subnet to internet or device(s) to internet c. device to subnet, or subnet to device I understand that it is not easy to explain or understand, however I try to exp...

antwal

(2) You need to indicate the subnet NOT the address for peers coming in or allowing local to reach remote subnets........ /interface wireguard peers SHOULD BE 192.168.10. 0 /24 and 192.168.178. 0 /24 add allowed-address=192.168.10. 1/ 24,192.168.80.2/24 interface=wireguard1 \ public-key="clien...

antwal

after adding the second client everything timed out

I am attaching the configuration for checking

chr.rsc

lte1.rsc

lte2.rsc

antwal

yes I did the test from PC to PC

with OpenVPN the average is 110ms
with Wireguard the average is 80ms

average ping from LTE to Google DNS 60ms

I just have to do the network speed test and try to add all clients to evaluate the stability

antwal

The problem is in firewall.

You have in firewall:
add action=drop chain=input in-interface-list=!LAN

Your wireguard interface is not added in interface list as LAN.

yes i added wireguard to the LAN

antwal

I deleted everything and recreated everything from the beginning by doing this: CHR: /interface wireguard add listen-port=13231 mtu=1420 name=wireguard1 /interface wireguard peers add allowed-address=192.168.10.1/24,192.168.80.2/24 interface=wireguard1 \ persistent-keepalive=35s public-key=\ "P...

antwal

What you want to do is perfectly possible. You may start with providing current config of CHR and one of the LTE devices. /export hide-sensitive file=anynameyouwish Review for public IP, serial number, passwords, ... and post contents separate per device between [ code] quotes (easier to read for e...

antwal

Hello everyone, I know this topic has been covered many times but I still couldn't get it to work properly even reading many guides about it on the forum. My problem is the migration from OpenVPN (fully functional) to Wireguard I have configured a CHR with public ip and here I should connect all the...

antwal

Probably there are some reason if the dynadish cost more money than that lhg model.... the price from the supplier between dynadish 5 and lhg xl 5 ac, is really minimal, only 30 euros of difference compare all three: DynaDish 5 - 5GHz, 25dBi, TX Power 31dBm, 1xGLAN, 802.11a / n / ac, RouterOS L3 LH...

antwal

okay, I'll do further tests on this, otherwise I thought I'd replace them with the "LHG XL 5 ac" but only if you can have at least 400Mbps (200 + 200) According to the scheme, the SXTs reach 1.5 km instead the LHGs at 20km for 802.11ac "866Mbps" but I have seen that the results a...

antwal

ok I did some tests but honestly the performances are very poor

config-screen2.jpg

config-link.png

tcp-test.png

udp-test.png

antwal

In idle, 3 -9 %, during the test 98-100%; currently i don't have a pc on the other side but i can connect it and test via iperf

antwal

Hello everyone, I have problems with a link between two SXT 5 AC, I have tried different configurations but the most stable one is with 802.11 in WPA2; I also tried with NV2 and NSTREME but the link is not successful, also the maximum speed I reach is 50/50 Mbps With firmware 7.2.3 the link is very ...

antwal

after various tests I realized that this type of antennas are not suitable for links over 500 meters; so I had to change the type of antennas

antwal

You stubbornly do not use the standard Channel 4. The 66.0 GHz frequency is still channel 5. What results do you get on channel 4 of 64.8GHz? The antennas are not precisely aligned. The parameters on the Master device are much worse than the Slave. Probably the installation rules are broken. I am d...

antwal

You wrote about 1300 meters. And in picture is 1835 meters. That's too much for nRAY. The first rain will disconnect it ....

it was initially 1300 meters, then it was moved to a higher building where the bridge is needed; otherwise I would do the extra 500 meters with another bridge

antwal

... for some strange reason it allows you to select it It allows you to choose, but the power is greatly reduced. I would not recommend using ROS7, use 6.48.6 LT In some versions of ROS6, channel 6 was also available. This is the best channel for long range. ok now they work, I tried at a higher di...

antwal

AP Bridge Frequency: 66960 Channel 5 is not available in every country. Check the region settings on both devices, try setting a different channel frequency. If the devices are flashed for a specific region, re-flash via Netinstall. I knew that channel 5 was not available for the EU but for some st...

antwal

Try upgrading rOS version and set the highest available frequency.

rOS: 7.2.3
AP Bridge Frequency: 66960

No link at 1300m

Station Bridge Scan, finds nothing

Schermata 2022-05-24 alle 11.27.16.png

antwal

Hello everyone, I have a problem with the kit of these two antennas; theoretically they say it can reach a distance of 1500m, but already at 1300m I have no signal. I updated the firmware to the latest version available, reset both antennas and reconfigured, but nothing to do they don't connect. The...

antwal

Hi all, initially on the LtAP I had put two R11e-LTE modules and I was able to have between 35 and 45 Mbps in download; now after the upgrade with the R11e-LTE6 modules I can't go beyond 8Mbps, what could be the problem? RouterOS: 7.1.1 R11e-LTE6 Firmware: V032 Config: # feb/24/2022 09:59:14 by Rout...

antwal

Solved

antwal

I'm currently removing 5x RB 951 and 3x RB 751 putting everything inside an RB 4011; the configuration is partial; anyway, I'll send you another configuration file I tried to change the firmware version too but I have the same problem; the wifi do not assign the ip from the dhcp Problem DHCP: wifi-p...

antwal

I get red entries when My config is wrong.
Please post your config

/export hide-sensitive file=anynameyouwish

I had to hide the static IPv4 and IPv6 from the configuration file

wifi-problems.rsc

antwal

Hi all, I have a problem that I can't solve; even trying different configuration reset the problem persists; after upgrading to the latest "long term" version all dhcp servers beyond the fourth do not work. All the dhcp want marked in red as if there was an error and the wlan including the...

antwal

Hi, it's very simple, you can try these examples: -> Local IP :log info [/ip address get [/ip address find interface=<vpn interface>] address] -> Remote IP :log info [/ip address get [/ip address find interface=<vpn interface>] network] -> Caller ID or Client IP Address :log info [/ppp active get [/...

antwal

What's new in 6.32.1 (2015-Sep-07 13:03): *) RB911/912 - fixed lock-up; *) RB493G - fixed reboot loop; *) firewall - do not lose firewall mangle rules on start-up; *) defconf - fix default configuration for routers without wireless package. What's new in 6.32 (2015-Aug-31 14:47): *) trafflow - adde...

antwal

Hi,

ipv6 not working - [Ticket#2014120566000801]

I have downgrade all RB.

Thanks.

antwal

Sorry for the delay; This is the configuration as it has always worked up to version 6:15; then the new version no longer worked ... This is my configuration: /interface 6to4 add clamp-tcp-mss=no comment="Hurricane Electric IPv6" \ local-address=<Static Public IPv4 Address> mtu=1280 name=s...

antwal

6to4 tunnel NO fixed !!!

Router OS 6.22
6.22.JPG
Router OS 6.19 (6to 4 work OK)
6.19.JPG

Hi miszak,

I have same problems; you can post the ipv6 configuration?

for me, working only with version 6.15; have some problems with 6.20.

Thanks.

antwal

Resolved with 6.15, but after not working IPv6.

antwal

Thanks, now working.

antwal

Hi all,

I have upgrade network from 6.10 to 6.15; but also some RB with 6.17; and the IPv6 not working If disable it the network working without problems.

How can downgrade the RB to 6.10?

I have this problem only with RB951G-2HnD.

Thanks.

antwal

Hi, I want import certificate on RouterOS; I have used this command: /certificate template add name=server country=IT ca-crl-host=<ip address> common-name=<domain name> email=<email> then I have used: /certificate create-certificate-request template: server key-passphrase: ********* and I have on st...

antwal

Hi, i have upgrade some Routerboard, model: RB951G-2HnD with routeros version 6.0, but have serious problems with the IPv6: On RB i have on ethernet gateway a connection with Optical Fiber and in the RB I have configured all static IPs, I have try to config some IPv6 with Hurricane Electric, with ol...

antwal

hello, i have the same problem but, with Hairpin NAT, not woking.... others solutions?

antwal

i have the same, problem, my routerboard RB450G, after three days are crashed and stop to work, I would like to return to the previous version but do not know how to do....

I have upgrade from 5.8 version to 5.18 (cpu load is always at 100%)

Thanks.

Search found 47 matches