/ip firewall filter add chain=forward action=drop src-address=10.10.10.0/24 dst-address=10.10.11.0/24 comment="Drop A to B" add chain=forward action=drop src-address=10.10.11.0/24 dst-address=10.10.10.0/24 comment="Drop B to A"
/ip address add interface=ether3 address=192.168.2.1/24 disabled=no add interface=ether4 address=192.168.3.1/24 disabled=no
/int w60g set [find] password=yoursafepassword
/ip dhcp-server lease get [find mac-address=00:01:02:03:04:05] address
/tool netwatch add down-script="/int pppoe-client set pppoe-out10 disabled=yes \n:delay 3s\r\ \n/int pppoe-client set pppoe-out10 disabled=no\r\ \n" host=192.168.88.10
[ros_command(":put ([interface ethernet monitor sfpplus1 once as-value]->\"sfp-vendor-part-number\")")]
No, it's not.It's just a shame that a capable os doesn't have a process to handle multicast across bridge/vlans!
/tool e-mail set address=mail.provider.com email@example.com password=youremailpassword port=465 start-tls=tls-only firstname.lastname@example.org
After re-reading my post I have to fully agree. Edited.Please stop the off-topic messages, and please delete them if they are yours.I'd love to see the terminal object-oriented.
(I will delete this when that happens)
/export compact hide-sensitive
You will have mpls connectivity on this interface.But if I remove an interface from the bridge, I loose connectivity to that interface. This is why I always add all interface to the default bridge.
I do - absolutely seamless. All connections are always in sync. Dealing with those as my daily business...@cdiedrich, do you know how HA clusters/pairs of Fortigate and PA behave in this regard?
#Site B /ip route add distance=20 dst-address=192.168.10.0/24 gateway=184.108.40.206 #Site A /ip route add distance=20 dst-address=192.168.1.0/24 gateway=220.127.116.11
/ip address add address=172.18.0.1/24 interface=vlan101
/ip address add address=172.18.0.1 interface=vlan101