Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 18 matches

by Poundbury
Tue Dec 07, 2021 8:23 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.49.2 [stable] is released!
Replies: 64
Views: 124451

Re: v6.49.2 [stable] is released!

My issue with 6.49.1 is here: SUP-67276 Mine was Tile - No sfp modules installed on the ones I tried. (CCR1036). Recoverable with a console cable, but no good if remote. Did the device successfully upgrade to 6.49.1 or 6.49.2, or did the boot loop only start after the RouterBOOT upgrade (after the s...
by Poundbury
Mon Dec 06, 2021 3:29 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.49.2 [stable] is released!
Replies: 64
Views: 124451

Re: v6.49.2 [stable] is released!

I had some issues upgrading Tile to 6.49.1 (viewtopic.php?p=894934#p894934)
Are there any changes in the RouterBoot code that might help me in 6.49.2
by Poundbury
Fri Dec 03, 2021 6:38 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.49.1 [stable] is released!
Replies: 138
Views: 81052

Re: v6.49.1 [stable] is released!

Anyone have experience of jumping large release versions? On 4 CCR (tile) routers, upgrading the routerboot to 6.49.1 has resulted in non booting hardware. The RouterOs upgrade was fine, and the routers rebooted into 6.49.1. However, "system package upgrade" reports a success message and t...
by Poundbury
Wed Dec 09, 2020 6:44 pm
Forum: Scripting
Topic: OSPF state problems
Replies: 4
Views: 6656

Re: OSPF state problems

Sorry to resurrect an ancient thread, but did Mikrotik ever acknowledge your router id assertion?
I think I may have an example of the same issue on recent (6.47) ROS.

Mike
by Poundbury
Thu Nov 08, 2018 11:22 am
Forum: General
Topic: CRS125 poor throughput & low cpu load [SOLVED]
Replies: 41
Views: 8594

Re: CRS125 poor throughput & low cpu load [SOLVED]

A couple of us have already given you the solution.... You need a bridge - with Mikrotik software, most of the layer 2 stuff is now done through the bridge interface. The "H" you see when "/int bridge port print" shows that as much layer2 as possible is handed off to the switch c...
by Poundbury
Tue Nov 06, 2018 11:42 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS125 poor throughput & low cpu load [SOLVED]
Replies: 41
Views: 8594

Re: CRS125 poor throughput & low cpu load [SOLVED]

Since you are using vlans, you probably don't need to do this. Just do the firewalling at the point that traffic crosses vlans - unless you need security between lan devices in the same vlan. Traffic crosses VLANs in this device :) I'm sure it does, but do you need to filter traffic in the same vla...
by Poundbury
Tue Nov 06, 2018 5:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS125 poor throughput & low cpu load [SOLVED]
Replies: 41
Views: 8594

Re: CRS125 poor throughput & low cpu load [SOLVED]

I think some of your problem is that you are passing your bridge traffic through the IP firewall. This will definitely slow everything down. Since you are using vlans, you probably don't need to do this. Just do the firewalling at the point that traffic crosses vlans - unless you need security betwe...
by Poundbury
Sat Oct 27, 2018 7:52 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS125 poor throughput & low cpu load [SOLVED]
Replies: 41
Views: 8594

Re: CRS125 poor throughput & low cpu load [SOLVED]

I made a Ookla speedtest (http://www.speedtest.net/) and it gives 250mbit/s if I bypass CRS125. Behind switch I can roughly reach 50mbit/s
Can you post your config?
by Poundbury
Wed Oct 24, 2018 5:22 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS125 poor throughput & low cpu load [SOLVED]
Replies: 41
Views: 8594

Re: CRS125 poor throughput & low cpu load [SOLVED]

I tested a crs125 in our network (we use them for management switches in pops) and got 170Mbps up and down using the google speed test. It's using NAT and has 10 ip firewall filter rules and fast track is not enabled. It maxed out the cpu (>95%) for the test, so I guess that's about the limit. As a ...
by Poundbury
Tue Oct 23, 2018 7:55 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS125 poor throughput & low cpu load [SOLVED]
Replies: 41
Views: 8594

Re: CRS125 poor throughput & low cpu load [SOLVED]

Well - the CRS is a switch... Use a router for routing! Not sure that's particularly helpful! The data sheet says 689.8 Mbps when routing with 1500 byte packets and 25 ip filter rules, so there's a reasonable expectation of above 50M. Presume the OP has checked that it's definitely the CRS causing ...
by Poundbury
Thu Mar 01, 2018 1:27 pm
Forum: General
Topic: New router OS
Replies: 49
Views: 57947

Re: New router OS

Any chance of backporting the improved BGP performance? Some of the requested features haven't been made, so there is no difference if you are waiting for them in v6, v7 or whatever version. Let's just say you are waiting for a specific feature, not a version. The v7 doesn't automagically come with ...
by Poundbury
Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:27 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: What BGP setups need to be optimized
Replies: 57
Views: 32179

Re: What BGP setups need to be optimized

We have around 15 CCR-1036's with full internet BGP tables. We tend to limit the number of peers per router because the convergence time is so high. There must be something different in the way that MT loads the routes into the FiB, because we don't see this on x86 hardware running Quagga, or on Cis...
by Poundbury
Thu Feb 12, 2015 3:40 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CCR & MetaRouter
Replies: 51
Views: 28302

Re: CCR & MetaRouter

Did you get a quote from Tilera?
One off's start at $13k USD for a 36 core pci card and went up to $19k USD for the 72 core.
You also need a one off dev license of $12k USD.

For you to build your own system as a one off, you're better sticking with off the shelf x86 I think.

Mike
by Poundbury
Fri Nov 28, 2014 6:55 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR-1072 release date?
Replies: 71
Views: 20211

CCR-1072 release date?

Any news on the CCR-1072?
I think it was planned for November 2014, and we're just about done with November.

Mike
by Poundbury
Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:48 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Interface monitor-traffic column width
Replies: 1
Views: 1155

Interface monitor-traffic column width

Is is possible to specify the column width for the interface monitor-traffic command? As the routers get bigger and more powerful, the numbers are too wide for the output and get truncated. /interface monitor-traffic aggregate once rx-packets-per-second: 1 836 999 rx-drops-per-second: 0 rx-errors-pe...
by Poundbury
Fri Jun 21, 2013 7:02 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: Mikrotik CCR Internal Power Connector Type
Replies: 12
Views: 4247

Re: Mikrotik CCR Internal Power Connector Type

I just found an old one in a parts bin here.
It's got P2422 jmt written on it.
I think that it's this:
http://www.jmtdg.com/en_products_sub.php?k=1_73&pid=91

I reckon your Farnell part will fit.

Mike
by Poundbury
Fri Jun 21, 2013 2:55 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: Mikrotik CCR Internal Power Connector Type
Replies: 12
Views: 4247

Re: Mikrotik CCR Internal Power Connector Type

I've seen these in, for example, Mini-ITX PSUs.
eg: http://www.morex.com.tw/products/imgproduct/62-1.jpg
I don't know where to buy separately, but the image in the picture is exactly what you want.

Mike
by Poundbury
Fri Apr 12, 2013 8:27 pm
Forum: General
Topic: SNMP Problem When Different Ingress and Egress
Replies: 1
Views: 953

Re: SNMP Problem When Different Ingress and Egress

I've noticed the same issue. I'm hoping someone from Mikrotik will take a look at this thread and comment... The behaviour is exactly the same as with Net-SNMP on generic Linux. It was introduced I think in version 5.5, and I therefore assume that RouterOS uses a port of that version. At the time, i...