Yes, wireless-default with sfq.Did you try wireless-default ?
It should give you what you want.
Sure, but I always had 2-3 dBm difference, here I have A LOT less...Calculator is synthetic, you will never get the same in real life, unless you run the link inside some vacuuum on another planet
40% better in 802.11? Did you test AC?NV2 is not working.TCP 40% better than before
Does it have improvements on point to multipoint with nv2?Yes, wireless-rep is the like cm2, but it has additional features (CAPsMAN will work with the package).
I think they'll fix it in ROS v7Thanks MRZ, can you let us know why?There will be no fix for this problem in ROS v6.
What if I use wireless-cm2 on AP and wireless-fp on clients? Can this create issue like slow speed and so on?Wireless-cm2 is the latest wireless package, it contains more optimizations compared to the wireless-fp. We suggest to use cm2 package if it's possible.
Hello, could you share your experience?I have bad experience on 11KM link
Is it possible to have a list of improvements? What if wireless-cm2 is used on AP and wireless-fp on clients? Is wireless-cm2 improved also in multi point?wireless-cm2 is not just capsman. it is a new wireless driver and much improved in all areas.
+1RB3011?
How can I use fast path where I have to limit users using queues?WirelessRudy
for now it is only 802.11 protocol.
With fast path trough wireless it should unload cpu and you should see general speed/capacity improvement.
Changing the antenna polarity in crowded locations has helped me in the past.
What about using MIMO antennas?...
Change polarity is another good method to use
->setArgument('number', WLAN_NUMBER_HERE)