Endpoint-Independent NAT
all world call it Full Cone NAT
https://forums.juniper.net/t5/Enterpris ... a-p/298924I've never heard about EVPN before.EVPN multihoming is better than MC-LAG
MC-LAG is dead.
After reading about it, it does seem to be very interesting.
Thanks for mentioning it here !
Is this a fix for the problem 2018101022007579?*) ccr - improved packet processing after overloading interface;
what about selective qinq?Version 6.43rc14 has been released.
*) bridge - added initial Q-in-Q support (CLI only);
this is not a feature request, it's a questioncareful now, forum police andyris might warn you to post in feature request thread.have you planned add HW offload with vlan-filtering function?
I have the same problemPCC load balancing does not work after upgrade
routes does not work
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 96#p426396Ulypka there is no such feature! It is not a bug! Windows doesn't support any tunnel bridging, it is RouterOS-to-RouterOS feature (and RouterOS-to-Cisco)
confirm bridge with two sides work on MTUlypka, you should have bcp enabled on both sides of PPP (OpenVPN) tunnel.
+1Routing Mark problem returns on my RB2011L. Downgrade to 6.7 solved the problem.
[Ticket#2013101866000167]Ulypka
Please provide us with more information.
As well send support output file to support (support@mikrotik.com).