No - tracking won't really help a notice-able amount. I'd fore-go it and use preemptive mode.as some of the users in the home where this is being used complain about their internet suddenly going out, which tracking might help a little with.
Would be good if we could make rules based on interface lists ;)If there is no static entry in OSPF interface configuration, then parameters are taken from "all" entry. So you can adjust priority there to have all dynamic interfaces needed priority,
One would possibly assume accidentally removed it from the default bridge - which is why the device model is important - might be best to factory reset the device.
Is that even possible Normis? To remove the ethernet interface itself?
This very thread explains the equivalent (none). Read it.hello,
Please what is the mikrotik equivalent of "no bgp enforce-first-as" on cisco
Does this come with new associated MIBs / OID's? Or more for polling via API?In v6.47beta there is a new menu added - "/system health gauges". You should use this for polling "Health" related data from all the RouterBOARDs.
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat
Hrmm i swear I remember fan holes on the back of 1100 case - maybe im thinking older model? My bad.Be careful choosing device, both RB1100AHx4 models have passive cooling!you will need active cooling, so buy a model with active cooling (RB1100AHx4 would be my suggestion).
Normis says ROS v7 doesnt existMost likely you will see this implemented in ROS v7.
There is the CCR1036 8G 2S+ if your after more, or even the 1072-8S+, or what we've done is breakout using a CRS317-1G-16S+(I've always thought MT should release a CCR1009-8G-2S+)...
RB1100AHx4 very robust and can move a lot of data - i'd go one of them.
I was looking for RB3011UiAS-RM or RB1100AHx4, What do you suggest?
If I could get an 1100 with an SFP/SFP+ port I'd be happy haha, was thinking of the 4011 to start replacing our 1100AHx4 fleet if it came in a respectable case (With dual power)not in near future. there are other devices that have rack cases