Community discussions

Search found 49 matches

by MimiFleX
Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:15 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: Serial ports not detected on LTE modem Quectel EP06-E
Replies: 4
Views: 1503

Re: Serial ports not detected on LTE modem Quectel EP06-E

Hello . i would likr to use the same modem as you to get the CA benefits in my area. I do not have a really good coverage. I'm actually using the SXT LTE kit..do you think would be possible to replace the R11E with the Quectel EP 06 ? Do you know if the RBM11G is compatble as well? THanks in advanc...
by MimiFleX
Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:51 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: Serial ports not detected on LTE modem Quectel EP06-E
Replies: 4
Views: 1503

Re: Serial ports not detected on LTE modem Quectel EP06-E

Just to let you know that support gave me that info which seems to work fine : please set the ignore-directip-mode to yes under Port Firmware and reboot the router - the usb port should be recognized - there you can send the AT commands. I can now speak AT with the modem. I need some more time and A...
by MimiFleX
Tue Jun 05, 2018 11:57 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: Serial ports not detected on LTE modem Quectel EP06-E
Replies: 4
Views: 1503

Serial ports not detected on LTE modem Quectel EP06-E

Hello all, as mentioned in the official documentation the Quectel EP06-E modem should be supported by the latest RouterOS version. I'm currently testing on both 6.42.3 and 6.43rc21 on a wAP 2nD unit. The modem is correctly detected as a regular USB device (after taping the USB3 pins like described i...
by MimiFleX
Mon May 14, 2018 12:49 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Can not redirect to https using web proxy rule
Replies: 7
Views: 2936

Re: Can not redirect to https using web proxy rule

A redirection to the target URL (HTTPS or not) is performed by the client (browser...) not the web server, not the proxy. The 307 redirection packet is only here to tell the client where to go. On a browser, the URL in the address bar is fully rewritten, so there is no issue about ssl domains or wha...
by MimiFleX
Mon May 14, 2018 12:33 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Can not redirect to https using web proxy rule
Replies: 7
Views: 2936

Re: Can not redirect to https using web proxy rule

such redirects should be done by the server, not a router A redirect is a redirect. Whatever is the URL. The router only sends a redirect message (307) to the client. The client is responsible of the execution of the redirection, not the router. We should be able to specify any URL scheme in the Re...
by MimiFleX
Mon May 14, 2018 12:29 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Can not redirect to https using web proxy rule
Replies: 7
Views: 2936

Re: Can not redirect to https using web proxy rule

Hi, +1 I encounter the same issue, I have a redirect rule in the web proxy, in order to catch all HTTP requests (from a Redirect DNAT Rule on TCP/80), and ask the browser to redirect to my web portal (HTTPS URL). The redirect To URL starts with https://, but the Web Proxy adds http:// before the url...
by MimiFleX
Mon Apr 09, 2018 11:15 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request TR-069 CPE
Replies: 80
Views: 24435

Re: Feature Request TR-069 CPE

Hi, I'm deploying TR069-Client on all the Mikrotik CPEs of an ISP, having a lot of its customers behind NAT. Thus the ACS (cloud hosted) is currently getting back from the CPE a bad connection request URL containing the private IP address, which is unreachable from the outside. TR-069/ Annex G defin...
by MimiFleX
Tue Dec 01, 2015 6:04 pm
Forum: General
Topic: IEEE 802.3ah/IEEE 802.3ag
Replies: 21
Views: 7973

Re: IEEE 802.3ah/IEEE 802.3ag

+1 for 802.3ah 802.1ag Y.1731 E-LMI Perhaps the new bridge implementation of the linux kernel will be hopefuly integrated in MikroTik in order to have true per VLAN switching + all the E-UNI and E-NNI mapping/swapping/stacking. This could help to be Carrier Ethernet compliant. Some implementations o...
by MimiFleX
Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:02 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1
Replies: 96
Views: 29887

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Strange behaviour with vlan and IP addresses :lol: Bug or feature ? Mail+supout has been sent to support. MMM MMM KKK TTTTTTTTTTT KKK MMMM MMMM KKK TTTTTTTTTTT KKK MMM MMMM MMM III KKK KKK RRRRRR OOOOOO TTT III KKK KKK MMM MM MMM III KKKKK RRR RRR OOO OOO TTT III KKKKK MMM MMM III KKK KKK RRRRRR OOO...
by MimiFleX
Thu Sep 13, 2012 5:09 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB
Replies: 22
Views: 5131

Re: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB

Good news, my L2TP issue is solved on the latest 6.0rc1 build !
However, I can't tell now if the random crashes for EoIP are still present without plugging in a production environment.
by MimiFleX
Thu Sep 13, 2012 5:06 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: v6.0beta3 released!
Replies: 82
Views: 20595

Re: v6.0beta3 released!

Hi all, great news from our side using the latest rc1 build (X86 NPK MD5 =a370f0926e29250c530c81597c247447 downloaded on 2012-09-12) : Difference from 6.0b3 : - VLANs are working (I can ping something else !) - USB is working (I can use my keyboard for the VGA console). - No more bugs on Ethernet Ru...
by MimiFleX
Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:49 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: v6.0beta3 released!
Replies: 82
Views: 20595

Re: v6.0beta3 released!

I'd similar dumps on x86 physical hardware too, including about traffic_gen, for 6.0b3. However I'm unable to see any dumps on rc1 (Sept/06/2012) and today version, I only have console reset/disconnect sending me back to the login prompt instead of the dump. I'm unable to produce supout files for th...
by MimiFleX
Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:16 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: v6.0beta3 released!
Replies: 82
Views: 20595

Re: v6.0beta3 released!

If I change interface over VLAN interface then I can not ping them anymore. Good to know that I'm not the only one having problems with VLANs, even with a RouterBoard hardware. More over, the support asked me to try the 6.0rc1 (yes there's a RC even if the last beta seem to be unusable as a potenti...
by MimiFleX
Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:08 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB
Replies: 22
Views: 5131

Re: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB

Tried 6.0beta3 yesterday, no luck, many bugs, oops and kernel panics, VLANs no working anymore.... :)

To be continued....
by MimiFleX
Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:04 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: v6.0beta3 released!
Replies: 82
Views: 20595

Re: v6.0beta3 released!

Funny release :) For support, see ticket 2011072766000267 for details (supout, pictures, details about VLANs and IP behaviour). For us the situation is worst on x86 + Intel network chipsets than ROS4-5 or 6beta2 as : - I'm unable to use VLANs AT ALL : data is transmitted, but not received over a vla...
by MimiFleX
Tue May 15, 2012 1:13 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature requests
Replies: 1159
Views: 204725

Re: Feature requests

Enable the TEE iptable target to allow ROS to become a network probe, and to mirror any kind of IP traffic to an analyser. From iptables man page : TEE The TEE target will clone a packet and redirect this clone to another machine on the local network segment. In other words, the nexthop must be the ...
by MimiFleX
Fri May 11, 2012 3:55 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request - LAC/LNS functionality
Replies: 128
Views: 36916

Re: Feature Request - LAC/LNS functionality

+1 for LAC feature where today using a Cisco gear stays compulsory.

Already requested in 2007 : [Ticket#2007082266000461]
by MimiFleX
Fri May 11, 2012 3:33 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v5.16 released
Replies: 69
Views: 17834

Re: RouterOS v5.16 released

Maybe you need a new feature, instead of how you did it before. Write to support, and describe your goal, we will work out how to solve it. Support request is now opened... [Ticket#2012051166000486] Moreover, this feature has been requested for L2TP in 2010 : "[Ticket#2010050466000476] L2TP packet ...
by MimiFleX
Fri May 11, 2012 12:55 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v5.16 released
Replies: 69
Views: 17834

Re: RouterOS v5.16 released

Sorry, for repeating myself. But do i understand it correctly? You mark original packet stream - allow it to be encapsulated (and maybe fragmented into 2 or more packets), and then use queues to limit tunnel packet stream - limitation results into packet drops, so you drop packet that might contain...
by MimiFleX
Fri May 11, 2012 12:10 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB
Replies: 22
Views: 5131

Re: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB

Can someone from Mikrotik can confirm that new intel drivers arre available in ROS6 beta ?
If YES, I'll will be happy to try to reproduce the on 5.x seen bugs to see if that helps.
by MimiFleX
Fri May 11, 2012 11:55 am
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v5.16 released
Replies: 69
Views: 17834

Re: RouterOS v5.16 released

*) reset packet mark when encapsulating/decapsulating from eoip,ipip,gre,eoipv6,ipipv6,gre6 tunnels Why? I'm using this behavior to marking packet for traffic shaping. For example if I have two ipip tunnels over one ethernet interface, I can mark SQL packets in both tunnels and then shape in tree q...
by MimiFleX
Thu Jan 19, 2012 2:40 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB
Replies: 22
Views: 5131

Re: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB

Janis from support told me that I have to wait for RouterOS 6 for a new kernel and new intel drivers.
I hope that will come soon.
by MimiFleX
Mon Jan 16, 2012 7:53 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB
Replies: 22
Views: 5131

Re: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB

The bug doesn't affect the packet sniffer at all, so I think the driver is doing its job correctly with the raw data. The bug affects L2TP and EoIP, so I think the bug could be somewhere in a common part of code used by L2TP and EoIP... perhaps caused by some weird meta-information stored into the ...
by MimiFleX
Mon Jan 16, 2012 7:48 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB
Replies: 22
Views: 5131

Re: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB

just change ethernet from intel to Broadcom or marvell. Mikrotik need a long time to compile new IGB driver in their kernel ))) Impossible. The NIC chipsets are parts of an industrial motherboard, and were selected for several facts : MTU up to 9160 bytes, in many tested cases broadcom is limited t...
by MimiFleX
Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:17 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB
Replies: 22
Views: 5131

Re: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB

As I'm able to reproduce the crash in our lab when needed for L2TP, the only thing I need is to have a kernel with the auto-reboot on crash feature disabled in the kernel, to see : If the crash occurs always in the same function If the crash is the same depending on the MTU value To have a clear log...
by MimiFleX
Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:31 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB
Replies: 22
Views: 5131

Re: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB

Send a full size image, or the original video - to support. Also include supout.rif file and full description of the issue. Normis, as previously said 2 tickets are already opened for this issue with supout.rif files, and with screen shots. I'll send you the original video, but I'm sorry I don't ha...
by MimiFleX
Thu Jan 12, 2012 4:47 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB
Replies: 22
Views: 5131

Re: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB

After several tries, I'm unable to get better than the picture below, extracted from a 25fps video :
crash3.png
by MimiFleX
Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:50 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB
Replies: 22
Views: 5131

Re: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB

Good to know, Intel has released an new release of the igb kernel few days ago. See : http://downloadcenter.intel.com/detail_desc.aspx?agr=Y&DwnldID=13663 Do you, Mikrotik guys, plan to integrate this new version of this module quickly ? I'm still unable to catch the whole crash debug message :( EDI...
by MimiFleX
Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:17 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB
Replies: 22
Views: 5131

Re: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB

Maris from support has replied that the bug comes from the Intel kernel module, and that I have to wait for a fix directly into the vanilla linux kernel before to have it corrected in ROS... can take a long time without any more clues. disable watchdog in RouterOS. watchdog is the one who reboots ro...
by MimiFleX
Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:45 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB
Replies: 22
Views: 5131

Re: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB

Is there a way to prevent kernel from rebooting ?
In my case the screen is immediately blanked by the BIOS. I've to take a movie to catch the crash... I hope that I'll be able to extract a still image that is readable.
by MimiFleX
Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:32 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB
Replies: 22
Views: 5131

Re: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB

/system console screen set line-count=50

make it crush again and capture whole panic and send it to support and add supout.rif file
OK, I'll try this immediately.
supout has already been sent to support.
by MimiFleX
Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:44 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB
Replies: 22
Views: 5131

Issues with MTU>1504 bytes on Intel NICs like 82575EB

Hi all, We encounter since a while heavy problems with Intel NICs like the 82575EB using MTU>1504 : ROS 5.11 on X86 machine (QuadCore Xeon). L2TP server not working anymore EoIP very unstable Router crashes and reboots randomly when receiving L2TP or EoIP packets First of all, 2 tickets were opened ...
by MimiFleX
Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:10 am
Forum: General
Topic: MIMO and more wireless cards problem
Replies: 18
Views: 4890

Re: MIMO and more wireless cards problem

What is the channel separation between the radio cards in one box? I see two cards mentioned to work in 5,4Ghz and one as AP in either 2,4 or 5,4Ghz. The ´normal´ 5Ghz band is 200Mhz wide (5500 to 5700Mhz) and if you use 20Mhz channel you can create 11 channels each 20Mhz apart. If channels inside ...
by MimiFleX
Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:15 pm
Forum: General
Topic: MIMO and more wireless cards problem
Replies: 18
Views: 4890

Re: MIMO and more wireless cards problem

Tape does not solve this issue.
by MimiFleX
Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:54 am
Forum: General
Topic: MIMO and more wireless cards problem
Replies: 18
Views: 4890

Re: MIMO and more wireless cards problem

We have ordered tape, and we have tried, without any change. That was only 19mm tape. I will receive a 25mm roll on friday.. but our hopes are very low. Mikrotik never said that will solve the problem.. but only that may helps... We don't want to be Mikrotik's beta testers anymore.. and that's what ...
by MimiFleX
Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:02 am
Forum: General
Topic: MIMO and more wireless cards problem
Replies: 18
Views: 4890

Re: MIMO and more wireless cards problem

did you email mikrotik support? because this is a user to user forum As you should read above, yes there is a opened ticket (Ticket#2010052666000569) since May, without any real solution, that's why I try to ask the forum : - to see if we are alone => It seems that we are not alone with this proble...
by MimiFleX
Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:36 pm
Forum: General
Topic: MIMO and more wireless cards problem
Replies: 18
Views: 4890

Re: MIMO and more wireless cards problem

bump... still no help from Mikrotik support..
by MimiFleX
Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:20 pm
Forum: General
Topic: MIMO and more wireless cards problem
Replies: 18
Views: 4890

Re: MIMO and more wireless cards problem

Same problem here : First message sent to Mikrotik support (modified to hide some private info) : Dear support, we encounter a real big issue on all our Mikrotik Routers (RB433 + 3×R52n or 3×R52Hn). Typical case is : - wlan1 and wlan2 are backhaul links interfaces (upstream and downstream, always in...
by MimiFleX
Wed Aug 05, 2009 6:22 pm
Forum: General
Topic: v3.27 bug: ssh port forwarding is not working
Replies: 76
Views: 13173

Re: v3.27 bug: ssh port forwarding is not working

Same problem here on 3.27.
This feature is very useful for us, and we are using it every day.

We hope to see it working again in the next release.

Regards,
by MimiFleX
Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:38 pm
Forum: General
Topic: How to update dynamic simple queues parameters ?
Replies: 0
Views: 468

How to update dynamic simple queues parameters ?

Hi, today I've hundreds of routers running ROS in Wireless AP Mode with DHCP and RADIUS using Rate-Limit attribute to create simple queues automagically. So there's today my problem : - I've thousands of leases and dynamic queues attributed to users on hundreds of routers. - I'm going to change most...
by MimiFleX
Fri Aug 03, 2007 5:53 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: UPS on miniRouter ?
Replies: 9
Views: 1944

Re: UPS on miniRouter ?

ok, with the 2.9 routerboard firmware, boot is ok. I didn't try this 2.9 version at first because the last version available on http://www.routerboard.com is 2.8. I was not able to see the Changelog for 2.9, and didn't want to brick the board ;) The 2.9 Changelog is here : http://www.routerboard.com...
by MimiFleX
Thu Aug 02, 2007 12:00 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: UPS on miniRouter ?
Replies: 9
Views: 1944

Re: UPS on miniRouter ?

Thanks for your answer. Ok, I've just upgraded to 3.0rc1 and UPS is working correctly. But miniRouter is unable to boot with UPS serial cable connected. If the cable is connected after boot, all is ok ! On RB532 I have to set "enter-setup-on" to "delete-key" to avoid RB532 to enter bios settings fro...
by MimiFleX
Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:10 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: UPS on miniRouter ?
Replies: 9
Views: 1944

UPS on miniRouter ?

Hi, We're using a lot of RB532 monitoring SmartAPC UPS via serial port and black cable provided with the UPS. But today we are starting using the wonderful miniRouter board when we don't need embedded WLAN cards. I disabled (as usual for RB532) serial terminal in RouterOS, to enable UPS monitoring.....
by MimiFleX
Tue Jul 11, 2006 12:01 pm
Forum: Scripting
Topic: Bug in script exportation
Replies: 0
Views: 733

Bug in script exportation

Hi, sorry if this problem is already known : I've a tiny script that I want to export : /ip dhcp-server enable Test /ip address set [find interface=Bridge] address=10.10.172.2/24 /interface wireless set trunk mode=ap-bridge /interface wireless set public ssid="test public \(SAM\)" /interface wireles...
by MimiFleX
Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:21 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Bad signal/interference?
Replies: 14
Views: 2637

does someone have some news about that very strange problem ?
I have downgraded to RouterOS 2.9.3 and did a /system reset.
All seems to be ok now. I'll make others tests (upgrade and see the difference with the same antenna, same cables, same CPE).
by MimiFleX
Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:44 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Bad signal/interference?
Replies: 14
Views: 2637

same problem

Hi there, I've got a similar problem with 3 RB532 with CM9 cards. These RB are running RouterOS 2.9.26. I notice that when I plug the 2,4GHz antenna, the signal level is the same, or worst. I tried many 2,4GHz antennas and many other coax cables to be sure, it's the same problem. One time, I switche...
by MimiFleX
Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:30 pm
Forum: General
Topic: BIG recurrent RIP problem
Replies: 10
Views: 1571

That seems to be OK with the 2.9.26 routing-test package on my square. The default routing package hasn't the default route propagation fonctionnality. I'll make more tests another day on our real production network. I'll try to give you a follow up about this. Is routing-test stable enough for prod...
by MimiFleX
Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:52 am
Forum: General
Topic: BIG recurrent RIP problem
Replies: 10
Views: 1571

No problems at all. I made a static route on router "5", there were no problems Thanks for your reply. Was your static route a default route (ie 0.0.0.0/0) ? There is no problem to propagate static routes other than 0.0.0.0/0 in non-looped networks for me. I'll work on it today and provide more det...
by MimiFleX
Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:02 pm
Forum: General
Topic: BIG recurrent RIP problem
Replies: 10
Views: 1571

Same problem here

I have the same problem with my networks : - I can't propagate 0.0.0.0/0 route from the routerOS connected to the internet gateway. - RouterOS prefers to use high metric default route received with RIP, rather than a local static default route. I've to force the local static default route metric to ...