MikroTik

meetriks2

Hi, I changed the configuration to fast path instead of connection tracking disabled. This clearly lowers the number of rx drops over a period of time. About a factor 10 in my case. Based on the graphs graph.png 5 min avg highest traffic peak is 800 mbit, 400 in and 400 out. 30 min 1 week average sp...

meetriks2

Hi EdPa, Indeed your snmp oid works. I didn't know that the snmpwalk would not reveal them. Thanks, this solves my monitoring issue. [root@monitor2 ~]# snmpwalk -v2c -c public xxx | grep 273 [root@monitor2 ~]# snmpwalk -v2c -c public xxx 1.3.6.1.4.1.14988 | grep 273 SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.14988.1.1...

meetriks2

Hi I would like to report a bug with this version: [admin@x] /interface ethernet switch> print stats name: switch1 switch2 driver-rx-byte: 0 0 driver-rx-packet: 0 0 driver-tx-byte: 0 0 driver-tx-packet: 0 0 rx-bytes: 0 0 rx-packet: 5 0 rx-too-short: 0 0 rx-64: 2 130 907 700 0 rx-65-127: 0 0 rx-128-2...

meetriks2

Hi All, I'm still stuck which my first question: [admin@xxx] /interface ethernet> print stats name: ether1 ether2 ether3 ether4 ether5 ether6 ether7 ether8 ether9 ether10 sfp-sfpplus1 driver-rx-byte: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 400 604 780 driver-rx-packet: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 838 185 driver-tx-byte: 0 ...

meetriks2

Hi All, After somedays: No more TX Pause which makes sense because flowcontrol is disabeld, so this is solved. Still RX Drops, well I did not expected the new version to be able to handle the traffic any better... But still the load is not high. The switch stats still look bad. I upgraded the FW to ...

meetriks2

Hi, Nobody any clues? Am i the only one see this? I have upgraded the ROS version to 6.45.8 and firmware to 6.44.6 Some more info on the port: [admin@xxx] /interface ethernet> monitor 10 name: sfp-sfpplus1 status: link-ok auto-negotiation: disabled rate: 10Gbps full-duplex: yes tx-flow-control: no r...

meetriks2

Hi, I have a RB4011 with only one 10 Gbit link routing/firewalling traffic. (6.44.6, and firmware 6.43.7) Works okay for about 18 months. Today I noticed some counters which did not show up in the monitoring or should not be there. [admin@x] /interface ethernet> print stats name: ether1 ether2 ether...

meetriks2

I'm still struggling with updating Mikrotiks. The last years exploits became very common. Whether or not the firewall prevents the Mikrotik from being exploited, as a commercial company you do not want any risk. When a customer’s sees an old version the have there doubts… And I don’t blame them. The...

meetriks2

Looks great. It's commercial product. Did you make it or bought it?
Does it also have a English interface?

And i understand the currency is less then 50 euro right?

Cheers,
Harry

meetriks2

It's a pity that I can't really use the dude to update all routers. With the current bug finding, it seems necessary to have a very good check / update system. The lack of an API/CLI to added devices really prevents us of adding all the devices. I can't use discovery since the routers are not in a s...

meetriks2

I'm also looking for an API for the Dude. There is seems to be no way you can bulk add a lot of devices (without discovery) Tried backuping the database,Opened it in a sqlite browser but the BLOB type seems to be a serialzed object or something, not the way to go it seems. Any body any luck? Cheers,...

meetriks2

My management network for CPE devices is IPv6 only.
I want to use the dude to role out updates.

Any plans to put this on the roadmap?

Cheers,
Harry

meetriks2

Hi all, The patron is still the same and i'm running v6.19 for many months. Version 6.30 introduces the route cache disable option. What's new in 6.30 (2015-Jul-08 09:07): *) possibility to disable route cache - improves DDOS attack handling performance up to 2x (note that ipv4 fastpath depends on r...

meetriks2

Anyone?

meetriks2

Works great! Question - I just went into Tools > Lua > Evaluate and pasted your code. EoIP became a choice for r-click decode as... It looks like the hook in the LUA is to recognize ip type 47 as "EoIP" Would it be possible to use GRE type 6400 instead? That might cause EoIP to show up au...

meetriks2

Hi All, I made a wireshark dissector for EoIP tunnels (Ethernet over IP from Mikrotik), it will show the EoIP header. With the tunnel id. It also show the protocols inside. Like mac addresses, vlan id. http://www.dansjemee.nl/wireshark.png It's a quick hack but its powerfull for troubleschooting. I'...

meetriks2

Dear forum & Support, MTU on the EOIP tunnel is partly working. It seems I cannot always control which MTU size is really used. If you generate a packet local all is fine (probably if you route also). But if you truly bridge it, the max MTU is always the size of the leaving interface. This is th...

meetriks2

Issue: Can't add any DHCP options with v6.x Description: I need DHCP options to tell Thinclients where to find the FTP server with the thinclient configurartion file. Versions affected: At least 6.12,6.13,6.15,6.20 Works on v5.26 How to reproduce: [admin@xxxx] > system resource print uptime: 5d20h4...

meetriks2

[admin@xxxx] /ppp active> print Flags: R - radius # NAME SERVICE CALLER-ID ADDRESS UPTIME ENCODING 0 probe sstp x 0.0.0.0 57s AES256-CBC 1 probe sstp x 0.0.0.0 43s AES256-CBC 2 probe sstp x 0.0.0.0 42s AES256-CBC 3 probe sstp x 0.0.0.0 39s AES256-CBC 4 probe sstp x 0.0.0.0 38s AES256-CBC The addres...

meetriks2

Hi

Thanks. I know. From production point of view it's nice to see if a certain feature drops packets.

Use the RP Filter saves me from many firewall rules.
Linux kernel seems to be able to log what is dropped by RP.

Cheers

meetriks2

Hi All, I'm implementing RP Filter on Routeros v6 and I'm looking for ways to debug it. I know i can use firewall rules with logging, and use packet capture to see there really being sent. But I want a easy way of debugging it. On Cisco and Juniper gear I have counters where I can see its dropping p...

meetriks2

Here is my config, is very simpel. The linux clients have a static IP configured. I do not assign them. [admin@x] /ppp> export /ppp profile set 1 idle-timeout=3m local-address=172.30.252.255 /ppp secret add name=probe password=xxxx profile=default-encryption [admin@x] /ppp> /interface [admin@xx] /in...

meetriks2

Cosmetic problem PPTP/SSTP server: [admin@x] > ppp active print Flags: R - radius # NAME SERVICE CALLER-ID ADDRESS UPTIME ENCODING <snip> 13 probe sstp xxxxx 0.0.0.0 1h19m42s AES256-CBC 14 probe pptp xxxxx 0.0.0.0 1h19m42s MPPE128 stateless It shows 0.0.0.0 but is not. And was not showed this way in...

meetriks2

Hi All, I got responses from Mikrotik support, the important part: V5 had routing table corruption. To fix this as workaround we introduced frequent routing table refresh and also recalculation on each route update in v6. Unfortunately there is nothing much we can do to improve this behavior in curr...

meetriks2

1) you should probably contact the official MikroTik support, this seems like an issue for them to investigate. 2) what do you use to generate these graphs, particularly the pps one is very nice :) I did contact support but the short answers was its still 80% idle. So no problem. Well I decided to ...

meetriks2

Hi All, Check this http://www.dansjemee.nl/13.PNG It still rising as you can see. Traffic is not different. (max is 400% for this graph) http://www.dansjemee.nl/14.PNG This is the sum of all cores deviced by the sum of the core, so 100% means full cpu load. Lets check winbox. A couple of times per m...

meetriks2

Hi Kreacher, Thanks for your responds. Seems that I posted my story twice. Sorry about that. My first post on this forum whent wrong due to the very long human verification time. Please check the other tread it contains more information. I will add the cpu specs shortly. http://forum.mikrotik.com/vi...

meetriks2

Hi all, Well it seems v6.13 suffers from the same problem as v6.7. Load is become higher. I will let it run for a couple of days / weeks depending on the drops I see. http://www.dansjemee.nl/10.png Load is better devide over de cores, but last 15 hours is become high again http://www.dansjemee.nl/11...

meetriks2

As I realized the upgrades are not always as clean as they look. Export config, remove config, netinstall latest, remove config again and import the saved original config could help with many weird things. You are right, I should test that. I was hoping that it was not needed and solved with the la...

meetriks2

Well 6.13 seems be the first to have no problem with much higher cpu load compare to v5.6
(or is follow the path of v6.7 and it will show up over a week or so)

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=84729

meetriks2

Hi All, I just upgraded to 6.13, it looks okay. (just like v6.7) Will keep it running until load builds up again, or hopefull everthing is fine now. http://www.dansjemee.nl/8.PNG As you can see no significant load change, it looks less busy, which is normal since it is outside office hours. Here a g...

meetriks2

Hi

As you can see runing again v5.26 is using a lot less CPU.
It's now running 10 day this version.

Cheers!

meetriks2

I will try to keep a long story short. It all started with the following patron with routeros v6.7 http://www.dansjemee.nl/1.png In Green the uptime the other colors are the load of each core. (notice at first I only monitored the first core add mid-march the other cores) Conclusion, the system gets...

Search found 33 matches

Re: RB4011 drops and snmp

Re: RB4011 drops and snmp

Re: v6.45.8 [long-term] is released!

Re: RB4011 drops and snmp

Re: RB4011 drops and snmp

Re: RB4011 drops and snmp

RB4011 drops and snmp

Re: API in The dude server

Re: API in The dude server

Re: API in The dude server

Re: API in The dude server

Re: Ipv6 support in Dude

Re: CPU load v6 much higher than v5 same router same traffic

Re: EoIP MTU setting not working with packets being bridged

Re: EoIP Wireshark Dissector

EoIP Wireshark Dissector

EoIP MTU setting not working with packets being bridged

Re: Known issues and bugs - a list

Re: v6.20 released!

Re: RP Filter

RP Filter

Re: v6.19 released

Re: v6.19 released

Re: CPU load v6 much higher than v5 same router same traffic

Re: CPU load v6 much higher than v5 same router same traffic

Re: CPU load v6 much higher than v5 same router same traffic

Re: CPU load v6 much higher than v5 same router same traffic

Re: CPU load v6 much higher than v5 same router same traffic

Re: CPU load v6 much higher than v5 same router same traffic

Re: v6.13 released!

Re: CPU load v6 much higher than v5 same router same traffic

Re: CPU load v6 much higher than v5 same router same traffic

CPU load v6 much higher than v5 same router same traffic