Did you read it or are you just throwing CVE numbers around?CVE-2023-52160, Does this affects ROS in any way?
Is it related to device reboots, due to kernel failure?*) wifi-qcom - improved system stability when using FastPath (introduced in v7.13);
Cutting costs, would probably be the one...Older devices from times of CRS226 etc had 128 MB of storage. Is there any way to explain what happened?
Nope my ax2's are still rebooting.So 7.13.2 is stable now?
Same setup, AX’ses are crashing, pretty much, daily.FWIW my AX2 (currently on 7.13) has never reboot since Dec 28th when I applied that version.
Simply using it as AP though via RB5009 capsman controller.
Not necessarily, there are cases, where having multiple lo’s is completely valid usecase.This seems right... there should be only one loopback interface.
Damn annoying, wifi is so unstable, due to constant device reboots/crashes :/
Mu both hAP ax2's are crashing at regular intervals, since yesterday, created support ticket.
Thanks, looks like this was the culprit..will keep monitoring for a while.set cake-wash=no
Exactly, as I was quite puzzled about such behavour.This info would nice to find in the manual..
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Scripting
Considering that MyScript has global scope variables MyVar1 and MyVar2 present?{
:global myVar1 999;
:global myVar2 9999;
/system script run myScript;
}
I have also two units, both report 240MB...Well, I have two units and both have 200+ MB of RAM. But, it is weird that MT never mentioned that on product page.
Nice to know...so far I have NetInstalled all my routers to get rid of unneeded packages.No need to custom netinstall. Just put there selected packages of higher version and reboot.
Latest 6.43.4 "stable", basically it crashes if you modify/remove default bridge.Which ROS? We have uptime 11 days on live network without problems. With ROS 6.43.2This device does not seem to be very stable, mine has crashed at least twice while configuring...
I usually tune them down with lacquer, which is actually used to darken the car taillights by tuners.Welcome to like every mikrotik router ever... I always cover them with electrical tape...... and the power led is unnecessary bright
Official answer: https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/MikroTik ... lity_tableIf there's no official answer, it might just be software.
For HW changes yes, for parts fixable via RouterOS, we can at least try...Whatever we request it is too late I guess...
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat dst-address=10.0.0.0/8 out-interface=eth0.4
Thank you for the tipMake sure you have set multicast lookup mode for MAC address.Code: Select all/interface ethernet switch set multicast-lookup-mode=dst-mac-and-vid-always
Would be great if this would get implemented...However, there is an enhancement request to make it work for each downstream interface individually
But it wouldnt remove frequency interference...As you know, enabling Nstream will hide the network from normail Wi-Fi devices.
Which will kill the whole point doing that, bridging means traffic would pass CPU and as it is not powerful enough you get even less troughput than running single interface.but you can set interface bonding (4 interface, 802.3ad) and bridge it into switch master port
And?Look carefully at the CCR screens
Well, thank you too, for decreasing my karma for helping you to find those...Thanks all for your help...
http://bit.ly/1q7WrBQWhat should I be searching for?
You could get them even from eBay.They should be very common...Where can I buy those 1u cable organisers on the side of the rack? They look handy.
They should be very common...Where can I buy those 1u cable organisers on the side of the rack? They look handy.
Also that "You exceeded the maximum allowed number of login attempts." annoyance is goneYay tapatalk working again
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
OK, thx for confirmation...I already thought that someone is hacking my forum accountI get the same thing when I try to login. I think MikroTik is implementing an anti-spam feature on the login.
shame
Notice: For support from Mikrotik staff, write to support@mikrotik.com - Mikrotik does not generally offer support on the forum, this is a user forum
Cisco is more expensive indeed, but I was referring to Mikrotik products.because of the SFPs. in an all optical network you need them. and considered the cisco gear, CCR is not expensive at all
TCP Sequence randomization, deep packet inspection, Active/Active clustering, etc...Sorry, but what "fancy" features ASA has that Tik can't do?
I know9.x has has 4 major releases though. Three with BGP support 9.1, 9.2, and 9.3. Now 9.2 and 9.3 won't run on a non -X ASA though.
Now it is completely Offtopic, but BGP support is in 9.x software which is quite "bleeding edge"...That said they do support BGP these days.
They dont use SMB but different protocols and for those CPU isnt a bottleneck...How do 3g usb modems perform if usb speeds are so limited?
Thank you for clarifying...Unless it was slipped into a release without me noticing, RouterOS does not support Cisco/RFC style /31 addressing.
Its not dead, but not being developed anymore either...Really?? I can't believe
Can you do it now, please?ask tomorrow on the morning
Could you please?I must go away now, but if I miss, remember me to show mine...
Compared to my results, unfortunately I dont have a CRS226 to play with, only CRS125 so I have no way to compare them...Only 50% slower, JeLi claimed 40 Mbps.
Having a IGMP Snooping on CRS`es would be already a good improvement...A CRS with 802.3at/af and passive PoE would be a nice addition Think surveillance cameras and IP phones...
Actually it is "must have" on CRS series, to even think about IPTV deployments...IGMP Snooping would be definately useful
Figured it out already as you see...This has nothing to do with mikrotik.
You are absolutely right, but I got quite a bit confused at the beginning...This is not right forum to discuss windows features.
/ip route print where dst-address = <prefix>
/ip route print where dst-address in <prefix range>