did anyone figure out the proper fix for this ? i see it on CCR2216 running 7.7 with 3 CCR's in a triangle.

how do you do this when you have a connection with ipv4 and ipv6 address families ? the connection only have 1 output.network
Do you just make the same address list in both ipv6 address list and ipv4 address lists ?

Thanks for the reply. I saw the bfd checkbox and assumed it was supported. reading on the forum, seems not yet. disabled bfd on the session, and it came up. for other people googling, the error message was: Unsupported capability received, code: 128BgpStarter{ c=Connection{ ConnId{ 192.0.2.1:45561 -...

Dropping a session due to a unknown capability announcement, in the negotiation, Is a critical bug that needs fixing.

But while we are waiting for that, do anyone know how to disable pre-standard route refresh capability 80 (128) and only use the standard 02 (2) ? on cisco XR ?

best regards

there are no dead timers or hold intervals that time out. the same instance the failover happen. that same instance all bgp and ospf sessions go out.
also the interface list and peer list is empty for a fraction of a second.

we are testing v7 in a lab. so the plan is to eventually move.

yes L1 is good. also some of the bgp peers that drop are on a separate port and dedicated fiber outside of the ospf L1 the problem happen when a paloalto or fortigate firewall with ospf to the ccr's fail over between the active and the passive firewall device. but fortigate ospf (and unrelated globa...

Did you ever find a solution to this problem ?
i suspect we experience the same.
all ospf and bgp sessions drop at the same time. and return a few seconds afterwards..

even bgp sessions that do not depend on ospf drop..
running 6.48.6 on ccr 1072's and ccr 1036's

does l3hw work for ipv6 yet ?

jool would be an awesome addition to mikrotik. it would provide essential and critical functionality that is expected of any decent isp router noways. NAT64 SIIT MAP-T NPTv6 It would also provide the important 464XLAT/PLAT CPE functions, that ISP's are searching for now. CPE support is basically wha...

your ipv6 ULA address space would be used if you did not have ipv4 on lan, so you an use it for a ipv6 only network. I can see some nihe uses for IPv6NAT. perhaps like hijacking dns queriesr and forcing them to your local pihole. temporary move a service to another ip with port forwarding while you ...

Hello mikrotik on this page https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/v7+Routing+Protocol+Status there is a very nice overview of the routing protocol features and the status of them that ROS7 have in progress. Are there any similar view or roadmap for all features ? it would make it easier to know...

omg .. IPv6 NAT? Now I'm kind of hyped. Always had IPv6 turned off in my main vlan because I couldn't make failover possible. So now it should be possible or am I wrong? IPv6 NAT can give you the ipv4 style design you are used to from ipv4. but ipv6 have much better solutions as well. Failover/mult...

pre covid. when going to a conference, I counted more then 15 people asking a unnamed firewall vendor about ipv6... and every one of them got the answer that "nobody is asking about ipv6"... ; "Nobody is asking about ipv6" is just a silly excuse, many vendors simply do not want t...

Can you share what you think the problem is ?
I have almost the exact scenario the orginal poster had.

This is a total disaster for mikrotik's future if they do not fix, before customer impact. EVERYTHING we deploy last years have ipv6, most are ipv6 only, some dualstack

Some comment from mikrotik would be nice. there is a lot of features that are becoming desperatly needed if you are going to use mikrotik things like: (in order of importance (for me) ) SIIT-DC NAT64 CLAT (464XLAT) MAP-T MAP-E lw4o6 probably some more that i forgot. most of these things have open so...

+1 obviously in critical demand in the modern world. everything we deploy nowadays is ipv6 with some ipv4 workaround/nat solution.

thank you for this, i ran into the same problem today.

the text on perhaps a mention on https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:BGP_based_VPLS
makes it sound like bgp is a ldp replacement, while it must be an addon. and that ldp is a prerequisite

is there any updates on this incredibly critical part of the puzzle ? is there no other option that just avoiding using mikrotik for routing ? there is nothing we deployed without ipv6 nowadays. But plenty that we deploy as ipv6 only. and CCR would be a excellent fit is so many cases. but this is a ...

+1

RTSP ALG for multiple video streams thru mikrotik is sorely needed

+1 for TACACS+ support

since mikrotik plays the cards close, everything I write is just gusstimates and assumptions.. But I belive part of the problem is that they are aming for a continuously moving target, the linux kernel and tooling are developed in a rapid pace. and there are new things in networking all the time. ta...

when support@ writes to me, they allways make it sound like Ros 7 is something that is in development and will be ready sometime. (specifically my issues will be fixed in the future) And ofcourse it may be in development, and it will probably be released eventually . But since this have been going o...

The single biggest reason i want Ros7 is that every time i ask mikrotik support for something.. they answer "this will be fixed in version 7" so mikrotik support use "version 7" as the "wont fix"/get rid of this annoying ticket. this leads to all our problems will be fi...

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:RouterOS6_news state "New OSPF parameter use-dn. Forces to ignore DN bit in LSAs. " the parametes does not show in winbox. but is configureable via cli. with use-dn=no i can propagate connected and static routes on ospf instance on a vrf on a vlan witho...