And this is the part I can´t consider to you, related to the circumstance that a first stable version with only the half activated feature set offered by RouterOS or in other words without all from RouterOS given options and functions, only to tell the whole public, "we have now the first real...

(selling only if the router is stable) . If a product is not fit for purpose then it shouldn't be sold. In the case of the CCR it seems its only stable under certain configurations. I believe it would be best to release a cut back version of the firmware that only allows tested and stable configura...

@ddd Our redundant concentrator running 4.17 on a RB1000 has been working perfectly for years. It is even the same deal with this in my eyes! If they (MikroTik) is not inserting many new features the half of the crowd is crying loud, and if all this fine things find their way in RouterOS and there ...

So v6.13 seems stable? Anyone using a hotspot with usermanager? Anyone using PCC and needing to use allow remote dns use?

in 6.13 vpn implementation is far from stable. so if you Need this you have to use an older version. the most stable until now is 6.7 (at least for my usecase)

@MikroTik: is this fixed in 6.14? @enc: I was able to replicate the issue with firewall rules only in case that sstp-client binded into sstp-server interface and sstp-interface used in firewall rule was ROS in versions range 6.8 - 6.13 (including). SSTP clients 6.7, 5.26, 6.14rc10 are working fine ...

In this case I can see two options: 1) Wait for 6.14 release, there are also some SSTP bug fixes 2) Generate support file and send it to MK support The third possible option can be selecting a different interface in firewall rule, apply configuration, then select back the sstp-server interface and ...

I'm having stability issues with my CCR (CCR1016-12G) after upgrading from ROS 6.5 to 6.10 and also 6.11. The CCR will run for a few days (as little as 2 days and as long as 7 days) before it loses connectivity. I can't ping or access via Winbox. Sometimes the touchscreen and serial console are unr...

Posted in the other thread, I am on 6.3, which is mostly stable. Am I right in saying 6.7 is the most stable now at the moment? I am still at 6.7 because ist more stable than 6.9 and 6.10 but today the router stopped working properly. i couldnt Export the /ppp node any more and all vpn-server confi...

anyone tried 6.11 on ccr? i am still stuck at 6.7 because 6.9 and 6.10 run unstable. max uptime was about 4 days.

Interfaces für IPSEC-Tunnels. So that the IN-Interface in the Firewall-rules is not the WAN-Interface and we could better match the ipsec-traffic

any reason 6.7 and not 6.9 ?

I am having performance issues with 6.10...

6.9 is as unstable as 6.10 and sstp is not working with Windows clients

i cannot use 6.10 have reboots every some days. max uptime was 4 days. i went back to 6.7. both firmwares have a memleak when creating support files. i tried to create a support-file every 10min to have one in case of an error. you can see the mem going down rapidly. after a conversation with suppor...

routeros dns server does not only reply mx records when asked for this type. it also puts all other types like a or ns in the response. exchange server gets confused with this. there is a setting in the outgoing tranport to use external dns server. this will solve the problem but dont ask me why.

My issues with 6.9 1) had a no responsive router after about 2 days uptime. had to reboot to get it back running -> cannot use it in production 2) i tested 6.9 for severel days but couldnot get sstp with windows-8 Clients to work. no usefull logs. ony two lines like "LCP lower down" or so....

i cannot set hash to sha256 in winbox (eg ipsec-peer config). in console it is possible

routeros 6.9, ccr1016

i want to configure sha-256 in winbox (e.g. ipsec peer) but i dont see this Option. only md5 and sha1. in console i can configure it.

i have routeros 6.9, bootloader 3.10, ccr1016