MikroTik

cheeze

I personally have my doubts that this has to do with hardware, but it very well may have to do with the differing CPU architectures that Mikrotik runs RouterOS on. I don't know if the MIPS/PPC architectures that they have can "do" a 64-bit integer. We're all sure and positive that x86, ARM, Tilera c...

cheeze

Yeah this is one of those things where it's kinda surprising that it hasn't been fixed yet. Does changing the variable type that stores this number from an integer to a double cause an issue within the calculation script?

cheeze

That is not the problem. The problem is getting a modern kernel that boots on all of the platforms while supporting hardware offloads. Just my opinion... To be honest, I think it's both. However I think what you bring up is likely more of the issue though. I wonder if it's worth it for Mikrotik to ...

cheeze

I am still not sure why Mikrotik didn't go with IP Infusion....

cheeze

Do we know if there will be MPLS hardware forwarding on the new switches?

CRS354-48G-4S+2Q+
CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+
CRS305-1G-4S+IN
CRS309-1G-8S+PC
CRS328-4C-20S-4S+RM
CRS332-32S+RM
CRS312-4C+8XG

cheeze

Mikrotik, please please please please. Leave the development of *NEW* features/things/whatnot out of ROS 6 now. Please, move the developers out of ROS 6 feature development and have them go to ROS 7 development. Bugfixes should still keep going on ROS 6 as they are going now (if possible). There nee...

cheeze

I have a lab with CRS317-1G-16S+ switches in core network as P routers. With L3 Only links routed within the IGP (OSPF). MPLS is enabled and LDP is distributing lables. Only real traffic entering the switch would be mpls not counting ospf that is cpu bound and probably LDP to but the datapath for r...

cheeze

What's new in 6.41rc31 (2017-Sep-20 06:56): Important note!!! Backup before upgrade! RouterOS (v6.40rc36-rc40 and) v6.41rc1+ contains new bridge implementation that supports hardware offloading (hw-offload). This update will convert all interface "master-port" configuration into new bridge configur...

cheeze

Maybe 'tik might find this useful as a high end router?

http://www.anandtech.com/show/11720/mor ... core-c3958

Something like a CCR.....

cheeze

$399 vs $1,599.0 What are you asking really? That we need to make a 1599$ device as well? I personally don't think that's what is being asked. I hate to prod and poke, but I see the MPLS forwarded via hardware in the future. Is that a far future thing? Like an ROS 7 thing? Or should we expect it be...

cheeze

"HW MPLS forwarding coming in future software update"

You have caught my attention.....REALLY caught my attention. Um.....do we have more information on this? Is this just for this switch? Any other devices? Please please?

cheeze

1GB for just one BGP feed that's a lot.

Just wait till you see some of the L3VPN/L2VPN NLRI on a service provider on a route reflector. It's far more than that.....

cheeze

Well done 'tik.

This is how things get done.

Now time for us to go break it for you and give it back

cheeze

BGP != Forwarding. BGP is a routing protocol. Multi-threaded BGP is hard, really hard. Juniper do not do it, Cisco IOS/IOS-XE do not do it. Processing the prefixes against all the filters, accross multiple cores and coming out with a result "in order" is very complex. This is purely speculation, bu...

cheeze

Here we go, it seems this has been brought up before:

viewtopic.php?t=95442

Has 'tik responded to this?

cheeze

Did some more investigation and....this is very different behavior. Did this on a Cisco, on a Juniper, and on a Mikrotik. Change on Cisco or Juniper does *NOT* cause the adjacency to bounce. A change on Mikrotik <> Cisco does though, even if I am making the change on the Mikrotik side. So in theory,...

cheeze

Hello everyone. Just wanted to ask if this is a behavior that has been seen here before. When I change the metric of an interface in OSPF, it actually tears down the neighborship and re-establishes it. I noticed on my Cisco that it consistently bounces when I change the metric. It comes back very fa...

cheeze

To attempt to bring it back on-topic, bigger CPU cores postpones the need for v7's new routing. Unless MT is going x86 or CHR with the new platform, version 6 will need major rewrites, which just seems silly at this point. At one point in time I thought there was a powerpoint presentation and a vid...

cheeze

Will people please stop talking about multicore BGP! It isn't going to happen! The performance enhancements are coming from other areas, not multi thread support. Well, they did do some work on it and were talking about it. I personally am not a big fan of making it too complicated....I think 1 thr...

cheeze

I know this is probably not going to go over well, but I'm going to say it anyway: it's time for Mikrotik to have an Apple equivalent of "Back to the Mac"; except the Mac is RouterOS. I don't want to see another piece of hardware. I want to see a commitment to releasing RouterOS 7. All these differ...

cheeze

The chipsets from Broadcom are being used in "routing switches" e.g. Brocade MLX/VDX, Nokia 7210 SAS-T/M and certain Arista switches. They are great for fixed scenarios but are not good as a "General Purpose" router, and have some pretty hard limitations. e.g. Broadcom Trident II can do VXLAN and Q...

cheeze

48 port Gb/e and 4x 10Gb/e (SFP+) (TileGX based) : Or please support the following chipsets from Broadcom. The Trident II and the Tomahawk. . - Trident/Tomahawk is meant for switches not for router. - Does TileGX has a future at Ezchip/Mellanox? There are other options: http://www.mellanox.com/page...

cheeze

48 port Gb/e and 4x 10Gb/e (SFP+) (TileGX based) 24 port Gb/e and 2x 10Gb/e (SFP+) (TileGX based) 16/32 port 10Gb/e (SFP+) (TileGX based) The above *NEED* to be able to do line rate for IP/IPv6/MPLS traffic, or close enough to it (like the way UBNT does by using an Octeon ASIC to get a decent level ...

cheeze

WOW....

Awesome, well done.

Lets hope bugs are minimal on it.

cheeze

I kinda want to ask what the scope was for the new STP implementation. Is it meant to basically run like per vlan rapid spanning tree protocol that is similar to Cisco? Basically instantiate rapid STP and then have the instance communicate with tagged packets? Per conversations that were had with su...

cheeze

No ROS 7 updates?

That's highly disappointing...
ROFL! Did you really expect that??

Well I wasn't expecting them to say, "Hey we released it." I was however hoping for them to kinda give an update on where they are in the process of it.

cheeze

No ROS 7 updates?

That's highly disappointing...

cheeze

Generally the idea is to not necessarily get a "new" kernel, but rather a stable one. Even a fast one is not really needed, although if it's possible it can be optimized....but that's definitely not the requirement. Stable is better than new when it comes to working with things that are considered "...

cheeze

Whoa whoa whoa.....what?

Access Denied on the 'tik website

cheeze

I got an idea Normis. How about this. Eventually deprecate the x86 installation. Then go to something like The Yocto Project and build a very lean Linux VM hypervisor but only for a singular VM, the CHR VM. Make it a completely automated installation and have it setup as a baseline Linux/KVM with on...

cheeze

I didn't check, i was running iperf. server A -> server B direct 9.8Gb/s server A -> ccr (LACP + vlans, in one vlan out another vlan) -> server B, approxy 0.98Gb/s If i ran multiple streams I could push up to 9.6-9.8Gb/s Well, it might be a good idea to check. Don't run TCP, use UDP. Force it to us...

cheeze

I have followed this up a few time with tech support. and it has been a while, but 1 TCP stream is cpu bound, just like single core BGP ...( that also is coming in V7 ... multi core bgp). I can put over 1G bu pushing multiple streams ... Hmm, so ok. If for example you start to push over that, what ...

cheeze

I bought the orig ccr1036 when it came out, to be disappointing with the performance. the issue single threaded forwarding .. limit single tcp streams to 1G... on a 10G routers thats annoying. Fix ... V7. I was under the impression that if a flow exceeds the ability of one CPU core to process, that...

cheeze

Hello, The 802.3ad load balancing is not supported in the new SwOS 2.0 yet. becs, can we please ask for a delay of SwOS 2.0 to happen so that 802.3ad can be added into it? Preferably for all platforms that support SwOS. If it can't be for all platforms, at least let it be for the platforms starting...

cheeze

nowadays memory controllers are very fast, so we will not lose any of performance. You will, in fact. And that is a well known fact. Memory controller won't help you when it comes to a twice as large pointer size. Having said that, I don't think it's a real reason why RouterOS x64 does not exist ou...

cheeze

For what it's worth, I think most of us are probably ok with V7 taking longer if some resources can be added to just either fix bugs in the routing stack, or even add some very VERY small features. For example, I still don't understand why something small like IPv6 BGP next hop resolution has NOT be...

cheeze

Per my understanding, the only ECMP that is given via a routing protocol within RouterOS is in OSPF and Static. I am not certain that there is an ECMP capability for BGP (using BGP multipath for example). I don't believe ECMP is influenced by fast path, or mangle. I could be wrong but I don't think ...

cheeze

The answer will be to wait for ROS7. Until then.....basically...yeah....

Also why in the heck are you using an IGP for anything other than loopbacks and links. Isn't that what BGP is for?

cheeze

The SPI process is actually (I think) controlling the LCD screen. Per the link that Normis sent out one can see this in the article...

"Typical applications include Secure Digital cards and liquid crystal displays."

cheeze

That's a pretty specific use case.

You'd be better off testing it yourself.

cheeze

Dear support and developers, could you please spend 10-15 min a month to post progress summaries for V7? I'm not asking for huge detailed report, just very quick summary so we can see some progress going. This is a great freaking idea actually. Kinda give like an outline of, "hey this is what we're...

cheeze

mpls - fixed crash on active tunnel loss in MPLS TE setups;

Can we ask what this entails?

cheeze

Hello everyone. Has there ever been a limit imposed on how many tests can run at once using the Traffic Generator? I have seen that there's a limit of numbers 0-25 which should mean a total of 26 tests. However I have found that the actual limit on my RB1100 is actually 16 total tests. So tests 0-15...

cheeze

I as well wish we had X86_64 on the bare metal installs. I *hate* the overhead that a VM adds...albeit I will admit a lot of times it's less than 5% total overhead costs. So for what it's worth one can get 95% of the throughput of a VM. The problem I have is how to start a VM automagically if the sy...

cheeze

I actually have a few questions on this. So it seems from the looks of it on the back we see a heatsink. Does that mean that this switch will be fully fanless? Or will it have a fan on the inside? How deep is it expected to be? About the same footprint as a current CCR? Is there an expected CPU that...

cheeze

To all who have upgraded to 6.38 I just wanted to give some info on what I have found. I have found that I needed to rediscover all of my devices for 6.38 as I lost all SNMP graphing/oids that were CPU, temperatures, and voltages. However it was quickly fixed with a full rediscovery of the device. I...

cheeze

You have now gained.....our interest. Very closely. I know this might be too close of a probing question but, is release of this box to the public contingent on those features? Or will those be added after release? I was already planning on buying one for the use of switching....but if what you're s...

cheeze

We are working on LACP support and also on accelerated routing and MPLS (including for this product). But since it is not ready yet, I did not want to make early promises. Forgive me Normis but....what does "accelerated routing and MPLS" mean. Fast path? Or something other than Fast path? Is this f...

cheeze

patrick7 - Bonding in past reported 2Gbps always. It did not matter if bonding had 2,3,4,5, etc. slave interfaces. Now it will simply report single link speed: *) snmp - always report bonding speed as speed from first bonding slave; For LACP that is Totally Wrong. In protocol less bonding this may ...

cheeze

For what it's worth, Mikrotik is just not there on IPv6 yet. I hate to say it, but they just are not in the current routing stack. It's better to just do IPv4 and MPLS related networking which....lets be honest is most of what networking entails right now. So for more stability and operation I would...

cheeze

Am I the only one that wants this 16 port 10 gig switch + the TILE-Gx 36 core chip? Just attach the switch chip links straight to the TILE-Gx chip...or something similar... Kind of a middle of the road router and switch. Able to utilize all 36 (or 16, or 9) cores and also able to run as a switch. Ba...

cheeze

What version of Linux is ROS 7 supposed to be built on.....is it in version 4?

cheeze

One of the reasons v7 takes so long, is that routing programs are being completely re-made from scratch. There is nothing yet to backport. Coding is hard. Project management is hard. But this is your job. Excusatio non petita, accusatio manifesta Second time, please, stop making fun of us. Maybe it...

cheeze

I received in my whatsapp

Ok so that's just hilarious.

cheeze

One of the reasons v7 takes so long, is that routing programs are being completely re-made from scratch. There is nothing yet to backport. Yeah I can totally understand that. Conforming to RFCs and programming a routing stack is *NOT* easy. I'm sure it's one of those things where the programmers sa...

cheeze

I realize that what I am asking for down below is a LOOOOOT of work but....I'd like to put them in there. BGP Labeled Unicast (RFC3107) for both IPv4 and IPv6 BGP Link-State (RFC7752) for the TE database distribution between areas (allowing for inter-area MPLS-TE) BGP Route-Target Constraints (RFC46...

cheeze

I don't know when this change was made, but I just want to absolutely thank you to whomever decided to do this at Mikrotik. http://www.mikrotik.com/download/archive This is the best thing that Mikrotik could have done for us as customers. This way people can mix/match firmware to suit their specific...

cheeze

You do know the limit for a single flow for a Tilera powered box is a little bit over 1Gb/sec..... The way it works is 1 flow is forwarded by 1 CPU.... You're going to have keep your individual flows at 1Gb/sec or lower. That being said though it shouldn't make the box stop forwarding. That's....dif...

cheeze

huh... so, there IS 64-bit version for PCs?.. ros_x86_64.gif Holy crap... Mikrotik peeps....is 6.33.5 the 64 bit release for x86? Can I PLEASE PLEASE PLEEEEEEEASE ask for carefulness here....and if possible can this kind of change be done not on a bugfix but on a feature release? If anything can an...

cheeze

Normis/Mikrotik For what it's worth I would say that unless there are any low hanging fruit/easy fixes that can be incorporated into 6.30 then I believe that the .4 should be the last iteration. With the way Mikrotik develops and at the speed they develop, the best thing I would say is to develop an...

cheeze

YES, this is what we love to see Mikrotik.

Please please just release one more bugfix for 6.30 and we should finally have a really good starting point for version 6 stability.

Thank you again for all the very hard work that is done. Thank you Mikrotik peeps.

cheeze

I would say, please release an RC-Final candidate file. If people do not have any issues with it, then rename it and re-release it as 6.30.0 with no change other than the name. That way whatever bugs are found are squashed before 6.30.0, and said backlash doesn't hit Mikrotik nearly as badly. Other ...

cheeze

I would be 100% on board with that change. However, if I may make a request/observation as a user of Mikrotik products. Please instead of using programmers to add to 6.x feature releases....please move them to version 7 development. That way version 7 has more development power. Please only have peo...

cheeze

Please please please add more information and reorganize/consolidate on how to use the switch chip functionality for non CRS and CRS. I would say that there should be one link on how to use all switching features for RouterOS. It would just be faster. Please use examples with Cisco as the main compa...

cheeze

Mikrotik, please PLEASE take your time. I don't think most of us care if you take 3 months. Take the time to perfect 6.29, or at least make it as good as possible.

Also, awesome

cheeze

The addition of fast path indicators.....FANTAAAAATIC...

TY Mikrotik. You guys/gals rock.

Are there anymore fast path options going to be available in the future? I heard firewall fast-path was in the development stages. Maybe we can get an IPv6 fast-path as well?

cheeze

MRZ, I'd say other than the single threaded process of evaluating routes/loading routes from the BGP RIB-IN to RIB LOCAL I don't think I've had any problem come up.

Obviously more BGP address families would be nice but, that's not really to the point of your question

cheeze

Mikrotik peeps. If this is how you handle new OS upgrades/releases then you will regain everything that was lost here in the community and then some. I realize this might be very difficult but....it is very helpful for the users of your software/hardware. Please consider releasing fewer software cha...

cheeze

Nah....

Version 6 isn't beta. It's just that some parts of it are still not working quite as well as they need to be....

cheeze

The only thing I found is these NICs....

http://www.hotlavasystems.com/products_10gbe.html

However for what it's worth....at the 10Gb/sec level I'd go ASICs. At that rate an MX80 is probably for the better. Or maybe a Cisco 6503/6506 with like a Sup 2T.

cheeze

I believe it's a RAM limit...and I believe it scales as one increases the amount of RAM available.

That being said, you got more than enough if you only have 1 IP facing the world...

cheeze

MPLS TE Fast Re-Route MPLS TE Link Protection MPLS TE Link-Node Protection MPLS TE behavior similar to Cisco Class Based Tunnel Selection MPLS TE Diffserv-Aware tunnels MPLS Segment Routing extensions to OSPF/ISIS ISIS Multicast separation of RPF table calculation into individual routing table and a...

cheeze

Holy crap....

Thank you...

cheeze

Hello Mikrotik peeps... I was curious if it was possible to have something like an RB1100 be released with say an AM3+ socket or a 1155/1150 socket? Then with RAM slots and a CF port/SATA port. Basically, if it was possible to have Mikrotik release a motherboard with the ports attached to the PCIe b...

cheeze

Seriously, these switches should never have been released. We've had a few for 6 months now, and they've never even been capable of functioning as basic switches. They're not even useful as paper weights because they aren't heavy enough. We're throwing ours out, and we're def not going to try Mikro...

cheeze

Are you going to oversaturate a port past line rate?

cheeze

Ugh, Metro Ethernet is such a freaking malaise in the networking world.

That and MEF is too...

Sorry, don't mean to rant.

I just hate MEF and what Metro Ethernet stands for.

cheeze

If I remember right, there is no NAT64 available.

I could always be wrong but there is no CGN related capabilities on RouterOS yet.

cheeze

So I can totally see that failing to be honest. I believe that would be due to a hardware limitation.

What I am finding interesting is the software side of things. Like for firewall filters or something like the MPLS auto-bandwidth timer being a value other than what is allowed in the Winbox/CLI...

cheeze

You realize PVST+ is proprietary to Cisco...right?

cheeze

Hello peeps...

Just had a question on the edit <value> functionality on RouterOS. Since it's Linux, that edit value seems to be much akin to nano editing a file. Now my curiosity is, does that mean that it allows for the box to be set to things that normal configuration wouldn't allow?

cheeze

This is almost as heartbreaking as fathers day in Harlem....

cheeze

Um...so...

I got a question I guess...

Have you tried 6.5? Does it work for what you need it to do?

cheeze

Is the RB850x2 similar to the Ubiquiti Edgerouter?

Also is availability for that model supposed to be May?

cheeze

From the looks of things, would yalls say that for what it's worth....6.9 is a pretty good release with minimal bugs?

I downloaded it but I haven't deployed it yet. From the posts here, it seems that this release is a good release.

cheeze

Hello Mikrotik peeps... I just wanted to ask if there was a feature that allows for a functionality that allows for an LSP between an ingress --> egress to carry only one type of traffic. Specifically, to allow for 1 QoS/Queue class to send traffic over the LSP and no other QoS/Queue classes. That w...

cheeze

Heya guys... I'm sorry if I missed a page on the SFPs that are supported. I haven't been able to find one. I realize that it supports really any SFP that conforms to the SFP standards. I was more curious if say an SFP like Cisco GLC-T. If anyone has used it. Maybe setup a page in the Mikrotik Wiki o...

cheeze

I think you're looking for... [<redacted>@STUFF-NETWORK-WAP] > /interface bridge host print Flags: L - local, E - external-fdb BRIDGE MAC-ADDRESS ON-INTERFACE AGE L Conversion Bridge 00:0C:42:E4:49:38 Wireless 0s Conversion Bridge 6C:C2:6B:06:E0:61 Wireless 11s Conversion Bridge 9C:2A:70:47:37:3C Wi...

cheeze

Another upvote.

Please Mikrotik, add LLDP and add LLDP-MED if possible. This would come in very handy for the new CRS switch.

cheeze

Call it a teaser. I was "teased" by the CRS as this option showed up a a little bit earlier then 6.5. :-( I am actually REAL curious about this. I wonder if Mikrotik found another way of increasing performance. If this is the case, then maybe one can have different levels of "fast path" for these b...

cheeze

Just a report as I upgraded to 6.5 on my home network.

No problems so far, everything upgraded properly the first time.

I have noticed that memory usage is a LOT lower whilst using the same exact packages and configs.

Well done Mikrotik

Time to do the same upgrades to my lab.

cheeze

I would say in MOST situations, the method you used should work. That method has worked for me here at home. However I have found that SOMETIMES, the firmware has to match up with the software load for things to work "best". That's why I suggested the gradual approach. Sometimes the gradual approach...

cheeze

Upgrade slowly...

Go to 5.26, then upgrade firmware.

Then try to go to like an earlier version of 6, upgrade firmware again.

Then try 6.5, and upgrade firmware. Then restart...

That might make it a smoother transition....

cheeze

L2MTU is 4064 CPU clock variants are min 500/ default 600/ max 750MHz Coo coo coo, thank you much Normis. A 25% could always help out for CPU starved situations. Sorry if I seem harsh, but where the hell do you get your infos from?! They aren't expensive anymore and also they aren't that difficult ...

cheeze

So, just to add some info here. PVST is Cisco proprietary. Other vendors (Juniper) do it also (they call it Virtual Spanning Tree or VSTP) but they have to license that crap out. Not sure Mikrotik wants to do that. I don't blame em either. You shouldn't expect PVST. I can understand expecting MST th...

cheeze

iDen, in all honestly there probably isn't any limitations software wise (excluding license limits of course) on the box. Really from what it seems, the box is just limited by CPU power. However the device is not one that is meant to be a high pps router. It's mainly meant to switch (as it has the A...

cheeze

It's out...WOOOHOOOOO...

http://routerboard.com/CRS125-24G-1S-IN
http://routerboard.com/CRS125-24G-1S-RM
http://routerboard.com/CRS125-24G-2HnD-1S-IN

Now time.....for Roc-Noc to get a few.....

cheeze

Do the fixes in the "route" portions fix the L3VPN problems only or do they also fix the BGP routes being stuck as well?

cheeze

Can yalls please list them here so I can open a ticket with Mikrotik on em?

cheeze

Heya peeps I thought it was interesting that there's a piece of the wiki that is reachable through google but it is not in the actual WIKI list. The page (http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Routing/Multicast) is not actually under "Multicast Routing" within the main wiki page table of contents. I ...

cheeze

I thought posting here would be as good....but I shall send the email there as well...

Danke

cheeze

I could always be wrong but, I believe Normis said that the only change will be the SSH fix.

cheeze

You need to (to my memory) queue everything. Not just one part of traffic. As in, mark traffic that matches your regex match and then mark all other traffic. Set up your queues to allow for your regex marked traffic to have more priority than your other traffic. Setting up the numbers in priority me...

cheeze

Heya Mikrotik peeps... So something I was thinking about in regards to ROS 7. I do realize that it's QUITE far away so this isn't something on a "near term" kind of thing that I'm asking for. Just looking for some clarification on the "next step" for ROS. I read someplace (I think it was Normis, but...

cheeze

I believe with all of the discussion around this, I do not think that Mikrotik will end up deploying anymore changes to OpenVPN within RouterOS.

I could always be wrong though (I hope I am...).

It might just be better to get a Vyatta box or an Edgemax for that specific functionality.

cheeze

CRS switch will be released very soon
Sweet, cause I'm hanging out. This juniper needs to go.

What it be? Is it going on ebay? Let me know...I'm studying for my JUNOS certs...

cheeze

CRS switch will be released very soon

EEEXCEEELLEEEEENT.....

cheeze

BFD um....can be setup to do that but wouldn't that be an insane amount of CPU utilization on a Mikrotik as there is no ASIC to do the hello generation/upkeep. That also being said, wouldn't that mean that there'd have to be a hello count of 15ms for BFD with a fail interval of 3 to get that actual ...

cheeze

Prerouting: This packet is selected as it ingresses the port and before any routing decisions are made Forward: This packet is selected after the routing decision Postrouting: This packet is selected right before it egresses the egress port Does it matter where you mark? Yes, because sometimes you m...

cheeze

Well done Mikrotik peeps... Here's hoping that this is a good base to start from and continue onto version 6 of ROS. If I may ask. Most of the releases/work since ROS 6 came out have been maintainence/bug fixes. That I think is good. I think that should continue. However I am curious if more things ...

cheeze

How stable is the power to the box?

cheeze

Are there any logs in the logging buffer when this occurs that show up?

Is there a pattern that can be repeated that you've seen that causes the layer 3 portion to stop forwarding?

Have you done any testing to repeat the issue?

cheeze

It's pretty well understood that things are kinda rocky in transitioning to ROS 6. Can we all please submit as many tickets to Mikrotik so that successive versions can get better? It does us no good to just complain frivolously. I think Mikrotik is trying to do what they do as best as they can. Lets...

cheeze

Sounds like you are not properly accounting for NAT translation.

Are you sure your return traffic is hitting a destination NAT rule?

cheeze

Well, I understand that restarting the process itself will end up doing what it does internally but I can definitely say that this does not exist within the implementation of the protocols within RouterOS. I have a Cisco 3750G that is peering BGP and OSPF with two RouterOS devices and they do not ha...

cheeze

Heya Mikrotik peeps.

I just wanted to ask if there was ever a discussion to add Graceful Restart to IGP/BGP within RouterOS?

cheeze

Do you need extra ports?

cheeze

I think I may have found a bug on x86 version of 6.0. I believe that loopback interfaces (or in this case, a bridge without anything on it) might end up being broken when it comes to adding it within OSPFv3. On my MIPS-BE router (RB751) it works perfectly, but on my x86 router it shows as inactive ...

cheeze

I think I may have found a bug on x86 version of 6.0. I believe that loopback interfaces (or in this case, a bridge without anything on it) might end up being broken when it comes to adding it within OSPFv3. On my MIPS-BE router (RB751) it works perfectly, but on my x86 router it shows as inactive a...

cheeze

Something I noticed about upgrading to 6.0 on x86. It kills all of the queues in queue tree. Once I rebuilt the queues everything else works.

Awesome, thank you Mikrotik

cheeze

I think they're great

However, I don't know what the letters/numbers mean.

Otherwise, awesome.

cheeze

I know that there's older versions of code that Mikrotik has on the download page...however I don't believe that it is sufficient. The code that is there is WAY older....not just a few versions back. It also seems like with the differences/bugs between versions of code that it almost might be benefi...

cheeze

So BE and CS1 are the traffic classifications under the Diffserv QoS model. BE = Best Effort = "It'll get there when it gets there" CS1 = Class 1 = "A little more important than best effort" It's essentially a Diffserv way of implementing the old school IP Precedence marks. http://www.cisco.com/en/U...

cheeze

So, what I am intending to do is this. If a packet comes into the router as BE, and it leaves out to ISP 1, then I want the connection that it makes under connection tracking to mark the return traffic coming back in from ISP 1 as BE. I'm doing that across all classes. So I was thinking to classify ...

cheeze

Heya guys. I am trying to remark return traffic with certain DSCP marks based on how it enters the router. I did it two ways, and the first way was more effecient but it didn't mark traffic. The second way I thought would also mark traffic but it does not. The second way is less effecient but I thin...

cheeze

First thing is first... Please proofread your post before you submit. It doesn't help that we have to decipher what you're trying to say. Secondly, attacking Mikrotik doesn't work. If you don't like something about it, and you feel that strongly then get another vendor. Clearly no one here will conv...

cheeze

Load V6 RC12 into the router (drop the files in) and then see if you can flash the board firmware.

That way you can upgrade the board firmware, and then when you restart it should be able to start in RC 12? I'm just guestimating this...

cheeze

Normis/MRZ/Mikrotik crew. I don't know how often this is said but I'm thankful to see that yalls are working your butts off to make this a better product. While I think that there's a lot of frustration that can be seen and is expressed, I still think it's a great product and I plan on buying more o...

cheeze

I guess I am trying to see if it's possible to call multiple routing filters from within ONE routing filter. Like this /routing filter add action=accept chain="INTERNAL ADVERTISEMENTS" match-chain="VPN HOSTS - EDGE" add action=accept chain="INTERNAL ADVERTISEMENTS" match-chain="CONNECTED" add action...

cheeze

Heya peeps.... Just had an issue with the firewall filter and maybe I'm not quite understanding the way IPTABLES does firewalling. So my goal is to allow for ICMP traffic destined to the router, but only when sourced from the router. This way the router can source pings/traces/whatever ICMP related ...

cheeze

Heya Mikrotik peeps/team.

I think we're all super excited over fast-path. I know I am

However I got a quick question. Does this also get engaged on x86? Are the performance boost numbers similar for x86 (50% and up?)?

Was just curious...

Keep up the great work, thank you...

cheeze

Wow cool cool... In upcoming RouterOS v6rc7, you will be able to see if Fastpath is currently active in the “ip settings” menu and in Winbox toolbar. Does this mean per interface? Also thank you so much Normis and Mikrotik team for listening to the request that I put in for that. Yalls are freaking ...

cheeze

Hello Mikrotik peeps I was just thinking today as I was getting ready to go to lunch. Would it seem reasonable to check which fast path handler is engaged on which interface? So every interface would have all of the fast path handlers that are currently working (IPv4, Traffic Generator, MPLS, Bridge...

cheeze

So just a quick question on this Mikrotik peeps. I know there was a discussion in regards to the 64 bit version of the code. I see that the TILE architecture is set to be 64 bit. Is the same opportunity going to occur on x86? It makes more sense for those routers to be 64 bit even more than the Tile...

cheeze

Normis, it might be a smidge premature for me to ask this but I'll try anyway...

As we currently know, firewall is the next thing that is planned for fast switching capabilities (or Fast-Path as Mikrotik calls it). Is there any plans to add other things like say, QoS or IPv6?

cheeze

Heh yes yes yes, you're right. I guess what I am thinking is even after that. I realize that a ton of work/bugs/feature are being ironed out through the RCs. I guess I'm thinking it might be a better idea to spend less time on features and more time on stability/bug fixes. I am definitely NOT the en...

cheeze

Heya peeps at the 'tik :) I was just thinking. After the release of v6, would it be possible to just one version after that to be PURELY just a bug fix release? As in, say 6.1. Can that only be a maintenance release and not a feature release? I realize this is something is strived for on every relea...

cheeze

Will there be an x86_64 version? unfortunately, no. not now I am satisfied with the 32 bit version. Why would you need a different one ? Thanks. for bigger available RAM? :) also, won't 64 instructions help to manage ipv6 addresses a bit faster? %) To also piggy back onto what Chupaka said. Having ...

cheeze

So say one interface has Mangle rules attached, and another one has nothing other than just normal forwarding then........is it enabled on the bare interface and disabled on the DPI interface? Fast Path is disabled when you add any firewall rule. Ok, so then Fast Path is disabled globally on all in...

cheeze

FastPath wont work with connection tracking. So anything that needs conntrack (firewall, mangle, etc.) will "disable" FastPath if you have conntrack in the new Auto mode. Cool cool....that makes sense. So basically if there's anything that uses DPI then FastPath (or Fast-Switching as Cisco called i...

cheeze

When one says, "No firewall rules" that means any and all configurations that fall under that right?

So no fast path with Mangle and Marking, or if there is an QoS/Queueing?

I'm not meaning to give a hard time. I'm just meaning to get clarification

Thank you Normis and Mikrotik team.

cheeze

So I changed my config to the following... /queue tree add limit-at=850k max-limit=850k name="Outbound Centurylink - 12mbit down 896kbit up" parent=CENTURYLINK priority=1 add limit-at=850k max-limit=850k name="CS7 outbound traffic - Centurylink" packet-mark="DSCP CS7" parent="Outbound Centurylink - ...

cheeze

Ahh you're right. I actually need to set a "max-limit" before the priority field actually gets utilized? So I know that the priority bit doesn't cause the order for them to change on processing (per the manual), but this is what I used as the manual entry: Priority We already know that limit-at (CIR...

cheeze

This is what I personally use: /queue tree add burst-limit=0 burst-threshold=0 burst-time=0s disabled=no limit-at=850k max-limit=850k name="Outbound Centurylink - 12mbit down 896kbit up" \ packet-mark="" parent=CENTURYLINK priority=1 add burst-limit=0 burst-threshold=0 burst-time=0s disabled=no limi...

cheeze

So, kind of a stupid question here on this. However it seems that it IS possible to setup a strict queuing policy. Can't one just setup the classes under the interface and then just put a priority on the classes? Therefore higher classes automatically get serviced first and then the lower classes ge...

cheeze

Hello Mikrotik peeps. Been using Tiks for a little while and I'm finding them pretty cool. Thanks much for such a cool product :) So something I was thinking about was how there is an offer for SWOS devices that are a few ports. Now that's great for a small switch and for the price/features, it just...

Search found 146 matches