Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 43 matches

by tonyd
Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:29 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: CRS317 DNS Problem - ERROR: could not resolve dns name
Replies: 3
Views: 3091

Re: CRS317 DNS Problem - ERROR: could not resolve dns name

I had the same issue. I'm way late to this party but thought I would add to it in case someone had this issue and found this forum thread looking for a solution. After disabling a Drop on Input firewall rule I realized that it must be a firewall issue, not an IP -> DNS configuration issue. I found t...
by tonyd
Fri Oct 18, 2019 6:01 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Route Public Resolved IP to Internal IP [SOLVED]
Replies: 2
Views: 535

Re: Route Public Resolved IP to Internal IP

Spectacular! Thank you! That solved my issue. I new I had to be missing something. I added that additional srcnat rule below my dstnat and all is well. Thanks again!
by tonyd
Fri Oct 18, 2019 12:35 am
Forum: General
Topic: Route Public Resolved IP to Internal IP [SOLVED]
Replies: 2
Views: 535

Route Public Resolved IP to Internal IP [SOLVED]

Hello, I'm looking for a way to route a publicly resolved domain to an internal IP, sourced of course, from my internal network. I host several servers for personal use that resolve to my public IP address, i.e. nextcloud.mydomain.com, smokeping.mydomain.com, cacti.mydomain.com, homeassistant.mydoma...
by tonyd
Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:13 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Freeradius + Mikrotik as NAS - no Wireless AP
Replies: 0
Views: 496

Freeradius + Mikrotik as NAS - no Wireless AP

Hello, I am trying to setup Freeradius + Mikrotik to authenticate MAC Address. We have many different wireless technologies, we don't use the Mikrotik as the wireless AP. So we would like new CPE to connect to AP, pull DHCP, and in doing so, the Mikrotik would first authenticate the MAC associated w...
by tonyd
Tue May 05, 2015 10:34 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Management VLAN Multiple Interfaces w/ Dedicated DHCP to each Interface
Replies: 10
Views: 2632

Re: Management VLAN Multiple Interfaces w/ Dedicated DHCP to each Interface

Hi All, Thank you for your responses and additional efforts to test. I've been out of the states for a couple of weeks. I will review your comments and let you know how this works out.

!! =)
by tonyd
Sun Apr 19, 2015 5:37 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Management VLAN Multiple Interfaces w/ Dedicated DHCP to each Interface
Replies: 10
Views: 2632

Re: Management VLAN Multiple Interfaces w/ Dedicated DHCP to each Interface

Hi bkuhn, Sorry for any confusion. Let me see if I can better explain. There are no mikrotik wireless links in this equation nor does the router itself have a wireless card. All links from the router are either a UBNT, Cambium, Siklu, or Dragonwave. These are APs or PtP links connected to eth ports....
by tonyd
Tue Apr 14, 2015 7:25 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Management VLAN Multiple Interfaces w/ Dedicated DHCP to each Interface
Replies: 10
Views: 2632

Re: Management VLAN Multiple Interfaces w/ Dedicated DHCP to each Interface

Hello,

Does anybody have an idea of how this would be accomplished? Or this this not possible with the Mikrotik product?

Thank you very much
by tonyd
Sat Apr 11, 2015 11:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Management VLAN Multiple Interfaces w/ Dedicated DHCP to each Interface
Replies: 10
Views: 2632

Re: Management VLAN Multiple Interfaces w/ Dedicated DHCP to each Interface

Clarification, not so much how to set up a vlan, I know the procedure. But how to use a bridge and/or a vlan to accomplish my functionality?

Thank you
by tonyd
Sat Apr 11, 2015 9:22 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Management VLAN Multiple Interfaces w/ Dedicated DHCP to each Interface
Replies: 10
Views: 2632

Management VLAN Multiple Interfaces w/ Dedicated DHCP to each Interface

Greetings, I'm wondering how you might go about setting up a common management vlan so that all backhaul radios would be on a single IP block while having a dedicated IP Block (DHCP) for each interface? So I want to be able to configure all backhaul radius on any interface to all be managed from a s...
by tonyd
Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:45 am
Forum: General
Topic: CCR1036-12G-4S now locking up constantly
Replies: 4
Views: 1586

CCR1036-12G-4S now locking up constantly

Hello, As much as I want to go f...ing off, I will attempt to keep my tone civil. I've got two CCR1036-12G-4S which I shelled out $1000+ each. Both serving a single channel of an etherchannel link between my core router and edge router. They ran flawlessly for 6ish months. Now they lock on me. I've ...
by tonyd
Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:20 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS-125-24G-1S keeps disconnecting
Replies: 5
Views: 1314

Re: CRS-125-24G-1S keeps disconnecting

@lambert: I've connect via MAC and IP. I am directly connected. It does disconnect me when changing config; /interface ethernet set [ find default-name=ether1 ] comment="WAN" ... /ip address add..., /ip firewall mangle add..., /ip firewall address-list add..., /ip firewall filter add... (first two r...
by tonyd
Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:31 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS-125-24G-1S keeps disconnecting
Replies: 5
Views: 1314

CRS-125-24G-1S keeps disconnecting

Hello all, I have a new CRS125-24G-1S. Can any tell me why this unit using keeps disconnecting on me? I can be in the middle of a configuration operation or pasting some config from the the cli and it stops responding and disconnects. I've upgraded to 6.20 after seeing some posts regarding Firmware ...
by tonyd
Fri May 30, 2014 7:25 am
Forum: General
Topic: Three Active Gateways - Really struggling?
Replies: 3
Views: 917

Re: Three Active Gateways - Really struggling?

Hi bajodel,

I honestly am a little unclear on the passthrough option. Does it mean... I've hit this rule, don't process any other rules to follow? At least that's how I understood it. Check box and "continue" to "pass through the remaining rules".

Thank you,
by tonyd
Thu May 29, 2014 10:48 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Three Active Gateways - Really struggling?
Replies: 3
Views: 917

Three Active Gateways - Really struggling?

Hi All, I'm really struggling with getting traffic to route to specific gateways depending on the internal IP Block/Network. My company has acquired a WISP that was designed and deployed by a couple of individuals not really familiar with Networking. So I've inherited a network set up with no routin...
by tonyd
Tue Aug 27, 2013 5:14 pm
Forum: General
Topic: winbox login - RADIUS PAP vs CHAP
Replies: 12
Views: 8374

Re: winbox login - RADIUS PAP vs CHAP

BUMP...

Has there been any movement toward addressing this issue? I too do not want to maintain a user list of clear text passwords, this is counter to any good security policy.

Thank you,

td
by tonyd
Mon Aug 12, 2013 1:25 am
Forum: General
Topic: Radius - 'no radius server found for 0d:02'
Replies: 10
Views: 5715

Re: Radius - 'no radius server found for 0d:02' - SOLVED

BINGO! SurferTim, thank you so much. I've got to look into the called-Id and why this prevented the MTR from making a call to the Radius server. I admit, I'm not yet very familiar with Radius. My gratitude and appreciation for helping me troubleshoot this!

=)
by tonyd
Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:21 am
Forum: General
Topic: Radius - 'no radius server found for 0d:02'
Replies: 10
Views: 5715

Re: Radius - 'no radius server found for 0d:02'

I do have debugging enabled. Seeing the "no radius server found" is what seems to be at the root of the problem. However, how can the MTR conclude the server is unreachable if it never "apparently" makes an attempt to reach the server as shown by the torch?

=)
Selection_011.png
by tonyd
Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:56 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Radius - 'no radius server found for 0d:02'
Replies: 10
Views: 5715

Re: Radius - 'no radius server found for 0d:02'

Hey SurferTim, Here's the hostpot output. I tried removing the domain from the radius config, unfortunately no change. Regarding the hotspot, I do have that checked in the Radius config, but not using it. Not yet past getting user login to work. Thanks so much! [admin@MikroTik] > /ip hotspot profile...
by tonyd
Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:24 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Radius - 'no radius server found for 0d:02'
Replies: 10
Views: 5715

Re: Radius - 'no radius server found for 0d:02'

Hi, I have verified that I have all the radius ports open with the proper protocol. That's what's so strange. Torching the traffic on my WAN interface shows no traffic to my radius server, no udp port 1812, and the radius statistics don't increment. I'm stumpted. =) Before login attempt [admin@Mikro...
by tonyd
Sat Aug 10, 2013 3:03 am
Forum: General
Topic: Radius - 'no radius server found for 0d:02'
Replies: 10
Views: 5715

Re: Radius - 'no radius server found for 0d:02'

Please anyone, I could sure use some assistance why the Mikrotik believe the Radius server isn't reachable when it just send and received an Account-Request.

Thank you very much
by tonyd
Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:32 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Radius - 'no radius server found for 0d:02'
Replies: 10
Views: 5715

Radius - 'no radius server found for 0d:02'

Greetings, I'm at a loss as to why I'm seeing this error and unable to attempt User login authentication via Radius. I'm at a development stage in setup and testing. I've reviewed a number of posts both related to User Manager and FreeRadius and have not found any information to shed light on this p...
by tonyd
Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:27 am
Forum: General
Topic: Centralized authentication for Winbox admin users
Replies: 5
Views: 2145

Re: Centralized authentication for Winbox admin users

Hi, This is a topic I'm interested, could you recall the tut that you indicated you found and post a link?

Thanks

td
by tonyd
Tue Jun 11, 2013 12:27 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: SOLVED - Migrating to new ISP/GW
Replies: 1
Views: 1229

Re: Migrating to new ISP/GW - How to Route Certain IP Blocks

Please, anybody with thoughts on what I'm missing here?

Thanks =)
by tonyd
Mon Jun 10, 2013 10:23 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: SOLVED - Migrating to new ISP/GW
Replies: 1
Views: 1229

SOLVED - Migrating to new ISP/GW

SOLVED I finally solved my routing problem. Despite every reference I found to Policy Route where you add a Mangle Rule and a 0.0.0.0/0 Route with a Marking Route, none of the information I found on policy routing was a solution. In the end I ended up having to first mark the packet with a mangle r...
by tonyd
Tue Mar 26, 2013 5:51 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Why two Ether1 Interfaces?
Replies: 3
Views: 656

Re: Why two Ether1 Interfaces?

hey nmaton, These, of course, are the names I gave them; it do not come new with them. New, out of the box, it had two ether1 interfaces. I could not, as you pointed out, have two interfaces with the same label. Trouble is this, 1) why the h3LL does a new RB come this way? I've used Cisco for many y...
by tonyd
Tue Mar 26, 2013 3:30 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Why two Ether1 Interfaces?
Replies: 3
Views: 656

Why two Ether1 Interfaces?

Hi, Can anyone tell me why I am seeing two Ether1 interfaces? Neither I am able to delete. So I have one disabled. My Cacti graphs work for all interfaces, except Ether1. It will graph for a while and then stop. This is a brand new RB1100AHx2 running 5.22. No mods to the CPU speed, etc. Also very st...
by tonyd
Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:19 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF - Bridged Interface
Replies: 6
Views: 2443

Re: OSPF - Bridged Interface

All of the above. RT1 to cisco switch to Canopy AP --/to/-- Canopy AP to RT2. I was wondering the same. I thought I understood MTU to be an issue with OSPF.
by tonyd
Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:35 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF - Bridged Interface
Replies: 6
Views: 2443

Re: OSPF - Bridged Interface

Ok, think I have it configured correctly, but still only see one neighbor... strange. ether2 Local is a ptp to RT2 via a Cisco switch. See Pics
by tonyd
Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:02 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF - Bridged Interface
Replies: 6
Views: 2443

Re: OSPF - Bridged Interface

samsung172, Thanks for the super fast response. I haven't worked with ptmp mode, but I'll take a look. I have lookbacks in place so good to go there.

Grats!
by tonyd
Sat Feb 23, 2013 12:09 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF - Bridged Interface
Replies: 6
Views: 2443

OSPF - Bridged Interface

Hi all, I've inherited a network made up of Mikrotik routers of various models, approx 20. The network design is made up of a number of /24's with ALL routers having an IP on one or more of the /24's. All routes are Static. My goal is to redesign the network so that I have /30's between my hops and ...
by tonyd
Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:33 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Transporting VLANs over VPLS??
Replies: 2
Views: 4237

Re: Transporting VLANs over VPLS??

Ok, I seem to have my VPLS Tunnel up and running and VLANs operating over the tunnel. If I connect a laptop to access port on switch 2 and modem to access port on switch 1 (both vlan 520) I can pull DHCP, and browse pages, send email, etc. However, pinging the other side of the /30 I do get packet f...
by tonyd
Tue Nov 13, 2012 10:28 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Transporting VLANs over VPLS??
Replies: 2
Views: 4237

Re: Transporting VLANs over VPLS??

Topo

Cisco Catalyst 2960G
Ports facing routers are trunked and ports facing a laptop to test vlan connectivity are access ports
Selection_062.png
by tonyd
Tue Nov 13, 2012 10:21 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Transporting VLANs over VPLS??
Replies: 2
Views: 4237

Transporting VLANs over VPLS??

Hello, I'm new to the Mikrotik world so I would greatly appreciate any help you might be able to lend me. I have to say that I've had an eye opener having dug into what RouterOS can do, wow! I am trying to set up (LAB) a configuration to transport several vlans over a VPLS Tunnel. I can/have set up ...
by tonyd
Wed Aug 01, 2012 7:11 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?
Replies: 19
Views: 7165

Re: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?

I here you, but don't see where the there is an issue with the return path. I can traceroute to the 10.9.10.1 network and the path is via the 192.168.1.185 interface. So the route from the 10.9.10.0 to the 192.168.1.0 and back would follow the same path. It hits my 192.168.1.0 gateway. The gateway h...
by tonyd
Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:05 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?
Replies: 19
Views: 7165

Re: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing? - SOLVED

SOLVED: But don't understand why I had to configure this way to get it to work... I had to NAT the 192.168.1.0/24 Network I wish to thank you for your assistance. And if you can shed some light on why I had to NAT this private to private it would be appreciated. tonyd add action=src-nat chain=srcna...
by tonyd
Mon Jul 30, 2012 12:04 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?
Replies: 19
Views: 7165

Re: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?

I cannot ping 192.168.1.185 from the 10.9.10.0/23 Network ARP from 192.168.1.200 host root@WorkStation:/home/tonyd# arp 10.9.10.1 10.9.10.1 (10.9.10.1) -- no entry root@WorkStation:/home/tonyd# arp 192.168.1.185 Address HWtype HWaddress Flags Mask Iface 192.168.1.185 ether 00:0c:42:df:64:ce C eth0
by tonyd
Fri Jul 27, 2012 12:42 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?
Replies: 19
Views: 7165

Re: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?

Still no worky... Thanks guys @SurferTim - Made the suggested change to the NAT config on the 10.9.10.0 network /ip firewall nat add action=src-nat chain=srcnat disabled=no out-interface=ether1 to-addresses=216.19.25.198 @CelticComms - From a pc on the 10.9.10.0 network (10.9.10.7) traceroute: C:\Us...
by tonyd
Thu Jul 26, 2012 3:58 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?
Replies: 19
Views: 7165

Re: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?

EDIT: Small typo on my diagram. The ip on eth2 of the Mikrotik is 10.9.10.1, not 10.1.10.9. @SurferTim - But vlan 192 does not traverse the Zentyal Firewall at all. Technically, eth3 is plugged directly into the 192.168.1.0 network my means of vlan 192. And since eth3 is on the same subnet, the last...
by tonyd
Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:21 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?
Replies: 19
Views: 7165

Re: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?

Please find the attached PDF Visio drawing. It's stripped down to just the key elements relative. I can ping the Mikrotik's Interoffice GW IP from the 192.168.1.0/24 network as mentioned. So I have a route back to the remote 10.9.10.0/23 network. The problem is I can't ping from the 10.9.10.0/23 net...
by tonyd
Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:32 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?
Replies: 19
Views: 7165

Re: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?

I'll put something together.... =)
by tonyd
Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:48 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?
Replies: 19
Views: 7165

Re: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?

@CelticComms - No IP/Firewall rules. I am NAT'ing the 10.9.10.0/23 network. The default GW for 0.0.0.0/0 is 216.22.22.197 @SurferTim - You're correct, it is the GW for the 10.9.10.0/23 network. I use Zentyal as my internal Gateway/Firewall. It's gateway to the world is 192.168.1.55. With respect to ...
by tonyd
Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:34 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?
Replies: 19
Views: 7165

Re: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?

Thanks CelticComms... I believe the answer is that it does. From the Mikrotik's perspective; shown in the "Routes" list; both ways. Eth3 is simply connected to an access port on a vlan that is part of the 192.168.1.0/24 network. Question, is the reason I can ping ip addresses on the 192.168.1.0 netw...
by tonyd
Fri Jul 20, 2012 3:56 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?
Replies: 19
Views: 7165

Route to 192.168.x.x Network - Not Routing?

Greetings, I'm new to the Mikrotik world and trying to get my arms around the RouterOS from both the GUI and CLI side. But I have a specific problem/question. I cannot figure out why traffic is not being routed to a specific IP block/interface. The network is there, the route is there. I can confirm...