Normis, will it pe possible somehow to decouple REST from www-ssl in the future?Documentation of the REST API https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/REST+API
thx for the correction. i thought the box has the same 4019 SoC, turned out the ac2 has 4018. my bad.The Block Diagram for this device says the switch chip is QCA8327.
in cases like this just look up the block diagram. it will show whether there's a possibility to switch between ports/slots/interfaces./system routerboard usb set type=mini-PCIe
see here:how does it work?
i'm wondering whether these enhancements also apply to the 'sister-devices' like cAP-ac.*) wireless - improved system stability on hAP ac^2;
advertise=yes is the default if the interface has a GUA (statically or dynamically) assigned. but to stay on the safe side you can always specify this exclusively.But you don't need to set advertise=yes in bridge1?? Customer device's will not have IPv6 address. Thanks
i'd go for the RB4011 w/o wifi (RB4011iGS+RM). this has superior performance, similar form factor.Could anyone point to a comparable unit to the ER12 in regards to performance?
hence there's no cure for every issue. again, the lame uniform symmetric encoding on the client can be seemingly effective against idiots, proving this is a bit better than nothing.but client needs original password.
https://mum.mikrotik.com//presentations ... 441331.pdfany hw news ?
i guess so. and they are also quite strange with their documentation: those things are extremely hard to get ahold of.I wonder if Qualcomm requires patent licensing for router SOCs in a similar way it does for cellphone chips
i know it will not improve the performance, but you should really move away from pptp, esp if it is used for sensitive stuff, like management.We use it only for "the dude" monitoring and 3 ppptp servers for managment.
i doubt. Mikrotik calls their modules as R11e-xxxx.Ok so it is something like the mini-PCI modules used for LTE (and, mainly in the past, also for WiFi)?
i saw ch341 kernel module in the newly released routeros7.0 beta1.I want to use CH340 usb-to-serial adapter. but Mikrotik not support yet.
Added ext4 support ?
[admin@MikroTik] > sys reso print uptime: 2m16s version: 7.0beta1 (development) build-time: Sep/05/2019 15:08:48 [admin@MikroTik] /disk> format-drive file-system= ext3 fat32
i just talked to the local distributor in hungary, they already received the price list that includes lora stuff:+1! do you have a release date yet?
https://blog.mikrotik.com/announcements ... graph.htmlWhy to print this info now? Maybe in the future we 'll have another tx-mode
sub 6GHz is not always necessary. we have a reasonably big - 145 links in one of the networks - 60GHz routed mesh (with a different equipment) without any 5GHz backup links, without any problems.they are digging their own grave!
you can be OK with this channel mapping. you can have the 100Mbps clients run the same high MCS, and ultimately serve more safely and do buffering on the FE part. i'm more interested in TDD - cause this is the key to boost client numbers.Whats about smaller Channels?
btw, this translates to:subscriber-number: +CME ERROR: 100
ok, what abouth the commandI do not see any security problem with this
can you please share some specifics? i have working ipv6 AFI BGPs in multivendor environment with mikrotik [almost] w/o any issues.BGP IPv6 With 2 Mikrotiks unusable, eventually it just sends the link local address instead of the actual address for next hop.
OPSFv3 Broken with similar issues.
trust me, there’s no mlppp support on ios-xr and it’s not even planned. indeed it would be nice to have itif MLPPP is so minor then cisco and juniper should abandoned that function.
can you show some results? i was experiencing performance varying between 250-430Mbps using SXTsq ACs with early 6.43rc builds even under excellent conditions.Little bit better but the issue still present
well, windows. bloated, insecure, PITA when it comes to remote access, no proper scripting (i know there's powershell) stupid gui apps with no means of automation.What's wrong with Wine?
IPQ4018/4019 in the new arm devices (sxtsq, hap ac2, disc lite 5ac) is wave2.wave 2 work in the new RouterOS update?
It would be nice to have an iperf3 compatible bandwidth test tool and the ability to specify the port number for it.Iperf is not implemented.
you don't. it is configured through the OLT and the GPON management system. only the ethernet side is configurable in routerOS, just as with other ethernet type interfaces.How do I configure the SFPONU device? Is there a way to update ONU parameters there?
be my guestAt nomikrotik devices it works normally.
yes, and it is documented here:Is this expected behavior?
i guess space constraints. the extra power input jack, the serial console, poe-out, all take up valuable space. and to have wifi you would need some extra circuitrySo according to your sheet the RB450Gx4 should have the possibillity for dualband wifi?
Wonder why mikrotik did'nt put it in.
can we assume that Mikrotik will ditch the PPC platform altogether?Newer, faster, cheaper, but same size.