try to upgrade the routerboard firmware as well, go to system routerboard upgrade.. then rebootSorry, it actually drops the WLAN interfaceIt adds what?
IMHO yes, but better to ask here >> viewtopic.php?f=21&t=131129&start=50I have 6.38.3 version, and I want to upgrade, but I want to avoid DHCP Server fail on bridge. What version is afected? Can I upgrade to 6.40.6 without risk of this bug?
+1 .. absolutely, and keep 6.40.x on bugfix for long timeCould we expect that 6.40.5 will become "bugfix" or 6.40.6 with fixes from 6.41?
6.40.5 is the last with "old-known-bridge-implementation" technology and not all want to upgrade to "new-better-but-not-too-familiarized" one.
+1 .. We know documentation takes time, but the rc features cannot be really well tested w/o at least basic suggestionsadd some documents
how do you manage that?hand out random /32
seriously as a customer i don't understand and that obliges me to search alternatives, as an act of responsibility towards my clients
I must check if they ship to EU, thank you anyway..Proscend endorses Versatek for US distribution:
https://www.versatek.com/product/vx-160 ... lco-grade/
They just restocked apparently.
probably not, and even if it works it will poorly perform (fraction of the nominal speed) and it will be unreliable IMHOI'm curious, does this work on 360 meters distance?
Interesting, I'll wait for news.Got the Procend 180-T ..[cut].. I will post some results..
Please normis, could you be more specific ? I'm in EU/Italy and this information would be usefull (also for other EU citizens)...[CUT].. Only a few countries in the EU have stricter rules.
..and the possibility to set source address (e.g. remote ipsec hosts)Hey, Mikrotik team!
Please extend "netwatch" funtionality a little bit. It is a nice feature, but so undeveloped.
It will be nice to have an option to set amount of ping to send before change status to down and at its frequency.
They seem ok, also my CRS326 lives at that temperature. I agree that it's probably a little higher than previous crs models but the architecture is different...CUT.. The switch constantly runs at 61°C and the SFP+ module at 49°C (my rack temperature is ~24°C)
ESXi 5.0/5.1:Dear Tom Jones,
Can you please tell me the same command for esxi 5.xx as your provided command is not working on esx 5.1
You are right, but try to use partitioning on a hEX (or any other "zero flash") devices!This was very easy to roll back with a partition. Just make the partition..
Probably wrong arch, try this:..
Can not install dude-6.39.2: system 6.39.2 is not installed, but is required
very hard task, they are from latvia ..they can drink forever!Be creative, invite someone from MikroTik for a drink (or two, three, ... you get the idea) and get some info from them!
- both (AFAIK)CRS328-24P-4S+RM
-- SFP ports support only 10Gbit modules or also 1Gbit modules?
-- have also Separate PSU for passive or 802.3af/at PoE out?
indeed, very useful and maybe a new CoDel/fq_codel queue type....cut..
A mangle rule which lets you modify any offset of a packet and a condition which works like the wireshark splice option would be really nice for us geeks
any english (or italian) version?
Am I the only one ?in my setup, starting from 6.38x, the email notification server PORT setting is ignored (If I put 587, it uses 25 instead). I can't test rc now, could someone please check/confirm ? thanks
Maybe some queries are not sent to public resolver but forced elsewhere, redirected queries are instead all catched so something can definitely be differentThe question is, what queries it sends that some public resolvers can properly answer and RouterOS can't? It should be the same.
It's ok for S+85DLC03D but why don't you use the DAC ?...
Is it okay? I tried looking for 850nm but most shops don't mention wavelength so I'm a bit confused.
Can I have more info about that ? Thank you...[cut]..
*) bridge - fixed VLAN BPDU rx and tx when connected to non-RouterOS device with STP functionality;
ok, this answers only to one question. What about partitions ? I'm now extremely used to work with them for failsafe/backup and I'm scared to upgrade my 3011 devices.About HW encryption, it was promised for ROS v7, because currently used kernel does not have a driver.
I'm sorry I've no answer, but I have a question ..what do you have/use on the other side (olt)?My GPON ONU works well, but also show no details in CRS125. Do you have someone working GPON SFP with details about SFP module? Thanks
Me too, where is it?Unfortunately I still have not been able to locate that script table... where is it?releasenote for 6.37rc10 says: snmp - added script table which executes script and returns it's output on get request;
what has changed during the year? more users? different queue? upgraded ros ?When CPU load increases to 90-100%, FAN speed is about 25000RPM. In profile it shows queueing consumes 70-80% CPU. This setup was working fine for more than a year and of late we are seeing this issue.
I Absolutely agree with you! Thanx for your lab works and detailed report.I also dug up my previous report of this bug, and Mikrotik stated that this behavior will be fixed in ROSv7.
This seems like too large of a bug to leave un-fixed in ROSv6.
I'm interested too..cut..
(I'm not quite sure what the behavior is for a tree that is parented to global - perhaps someone else can chime in on that point)...cut..
I got it, so I must wait..bajodel - This is different fix for other issue.
ZeroByte, only directly connected ip/subnet ..right?..CUT..
- proxy-arp: the Mikrotik will reply to all arp requests for IP addresses the Mikrotik knows how to reach, and are on a different interface than the one where the arp request was received.
At layer2 you have no "connections", only " packets " .? So no ..you can not control new connections..
your mean is in bridge mode we can not control new connection limitation? ..
.. http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:RA ... dictionary ..Any change you can also provide us with RADIUS attributes numbers 23 to 25 so I can submit an updated dictionary.mikrotik to the freeradius repository?
+1 .. I was wondering, apart software (no) implementations, somebody knows real hardware capabilities of those switch chips ?+1 for me.....i'm addicted to LACP like crack.
I strongly agree, I'm going to be involved in some projects in which that feature will be a requirement....[cut] .. the need of easy per-user separation of VLANs became more important, by an order of magnitude. Seriously. It is now the game changer for indoor installations
I strongly hope it's only a " ..not yet " ..but time is passing by..another issue with ac equipment
no 10mhz channel
no spectrum analizer
no tx power control
1 GbpsHow much would I get on single connection on SFP port on CCR1036 router?