Code: Select all
ip route print
Code: Select all
routing ospf lsa print detail
ip route print
routing ospf lsa print detail
ip dns print
ipv6 address print
add stp-type=config
interface bridge port print where hw-offload=yes
/routing ospf export
/routing ospf neighbor print detail
/routing ospf as-border-router print detail
We have mainly packet loss pinging from the remote end to ccr2004 gigabit interface, the problem probably occurs when the upstream traffic from the 10G->1G fullfill the ethernet..
Mikrotik default MPLS mtu is 1530, if I understood correctly, then it must be raised if the end customer needs qinq, for example.
Is VPNv6 planned for implementation as well?Yes of course, it will be implemented.
What does the radius log say for those two connections?why the dhcp give same address to active user ppp ??? i check everything But I couldn't solve the problem
SERVER : 1100AHX2 (6.47.4)
I use Radius
routing bgp advertisements print peer=peer_name
How does this solve the problem of analyzing and mitigating threats at L4 - L7?UTM could be done for free if all routers had Torrent and BlockChain
can anyone please help me to configuring wireguard
i setup peer and wg interface
but traffic cant go throw the tunnel
v7beta does not have this limit.
routing bgp advertisements print peer="peer_name"
when Router C receive the route it is not complete and it will not choose as best path, this is the issue
mpls ldp neighbor print detail
mpls forwarding-table print detail
interface vpls print detail
Ok - next question is re-adjacency – with OSPF can take up to 5mins will iBGP be the same
system routerboard settings set cpu-frequency=1200
system routerboard settings set cpu-frequency=1200
You're correct, I missed that it's a /16 mask, but I believe the route will still need to be on PF Sense.If you look correctly, he need to route 192.168.0.0/16, as 192.168.5.1 is a part of this network
[admin@lab1.iparchitechs.com] > ip route vrf add routing-mark=vrf-1 interfaces=lo1,lo2
IndeedThis is the way.
Currently, it is not possible, but because of a lot of customer requests for it, we are strongly considering to implement it! :]
Still, SNMP monitoring of BGP parameters (peer up, number of prefixes received, number of active routes to that peer) would be welcome, e.g. for graphing.